A Feasibility Study to Assess Sleep and Subsequent Breast Milk Volume Among Mothers With Hospitalized Preterm Infants.

BACKGROUND: Sleep is essential for optimal health, and disturbed postpartum sleep is associated with compromised infant attachment. The postpartum experience of mothers with preterm infants is unlike the biological norm, as they are separated from their infants and often express breast milk. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of conducting a clinical research study among women with hospitalized preterm infants. We also explored for associations between maternal sleep patterns and sleep-related psychological states and subsequent breast milk volume. METHODS: Participants were recruited from Magee-Womens Hospital, located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania New mothers completed daily sleep and pumping logs and scales to measure stress, trauma, depression, fatigue, and sleep quality. RESULTS: A total of 78 women were screened, 18 women consented, and a total of 8 participants completed the study. Screening from the postpartum unit increased recruitment. The participants experience worsening sleep quality over time, moderate stress, and fatigue. Stress, postnatal depression, and fatigue are negatively associated with milk volume. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Postpartum recruitment with frequent follow-ups improved recruitment and retention. We present a preliminary association between maternal stress, fatigue, and depression, and subsequent breast milk volume. Sleep-related psychological states may negatively influence milk volume.

"It gave me so much confidence": First-time U.S. mothers' experiences with antenatal milk expression.

Antenatal milk expression (AME) involves maternal hand-expression, collection, and storage of breast milk during pregnancy for the purposes of reducing the early formula use in breastfed infants. AME is not widely practiced in the United States, despite its growing popularity elsewhere. In this study, we examined the experiences of first-time mothers recruited from a U.S. midwife practice who engaged in AME within the context of a pilot randomized controlled trial. The AME intervention involved demonstration and practice of AME with a lactation consultant beginning at 37 weeks of gestation, reinforcement at weekly study visits until delivery, and daily home practice. Nineteen women participated in a semistructured interview at 1-2 weeks postpartum regarding their study experiences. Major themes included (1) perceived benefits and impact of AME, (b) AME implementation, and (c) use of AME milk. Women perceived multiple benefits of AME, most notably that it increased their confidence that they would be able to make milk and breastfeed successfully postpartum. Women expressed some concern that no/little milk expressed could be indicative of postpartum milk production problems. Regarding implementation, women found that the AME protocol fit well into their daily routine. There was mixed feedback regarding comfort with practicing AME in the presence of partners. Reasons for postpartum use of AME milk varied; barriers to provision included inadequate milk storage options at the birth hospital and unsupportive hospital providers/staff. With few caveats, AME appears to be an acceptable breastfeeding support intervention among a sociodemographically homogeneous group of first-time mothers in the United States.

Enhancing Implementation of Complex Critical Care Interventions through Interprofessional Education.

Background: Many critical care interventions that require teamwork are adopted slowly and variably despite strong evidence supporting their use. We hypothesize that educational interventions that target the entire interprofessional team (rather than professions in isolation) are one effective way to enhance implementation of complex interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objective: As a first step toward testing this hypothesis, we sought to qualitatively solicit opinions about team dynamics, evidence translation, and interprofessional education as well as current knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding the use of one example of a team-based practice in the ICU-preventive postextubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Methods: We conducted a qualitative evaluation using semistructured interviews and focus groups with nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians working in four ICUs in four hospitals within an integrated health system. ICUs were selected based on variation in academic versus community status. We iteratively analyzed transcripts using a thematic content analysis approach. Results: From December 2018 to January 2019, we conducted 32 interviews (34 people) and 3 focus groups (20 people). Participants included 31 nurses, 15 respiratory therapists, and 8 physicians. Participants had favorable views of how their teams work together but discussed ways team dynamics (e.g., leader inclusiveness) impact care coordination. Participants viewed interprofessional education favorably and shared suggestions regarding preferred content and delivery (e.g., include both profession-specific and team-oriented content). Though participants reported frequently using NIV as a treatment, they described rarely using NIV as a preventive strategy, and nurses and respiratory therapists described challenges to use such as perceived patient discomfort. There were ICU-specific differences in management of patients at a high risk for respiratory failure after extubation, with some preferring to delay extubation. Conclusion: Participants reported optimism that interprofessional education can be an acceptable and effective way to improve translation of evidence into practice. Participants also detailed patient-specific and ICU-wide barriers to the implementation of preventive postextubation NIV. This information about teamwork in the ICU, suggestions for interprofessional education, and barriers and facilitators to use of a target evidence-based practice can inform the development of novel educational strategies in ways that increase acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the intervention.

