Chang Gung Forum: An Exemplary Strategy for Implementing a Multidisciplinary Network of Experts in Craniofacial Anomalies.

INTRODUCTION: The Chang Gung Forum has been dedicated to the care of craniofacial anomalies since 2000. This annual continuing medical education program focuses on orofacial cleft and surgery-first orthognathic surgery by providing up-to-date information and management guidelines. This study explored how the Chang Gung Forum has influenced medical perspectives, decisions, and practices in a multidisciplinary craniofacial team. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2022, 20 Chang Gung Forums have been held. A questionnaire was distributed among 170 attendees who had participated in the forum more than once. The questionnaire collected information on the participants' experiences and levels of satisfaction with the educational program and whether or how it had influenced their clinical practice. RESULTS: Valid responses from 86 attendees (response rate, 50.6%) who had participated more than once were collected and analyzed. The overall satisfaction rate of the Chang Gung Forum based on the respondents' most recent visits was 4.28 ± 0.63 out of 5. Of the respondents, 90.9% acknowledged changes in their clinical practice, with modifications in surgery plans and decisions being the most notable (48.5%). In addition, comprehension increased throughout years of attending the annual forum (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Chang Gung Forum has contributed markedly to the community of congenital craniofacial anomalies. The program will continue providing updated information and influencing the clinical decision-making of health care professionals.

Stability between single and segmental maxillary osteotomies in bimaxillary surgery for cleft-associated class III deformity: a CBCT study.

OBJECTIVE: Segmental Le Fort I osteotomy through the cleft is a common strategy to narrow the alveolar cleft in adults. This study compared skeletal stability between single and segmental Le Fort I osteotomies in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined 45 adults with complete UCLP-associated class III deformities who underwent bimaxillary surgery with either single (n = 30) or segmental (n = 15) Le Fort I advancement. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the facial skeleton were acquired before surgery, 1-week postsurgery, and at follow-up. Measures of landmarks from the CBCT images for the two treatment groups were compared for translation (left/right, posterior/anterior, superior/inferior) and rotation (yaw, roll, pitch). RESULTS: Postsurgery, the downward movement of the maxilla was larger in the segmental group than the single group. At follow-up, the maxilla moved backward in both groups, and upward in the segmental group. The mandible moved forward and upward and rotated upward in both groups. The amount of upward movement and rotation was larger in the segmental group than the single group. CONCLUSIONS: Two years after bimaxillary surgery in patients with UCLP-associated class III deformity, greater relapse was found after segmental Le Fort I osteotomies in vertical translation of the maxilla and mandible, and pitch rotation of the mandible compared with single Le Fort I osteotomies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The vertical relapse of the maxilla was larger after segmental Le Fort I advancement compared with single Le Fort I advancement in clefts.

Simultaneous free flap and forehead flap for nasal reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of total or near-total nasal defects is challenging and requires the re-creation of three nasal layers. Fasciocutaneous free flaps have been used effectively for restoring the vascularized nasal lining and staged forehead flap for nasal skin replacement, which is a long process. The aim of this study is to share our experience of combination of preliminary free tissue transfer with paramedian forehead flap reconstruction in the same stage of complex nasal reconstruction. METHODS: From December 2015 to July 2021, 10 patients underwent nasal reconstruction with free flaps including 4 medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flaps, 5 anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps and 1 radial forearm flap for lining and forehead flaps for skin coverage simultaneously for total or subtotal nasal defects. Nasal obstruction symptoms evaluation (NOSE) score was utilized to evaluate the functional outcome and the aesthetic results were evaluated with the last follow-up photos with score 1-5 by 5 plastic surgeon and 5 laypersons. RESULTS: The size of the free flaps ranged from 3 cm x 6 cm to 6 cm x 13 cm. After excluding one patient who expired before forehead flap division due to comorbidities, the average duration between combination surgery and the division of the forehead flap pedicle of the remaining patients was 5.7 months (range, 2-12). For patients without any postoperative events, the duration was 2.2 months (range, 2-3). One free flap had partial necrosis due to infection. The average follow-up duration was 29.6 months (range, 12-64). The NOSE score was 5.9 (range, 0-10) and the aesthetic score is 4.1 (range, 3-5) in average. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of preliminary free tissue transfer for nasal lining restoration with a paramedian forehead flap for nasal skin replacement in the same stage may shorten the long process and achieve satisfactory reconstruction in complex nasal reconstruction.

