Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 87(3): 573-581, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35551965

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is variation in the outcomes reported in clinical studies of basal cell carcinoma. This can prevent effective meta-analyses from answering important clinical questions. OBJECTIVE: To identify a recommended minimum set of core outcomes for basal cell carcinoma clinical trials. METHODS: Patient and professional Delphi process to cull a long list, culminating in a consensus meeting. To be provisionally accepted, outcomes needed to be deemed important (score, 7-9, with 9 being the maximum) by 70% of each stakeholder group. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five candidate outcomes identified via a systematic literature review and survey of key stakeholders were reduced to 74 that were rated by 100 health care professionals and patients in 2 Delphi rounds. Twenty-seven outcomes were provisionally accepted. The final core set of 5 agreed-upon outcomes after the consensus meeting included complete response; persistent or serious adverse events; recurrence-free survival; quality of life; and patient satisfaction, including cosmetic outcome. LIMITATIONS: English-speaking patients and professionals rated outcomes extracted from English language studies. CONCLUSION: A core outcome set for basal cell carcinoma has been developed. The use of relevant measures may improve the utility of clinical research and the quality of therapeutic guidance available to clinicians.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/therapy , Delphi Technique , Humans , Quality of Life , Research Design , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Lasers Med Sci ; 34(4): 703-709, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30280300

ABSTRACT

Non-invasive skin-tightening devices can induce thermal denaturation and skin shrinkage via externally applied radiofrequency emissions or high-frequency ultrasound. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and test a method for measurement of skin reduction associated with application of such energy devices. Twenty-five healthy participants with mild to moderate skin laxity of the arms were enrolled. Pinpoint microtattoos were placed at each of the treatment sites to delineate two 6 × 12 cm rectangles per subject. A non-stretchable filament, tape and marking pen apparatus was used to measure the size of each rectangle before treatment and at follow-up visit by two blinded investigators. After randomization, one side received a single pass with a radiofrequency device (6.78 MHz), while the contralateral side received multiple passes. Participants underwent two treatment sessions to each side 2 weeks apart, and returned for follow-up 4 weeks after the second treatment. Length and area measurement were analyzed to assess precision and accuracy of measurements and to compare efficacy of treatment between pre- and post-treatment. Concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) demonstrated substantial inter-investigator reliability and precision in length measurements (CCC, 0.94 to 0.98 in pre-treatment; 0.95 to 0.98 in post-treatment). Measurements at the 6-week post-treatment follow-up demonstrated a statistically significant skin reduction in all six of the measured parameters. A simple skin measurement method requiring minimal instrumentation can quantitatively evaluate skin shrinkage associated with non-invasive skin-tightening devices.


Subject(s)
Skin Aging/pathology , Skin/pathology , Tattooing , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Radio Waves , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 79(2): 320-326, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29698710

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive fat removal is preferred because of decreased downtime and lower perceived risk. It is important to seek new noninvasive fat removal treatments that are both safe and efficacious. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which carboxytherapy, which is the insufflation of carbon dioxide gas into subcutaneous fat, results in reduction of fat volume. METHODS: In this randomized, sham-controlled, split-body study, adults (body mass index, 22-29 kg/m2) were randomized to receive 5 weekly infusions of 1000 cm3 of CO2 to 1 side of the abdomen, and 5 sham treatments to the contralateral side. The primary outcome measures were ultrasound measurement of fat layer thickness and total circumference before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 16 participants completed the study. Ultrasound measurement indicated less fat volume on the side treated with carboxytherapy 1 week after the last treatment (P = .011), but the lower fat volume was not maintained at 28 weeks. Total circumference decreased nominally but not significantly at week 5 compared with baseline (P = .0697). Participant body weights did not change over the entire course of the study (P = 1.00). LIMITATIONS: Limitations included modest sample size and some sources of error in the measurement of circumference and fat layer. CONCLUSION: Carboxytherapy provides a transient decrease in subcutaneous fat that may not persist. Treatment is well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Body Contouring/methods , Carbon Dioxide/therapeutic use , Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal/drug effects , Adiposity , Adult , Carbon Dioxide/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Insufflation , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Treatment Failure , Ultrasonography
4.
Dermatol Surg ; 44(1): 106-114, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28930790

