ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Interest is growing in immediately loading definitive implant-supported prostheses. However, it appears that implant protocols are evolving faster than their scientific validation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify the current trends, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a specific clinical loading scenario (type A), where a single definitive implant-retained restoration is delivered within 3 days. The focus question was "In partially edentulous patients requiring an implant-retained prosthesis (population), is immediate loading with a definitive restoration (concept) a viable treatment option (context)?" MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Two authors independently reviewed the studies, screened titles and abstracts, and performed full-text analysis. Cross-reference checks within the bibliography of included studies, relevant reviews, and guideline were conducted. Bibliometric information and study details were extracted. RESULTS: The search identified 2568 titles after removing duplicates. Four studies involving 91 participant and 100 implant-retained restorations were included in this scoping review. The selected articles were a randomized controlled trial (RCT), a prospective clinical study, and the remaining 2 were case series. The follow-up periods investigated ranged from 6 to 26 months. All studies evaluated marginal bone loss as a primary outcome, and only 1 implant failure was reported. Patient-reported outcome measures were favorable, and no major biological or technical complications were reported in any study. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate loading with a definitive restoration within 3 days appears to be a suitable approach in specific clinical situations.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the survival rates of restorations utilizing titanium base abutments (TBA) for restoring single-unit implant prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The focus question was: In patients who require the restoration of a single dental implant utilizing a titanium base abutment, what are the determining factors and outcomes relating to implant prosthesis prognosis and survival? A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) was conducted on 16 April 2023 and updated on 5 May 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), retrospective studies and prospective studies, reporting on the use of TBA for single implant prostheses, were reviewed. A Cochrane collaboration risk of bias assessment analysis was performed for randomized clinical studies, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool was applied for non-randomized studies. A meta-analysis was performed on clinical trials reporting on survival rates of both TBA and other abutments. Other clinical studies, reporting on TBA only, were included for descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The search provided 1159 titles after duplicates were removed. Six RCTs were included to perform a meta-analysis and compare the survival of the TBA to other abutments [OR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.21-2.63, heterogeneity; I2 0%; p = .99]. Twenty-three prospective and retrospective studies fulfilled the criteria and were included in the meta-analysis after 12 months of function. A total of 857 single implant-supported prostheses fabricated with a TBA were included. TBA abutments have an estimate 98.6% survival rate after 1 year in function (95% CI: 97.9%-99.4%). The mean follow-up period was 31.2 ± 16.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Single implant prosthesis restored with titanium base abutments showed favourable short-term survival rates.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Titanium , Humans , Databases, FactualABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess radiographic, clinical and patient-reported outcomes of single zirconia implant-supported crowns on titanium base abutments (TBA) over a 7.5-year period. METHODS: Twenty-four patients received bone-level titanium implants and screw-retained zirconia implant crowns utilising TBA. Marginal bone level (MBL), clinical parameters (probing depth-PD, bleeding on probing-BoP, plaque control record-PCR), technical complications (USPHS criteria) and patient satisfaction were assessed at crown delivery (baseline), 1 year (FU-1) and at 7.5 years (FU-7.5) of follow-up. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were available for re-examination at 7.5 years. The mean MBL at FU-7.5 (0.35 ± 0.20mm) did not significantly change compared to baseline (0.54 ± 0.39, p=.352) and to FU-1 (0.54 ± 0.45mm, p=0.524). From baseline to 7.5 years, the mean PD increased significantly, from 3.0 ± 0.6mm to 3.7 ± 0.8mm (p=0.005). However, BoP and PCR did not significantly change; (BOP: from 27.1 ± 20.7% to 25.0 ± 20.0%, p=0.498; PCR: from 11.1 ± 21.2% to 25.0 ± 25.1%, p=0.100). Nine patients presented with more than one bleeding site. This denoted a peri-implant mucositis prevalence of 50%, whilst none of the implants presented peri-implantitis. One incidence of minor and major ceramic chipping were reported on 2 out of the 18 crowns, resulting in a prosthetic survival rate of 94.4%. Seventeen patients were highly satisfied with their result. CONCLUSION: Single implant-supported zirconia crowns on TBA displayed: (i) minor number of technical complications, (ii) high prosthetic survival rate, (iii) stable marginal bone level and (iv) high patient satisfaction at 7.5 years. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Titanium base abutments despite their high use in clinical practice, lacked medium- and long-term studies. The presented findings highlight their clinical performance at 7.5 years as they display satisfying radiographic, clinical and patient-related outcomes. TBA appear to be a suitable abutment choice for medium-term implant-supported restorations.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this laboratory study is to evaluate the application of a pre-sintered surface augmentation to zirconia (Zir) and lithium disilicate (LDS) ceramics on the delamination strength of adhesive resin cement. The applied surface augmentation was the ruling of lines to the pre-sintered surface of the ceramics. METHODS: Ninety milled Zir and sixty pressed LDS specimens (3mm×0.5mm×25mm) were created and divided into five groups (n=30). Group 1: Zir no surface treatment (control Zir-NT); Group 2: Zir airborne particle abraded (Zir-APA) with 30µm CoJet; Group 3: Zir pre-sintered surface augmentation (Zir-SA); Group 4: LDS etched (control LDS-etched) and; Group 5: LDS with pre-sintered surface augmentation and etching (LDS-SA). A resin adhesive cement (3mm×1mm×8mm) was then applied and cured to the ceramic specimens. The delamination strength values of the resin cement from the ceramic were recorded. The delamination strength data were analysed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Turkey post hoc analysis. RESULTS: The mean delamination strength and standard deviation, when comparing only the Zir-SA to the resin cement were statistically different (p<0.001); Zir-SA 63.42±11.85, Zir-NT 26.82±12.07, and Zir-APA 48.11±17.85MPa. Comparison between LDS groups were not significantly different (p=0.193); LDS-etched 33.49±16.07 and LDS-SA 28.83±10.15MPa. The delaminated Weibull modulus was highest for surface augmentation Zir specimens (m=13.56) but decreasing to less than half for Zir-APA (m=6.27) and Zir-NT (m=5.68). The Weibull values for the LDS-SA and LDS-etched specimens was 5.63 and 3.38 respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: Incorporating the pre-sintered surface augmentation to zirconia improved the delamination strength and reliability of Zir to the resin cement but not for LDS.