Forehead Flap Reconstruction in Different Nasal Defect: 58 Patients' Psychological Outcomes.

Forehead flap nasal reconstruction is a lengthy process; the final outcome requires multiple stages and several months to achieve. After flap transfer, the pedicle flap has to be kept attached to the face for weeks, which may lead to a variety of psychosocial distress and challenges for patients. From April 2011 to December 2016, 58 patients who underwent forehead flap reconstruction for nasal reconstruction were included. The general satisfaction questionnaire, Derriford Appearance Scale 19, and Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, were utilized to assess the change in psychosocial functioning over 4 time points: preoperative (time 1), 1 week after forehead flap transfer (time 2), 1 week after forehead flap division (time 3), and final outcome after refinement procedures (time 4). The patients were also divided into 3 groups based on the severity of nasal defects: defects involving only a single subunit (n=19), subtotal nasal defects (n=25), and total nasal defects (n=13). Between- and within-group comparisons were conducted. The vast majority of patients had the highest levels of postoperative distress and social avoidance immediately after flap transfer; these levels decreased after flap division and refinement procedures. The psychosocial functioning was more strongly affected by the stage time point than by the severity of the original nasal defects. The forehead flap nasal reconstruction can not only help patients gain a relatively normal nose but also restore their self-esteem and social confidence. The lengthy process is beneficial and worthwhile, even though it involves short-term psychosocial distress.

Upper Margin of the Forehead Flap and Its Correlation With Aesthetic Results in Nasal Reconstruction in Fitzpatrick Skin Type III and IV Chinese.

BACKGROUND: The forehead flap is one of the most commonly used methods for nose reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To determine the ideal upper margin of the flap in nasal reconstruction and its correlation with aesthetic results. METHODS: From April 2013 to September 2017, 40 patients underwent nasal reconstruction involving the dorsum with a forehead flap. The authors hypothesized 5fdifferent levels as the position to place the upper margin of the forehead flap: (1) glabella, (2) level of the upper eyelid, (3) intercanthal line, (4) horizontal line between the keystone and intercanthal line, and (5) the keystone. Then they photoshopped the upper margins of the forehead flap at 5 different levels and designed a questionnaire. Nasal reconstructive plastic surgeons, medical practitioners, and people without medical backgrounds chose the most aesthetically pleasing photograph for every patient. RESULTS: The questionnaire showed that the most aesthetically pleasing positions were located at glabella (n = 0), level of upper eyelid (n = 9), intercanthal line (n = 24), the line between keystone and intercanthal line (n = 6), and keystone (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The authors suggest placing the upper margin of the forehead flap at the level of the intercanthal line in nasal reconstruction involving the dorsum to achieve the best aesthetic results.

Simultaneous Paramedian Pedicle Forehead and Free Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction of a Composite Nasal Defect: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Extensive nasal defects after resection of a malignancy are a challenge for all plastic surgeons. Nasal composite tissue defects have to be reconstructed with multiple staging surgeries. A paramedian pedicled forehead flap and free tissue transfer can be used for lining and skin replacement at different stages. In general, free tissue transfer is used for nasal lining and nasal floor reconstruction at the preliminary stage. Several weeks or months later, a paramedian pedicled forehead flap is used to replace the skin. Intermediate stages will also be necessary, and therefore the total therapeutic course is very long. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the simultaneous use of a paramedian pedicle forehead flap and a free medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap to reconstruct a composite nasal defect after wide excision of squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENT: In 2015, a 57-year-old woman with squamous cell carcinoma of the nose underwent tumor wide excision, which caused a composite defect involving multiple nasal subunits (partial tip, dorsum, right sidewall, right ala subunits). She received both a pedicled paramedian forehead flap to replace the skin and an MSAP flap to reconstruct the lining during the same procedure. At the intermediate stage 4 weeks later, the pedicled forehead flap was elevated and tailored. Then, a further 4 weeks later, flap division was performed. RESULTS: The patient received a total of 3 surgical procedures to reconstruct the composite defects of multiple nasal subunits. Nasal reconstruction was done within 2 months. The patient was satisfied with the aesthetic appearance and functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous paramedian pedicle forehead and free flap reconstruction can provide an effective solution for composite nasal defects. Satisfactory functional and aesthetic results can be achieved.