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lighting is an important component of consistent, high-quality dermatologic photography. There are different types of lighting solutions available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate currently available lighting equipment and methods suitable for procedural dermatology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overhead lighting, built-in camera flashes, external flash units, studio strobes, and light-emitting diode (LED) light panels were evaluated with regard to their utility for dermatologic surgeons. A set of ideal lighting characteristics was used to examine the capabilities and limitations of each type of lighting solution. Recommendations regarding lighting solutions and optimal usage configurations were made in terms of the context of the clinical environment and the purpose of the image. RESULTS: Overhead lighting may be a convenient option for general documentation. An on-camera lighting solution using a built-in camera flash or a camera-mounted external flash unit provides portability and consistent lighting with minimal training. An off-camera lighting solution with studio strobes, external flash units, or LED light panels provides versatility and even lighting with minimal shadows and glare. CONCLUSION: The selection of an optimal lighting solution is contingent on practical considerations and the purpose of the image.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Lighting , Photography/methods , Documentation/methods , Humans
7.
Dermatol Surg ; 43(8): 1076-1086, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28362672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photographs are an essential tool for the documentation and sharing of findings in dermatologic surgery, and various camera types are available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the currently available camera types in view of the special functional needs of procedural dermatologists. METHODS: Mobile phone, point and shoot, digital single-lens reflex (DSLR), digital medium format, and 3-dimensional cameras were compared in terms of their usefulness for dermatologic surgeons. For each camera type, the image quality, as well as the other practical benefits and limitations, were evaluated with reference to a set of ideal camera characteristics. Based on these assessments, recommendations were made regarding the specific clinical circumstances in which each camera type would likely be most useful. RESULTS: Mobile photography may be adequate when ease of use, availability, and accessibility are prioritized. Point and shoot cameras and DSLR cameras provide sufficient resolution for a range of clinical circumstances, while providing the added benefit of portability. Digital medium format cameras offer the highest image quality, with accurate color rendition and greater color depth. Three-dimensional imaging may be optimal for the definition of skin contour. CONCLUSION: The selection of an optimal camera depends on the context in which it will be used.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Photography/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Photography/methods
8.
Br J Neurosurg ; 29(3): 371-3, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25620087

ABSTRACT

Stereoscopic three-dimensional (3D) imaging can present more information to the viewer and further enhance the learning experience over traditional two-dimensional (2D) video. Most 3D surgical videos are recorded from the operating microscope and only feature the crux, or the most important part of the surgery, leaving out other crucial parts of surgery including the opening, approach, and closing of the surgical site. In addition, many other surgeries including complex spine, trauma, and intensive care unit procedures are also rarely recorded. We describe and share our experience with a commercially available head-mounted stereoscopic 3D camera system to obtain stereoscopic 3D recordings of these seldom recorded aspects of neurosurgery. The strengths and limitations of using the GoPro(®) 3D system as a head-mounted stereoscopic 3D camera system in the operating room are reviewed in detail. Over the past several years, we have recorded in stereoscopic 3D over 50 cranial and spinal surgeries and created a library for education purposes. We have found the head-mounted stereoscopic 3D camera system to be a valuable asset to supplement 3D footage from a 3D microscope. We expect that these comprehensive 3D surgical videos will become an important facet of resident education and ultimately lead to improved patient care.


Subject(s)
Head , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Neurosurgery , Neurosurgical Procedures , Video Recording/instrumentation , Humans , Neurosurgery/education , Neurosurgery/instrumentation , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods
10.
Cureus ; 10(4): e2459, 2018 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29888163

ABSTRACT

Traditional still cameras can only focus on a single plane for each image while rendering everything outside of that plane out of focus. However, new light-field imaging technology makes it possible to adjust the focus plane after an image has already been captured. This technology allows the viewer to interactively explore an image with objects and anatomy at varying depths and clearly focus on any feature of interest by selecting that location during post-capture viewing. These images with adjustable focus can serve as valuable educational tools for neurosurgical residents. We explore the utility of light-field cameras and review their strengths and limitations compared to other conventional types of imaging. The strength of light-field images is the adjustable focus, as opposed to the fixed-focus of traditional photography and video. A light-field image also is interactive by nature, as it requires the viewer to select the plane of focus and helps with visualizing the three-dimensional anatomy of an image. Limitations include the relatively low resolution of light-field images compared to traditional photography and video. Although light-field imaging is still in its infancy, there are several potential uses for the technology to complement traditional still photography and videography in neurosurgical education.

11.
Trials ; 18(1): 490, 2017 Oct 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29061190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma is the most common skin cancer worldwide. Treatment options include both surgical and topical modalities. Although risk of metastasis is low, basal cell carcinoma can be invasive and infiltrate important underlying structures such as bone or cartilage. While many clinical trials examining therapies for basal cell carcinoma exist, the lack of consensus in outcome reporting across all trials poses a concern. Proper evaluation and comparison of treatment modalities is challenging. In order to address the inconsistencies present, this project aims to determine a core set of outcomes which should be evaluated in all clinical trials of basal cell carcinoma. METHODS/DESIGN: Outcomes will be extracted over four phases: (1) a systematic literature review, (2) patient interviews, (3) other published sources, and (4) stakeholder involvement. Potential outcomes will then be examined by the Steering Committee, who may add or remove outcomes. The Delphi process will then be performed to condense the list of outcomes generated. Two rounds of Delphi surveys will be performed with two groups of participants - physicians and patients. A consensus meeting with relevant stakeholders will be conducted after the Delphi exercise to further select outcomes, taking into account participant scores. By the end of the meeting, members will vote and decide on a final recommended set of core outcomes. For the duration of the study, we will be in collaboration with both the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Cochrane Skin Group - Core Outcome Set Initiative (CSG-COUSIN). DISCUSSION: This study aims to develop a core outcome set to guide assessment in clinical trials on basal cell carcinoma. The end-goal is to improve the consistency of outcome reporting and allow proper evaluation of treatment effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Endpoint Determination , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Research Design , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/secondary , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Patient Participation , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Stakeholder Participation , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome
12.
Trials ; 18(1): 321, 2017 07 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28701207

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a common skin cancer that poses a risk of metastasis. Clinical investigations into SCC treatment are common, but the outcomes reported are highly variable, omitted, or clinically irrelevant. The outcome heterogeneity and reporting bias of these studies leave clinicians unable to accurately compare studies. Core outcome sets (COSs) are an agreed minimum set of outcomes recommended to be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a given condition or disease. Although COSs are under development for several dermatologic conditions, work has yet to be done to identify core outcomes specific for SCC. METHODS/DESIGN: Outcome extraction for COS generation will occur via four methods: (1) systematic literature review; (2) patient interviews; (3) other published sources; and (4) input from stakeholders in medicine, pharmacy, and other relevant industries. The list of outcomes will be revaluated by the Measuring PRiority Outcome Variables via Excellence in Dermatologic surgery (IMPROVED) Steering Committee. Delphi processes will be performed separately by expert clinicians and patients to condense the list of outcomes generated. A consensus meeting with relevant stakeholders will be conducted after the Delphi exercise to further select outcomes, taking into account participant scores. At the end of the meeting, members will vote and decide on a final recommended set of core outcomes. The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) organization and the Cochrane Skin Group - Core Outcome Set Initiative (CSG-COUSIN) will serve as advisers throughout the COS generation process. DISCUSSION: Comparison of clinical trials via systematic reviews and meta-analyses is facilitated when investigators study outcomes that are relevant and similar. The aim of this project is to develop a COS to guide use for future clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Delphi Technique , Endpoint Determination/standards , Research Design/standards , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Consensus , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome
13.
Trials ; 18(1): 359, 2017 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28764734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Facial aging is a concern for many patients. Wrinkles, loss of volume, and discoloration are common physical manifestations of aging skin. Genetic heritage, prior ultraviolet light exposure, and Fitzpatrick skin type may be associated with the rate and type of facial aging. Although many clinical trials assess the correlates of skin aging, there is heterogeneity in the outcomes assessed, which limits the quality of evaluation and comparison of treatment modalities. To address the inconsistency in outcomes, in this project we will develop a core set of outcomes that are to be evaluated in all clinical trials relevant to facial aging. METHODS/DESIGN: A long list of measureable outcomes will be created from four sources: (1) systematic medical literature review, (2) patient interviews, (3) other published sources, and (4) stakeholder involvement. Two rounds of Delphi processes with homogeneous groups of physicians and patients will be performed to prioritize and condense the list. At a consensus meeting attended by physicians, patients, and stakeholders, outcomes will be further condensed on the basis of participant scores. By the end of the meeting, members will vote and decide on a final recommended set of core outcomes. Subsequent to this, specific measures will be selected or created to assess these outcomes. DISCUSSION: The aim of this study is to develop a core outcome set and relevant measures for clinical trials relevant to facial aging. We hope to improve the reliability and consistency of outcome reporting of skin aging, thereby enabling improved evaluation of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative, accessible at http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/737 . Core Outcomes Set Initiative, (CSG-COUSIN) accessible at https://www.uniklinikum-dresden.de/de/das-klinikum/universitaetscentren/zegv/cousin/meet-the-teams/project-groups/core-outcome-set-for-the-appearance-of-facial-aging . Protocol version date is 28 July 2016.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Cosmetic Techniques , Delphi Technique , Endpoint Determination , Face , Rejuvenation , Skin Aging , Age Factors , Consensus , Humans , Patient Outcome Assessment , Research Design , Stakeholder Participation , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Biomol Screen ; 17(8): 1071-9, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22693105

ABSTRACT

Public databases that store the data from small-molecule screens are a rich and untapped resource of chemical and biological information. However, screening databases are unorganized, which makes interpreting their data difficult. We propose a method of inferring workflow graphs--which encode the relationships between assays in screening projects--directly from screening data and using these workflows to organize each project's data. On the basis of four heuristics regarding the organization of screening projects, we designed an algorithm that extracts a project's workflow graph from screening data. Where possible, the algorithm is evaluated by comparing each project's inferred workflow to its documentation. In the majority of cases, there are no discrepancies between the two. Most errors can be traced to points in the project where screeners chose additional molecules to test based on structural similarity to promising molecules, a case our algorithm is not yet capable of handling. Nonetheless, these workflows accurately organize most of the data and also provide a method of visualizing a screening project. This method is robust enough to build a workflow-oriented front-end to PubChem and is currently being used regularly by both our lab and our collaborators. A Python implementation of the algorithm is available online, and a searchable database of all PubChem workflows is available at http://swami.wustl.edu/flow.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Data Mining/methods , Databases, Chemical , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Computational Biology , Computer Graphics , Database Management Systems , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Molecular Structure , Small Molecule Libraries/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL