Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 93
Filter
1.
Surg Technol Int ; 38: 279-288, 2021 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33823055

ABSTRACT

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening event that requires immediate surgical treatment. Improvements in surgical treatment, graft technology, organ protection and imaging techniques have led to improved clinical outcomes. Individualized treatment concepts have emerged based on more advanced planning tools that allow for a tailored approach even in complex situations such as multi-level malperfusion. This review provides an overview of the current surgical treatment of ATAAD, focusing on new disease classifications, preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment, new prosthesis and stent technologies, and organ-protection strategies.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Acute Disease , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Card Surg ; 35(11): 3195-3198, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32741036

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Outflow graft (OG) obstruction is a dangerous complication that may occur for various reasons after the implantation of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD). CASE REPORT: In this study, we describe the case of a 67-year-old patient on LVAD support who developed a late pseudoaneurysm of the OG anastomosis (to the descending aorta) causing OG stenosis at the level of the anastomosis. The patient was treated with a customized fenestrated endovascular stent graft placed into the descending aorta and stent implantation into the OG.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Aneurysm, False/etiology , Aneurysm, False/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Stents , Ventricular Outflow Obstruction/etiology , Ventricular Outflow Obstruction/surgery , Aged , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
3.
Surg Technol Int ; 36: 95-97, 2020 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32432332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The treatment of ATAAD is highly individualized and mainly depends on anatomical and technical factors. Great efforts to reduce the time to diagnosis and technological innovations have led to improved surgical results with a lower rate of dissection-related reoperations during long-term follow up. The aim of this article is to introduce a novel hybrid device for the treatment of DeBakey I acute aortic dissection. CONCEPT: A non-covered hybrid stent from Ascyrus Medical (Boca Raton, FL, USA) aims to improve the current standard of care, without increasing technical complexity or device-related complications. The AMDS (Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent) prolongs the hemiarch operation by only a few minutes, does not need endovascular skills to be deployed, and provides an anatomical and "haemodynamic" correction. The device is intended to reduce perfusion of the false lumen by sealing the distal anastomosis, and to restore distal perfusion of the true lumen. Obliteration of the false lumen at the distal anastomosis is likely to reduce aortic enlargement and the need for reoperations, mainly driven by a low-flow state and pressure reduction, which promote thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The AMDS provides a new concept to treat acute aortic dissection by moving the focus from resecting the dissected tissue to restoring adequate true-lumen flow and sealing the false lumen at the distal anastomosis. With a high rate of procedural success, AMDS represents a safe, reproducible and promising solution to treat DeBakey I aortic dissections.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Humans , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 58(6): 831-838, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31615695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: At 12 months follow up of the PLIANT study, clinical success and efficacy of the E-liac Stent Graft System (JOTEC GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) were evaluated. Clinical success was defined as aneurysm exclusion (no type I, III, IV endoleak) with primary patency of the internal iliac artery (IIA) and external iliac artery (EIA) on the E-liac implantation side. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre European observational study, clinical and morphological data of 45 patients (93% male, mean age 72 y) were prospectively collected in 11 European centres between July 2014 and June 2016. Forty patients underwent an aorto-iliac (three patients bilaterally) treatment and five an isolated iliac treatment. RESULTS: At 12 months follow up, data were available for 42 patients. Overall clinical success at 12 months was 90%, with a survival rate of 100%. Four patients (10%) did not achieve clinical success, one with an internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion on the E-liac implantation side, one with an infrarenal type Ia endoleak, and two with type Ib endoleaks in IIA. At 12 months the primary patency rate in the internal iliac artery on the iliac side branch implantation side was 98%. Two patients (5%) received E-liac related re-interventions: one caused by an edge stenosis at the distal end of the graft limb in the external iliac artery (EIA) and one caused by thrombo-embolism in the external iliac artery. Thus, for the EIA, primary and secondary patency rates were 98% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low device related re-intervention rate of 5%, the high survival rate of 100%, and the high primary patency rates of 98% for the IIA and EIA at 12 month follow up demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the E-liac Stent Graft System. Long term 36 month results are awaited to confirm the efficacy and durability.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Endoleak/epidemiology , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/epidemiology , Iliac Aneurysm/surgery , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Computed Tomography Angiography , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Europe , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/diagnostic imaging , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/etiology , Humans , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
5.
Surg Technol Int ; 34: 313-320, 2019 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664224