Skeletal and upper airway stability following modified maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in skeletal class I or II deformity.

OBJECTIVES: Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is an effective short-term treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term stability of the facial skeleton, upper airway, and its surrounding structures, as well as improvement in OSA following MMA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one adults with moderate-to-severe OSA underwent surgery-first modified MMA as primary surgery. Polysomnography and cone-beam computed tomography were obtained pre-surgery, early post-surgery, and at follow-up (i.e., ≥ 2 years post-surgery). Image analysis software assessed the facial skeleton, upper airway, and its surrounding structures. RESULTS: Early post-surgery, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) had decreased significantly (p < 0.001) and the minimum oxygen saturation (MSAT) increased (p = 0.001), indicating significant improvement in OSA. At follow-up, the AHI and MSAT remained stable. However, the anterior maxilla, soft palate, and tongue moved backward while the hyoid moved downward. There was also a significant decrease in the minimal cross-sectional area of the oropharynx. The reduction in AHI was significantly related to the anterior movement of the anterior maxilla and tongue, inferior movement of the posterior maxilla, and superior movement of the soft palate tip. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement of OSA after modified MMA remained stable for at least 2 years following treatment, despite the relapse of the facial skeleton, upper airway, and its surrounding structures. The reduction of AHI was not related to changes in the caliber of the upper airway but to the movement of the maxilla, soft palate, and tongue. Clinical relevance Modified MMA is clinically effective for long-term treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe OSA.

Comparison of stability and outcomes of surgery-first bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III deformity between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVES: Some adults with cleft lip and palate (CLP) require orthognathic surgery due to skeletal deformity. This prospective study aimed to (1) compare skeletal stability following bimaxillary surgery for correction of class III deformity between patients with unilateral CLP (UCLP) and bilateral CLP (BCLP), and (2) identify risk factors of stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with CLP and skeletal class III deformities who underwent surgery-first bimaxillary surgery were divided into two groups according to cleft type: UCLP (n = 30) and BCLP (n = 30). Skeletal stability was assessed with measures from cone beam computed tomography images of the maxilla and mandible taken before treatment, 1-week and ≥ 1 year postsurgery for translation (left/right, posterior/anterior, superior/inferior) and rotation (yaw, roll, pitch); multiple regression analysis examined risk factors. RESULTS: At follow-up, the maxilla moved upwards in both groups, and backwards in the UCLP group. The mandible moved forward and upward, shifted to the cleft (deviated) side, and rotated upward in both groups. The amount of surgical advancement was a risk factor for sagittal stability in the maxilla (ß = -0.14, p < 0.05). The mandible had three risk factors for sagittal stability: age (ß = -0.23, p < 0.05), surgical team (ß = -1.83, p < 0.05), and amount of surgical setback (ß = -0.32, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Two years after bimaxillary surgery, patients with UCLP had a higher sagittal relapse of the maxilla compared with patients with BCLP, which was due to a greater surgical advancement in the patients with UCLP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgery-first bimaxillary surgery results in favorable treatment outcomes for correction of cleft-related class III deformity. Severity of jaw discrepancy and surgeons should be considered in the surgical design of overcorrection.

The Relationship Between Inter-canthal Distance and Implant Height in Asian Rhinoplasty.