Integrative Review of Breastfeeding Support and Related Practices in Child Care Centers.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the extant research on the support of breastfeeding and breast milk feeding and related practices in child care centers (i.e., daycare centers) in the United States and globally. DATA SOURCES: We used key terms to search Ovid, CINAHL, and PubMed for articles that met eligibility criteria. When potentially relevant articles were identified in PubMed, we used the cited by and similar articles features to identify additional articles. We also examined the reference lists of reviewed studies. STUDY SELECTION: We included original research articles on breastfeeding or breast milk feeding in child care centers published in 2000 or after and available in English. We reviewed titles and/or abstracts of 1,984 articles and abstracted 37 for full-text review. Of these, 16 studies met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION: We abstracted data from the 16 articles to facilitate comparison and identification of patterns related to support of breastfeeding/breast milk feeding and related practices in child care centers. These data included year of publication, setting, design/methodology (and methodologic limitations), type of respondent/sampling unit (e.g., directors and staff members of child care centers, mothers), sample size, outcome measures, and pertinent study findings. DATA SYNTHESIS: We categorized study findings into three themes: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experiences of Staff Members in Child Care Centers; Implementation and Adherence to Policies, Practices, and Regulations in Child Care Centers; and Prevalence of Breastfeeding in Child Care Centers. Findings indicated staff members generally had positive attitudes toward breastfeeding but tended to remain neutral regarding encouragement and support of breastfeeding. Training and knowledge about breastfeeding among staff members in child care centers appears limited and focused mainly on the storage and preparation of breast milk; however, staff members indicated the desire to obtain additional education about breastfeeding. Few U.S. child care centers or states have comprehensive, evidence-based policies and regulations to address support for breast milk feeding and breastfeeding. The prevalence of breastfeeding in U.S. child care centers is less than that in other child care settings (home-based child care, etc.), child care centers in other developed countries, and national breastfeeding averages. CONCLUSION: We found a general lack of policies and practices to support breastfeeding in child care centers, particularly in the United States. The degree to which this policy/practice deficit contributes to suboptimal breastfeeding rates among women who use child care centers requires further study.

Winging it: maternal perspectives and experiences of breastfeeding newborns with complex congenital surgical anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of breastfeeding (inclusive of breast milk expression/pumping, provision of breast milk via devices, and at-breastfeeding) among mothers of newborns with complex congenital surgical anomalies and the contexts under which pro-breastfeeding behaviors and attitudes are facilitated or compromised. STUDY DESIGN: We used qualitative description to analyze 23 interviews conducted with 15 mothers of newborns undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal, cardiac, or neural tube defects. RESULTS: Breastfeeding experiences were characterized by naivety regarding the importance and rationale for exclusive breast milk feedings and best practices to facilitate milk supply maintenance and transition to at-breast feeds. Maternal breastfeeding views and behaviors were impacted by indeterminate prenatal plans to breastfeed/provide breast milk, limited prior breastfeeding exposure and knowledge, and gaps in postnatal lactation support. CONCLUSION: Future research should investigate methods to improve exclusive breast milk feeding and facilitate transitions to at-breast feeds among mothers of newborns with surgical congenital anomalies, with consideration of identified barriers.

"I Just Want to Do Everything Right:" Primiparous Women's Accounts of Early Breastfeeding via an App-Based Diary.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to describe the early breastfeeding experience of primiparous women. METHODS: Healthy, primiparous women intending to exclusively breastfeed downloaded a commercial infant feeding mobile application (app) during their postpartum hospitalization. Women free-texted breastfeeding thoughts and experiences through 8 weeks postpartum in the app's diary. Diary content was qualitatively coded. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants completed diaries and were included in analyses. The overarching theme was Seeking sustainability and validation. Mothers felt overwhelmed, anxious, and frustrated with the intensity and unpredictability of breastfeeding and inconsistent professional breastfeeding support. The ability to exclusively breastfeed was seen as a bellwether of maternal competence. Breastfeeding progress was primarily measured through external feedback (e.g., weight checks) and managed through strict adherence to provider feeding plans. As breastfeeding problems and intensity abated, women exhibited optimism and assumed greater independence in feeding decisions. DISCUSSION: The primiparous breastfeeding experience is fraught with internally imposed and externally reinforced pressure to produce and persevere despite inadequate breastfeeding support infrastructure.