ABSTRACT

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has dramatically changed the treatment of valvular heart disease over the past decade. At the same time, the indications for bioprosthesis implantation have been continuously extended toward younger patients, driven by excellent clinical results and improved durability. While the omission of oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of severe bleeding complications, the long-term durability of bioprostheses is still limited. In light of the growing number of elderly transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients, the prevalence of patients with failed bioprostheses and advanced comorbidities is expected to rise. Currently, transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) and valve-in-ring (ViR) interventions represent a valuable alternative treatment option for patients with a high risk for surgical reoperation. Several reports have described a high procedural success rate and low postprocedural morbidity and mortality during mid-term follow-up. We are still facing valve-specific and procedure-related challenges in all types of procedures, but especially in transcatheter ViR interventions. Considering the high technical demand of these interventions, a strong and highly specialized heart team in heart valve centers is the cornerstone of successful patient treatment. This review focuses on individualized patient selection, procedure-specific risk factors and technical aspects of transcatheter ViV/R interventions, and explores the currently available literature on postinterventional outcome.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve/surgery , Bioprosthesis/adverse effects , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
6.
Vascular ; 26(6): 647-656, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30037302

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To study the safety and feasibility of the E-liac Stent Graft System® in patients with aorto/iliac aneurysms. METHODS: A prospective multicentric European registry of patients receiving the E-liac Stent Graft System® was conducted. Endpoints of the study included the technical success as well as periprocedural events and 30-day endoleaks, reinterventions, internal and external iliac artery patency and mortality. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and June 2016, a total of 45 patients (93% men, mean age 72 years, range 53-90 years) were enrolled at 11 sites in four European countries. Five patients received an isolated iliac treatment. Thirty-seven patients were treated with a combination of an abdominal stent graft and a unilateral E-liac and three in combination with bilateral E-liac. All E-liac Stent Grafts (48) were implanted in the intended position and the internal iliac arteries were successfully bridged. Two patients did not receive clinical success, due to endoleak type Ia of the aortic stent graft. At 30-day follow-up, clinical success rate was 96%. Three successful endovascular reinterventions were performed within the 30-day follow-up: one due to a type Ia endoleak in the common iliac artery, one due to type Ia endoleak of the aortic stent graft, and one due to bilateral lower limb claudication provoked by stent graft limb stenosis. At 30-day, a 100% survival rate and complete absence of pelvic or buttock ischemia/claudication were reported. Primary patency at 30 days was 100% for the internal iliac artery and 98% for the external iliac artery with an assisted patency of 100% in the latter. CONCLUSIONS: The high clinical success rate, low rates of device-related reinterventions (2%), and excellent patency rate demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the E-liac Stent Graft System. Long-term results are awaited to state efficacy and durability. Clinical Trials.gov. Identifier no. NCT02209194.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Iliac Aneurysm/surgery , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/physiopathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Computed Tomography Angiography , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Iliac Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Aneurysm/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Patency
7.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731123

ABSTRACT

The treatment of DeBakey type I aortic dissection remains a major challenge in the field of aortic surgery. To upgrade the standard of care hemiarch replacement, a novel device called an "Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent" (AMDS) is now available. This hybrid device composed of a proximal polytetrafluoroethylene cuff and a distal non-covered nitinol stent is inserted into the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta during hypothermic circulatory arrest in addition to hemiarch replacement. Due to its specific design, it may result in a reduced risk for distal anastomotic new entries, the effective restoration of branch vessel malperfusion and positive aortic remodeling. In this narrative review, we provide an overview about the indications and the technical use of the AMDS. Additionally, we summarize the current available literature and discuss potential pitfalls in the application of the AMDS regarding device failure and aortic re-intervention.