Augmentation rhinoplasty is one of the top three anesthetic surgeries in Asia. I-shaped silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene composite implants are feasible for both primary and secondary augmentation rhinoplasty in Asians. This series was to analyze and evaluated the effect of the rhinoplasty to the intercanthal distance and to compare the height of the implantation with those differences in ICD before and after rhinoplasty. We retrospectively reviewed data from a single medical center via a single surgeon (Hsiao YC), at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, between 2011 and 2017 with follow-up through 2018. There were 223 patients who received augmentation rhinoplasty with an I-shaped composite silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene ePTFE-lined silicone dorsal composite implant (Implantech, Ventura, CA) with a glabellar component (chimeric technique) or without a glabellar component. There were 169 patients with the height of the I-shaped composite implant over 3 mm, and 15 patients were less than 3 mm. There was no distribution significance between two groups even in gender, age, type of surgery, or indication. The paired difference of ICD/IPD ratio was statistically significant in the group with the height of composite implant over 3 mm (1.04% ± 0.11, p < 0.005, 95%). The normalized ratio of the ICD to IPD is estimated to decrease by 1-2%. Appropriate candidates including those with a wide ICD should be informed about these data during preoperative decision-making.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Simultaneous Fat Injection for Nasal Contouring in Orthognathic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation rhinoplasty with autologous fat grafting is a useful procedure to meet the demand for facial harmonization in the Asian population. We used this procedure during orthognathic surgery to address inadequate dorsum projection. This prospective study was conducted to determine the fat retention rate in patients undergoing simultaneous autologous fat injection augmentation rhinoplasty and orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Nineteen patients were treated with simultaneous bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and autologous fat grafting of the nasal dorsum and tip. The paired t test was used to compare the nasal volumes before and at least 6 months after surgery measured by 3-dimensional computer tomography scans. All measurements were performed twice by the same evaluator at least 2 weeks apart for intrarater consistency. RESULTS: Seventeen patients completed the study. The volume means before and after surgery were 22.3 ± 4.6 cm3 and 23.3 ± 4.7 cm3, respectively, with a mean difference of 1.0 ± 0.3 cm3 (P < .001). The mean retention rate was calculated to be 50.5% ± 7.0% (range: 40.5%-64.7%). Intrarater consistency was high with a Cronbach α of .97 (P < .001) and .98 (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: This prospective study provides objective graft retention measurements for fat injection augmentation rhinoplasty combined with orthognathic surgery. All patients were satisfied with the results and no complications or additional morbidity was noted in the postoperative course. We consider this procedure to be a safe, reliable, and powerful adjunct to improve the aesthetic results of orthognathic surgery.

Diced Cartilage Rhinoplasty for Cleft Nose Deformities: Determining the Flexibility of the Cartilage Framework.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this trial is to evaluate the flexibility of the cartilaginous component of the cleft nose after diced cartilage rhinoplasty by determining the degree of possible bending in relation to the vertical nasal dorsum axis and to compare with to a control group of the unaffected population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen cleft nose patients with diced cartilage rhinoplasty were included in this study, as well as a control group of 15 unaffected individuals. The angle of maximum nasal bending is measured between the basic and maximum bending axis and performed by the same rater twice at least 2 weeks apart to account for intrarater reliability. Study groups were compared with Fisher and independent t test. RESULTS: The maximum bending to the left side was 16.10 ± 5.03 degrees for the study group and 23.95 ± 6.54 degrees for the control group (P = 0.001). The maximum bending to the right side were 16.54 ± 6.73 degrees for the study group and 23.00 ± 8.88 degrees for the control group (P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Diced cartilage graft injection for dorsal augmentation yields reproducible and esthetically pleasing outcomes with good flexibility and natural feel of the nasal tip. Although there is a significant difference compared with a nonaffected control group in maximum bending capacity, all patients in this study were satisfied with the results.

Paranasal Augmentation With Composite Graft Transfer in Overresection of Alar Base and Nostril Contracture.

BACKGROUND: Many Asian patients desire a narrower nasal base with less flaring of the alar lobules. However, patients who underwent multiple rhinoplasty surgeries with nostril contracture or an overreduction of the alar base may experience nostril contracture and deformity, which may lead to further airway obstruction. We present a technique that combines paranasal augmentation with composite chondrocutaneous graft transfer to overcome this problem. METHODS: Nine patients underwent composite chondrocutaneous graft transfer to the soft triangle or alar base combined with paranasal augmentation using preshaped porous polyethylene implants to correct nostril contracture and airway obstruction between September of 2014 and May of 2018. Preoperative and postoperative alar base distances and cross-sectional areas of the nostrils were measured and compared. RESULTS: The average thickness of paranasal augmentation was 5.5 mm (range, 4.0-7.0 mm). Eighteen composite grafts were located over the soft triangle (n = 3) and the alar base (n = 15). The average number of composite grafts for each person was 2 (range, 1-4). All composite grafts survived totally or partially, and no graft failed. The average follow-up was 10.9 months (range, 3-28 months). The alar base increased 13.9% (range, 2.2%-23.9%), and the nostril area increased an average of 78.1% (range, 4.5%-316.8%) postoperatively. Patients had satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Combining paranasal augmentation and composite graft transfer increased the cross-sectional area of the external valve and improved nostril contracture and airway obstruction after the overresection of the alar base or nose contracture after multiple rhinoplasty surgeries.

