Clinical Outcomes of Splenic Artery Embolization Versus Splenectomy in the Management of Hemodynamically Stable High-Grade Blunt Splenic Injuries: A National Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) versus splenectomy in adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) compared SAE versus splenectomy in adults with blunt high-grade splenic injuries (grade ≥ IV). Patients were stratified first by hemodynamic status then splenic injury grade. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and transfusion requirements at four and 24 h from arrival. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred nine hemodynamically stable patients were analyzed, with 2975 (95.7%) undergoing splenectomy and 134 (4.3%) with SAE. One thousand eight hundred sixty five patients had grade IV splenic injuries, and 1244 had grade V. Patients managed with SAE had 72% lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; P = 0.002), significantly shorter ICU-LOS (7 versus 9 d, 95%, P = 0.028), and received a mean of 1606 mL less packed red blood cells at four h compared to those undergoing splenectomy. Patients with grade IV or V injuries both had significantly lower odds of mortality (IV: OR 0.153, P < 0.001; V: OR 0.365, P = 0.041) and were given less packed red blood cells within four h when treated with SAE (2056 mL versus 405 mL, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SAE may be a safer and more effective management approach for hemodynamically stable adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries, as demonstrated by its association with significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality, shorter ICU-LOS, and lower transfusion requirements compared to splenectomy.

Impact of Trauma Center Type on Outcomes in Pediatric Population Following Severe Isolated Blunt Traumatic Brain Injuries: A National Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the association between trauma center type, verification level, and clinical outcomes in pediatric trauma patients with moderate and severe isolated blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Program (TQP) Participant Use File (PUF) database from 2017 to 2021. Severely injured pediatric (<18 years) trauma patients with isolated moderate and severe TBI (AIS head >2, all other body regions <3) were included. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, intensive care unit length-of-stay (ICU-LOS), and ventilator-free days (VFDs). RESULTS: Patients treated at a level-I combined adult and pediatric trauma centers (CTCs) had significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality than those treated at adult trauma centers (ATCs) (OR .495, 95% CI 0.291-.841, P = .009). Patients treated at level-I pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) (OR 2.726, 95% CI 2.059-3.609, P < .001) and level-II PTCs (OR 6.18, 95% CI 3.402-11.239, P < .001) were significantly more likely to be discharged home than equivalent-level ATCs. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with isolated blunt moderate and severe TBI treated at level-I PTCs and CTCs had reduced odds of in-hospital mortality compared to level-I ATCs. Patients at level I and II PTCs had significantly higher odds of discharge home than those at equivalent-level CTCs and ATCs.

National Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Cirrhotic Blunt Trauma Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy Versus Non-operative Management: A Propensity Case-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes among severely injured trauma patients presenting with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries with a pre-diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) undergoing emergency laparotomy vs nonoperative management (NOM). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File (ACS-TQIP-PUF) dataset from 2017 to 2021. Adults (≥18 years) with a pre-existing diagnosis of LC who presented with severe blunt (ISS ≥ 16) isolated solid organ abdominal injuries and underwent laparotomy or NOM were included. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and in-hospital complications such as acute renal failure and deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: 929 patients were included in this analysis, with 355 undergoing laparotomy and 574 managed nonoperatively. Laparotomy patients suffered greater in-hospital mortality (n = 186, 52.3% vs n = 115, 20.0%; P < .01), required significantly more blood within 4 hours (8.9 units vs 4.3 units, P < .01), and had a significantly longer ICU-LOS (10.2 days vs 6.7 days, P < .01). In the 1:1 propensity score matched analysis of 556 matched patients, in-hospital mortality was greater for laparotomy patients (52.3% vs 20.0%, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Laparotomy was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched trauma patients, longer ICU-LOS, and more blood products given at 4 hours compared to NOM. These findings illustrate that NOM may be a safe approach in managing severely injured trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries and a pre-diagnosis of LC.

Predictors of Clinical Outcomes and the Need for Massive Transfusion Protocols in Geriatric Trauma Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The current literature lacks a clear consensus on the predictors of mortality and outcomes of geriatric trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock. This systematic review aims to investigate predictors of clinical outcomes and the need for massive transfusion protocol in the geriatric trauma population with hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Google Scholar were searched for studies evaluating geriatric trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock or receiving MTP. Outcomes of interest included the effect of advanced age on clinical outcomes, the accuracy of SI and other variables in predicting mortality and need for MTP, and associations between blood product ratio and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review. In most studies, advanced age was an accurate predictor of mortality and complication rates in geriatric patients undergoing management of shock with MTP. SI along with other variables such as systolic blood pressure (SBP) were sensitive predictors of mortality and the need for MTP. Studies evaluating blood product ratio found an increased incidence of complications with higher plasma: red blood cell ratios. CONCLUSION: Advanced age among geriatric patients is associated with increased mortality and complications when undergoing MTP. Shock Index and age x Shock Index are accurate and reliable predictors of mortality and need for MTP in the geriatric trauma population with hemorrhagic shock suffering blunt and/or penetrating injuries. An increased plasma: RBC ratio was associated with more complications in geriatric patients.