8.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 65(6)2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814808

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of transposition of the omentum into the mediastinum to support the replacement of infected aortic grafts or to cover infected aortic grafts that are not amenable for surgical replacement. METHODS: All patients with thoracic aortic graft infections who underwent mediastinal transposition of the omentum at our institution between 2005 and 2023 were included in this study. Mediastinal transposition of the omentum was performed either after replacement of the infected graft ('curative concept') or solely as bailout procedure by wrapping the infected graft ('palliative concept'). The diagnosis, including computed tomography scans during follow-up, was made according to the criteria of the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration. RESULTS: The patient cohort consisted of 31 patients. Both in-hospital and 1-year mortality were 0% (n = 0) for the curative concept (n = 9) compared to 23% (n = 5) and 41% (n = 9) for the palliative concept (n = 22), respectively. There was no graft infection-associated death or recurrence of infection after 3 years in the curative group. Survival was 52% at 3 years in the palliative group, with freedom of infection in 59% of the patients (n = 13). CONCLUSIONS: Transposition of the omentum and wrapping of the infected aortic prosthetic graft is a useful bailout strategy for patients who are ineligible for replacement of an infected aortic graft. However, mortality stays high. For radical treatment of aortic graft infections, it may prove an effective supportive therapy and represents an important tool in the armamentarium of cardiac surgeons.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Thoracic , Aorta , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Mediastinum , Omentum , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Omentum/transplantation , Omentum/surgery , Male , Female , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Aged , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Aorta/surgery , Mediastinum/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 18(1): 194, 2023 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37340389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a well-established therapy for descending aortic aneurysms (DTA). There is a paucity of large series reporting the mid- and long-term outcomes from this era. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of TEVAR with regards to the effect of aortic morphology and procedure-related variables on survival, reintervention and freedom from endoleaks. METHODS: In this retrospective single center study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes among 158 consecutive patients with DTA than underwent TEVAR between 2006 and 2019 at our center. The cohort included 51% patients with device landing zones proximal to the subclavian artery and 25.9% patients undergoing an emergent or urgent TEVAR. The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes were reintervention and occurrence of endoleaks. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 33 months [IQR 12 to 70] while 50 patients (30.6%) had longer than 5-year follow-up. With a median patient age of 74 years, post-operative Kaplan Meyer survival estimates were 94.3% (95%CI 90.8-98.0, SE 0.018%) at 30 days, 76.4% (95%CI 70.0-83.3, SE 0.034%) at one year and, 52.9% (95%CI 45.0-62.2, SE 0.043%) at five years. Freedom from reintervention at 30 days, one year, and five years was 92.9% (95%CI 89.0-97.1, SE 0.021%), 80.0% (95%CI 72.6-88.1, SE 0.039%), and 52.8% (95%CI 41.4-67.4, SE 0.065%), respectively. On cox regression analysis greater aneurysm diameter, and the use of device landing zones in aortic regions 0-1 were associated with an increased probability of all-cause mortality, and with reintervention during follow-up. Independent of aneurysm size undergoing urgent or emergent TEVAR was associated with higher mortality risk for the first three years post-operative but not on long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Larger aneurysms and those requiring stent-graft landing in aortic zones 0 or 1, are associated with higher risk for mortality and reintervention. There remains a need to optimize clinical management and device design for larger proximal aneurysms.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Aortic Aneurysm , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Humans , Aged , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , Endoleak/etiology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Aortic Aneurysm/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
10.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 10: 1299192, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38034371

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Open surgical repair remains the current gold standard for the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. However, especially elderly patients with relevant comorbidities who are deemed unfit for open surgery may benefit from a minimally invasive endovascular approach. Methods: We report a case of an 80-year-old male with retrograde acute type A aortic dissection and peripheral malperfusion after receiving thoracic endovascular aortic repair due to thoracic aortic aneurysm. Our individualized endovascular approach consisted of left carotid-subclavian bypass, proximal extension of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using a covered stent graft and a single covered stent graft for the ascending aorta in combination with an uncovered stent for the aortic arch. Results: Postoperative computed tomographic angiography demonstrated excellent outcome with no signs of endoleak or patent false lumen. Follow-up after 3.5 years showed a stable result with no signs of stent failure or dissection progress. No aortic re-interventions were needed in the further course. Discussion: An individualized endovascular approach may be justified for acute type A aortic dissection in elderly patients with high surgical risk if performed in specialized aortic centers. Additional short-length stent graft devices are needed to address the anatomical challenges of the ascending aorta. For enhanced remodeling of the dissected aorta, the use of an additional uncovered stent may be advisable.