Patient satisfaction and quality of life after orthodontic treatment for cleft lip and palate deformity.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with cleft lip-cleft palate (CLP) often require orthodontic treatment, with or without orthognathic surgery. Patient satisfaction is the most important outcome parameter in orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to (1) determine patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) after orthodontic treatment and (2) identify associated factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study recruited patients with CLP who had completed orthodontic treatment at a craniofacial center in Taiwan. Participants (N=213) had received treatment for unilateral CLP (n=99), bilateral CLP (n=50), cleft lip and alveolus (n=39), and isolated cleft palate (n=25). Self-report questionnaires evaluated satisfaction with appearance and QoL; multiple regression analysis examined associated factors. Participants' expectations of treatment results were also reported. RESULTS: Participants reported moderate satisfaction with facial appearance and QoL. Satisfaction with treatment was lower or much lower than expected for 13% of participants. Treatment for bilateral CLP was associated with the lowest satisfaction with overall appearance (r = -8.123, P < 0.05); participants who had received orthognathic surgery had the highest satisfaction (r = 5.534, P < 0.05). Treatment for unilateral and bilateral CLP was associated with low QoL for smile (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic treatment had a positive effect on facial appearance and quality of life in patients with CLP. Type of cleft and orthognathic surgery significantly influenced satisfaction with facial appearance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Efforts must be taken to modify treatment strategies for patients with bilateral CLP in order to improve satisfaction with appearance following treatment.

Comparative stability and outcomes of two surgical approaches for correction of class III asymmetry with lip or occlusal cant.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the stability and outcomes of the two surgical approaches for patients with roll asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 adult patients were consecutively recruited for this prospective study. Patients with class III asymmetry and lip or occlusal cant who underwent bimaxillary surgery were grouped according to surgical approach: asymmetric posterior impaction on both sides (API, n = 31) and posterior impaction on one side and posterior extrusion on the other side (PIE, n = 19). Postsurgical stability and outcomes between groups were determined with cone-beam computed tomography for facial midline, lip, and occlusal cant at 1 week (T1), and at least 12-month postsurgery (T2, completion of orthodontic treatment). RESULTS: Presurgery, the upper anterior occlusal cant and lip cant were significantly greater for the PIE group (p < 0.05). Postsurgery (T2), the mandible moved upward and rotated upward in both groups. However, the upward rotation was significantly greater in the PIE group compared with the API group. Although the two approaches resulted in significant improvements in facial symmetry, the deviation in the facial midline remained under-corrected for most API patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patient outcomes for mandibular stability and facial symmetry differed between the two surgical approaches for correction of class III asymmetry with lip or occlusal cant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggest that planned over-correction is a reasonable option for the approach of asymmetric posterior impaction on both sides.

Ideal Nasal Radix Position in Fluctuating Facial Asymmetry.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation rhinoplasty had become increasingly popular among Asians. Failure to recognize nasal deviation before surgery may engender unsatisfactory outcomes because the deviation becomes prominently visible after surgery due to the central position of the nose. Ideal nasal radix positioning has yet to be addressed. The head position affects facial asymmetry judgements; however, its effect on rhinoplasty has never been studied. This study determined the ideal nasal radix position in facial fluctuating asymmetry and investigated the effects of the natural head position (NHP) on nasal deviation perceptions. METHODS: A survey was conducted to compare different head and nasal radix horizontal positions using images of patients who underwent augmentation rhinoplasty. Images were retouched using editing software to adjust the head and nasal radix positions. The survey was performed using questionnaires involving 3 plastic surgeons and 3 laypersons, who were asked to determine the presence of nasal deviation and select the ideal nasal radix position among the retouched images. RESULTS: Twenty patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty were included in this study. The recognition of nasal deviation was significantly higher in the NHP than in the compensatory head position. The surgeons and the laypersons considered the midsagittal line the most appropriate position of the nasal radix. CONCLUSIONS: Facial analysis for augmentation rhinoplasty should be performed with the patient's head in the NHP to prevent nasal deviation masking. The preferred nasal radix position in facial fluctuating asymmetry is the midsagittal line.Level of Evidence: Level V, descriptive study.

