Loss of copy numbers of retrotransposons (HERVK) on chromosome 7p11.2 impacts EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor)-induced phenotypes for platinum sensitivity and long-term survival in ovarian cancer-A study from the OVCAD consortium.

We analyzed variations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene and 5'-upstream region to identify potential molecular predictors of treatment response in primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Tumor tissues collected during debulking surgery from the prospective multicenter OVCAD study were investigated. Copy number variations in the human endogenous retrovirus sequence human endogenous retrovirus K9 (HERVK9) and EGFR Exons 7 and 9, as well as repeat length and loss of heterozygosity of polymorphic CA-SSR I and relative EGFR mRNA expression were determined quantitatively. At least one EGFR variation was observed in 94% of the patients. Among the 30 combinations of variations discovered, enhanced platinum sensitivity (n = 151) was found dominantly with HERVK9 haploidy and Exon 7 tetraploidy, overrepresented among patients with survival ≥120 months (24/29, p = .0212). EGFR overexpression (≥80 percentile) was significantly less likely in the responders (17% vs. 32%, p = .044). Multivariate Cox regression analysis, including age, FIGO stage, and grade, indicated that the patients' subgroup was prognostically significant for CA-SSR I repeat length <18 CA for both alleles (HR 0.276, 95% confidence interval 0.109-0.655, p = .001). Although EGFR variations occur in ovarian cancer, the mRNA levels remain low compared to other EGFR-mutated cancers. Notably, the inherited length of the CA-SSR I repeat, HERVK9 haploidy, and Exon 7 tetraploidy conferred three times higher odds ratio to survive for more than 10 years under therapy. This may add value in guiding therapies if determined during follow-up in circulating tumor cells or circulating tumor DNA and offers HERVK9 as a potential therapeutic target.

Gene expression markers in peripheral blood and outcome in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A study of the European GANNET53 consortium.

Disease progression is a major problem in ovarian cancer. There are very few treatment options for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), and therefore, these patients have a particularly poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to identify markers for monitoring the response of 123 PROC patients enrolled in the Phase I/II GANNET53 clinical trial, which evaluated the efficacy of Ganetespib in combination with standard chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy alone. In total, 474 blood samples were collected, comprising baseline samples taken before the first administration of the study drugs and serial samples taken during treatment until further disease progression (PD). After microfluidic enrichment, 27 gene transcripts were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and their utility for disease monitoring was evaluated. At baseline, ERCC1 was associated with an increased risk of PD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.55; p = 0.005), while baseline CDH1 and ESR1 may have a risk-reducing effect (CDH1 HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.96; p = 0.024; ESR1 HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.86; p = 0.002). ERCC1 was observed significantly more often (72.7% vs. 53.9%; p = 0.032) and ESR1 significantly less frequently (59.1% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.018) in blood samples taken at radiologically confirmed PD than at controlled disease. At any time during treatment, ERCC1-presence and ESR1-absence were associated with short PFS and with higher odds of PD within 6 months (odds ratio 12.77, 95% CI: 4.08-39.97; p < 0.001). Our study demonstrates the clinical relevance of ESR1 and ERCC1 and may encourage the analysis of liquid biopsy samples for the management of PROC patients.

Predictors of long-term progression-free survival in patients with ovarian cancer treated with niraparib in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics associated with long-term progression-free survival (≥2 years) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in the phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of PRIMA, patients randomized to niraparib were grouped based on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (progressive disease/censoring <2 years or ≥2 years after randomization). Variables assessed for predictive value were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage at diagnosis, clinical response to platinum-based chemotherapy, number of prior chemotherapy cycles, primary tumor location, body mass index, categorical age, debulking surgery type, number of baseline target lesions, number of baseline non-target lesions, BRCA/homologous recombination-deficiency status, residual disease status, and duration from end of chemotherapy to randomization. Logistic regression modeling using backward elimination (significance level=0.15) identified covariates associated with long-term progression-free survival (clinical cut-off date November 17, 2021). RESULTS: Of 487 patients randomized to niraparib, 152 (31%) had progressive disease/censoring ≥2 years after randomization. Multivariable logistic regression modeling using backward elimination identified BRCA1/2 mutation/homologous recombination deficiency status (p<0.0001), FIGO stage (p=0.041), primary tumor location (p=0.095), and number of baseline non-target lesions (p=0.0001) to be associated with long-term progression-free survival. Patients significantly more likely to achieve progression-free survival of ≥2 years in the final model were those with BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated/homologous recombination-deficient tumors or BRCA wild-type/not determined/homologous recombination-deficient tumors (vs BRCA wild-type/homologous recombination-proficient/not determined tumors), FIGO stage III (vs IV), and 0 or 1 baseline non-target lesions (vs ≥2 baseline non-target lesions). CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis-generating results of this analysis suggest that BRCA1/2 mutation/homologous recombination-deficiency status, FIGO stage, and number of baseline non-target lesions may predict progression-free survival of ≥2 years in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving niraparib first-line maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02655016.

Impact of BRCA Mutation Status on Tumor Dissemination Pattern, Surgical Outcome and Patient Survival in Primary and Recurrent High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study by the Ovarian Cancer Therapy-Innovative Models Prolong Survival (OCTIPS) Consortium.

BACKGROUND: This study seeks to evaluate the impact of breast cancer (BRCA) gene status on tumor dissemination pattern, surgical outcome and survival in a multicenter cohort of paired primary ovarian cancer (pOC) and recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records and follow-up data from 190 patients were gathered retrospectively. All patients had surgery at pOC and at least one further rOC surgery at four European high-volume centers. Patients were divided into one cohort with confirmed mutation for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCAmut) and a second cohort with BRCA wild type or unknown (BRCAwt). Patterns of tumor presentation, surgical outcome and survival data were analyzed between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients with BRCAmut disease were on average 4 years younger and had significantly more tumor involvement upon diagnosis. Patients with BRCAmut disease showed higher debulking rates at all stages. Multivariate analysis showed that only patient age had significant predictive value for complete tumor resection in pOC. At rOC, however, only BRCAmut status significantly correlated with optimal debulking. Patients with BRCAmut disease showed significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) by 24.3 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged in the BRCAmut group at all stages as well, reaching statistical significance during recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BRCAmut disease showed a more aggressive course of disease with earlier onset and more extensive tumor dissemination at pOC. However, surgical outcome and OS were significantly better in patients with BRCAmut disease compared with patients with BRCAwt disease. We therefore propose to consider BRCAmut status in regard to patient selection for cytoreductive surgery, especially in rOC.

A randomized phase 2 study of sapanisertib in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in women with advanced, recurrent, or persistent endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This phase 2 study investigated sapanisertib (selective dual inhibitor of mTORC1/2) alone, or in combination with paclitaxel or TAK-117 (a selective small molecule inhibitor of PI3K), versus paclitaxel alone in advanced, recurrent, or persistent endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients with histologic diagnosis of endometrial cancer (1-2 prior regimens) were randomized to 28-day cycles on four treatment arms: 1) weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15); 2) weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 + oral sapanisertib 4 mg on days 2-4, 9-11, 16-18, and 23-25; 3) weekly sapanisertib 30 mg, or 4) sapanisertib 4 mg + TAK-117 200 mg on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17, and 22-24. RESULTS: Of 241 patients randomized, 234 received treatment (paclitaxel, n = 87 [3 ongoing]; paclitaxel+sapanisertib, n = 86 [3 ongoing]; sapanisertib, n = 41; sapanisertib+TAK-117, n = 20). The sapanisertib and sapanisertib+TAK-117 arms were closed to enrollment after futility analyses. After a median follow-up of 14.4 (paclitaxel) versus 17.2 (paclitaxel+sapanisertib) months, median progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) was 3.7 versus 5.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.15; p = 0.139); in patients with endometrioid histology (n = 116), median PFS was 3.3 versus 5.7 months (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43-1.03). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 54.0% with paclitaxel versus 89.5% paclitaxel+sapanisertib. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support inclusion of chemotherapy combinations with investigational agents for advanced or metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was not met and toxicity was manageable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02725268.

HE4 as a serum biomarker for the diagnosis of pelvic masses: a prospective, multicenter study in 965 patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of adding human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to ultrasound for detecting ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Patients aged > 18 years who were scheduled to undergo surgery for a suspicious pelvic mass had CA125 and HE4 levels measured prior to surgery, in addition to a routine transvaginal ultrasound scan. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4 and ROMA for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of 965 evaluable patients, 804 were diagnosed with benign tumors and 161 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer. In late-stage ovarian cancer, CA125, HE4 and ROMA all had an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC > 0.92), whereas in stage I and II, diagnostic performance of all three biomarkers was less adequate (AUC < 0.77). In the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and endometriosis, ROMA and HE4 performed better than CA125 with 99 and 98.1% versus 75.0% sensitivity, respectively, at 75.4% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: ROMA and HE4 could be valuable biomarkers to help with the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in premenopausal patients in order to differentiate from endometriosis, whereas CA125 may be more adequate for postmenopausal patients.

Prevalence of human papillomavirus detection in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

We conducted a meta-analysis of published data to update and estimate the prevalence of HPV in ovarian cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles published from 1989 until 2020 by searching Web of Sciences, Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library Central databases were gathered. A pooled estimation of HPV prevalence with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated based on a random effect model. Quantitative assessment of heterogeneity was explored using Cochrane test and I2. Additionally, publication bias, sensitivity, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses were also performed. Twenty-nine studies involving 2280 patients with ovarian cancer were included. The statistical heterogeneity was high (I2 = 88%, P<0.0001). The pooled prevalence of HPV in ovarian cancer cases was 15.9% (95% CI, 11-22). In subgroup analyses, the highest prevalence of HPV was reported by studies from Asia (30.9%; 95% CI, 20-44) and Eastern Europe (29.3%; 95% CI, 4.4-78). Furthermore, the most frequently detected HPV genotype was HPV16 (54%; 95% CI, 27.9-55), followed by HPV18 (23.2%; 95% CI, 18.8-28.2). Our meta-analysis suggests a great difference in the prevalence of HPV detected in ovarian cancer by different studies, which is not seen in strongly HPV-associated cancers such as cervical cancer. However, the prevalence varied markedly by geographic region. Considering the substantial heterogeneity found, more studies with control groups and precise assays measuring HPV mRNA expression are needed to further evaluate the link and causative aetiology between HPV and ovarian cancer.

Secondary malignancies in long-term ovarian cancer survivors: results of the 'Carolin meets HANNA' study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of secondary malignancies in long-term survivors with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Long-term survivors with ovarian cancer (survival ≥8 years after initial diagnosis) with multiple malignancies were identified within the Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer and our study 'Carolin meets HANNA - Holistic Analyses of Long-term Survivors with Ovarian Cancer'. RESULTS: Of a total of 225 long-term survivors with ovarian cancer, 36 patients (16%) had at least one more cancer diagnosis before, concomitant with, or after, ovarian cancer. Median age was 52.5 years (range 37-79). A total of 60% were diagnosed with stage III/IV and most tumors were high-grade (88.6%), as well as of serous histology (63.9%). Median overall survival was 10 years (range 8-19). Secondary cancer after ovarian cancer was found in 17 long-term survivors (7.6%). Breast cancer was the most frequent secondary malignancy. Median duration between diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer and secondary cancer diagnosis was 78.5 months (range 12-220). BRCA was tested in 11 patients with seven patients being BRCA1 and one patient BRCA2 positive. Secondary cancers were detected by screening in 35.3% and self-detected in 29.4% of patients (breast self-examination). CONCLUSION: A secondary malignancy was diagnosed in 7.6% of long-term survivors. Routine follow-up and cancer screening should be performed in long-term ovarian cancer survivors.

Lymphovascular space invasion and Ki67 as predictors of lymph node metastasis in primary low grade serous ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Low grade serous ovarian cancers characterize a unique clinical pattern and likely less frequent incidence of lymphatic metastasis. The expression level of Ki67 is associated with differences in prognosis and therapy outcome. However, its expression in combination with lymphovascular space invasion has not been evaluated in the prediction of lymphatic metastasis. METHODS: Patients with low grade serous ovarian cancer were identified in an institutional database. Patients with primary low grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed and/or treated at our center between September 2000 and December 2018 were identified. Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis was performed to find the cut-off values of per cent Ki67 to discriminate patients with lymph node metastasis. The association between the presence of lymphovascular space invasion and lymph node involvement was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients with primary low grade serous ovarian cancer were identified in our institution's database. Of these, 72 (66.1%) patients underwent primary surgery with pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection. Complete data for Ki67 expression and lymphovascular space invasion were obtained for 61 (84.7%) of these patients. Among them, 37 (60.7%) patients had lymph node metastasis. The presence of lymphovascular space invasion was associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastases (odds ratio (OR)=12.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.15 to 51.81; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis including age >65 years, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and ascites>500 mL, lymphovascular space invasion remained a significant risk factor for lymphatic metastases (OR=35.11, 95% CI 2.38 to 517.69; p=0.010). Ki67 ≥6% was associated with a higher risk of lymphovascular space invasion (OR=3.67, 95% CI 1.26 to 10.64; p=0.017). No significant correlation between Ki67 expression level and nodal metastases was found (OR=2.19, 95% CI 0.76 to 6.26; p=0.14). Neither presence of lymphovascular space invasion or nodal metastases was associated with a statistically poorer prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: We showed an association between lymphovascular space invasion, Ki67 expression, and risk of lymph node metastasis in primary low grade ovarian cancer. Further prospective trials evaluating lymphovascular space invasion and Ki-67 as predictors of lymph node metastasis are needed.

Impact of clinical factors and surgical outcome on long-term survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term survivors of ovarian cancer are a unique group of patients in whom prognostic factors for long-term survival have been poorly described. Such factors may provide information for a more personalized therapeutic approach. The objective of this study is to determine further characteristics of long-term survivors with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS: Long-term survivors were defined as patients living longer than 8 years after first diagnosis and were recruited within seven high volume centers across Europe from November 1988 to November 2008. The control group included patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with less than 5 years' survival identified from the systematic 'Tumorbank ovarian cancer' database. A subanalysis of Charité patients only was performed separately for in-depth analysis of tumor dissemination. Propensity score matching with nearest-neighbor caliper width was used to match long-term survivors and the control group regarding age, FIGO stage, and residual tumor. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer were included, divided into 131 long-term survivors and 145 control group patients. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, platinum sensitivity (p=0.002) was an independent favorable prognostic factor whereas recurrence (p<0.001) and ascites (p=0.021) were independent detrimental predictors for long-term survival. Significantly more long-term survivors tested positive for mutation in the BRCA1 gene than the BRCA2 gene (p=0.016). Intraoperatively, these patients had less tumor involvement of the upper abdomen at initial surgery (p=0.024). Complexity of surgery and surgical techniques were similar in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Platinum sensitivity constitutes a favorable factor for long-term survival whereas tumor involvement of the upper abdomen, ascites, and recurrence have a negative impact. Based on clinical estimation, long-term survival is associated with combinations of clinical, surgical, and molecular factors.

ESGO-SIOPE guidelines for the management of adolescents and young adults with non-epithelial ovarian cancers.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines for the management of adolescents and young adults aged 15 to 25 years with non-epithelial ovarian cancers, including malignant ovarian germ cell tumours, sex cord-stromal tumours, and small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcaemic type. The developmental process of these guidelines is based on a systematic literature review and critical appraisal process involving an international multidisciplinary developmental group consisting of experts from relevant disciplines (paediatric oncology, paediatric surgery, medical oncology, pathology, psycho-oncology, gynaecological oncology, and reproductive endocrinology). Given the specific and often complex issues involved in treating this group of patients, fertility sparing surgery and decrease of acute and long-term toxicities from treatment were important criteria for guidelines definition. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 54 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery.

Sorafenib plus topotecan versus placebo plus topotecan for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TRIAS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Antiangiogenic therapy has known activity in ovarian cancer. The investigator-initiated randomised phase 2 TRIAS trial assessed the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib combined with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial at 20 sites in Germany. Patients (≥18 years) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer previously treated with two or fewer chemotherapy lines for recurrent disease were stratified (first vs later relapse) in block sizes of four and randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-generated response system to topotecan (1·25 mg/m2 on days 1-5) plus either oral sorafenib 400 mg or placebo twice daily on days 6-15, repeated every 21 days for six cycles, followed by daily maintenance sorafenib or placebo for up to 1 year in patients without progression. Investigators and patients were masked to allocation of sorafenib or placebo; topotecan treatment was open label. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01047891. FINDINGS: Between Jan 18, 2010, and Sept 19, 2013, 185 patients were enrolled, 174 of whom were randomly assigned: 85 to sorafenib and 89 to placebo. Two patients in the sorafenib group had serious adverse events before treatment and were excluded from analyses. 83 patients in the sorafenib group and 89 in the placebo group started treatment. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with sorafenib versus placebo (hazard ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·43-0·83; p=0·0018). Median progression-free survival was 6·7 months (95% CI 5·8-7·6) with sorafenib versus 4·4 months (3·7-5·0) with placebo. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (57 [69%] of 83 patients in the sorafenib group vs 47 [53%] of 89 in the placebo group), neutropenia (46 [55%] vs 48 [54%]), and thrombocytopenia (23 [28%] vs 20 [22%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 49 (59%) of 83 sorafenib-treated patients and 45 (51%) of 89 placebo-treated patients. Of these, events were fatal in four patients (5%) in the sorafenib group (dyspnoea and poor general condition, septic shock, ascites and dyspnoea, and sigma perforation) and seven (8%) in the placebo group (pulmonary embolism in two patients, disease progression in two patients, and one case each of sepsis with fever, pleural effusion, and tumour cachexia). Sorafenib was associated with increased incidences of grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (three [13%] vs 0 patients) and grade 2 alopecia (24 [29%] vs 12 [13%]). INTERPRETATION: Sorafenib, when given orally in combination with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy, showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. These encouraging results support the crucial role of antiangiogenesis as the treatment backbone in combination with chemotherapy, making this approach attractive for further assessment with other targeted strategies. FUNDING: Bayer, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Ovarian tumours of different histologic type and clinical stage induce similar changes in lipid metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Previous results obtained from serum samples of late-stage, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients showed large alterations in lipid metabolism. To validate and extend the results, we studied lipidomic changes in early-stage ovarian tumours. In addition to serous ovarian cancer, we investigated whether these changes occur in mucinous and endometrioid histological subtypes as well. METHODS: Altogether, 354 serum or plasma samples were collected from three centres, one from Germany and two from Finland. We performed lipidomic analysis of samples from patients with malignant (N = 138) or borderline (N = 25) ovarian tumours, and 191 controls with benign pathology. These results were compared to previously published data. RESULTS: We found 39 lipids that showed consistent alteration both in early- and late-stage ovarian cancer patients as well as in pre- and postmenopausal women. Most of these changes were already significant at an early stage and progressed with increasing stage. Furthermore, 23 lipids showed similar alterations in all investigated histological subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in lipid metabolism due to ovarian cancer occur in early-stage disease but intensify with increasing stage. These changes occur also in other histological subtypes besides high-grade serous carcinoma. Understanding lipid metabolism in ovarian cancer may lead to new therapeutic and diagnostic alternatives.

Characterisation of tumour microvessel density during progression of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: clinico-pathological impact (an OCTIPS Consortium study).

BACKGROUND: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) intratumoural vasculature evolution remains unknown. The study investigated changes in tumour microvessel density (MVD) in a large cohort of paired primary and recurrent HGSOC tissue samples and its impact on patients' clinico-pathological outcome. METHODS: A total of 222 primary (pOC) and recurrent (rOC) intra-patient paired HGSOC were assessed for immunohistochemical expression of angiogenesis-associated biomarkers (CD31, to evaluate MVD, and VEGF-A). Expression profiles were compared between pOCs and rOCs and correlated with patients' data. RESULTS: High intratumoural MVD and VEGF-A expression were observed in 75.7% (84/111) and 20.7% (23/111) pOCs, respectively. MVDhigh and VEGF(+) samples were detected in 51.4% (57/111) and 20.7% (23/111) rOCs, respectively. MVDhigh/VEGF(+) co-expression was found in 19.8% (22/111) and 8.1% (9/111) of pOCs and rOCs, respectively (p = 0.02). Pairwise analysis showed no significant change in MVD (p = 0.935) and VEGF-A (p = 0.121) levels from pOCs to rOCs. MVDhigh pOCs were associated with higher CD3(+) (p = 0.029) and CD8(+) (p = 0.013) intratumoural effector TILs, while VEGF(+) samples were most frequently encountered among BRCA-mutated tumours (p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis showed VEGF and MVD were not independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: HGSOC intratumoural vasculature did not undergo significant changes during disease progression. High concentration of CD31(+) vessels seems to promote recruitment of effector TILs. The study also provides preliminary evidence of the correlation between VEGF-positivity and BRCA status.