11.
J Clin Med ; 12(6)2023 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36983272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perioperative stroke remains a devastating complication in the operative treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. To reduce the risk of perioperative stroke, different perfusion techniques can be applied. A consensus on the preferred cerebral protection strategy does not exist. METHODS: To provide an overview about the different cerebral protection strategies, literature research on Medline/PubMed was performed. All available original articles reporting on cerebral protection in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection and neurologic outcomes since 2010 were included. RESULTS: Antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion may provide similar neurological outcomes while outperforming deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The choice of arterial cannulation site and chosen level of hypothermia are influencing factors for perioperative stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is not recommended as the sole cerebral protection technique. Antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion are today's standard to provide cerebral protection during aortic surgery. Bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion potentially leads to superior outcomes during prolonged circulatory arrest times between 30 and 50 min. Arterial cannulation sites with antegrade perfusion (axillary, central or carotid artery) in combination with moderate hypothermia seem to be advantageous. Every concept should be complemented by adequate intraoperative neuromonitoring.

12.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 64(4)2023 10 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37589652

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the outcome of elderly patients with surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) complicated by malperfusion. METHODS: Patients ≥70 years old who underwent surgical treatment for ATAAD between January 2000 and December 2020 were enrolled in this study and stratified by their specific Penn Classification into 4 different subgroups, where Penn Abc was defined as multilevel malperfusion. Short- and long-term outcomes were investigated. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Four hundred elderly patients underwent surgical treatment for ATAAD. A total of 204 (51%) patients had no evidence of malperfusion (Penn Aa), 106 (26.5%) had localized organic malperfusion (Penn Ab), 44 (11%) patients had systemic malperfusion (Penn Ac) and 46 (11.5%) suffered from multilevel malperfusion (Penn Abc). For the latter, in-hospital mortality was 70% (P < 0.001). Age (P < 0.006) and multilevel malperfusion (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 1-year mortality. Patients with multilevel malperfusion showed the worst 1-year survival (P < 0.001). In the case of Penn Aa, in-hospital mortality was 13% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery may lead to satisfactory results in the absence of malperfusion, even in octogenarians. Elderly patients with multilevel malperfusion show very poor surgical outcome. In these patients, the decision for surgery should be taken with caution. Operation, if performed, should be carried out by experienced teams only.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Risk Factors , Hospital Mortality , Acute Disease , Retrospective Studies
13.
Heart Surg Forum ; 15(3): E164-6, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22698607

ABSTRACT

We report on successful emergency transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with percutaneous coronary revascularization in a polymorbid and preterminal patient in profound cardiogenic shock and with multiorgan failure. The risk scores were almost unbelievably high (Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality score, 83.9%; Society of Thoracic Surgeons morbidity and mortality score, 96.8%; logistic EuroSCORE, 96.7%). Two and a half years after the procedure, the patient is doing very well.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Multiple Organ Failure/surgery , Shock, Cardiogenic/surgery , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Humans , Male , Multiple Organ Failure/complications , Risk Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications , Treatment Outcome
14.
Heart Surg Forum ; 15(5): E268-71, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23092663

ABSTRACT

Recently during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), we were faced with a problem that seemed to be untreatable by TAVI. It was difficult to decide whether to perform atypical TAVI or to convert to conventional redo aortic valve surgery in an extremely high-risk patient with a degenerated stentless aortic bioprosthesis.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Bioprosthesis , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Reoperation/methods , Risk Assessment , Stents , Treatment Outcome
15.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 62(5)2022 10 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35396839