The Upper Buccal Musculomucosal Flap for Nasal Lining and Columellar Defect Reconstruction.

ABSTRACT: Restoring the nasal lining is a great challenge in the reconstruction of nasal defects. In this series, the authors present our experience in using the upper buccal musculomucosal (UBMM) flap for the reconstruction of full thickness columellar or nasal lining defects. Ten patients who underwent UBMM flap reconstruction of columellar or nasal lining defects, with or without composite grafting, were identified between December of 2014 and February of 2017. The records were retrospectively reviewed to determine the demographics, nasal deformity etiology, surgical technique, complications, flap survival rate and duration of follow-up. Of these ten patients, three were men, and seven were women; the average age was 48.1 years (range, 34-66 years). Four patients underwent bilateral UBMM flaps, and 6 patients underwent unilateral UBMM flap reconstruction. All of the donor sites were closed without complications, except for one small granuloma that occurred 8 months later. Of the total 14 flaps, 7 healed well, 6 healed well after minimal debridement in the clinic, and one failed and was replaced with a contralateral UBMM flap. The average follow-up time was 20.1 months (range, 8-38 months). All patients had satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes. Due to the limited availability of healthy local tissue for nasal lining reconstruction after multiple surgeries, the UBMM flap serves as an applicable choice to restore columellar or nasal lining defects, with minimal donor site morbidity and no visible external scarring.

A Comparative Study Between Classic Derotation Graft and Novel Double V Cutting Folded Derotation Graft.

BACKGROUND: To introduce an innovative refinement, the "double V cutting folded derotation graft" (DVCFD graft), which is a method for nasal tip lengthening in aesthetic rhinoplasty with strong holding force and efficient cartilage use. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2018 to July 2019 with 101 patients, including 11 males and 90 females with an average age of 36.87 ± 10.12 years, at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; the patients received classic derotation grafts (n = 49, 17 of them were one layer and 32 of them were two layers) and DVCFD grafts (n = 52) for cosmetic tip plasty. The tip projection, columella labial angle and nasolabial angle were measured through clinical photography at three different times (T0: pre-operation, T1: two weeks post-operation and T2: five months post-operation). The differences between the original derotation graft and the DVCFD graft were identified using paired-t and independent-t tests. RESULTS: The final relapse ratios of the classic derotation graft and DVCFD graft were 36.78% versus 36.92% for tip projection, 40.65% versus 38.58% for columella labial angle and 45.00% versus 47.76% for nasal labial angle, respectively. The P values of the independent-t tests were 0.991, 0.564 and 0.439, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both the classic derotation graft and DVCFD graft possess similar stability in tip plasty. The novel modification of the DVCFD graft has more efficient cartilage usage and is a feasible and safe surgical option for patients with limited harvestable cartilage for tip lengthening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Laser hair removal following forehead flap for nasal reconstruction.

The forehead flap is a dependable option for nasal reconstruction owing to its reliability and anatomic likeness to nasal skin. For patients with low hairlines, the vertical design of the paramedian forehead flap can intrude into the scalp, thus incorporating hair into the nasal reconstruction. The inadequate length of the forehead flap or shift to an oblique design may result in eyebrow elevation and asymmetry. Therefore, laser hair removal (epilation) on the forehead flap has been proposed to improve esthetic results. An alexandrite laser (755 nm, 10 to 20 ms, 18-mm spot size) with a Dynamic Cooling Device™ (DCD™) cooling system was used for hair removal in 22 patients (16 male and 6 female patients) after nasal reconstructions using forehead flaps from December 2011 to September 2016. All patients received cryogen spray cooling laser treatment (CSC-LT). The mean follow-up period was 24 months, with a range between 18 and 50 months. The average duration of treatment was 1.8 months (range, 1-5 months). The energy density ranged from 14 to 18 J/cm2 with an average of 17.2 J/cm2. The number of treatments ranged from 2 to 4 (mean 2.8). Patients had satisfactory esthetic results over 11.1 months (range, 8-18 months). Residual white hairs were observed in 3 patients, and 4 patients had tiny black residual hairs without deteriorating cosmesis. Using an alexandrite laser to remove hair on the forehead is safe and reliable in nasal reconstruction with superior recipient site cosmesis.

History and Evolution of Orthognathic Surgery at Chang Gung Craniofacial Center: Lessons Learned From 35-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Modern orthognathic surgery (OGS) was established on the basis of contributions from multidisciplinary centers worldwide. This study reports the history and evolution of OGS at the Chang Gung Craniofacial Center (CGCC) and identifies the lessons learned from 35 years of experience. METHODS: The total number of OGS procedures managed by the CGCC multidisciplinary team between 1981 and 2016 was determined. The database of the senior author (Y.-R.C.) was reviewed for consecutive OGS procedures performed between 2003 and 2016. A literature review was also performed to retrieve the contributions from the total CGCC team. RESULTS: The 35 years of experience at a single center and 13-year experience of a single surgeon corresponded to 8073 and 2883 OGS procedures, respectively. Moreover, 53 peer-reviewed articles were reviewed. Teamwork (plastic surgeons, orthodontists, and anesthetists) ensured an optimal balance between occlusion functional and facial aesthetic outcomes, with patient safety ensured and a minimum of OGS-related complications. Progression from the conventional orthodontics-first approach to the surgery-first OGS approach decreased the overall treatment time. Transition from 1-jaw to 2-jaw surgery enabled more consistent aesthetic outcomes to be achieved. Conversion from the 2-splint to the single-splint technique enabled development of a more precise tridimensional simulation plan and surgical execution, including in challenging scenarios such as malocclusion associated with facial asymmetry. Clockwise pitch rotation of the maxillomandibular complex has been designed for facial aesthetic purposes in class III malocclusion, whereas counterclockwise pitch rotation of the maxillomandibular complex improves airway function in those with sleep apnea. CONCLUSIONS: The lessons learned from experience and outcome-based articles reveal that OGS has successfully evolved at the CGCC, with a balance being achieved between functional and aesthetic outcomes and effective decreases in the burden of care (ie, morbidity, complications, and treatment time).

Simultaneous Surgical Correction of Skeletal Class III Dentofacial Deformity During Acute Management of Facial Fractures: Patient Selection and Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND: Mandibular prognathism is a common dentofacial deformity in Asia. Treatment of such condition may vary from orthodontic camouflage to surgical orthodontics with orthognathic surgery depending on the severity of the condition. Because of the prominent position of the mandible, fractures involving different locations of the mandible commonly occur in maxillofacial trauma. Anatomical reduction of maxillofacial fractures and restoration of the pretraumatic occlusion are the primary goals of acute management of facial fractures. In patients with dentofacial deformity, simultaneous surgical correction of their malocclusion and improvement of their facial aesthetics while providing open treatment to the maxillofacial fractures are rarely reported in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reported 3 cases with combined open reduction and internal fixation and surgery-first orthognathic surgery principles to correct class III malocclusion with mandibular prognathism during acute management of maxillofacial fractures. Computer-assisted surgical simulation was used in surgical planning and fabrication of surgical splint. RESULTS: Two patients underwent mandibular osteotomies in addition to open reduction and internal fixation of maxillofacial fractures. One patient had both maxillary and mandibular osteotomies during facial fracture repair. Class I occlusion with satisfactory facial profile was achieved in all 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Careful patient selection with presurgical planning using computer-assisted surgical simulation is essential in achieving successful outcomes in correcting dentofacial deformities while managing maxillofacial fractures. This combined technique is a viable option in the surgical management of facial fractures in patients with dentofacial deformities.