The prognostic impact of cancer stem-like cell biomarker aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 (ALDH1) in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of cancer stem cell biomarker aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 (ALDH1) with ovarian cancer patients' prognosis and clinico-pathological characteristics. METHODS: The electronic searches were performed in January 2018 through the databases PubMed, MEDLINE and Scopus by searching the terms: "ovarian cancer" AND "immunohistochemistry" AND ["aldehyde dehydrogenase-1" OR "ALDH1" OR "cancer stem cell"]. Studies evaluating the impact of ALDH1 expression on ovarian cancer survival and clinico-pathological variables were selected. RESULTS: 233 studies were retrieved. Thirteen studies including 1885 patients met all selection criteria. ALDH1-high expression was found to be significantly associated with poor 5-year OS (OR = 3.46; 95% CI: 1.61-7.42; P = 0.001, random effects model) and 5-year PFS (OR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.11-4.13; P = 0.02, random effects model) in ovarian cancer patients. No correlation between ALDH1 expression and tumor histology (OR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.36-1.02; P = 0.06, random effects model), FIGO Stage (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.33-1.30; P = 0.22, random effects model), tumor grading (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.40-1.45; P = 0.41, random effects model) lymph nodal status (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 0.81-5.18; P = 0.13, random effects model) or patients' age at diagnosis (OR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.54-1.29; P = 0.41, fixed effects model) was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Basing on the available evidence, this meta-analysis showed that high levels of ALDH1 expression correlate with worse OS and PFS in ovarian cancer patients.

Clinical Outcome After Completion Surgery in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: The Charite Experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate surgical outcome and survival benefit after completion surgery. METHODS: We evaluated 164 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent incomplete primary cytoreductive surgery or rather received only staging procedures from January 2000 to December 2014 in outside institutions. Patient-related data were registered in prospective database of Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer. The outcome analyses were performed for early and advanced stages of ovarian cancer separately. RESULTS: The majority of patients were at the time of completion surgery in advanced stages of disease. From overall 111 advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients, 74 (66.6%) could be operated macroscopically tumor free, minimal residual disease 1 cm or less was achieved in 15.3% of the cases. Mean overall survival for patients without versus those with any tumor residual was 70 months (95% confidence interval, 61.3-81.5) versus 24.7 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1-42.4; P ≤ 0.0001). After applying completion surgery, 47 (28.6%) and 12 (6.7%) patients were upstaged in FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) IIIC and IV stages, respectively. Upstaging resulted in therapy changes in 10 patients (19%) with assumed FIGO IA stages. Major operative complications were registered in 28.8% of advanced cases, and 30-day mortality reached 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Recent research has shown that the most profound impact on survivorship occurs when women get proper care from surgeons trained in the latest techniques for treating ovarian cancer. Completion surgery maintained that even after initial incomplete cytoreduction outside of the high specialized units, after applying appropriate surgery techniques macroscopically, disease-free situation is achievable and outcomes are comparable with the results of primary debulking surgery.

Genetic Versus Epigenetic BRCA1 Silencing Pathways: Clinical Effects in Primary Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Study of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Consortium.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess in a large cohort of primary epithelial ovarian cancer patients the incidence and the clinical effect of BRCA1 genetic and epigenetic silencing mechanisms. METHODS: A total of 188 primary epithelial ovarian cancer patients, treated between 2000 and 2011 at the Charité University Hospital of Berlin, were included. The patients' tumor and blood samples were obtained from the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network (www.toc-network.de). Direct sequencing of BRCA1 exon 11 was performed to detect germline mutations, whereas tumor samples were assessed for BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation by bisulphite-converted methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Basing on their BRCA1 status, patients were compared regarding clinicopathological variables and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (11.2%) showed hypermethylation in BRCA1 promoter (HMB), and 18 patients (9.6%) presented germline mutations in BRCA1 exon 11 (GMB). Patients with HMB showed a significantly younger age at diagnosis compared with BRCA1 wild type (BWT) patients (54 vs 61 years, P = 0.045), and both GMB and HMB patients were more likely to have high-grade serous ovarian cancer (76.2% and 77.8% vs 52.7%, P = 0.043 and P = 0.043). Positive family history of breast or ovarian cancer (OC) was more frequently reported among GMB patients with respect to BWT patients (44.4% vs 13.5%, P = 0.003); GMB, HMB, and BWT patients did not show significant differences in terms of tumor dissemination pattern, surgical outcomes, platinum response or survival; neither mutational nor hypermethylation BRCA1 status was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hypermethylation in BRCA1 is associated with earlier occurrence of OC. In addition, the coexistence of both GBM and HMB is an infrequent event, occurring in 0.5% of OC cases. Silencing of BRCA1 through mutation and hypermethylation confers to distinct clinical characteristics of OC patients but similar clinical outcome with respect to BWT patients.

Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.

OBJECTIVE: The main goal of the current study was to compare survival differences among subgroups of primary ovarian cancer patients in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIIC and IIIA1 after complete tumor debulking surgery. METHODS: A total of 218 patients with primary ovarian cancer who received complete cytoreductive surgery were included in the current retrospective analysis of the validated Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network Database, which covers the periods January 2002 until December 2012. According to their tumor spread pattern, patients were divided into three groups: Group A (peritoneum only), Group B (peritoneum and lymph nodes), and Group C (lymph nodes only). Associations between groups and clinicopathological factors were analyzed using standard statistical procedures. RESULTS: The vast majority of patients were classified into Group B. Lymph node involvement was detected in 70.5 % of the cases where peritoneal implants presented ≥2 cm beyond the pelvis (Group A + B). The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 47.4 % in Group A, 45.1 % in Group B, and 91.7 % in Group C (p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis of Group B, both pelvic and para-aortic lymph node involvement was found in 57 % of patients. Patients in Group B who had para-aortic lymph node involvement only had better median progression-free survival (PFS) compared with patients with pelvic lymph node involvement only and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node involvement (28, 16, and 18 months, respectively; p = 0.02). The median OS differed significantly between patients with para-aortic lymph node involvement only versus patients with both pelvic and para-aortic involvement (68.5 vs. 46.7 months; p = 0.02). Three-year PFS was 90.0 % in FIGO IIIA1(i) and 62.6 % in FIGO IIIA1(ii) (hazard ratio 2.30, 95 % confidence interval 0.45-11.58). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FIGO stage IIIC with lymph node involvement only had the best clinical outcome compared with patients in the same stage with peritoneal involvement only. Furthermore, involvement of both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes were of the same infrequency, and involvement of only para-aortic lymph nodes in this stage resulted in a better chance of survival than involvement of pelvic lymph nodes only or both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes simultaneously. In accordance with the revised FIGO classification of 2013, our study revealed that FIGO IIIA1(i) is prognostically better compared with FIGO IIIA1(ii).

Sentinel Node Mapping in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: Indocyanine Green Versus Other Conventional Dyes-A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Historically, blue dyes, (99)Tc or a combination of the two tracers have been used for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer patients. Indocyanine green (ICG), as a tracer, has been recently introduced in this setting. Our goal was to assess the differences in overall and bilateral detection rates as well as in false-negative rates among the different tracers. METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched in January 2016 by searching the terms "sentinel lymph node" and "dye" and "indocyanine green," and "cervical cancer" or "endometrial cancer." Series comparing different tracers injected intracervically and reporting the detection rate and/or SLN false-negative rate were selected. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were retrieved. Six studies including 538 patients met selection criteria. Compared with blue dyes, ICG SLN mapping had higher overall (odds ratio [OR] 0.27; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.50; p < 0.0001) and bilateral detection rates (OR 0.27; 95 % CI 0.19-0.40; p < 0.00001). No differences were found between ICG and (99)TC, although these results are based on data of a single series. No differences in overall and bilateral detection rates were found between ICG and the combination of blue dyes and (99)TC. The pooled analysis of false-negative rates data showed no difference in false-negative rates between tracers. CONCLUSIONS: In cervical and endometrial cancer, ICG SLN mapping seems to be equivalent to the combination of blue dyes and (99)TC in terms of overall and bilateral detection rates. Its safety profile and ease of use may favor its employment respect to conventional tracers.