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to investigate outcomes after the surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection in regard to three available selective cerebral perfusion strategies. METHODS: From 2000 to 2019, patients were selected based on the employment of either retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP), unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (uACP) or bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bACP) during open zone-0 anastomosis. Propensity score TriMatch analysis considering several preoperative and intraoperative variables was used to identify well-balanced triplets. The primary end point of the study was a new cerebral operation-related neurologic deficit. RESULTS: Operative times (operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, reperfusion time) were significantly longer in the RCP group, in which deeper hypothermia was applied (27.5 [24-28], 28 [26-28] and 16 [16-17]°C for uACP, bACP and RCP, respectively, P-value <0.001). The RCP group showed higher red blood cell concentrates and fresh frozen plasma transfusion rates. No significant difference of new cerebral operation-related neurologic deficit was observed between the 3 groups (12.9% vs 12.9% vs 11.3% for RCP, uACP and bACP, P-value = 0.86). In addition, 30-day mortality showed similar distribution independently of the cerebral perfusion strategy adopted (17.7% vs 14.5% vs 17.7% for RCP, uACP and bACP, P-value = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: However, based on a small sample size, the comparison showed no relevant differences in terms of neurologic outcome and 30-day mortality, confirming RCP, uACP and bACP as safe and reproducible selective cerebral perfusion strategies in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Aortic Dissection , Humans , Blood Component Transfusion , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Treatment Outcome , Plasma , Perfusion , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery
16.
Innovations (Phila) ; 17(3): 237-243, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35616926

ABSTRACT

Seven adult patients underwent a two-stage treatment of complex coarctation (CoA), including surgical revascularization of the left subclavian artery (LSA) to left common carotid artery (LCCA), followed by transcatheter covered stent implantation. The majority of patients (5 of 7, 71%) received 1 covered stent (covered Cheatham Platinum stent: 8 zig/45 mm [n = 2], 10 zig/60 mm [n = 1], 10 zig/65 mm [n = 1]; BeGraft: 24/48 mm [n = 2]). In 1 patient (14%), the implantation of 2 covered stents (BeGraft 20/48 mm) was necessary. During a median follow-up of 2.4 years (interquartile range, 0.1 to 4.9 years), complications occurred in 3 of 7 patients (43%), including an asymptomatic but severe stenosis of the LSA bypass (n = 1), a recoarctation with a mild endoleak (n = 1), and a severe endoleak (n = 1). Surgical revascularization of the LSA to the LCCA can successfully prepare for covered stent implantation in complex CoA in adult patients. This two-stage approach was feasible and safe with complications occurring in 3 of 7 patients (43%). All complications were managed by catheter reintervention only.


Subject(s)
Aortic Coarctation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Adult , Humans , Aortic Coarctation/complications , Aortic Coarctation/surgery , Aortography/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Carotid Artery, Common/surgery , Endoleak/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Prosthesis Design , Stents/adverse effects , Subclavian Artery/surgery , Treatment Outcome
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149286

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the factors affecting mid and late aortic remodelling following thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the PETTICOAT (Provisional Extension To Induce Complete Attachment) technique among patients with complicated acute or subacute type B aortic dissection. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre study that evaluates clinical and morphological outcomes among 65 consecutive patients. The area and diameter of the true and false lumen, overall aortic diameter and false lumen perfusion were evaluated. RESULTS: Concomitant direct visceral artery stenting was successfully conducted in 32 (49%) patients. There was one (1.5%) postoperative stroke; three (4.6%) patients developed spinal cord ischaemia; two (3%) patients suffered retrograde type A dissection; and two (3%) patients had mesenteric ischaemia, despite successful reperfusion, that required a bowel resection. Median postoperative follow-up was 63.1 (interquartile range, 32.1- 91.8) months. The probability of survival was 96.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 88.3%-99.2%] at 30 days, 93.9% (95% CI 84.4%-97.6%) at 1 year, 78.0 (95% CI 64.2%-87.0%) at 5 years and 72.8% (95% CI at 57.9%-83.2%) at 10 years postoperatively. There was a statistically significant postoperative increase in true-lumen area, diameter and true-lumen index in all five aortic levels measured. Complete false lumen (FL) thrombosis at the coeliac trunk, renal arteries and aortic bifurcation levels was observed in 47%, 15% and 24% of patients at midterm (6-15 months) and in 29%, 21% and 29% on late (later than 21 months) computed tomography angiograms (CTA). Persistent false lumen (FL) perfusion at the coeliac level on midterm CTA was associated with a larger extent of late aortic growth (P = 0.042) and was, in the majority of cases, caused by iliac re-entries either alone (28.57) or in combination with visceral and lumbar (28.57%) or distal aortic (10.71%) re-entries. A larger abdominal aortic diameter at midterm was associated with an increased probability of distal aortic reinterventions (hazard ratio 7.26, 95% CI 2.41-21.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent FL perfusion of the distal aorta at midterm following TEVAR with the PETTICOAT technique among patients with acute and subacute type B dissection is caused mainly by iliac, visceral, lumber and distal aorta re-entries. Patients with persistent FL perfusion have an increased risk of aortic aneurysmal growth at late follow-up.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Aortic Dissection , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/etiology , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Aorta/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/etiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Heart Valve Dis ; 20(6): 711-4, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22655503

ABSTRACT

A simple hybrid procedure, namely transapical aortic valve implantation combined with 'off-pump' coronary artery bypass using an internal thoracic artery, was performed in a patient with porcelain aorta, aortic valve stenosis and coronary artery disease. This approach does not require cardiopulmonary bypass, and avoids aortic or peripheral arterial cannulation and clamping of the aorta. This hybrid approach can be regarded as a 'new technique' being applied to an 'old idea'.


Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve , Coronary Artery Bypass , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Vascular Calcification/complications , Aged , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Male
19.
Heart Surg Forum ; 14(6): E354-6, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22167760

ABSTRACT

We were faced with a difficult question: how to treat a high-risk patient with severe aortic valve stenosis and a secundum atrial septal defect (ASD II). An 85-year-old woman with progressive dyspnea and pedal edema and in New York Heart Association class IV was treated with concomitant transapical aortic valve implantation and transcatheter closure of the ASD II. The combined procedure and postoperative course were completely uneventful. At 2 years after the clinical follow-up, the patient is doing well. This case report demonstrates, for the first time, the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of simultaneous application of 2 transcatheter methods--aortic valve implantation and closure of an ASD II. As surgeons, we should consider percutaneous treatment of combined structural heart disease in patients at high risk for conventional surgery.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Angiography , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/complications , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/diagnostic imaging , Humans
20.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 32(5): 695-702, 2021 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV) implantation is an alternative treatment to surgery for high-risk patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves. Some types of bioprostheses are fluoroscopically translucent, resulting in an 'invisible' target deployment area. In this study, we describe the feasibility and outcomes of this procedure using intraoperative fusion of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and live fluoroscopy to facilitate valve deployment in cases of invisible bioprosthetic valves. METHODS: We reviewed all TMViV implantations at our centre from July 2014 to July 2019. Patient, procedure and outcome details were compared between those with a visible bioprosthesis (N = 22) to those with an invisible one (N = 12). Intra-operative TEE and live Fluoroscopy co-registration were used for real-time guidance for all invisible targets. RESULTS: All valve implantations were completed successfully in both groups without cardiovascular injury, valve migration or left ventricular outflow-tract obstruction. Technical success was 100% in both groups. One-year survival was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 70-96] for the entire cohort, with 79% (95% CI 63-100) survival for the visible group and 92% (95% CI 77-100) for the invisible group. Probability of 1-year survival free from mitral valve reintervention, significant valve dysfunction, stroke or myocardial infraction was 78% (95% CI 63-93) for all patients whereby the probability was 72% (95% CI 54-97) in the visible group and 80% (95% CI 59-100) for the invisible group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intraoperative TEE and live fluoroscopy image fusion facilitates accurate TMViV among patients with a fluoroscopically invisible target-landing zone.


Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Fluoroscopy , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL