Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(3): 544-550, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Existing criteria to improve the probability of capturing dermatomyositis (DM) include muscle biopsy but little is known about whether less invasive diagnostic procedures may be just as useful. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether skin biopsy, electromyography, or magnetic resonance imaging of the involved muscle could be done in lieu of muscle biopsy. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-five patients were reviewed to investigate the presence of cutaneous and muscle disease, their timing in relation to diagnosis, and results of skin biopsies, muscle biopsies, magnetic resonance imaging, and electromyography. RESULTS: Of the cases with findings consistent with DM on muscle biopsy, 65% were in agreement with diagnostic features on electromyography or magnetic resonance imaging. Results of skin and muscle biopsies supported DM in 67% of patients who underwent both procedures. LIMITATIONS: A limited number of patients had muscle biopsies. CONCLUSION: In the presence of DM-specific skin findings, less invasive procedures may be sufficient to diagnose DM and guide its management.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Dermatology , Dermatomyositis , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Biopsy , Dermatomyositis/diagnosis , Dermatomyositis/pathology , Humans , Muscles/pathology
2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(4): 1051-1058, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553683

ABSTRACT

The use of herbal supplements that promise to improve immune health has gained popularity among dermatology patients. However, there is little to no evidence that herbal supplements improve dermatologic conditions. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that Spirulina platensis, Aphanizomenon flos-aqua, Chlorella, Echinacea, and alfalfa activate immune cells via certain cytokines and chemokines. Case reports suggest the association of ingesting immunostimulatory herbs and the clinical onset or flares of diseases characterized by an exaggerated immune response such as lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and autoimmune blistering disorders. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the prevalence of herbal supplement use in this patient population. In addition, in vitro studies should examine the underlying mechanisms by which herbs stimulate immune pathways that are already overactive in autoimmune patients.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Autoimmune Diseases/chemically induced , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Animals , Aphanizomenon , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Autoimmune Diseases/physiopathology , Chlorella , Cytokines/metabolism , Disease Progression , Echinacea/adverse effects , Humans , Medicago sativa/adverse effects , Skin Diseases/immunology , Skin Diseases/physiopathology , Spirulina
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(6): 1562-1567, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682879

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outcome measures of clinical trials in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) should reflect clinically meaningful improvement in disease activity, as measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index activity score (CLASI-A). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define the degree of improvement in disease activity meaningful to a patient's quality of life. METHODS: The change in the CLASI-A in 126 patients needed to predict meaningful change in QoL, as defined by the Emotions and Symptoms subscales of the Skindex-29, was evaluated by linear regression models. RESULTS: In patients with an initial CLASI-A of ≥8, a 42.1% or ≥7-point and a 31.0% or ≥5-point decrease in CLASI-A predicts meaningful improvement in the Emotions and the Symptoms subscales, respectively. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data at a single site. CONCLUSIONS: A CLASI-A score of ≥8 for trial entry allows for inclusion of patients with milder disease where CLASI-A improvement by ≥50% is clinically significant and meaningful.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/psychology , Male , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 78(4): 769-775.e2, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102487

ABSTRACT

Mechanic's hands is a poorly defined clinical finding that has been reported in a variety of rheumatologic diseases. Morphologic descriptions include hyperkeratosis on the sides of the digits that sometimes extends to the distal tips, diffuse palmar scale, and (more recently observed) linear discrete scaly papules in a similar lateral distribution. The association of mechanic's hands with dermatomyositis, although recognized, is still debatable. In this review, most studies have shown that mechanic's hands is commonly associated with dermatomyositis and displays histopathologic findings of interface dermatitis, colloid bodies, and interstitial mucin, which are consistent with a cutaneous connective tissue disease. A more specific definition of this entity would help to determine its usefulness in classifying and clinically identifying patients with dermatomyositis, with implications related to subsequent screening for associated comorbidities in this setting.


Subject(s)
Dermatomyositis/pathology , Hand Dermatoses/pathology , Dermatomyositis/complications , Hand Dermatoses/complications , Humans , Rheumatic Diseases/complications
11.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 315(8): 2431-2435, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37061989

ABSTRACT

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by distinctive cutaneous manifestations, often accompanied by muscle inflammation and interstitial lung disease. DM has a significant impact on quality of life (QoL) in patients, due to the physical and emotional symptoms caused by their disease. Despite this known emotional impact, there is no published literature capturing how adults with DM feel about their disease, from their perspective. We seek to better understand how cutaneous DM impacts patients in their daily lives. Seventeen patients with cutaneous DM presenting to an autoimmune dermatology clinic were interviewed about how their cutaneous findings have impacted their life. Patients were asked three questions: what troubles you the most about your cutaneous/skin DM, how much bother does the skin DM cause, and what about your skin disease most impacts your daily life. Responses were scribed by a second researcher. Themes and subthemes from the interviews were generated. Of 17 patients, 17 (100%) were female, 7 (41%) had amyopathic DM, median age was 65 years (IQR 48-68), and median Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) activity score was 12 (IQR 6-17.5) at the time of interview. Seven themes emerged. Most reported physical signs included: itchiness (n = 10, 59%) and physical pain/uncomfortableness (n = 6, 35%). Our study demonstrates that patients are burdened by the physical, emotional and social aspects of their disease, and struggle to manage it. This better understanding of how patients feel will help guide management and allow clinicians to address patient needs. Additionally, these insights may help in the development of QoL tools that address the concerns of patients with severe and chronic skin conditions, like DM.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Dermatomyositis , Adult , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Dermatomyositis/complications , Quality of Life , Skin , Chronic Disease
12.
Front Immunol ; 13: 899526, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35693768

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccination against COVID-19 reduces the risk of severe COVID-19 disease and death. However, few studies have examined the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with autoimmune skin disease. Objectives: We sought to determine the incidence of disease exacerbation in this population following COVID-19 vaccination as well as the associated factors. Methods: We performed a chart review of all patients seen in the autoimmune skin disease clinic of the principal investigator during the study period. All patients included for analysis were systematically and prospectively asked about COVID-19 vaccination status, manufacturers, vaccine dates, autoimmune symptoms after the vaccine, and timing of symptom onset using a standardized template as part of their visit. Demographics and autoimmune disease diagnosis were also collected. Analysis used Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: 402 subjects were included for analysis. 85.6% of patients were fully vaccinated, with 12.9% unvaccinated and 1.5% partially vaccinated. 14.8% of fully vaccinated patients reported worsening autoimmune signs and symptoms after the vaccine. Fully vaccinated dermatomyositis patients were more likely to report worsening autoimmune signs and symptoms after the vaccine (22.7%) than fully vaccinated lupus erythematosus patients (8.6%) (p=0.009). Patients fully vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine trended towards an increased likelihood of reporting worsening autoimmune signs and symptoms after the vaccine (19.1%) than those with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (12.0%) (p=0.076). Of the patients who had autoimmune symptoms after vaccination, 20% had symptoms after the 1st dose, 82% after the 2nd dose, and 4% after the 3rd dose with median onset (95% confidence interval) of 7 (2,14), 14 (14,21), and 18 (7,28) days later, respectively. Conclusions: More fully vaccinated dermatomyositis patients had exacerbation of autoimmune signs and symptoms after the vaccine than fully vaccinated lupus erythematosus patients. However, given the risks of COVID-19, clinicians should still promote vaccination in most patients with autoimmune skin disease.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 , Dermatomyositis , Vaccines , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Autoimmune Diseases/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Humans , Vaccination/adverse effects
13.
J Invest Dermatol ; 142(10): 2651-2659.e1, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35490744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for skin disease in dermatomyositis. Lenabasum is a cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist that triggers the resolution of inflammation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenabasum in patients with refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis. DESIGN: This study was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study conducted from July 2015 to August 2017. POPULATION: The population included subjects aged ≥18 years with at least moderately active dermatomyositis skin activity by Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity ≥ 14 and failure or intolerance to hydroxychloroquine. INTERVENTION: Participants received 20 mg lenabasum daily for 28 days and then 20 mg twice per day for 56 days or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was a change in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity. Safety and other secondary efficacy assessments were performed till day 113. RESULTS: A total of 22 subjects were randomized to lenabasum (n = 11) or placebo (n = 11). No serious or severe adverse events were related to lenabasum, and no participants discontinued the study. The adjusted least-squares mean for Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity decreased more for lenabasum, and the difference was significant on day 113 (least-squares mean [standard error] difference = ‒6.5 [3.1], P = 0.038). Numerically greater improvements were seen in multiple secondary efficacy outcomes and biomarkers with lenabasum. CONCLUSION: Lenabasum treatment was well tolerated and was associated with greater improvement in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity and multiple efficacy outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02466243.


Subject(s)
Dermatomyositis , Hydroxychloroquine , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers , Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Dermatomyositis/diagnosis , Dermatomyositis/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Dronabinol/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Receptors, Cannabinoid , Treatment Outcome
14.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 24(1): 12, 2022 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34983619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lenabasum is a cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2R) reverse agonist that demonstrates anti-inflammatory effects in vivo and in vitro in dermatomyositis (DM) and is currently being investigated for therapeutic potential. The purpose of our study is to investigate CB2R distribution as well as the effects of lenabasum in DM. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry staining (IHC) was utilized to examine immune cell and cytokine production changes in lesional DM skin biopsies from lenabasum and placebo-treated patients. CB2R expression in various immune cell populations within DM skin was investigated with image mass cytometry (IMC), whereas flow cytometry elucidated CB2R expression in DM peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as well as cytokine production by CB2R-expressing cell populations. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of lenabasum treatment, IHC staining showed that CD4+ T cells, CB2R, IL-31, IFN-γ, and IFN-ß cytokines were downregulated. IFN-γ and IFN-ß mRNA decreased in lesional DM skin but not in PBMCs. IMC findings revealed that CB2R was upregulated in DM lesional skin compared to HC skin and DM PBMCs (p<0.05). In DM skin, CB2R was upregulated on dendritic cells, B cells, T cells, and macrophages while dendritic cells had the greatest expression in both DM skin and PBMCs (p<0.05). These CB2R+ cells in the skin produce IL-31, IL-4, IFN-γ, and IFN-ß. CONCLUSION: Our findings of differential CB2R expression based on location and cell type suggest modes by which lenabasum may exert anti-inflammatory effects in DM and highlights dendritic cells as potential therapeutic targets.


Subject(s)
Dermatomyositis , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Dermatomyositis/pathology , Dronabinol/analogs & derivatives , Dronabinol/metabolism , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , Receptors, Cannabinoid/metabolism , Receptors, Cannabinoid/therapeutic use
15.
Ann Transl Med ; 9(5): 431, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33842652

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) can present with or without features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with estimates of the incidence of isolated skin disease almost equaling the incidence of those with systemic disease. However, despite the impact CLE has on a patient's quality of life (QoL), there has been no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved treatment for the disease in the past 50 years. In addition, patients with skin predominant LE are often excluded from clinical SLE trials. In the rare trials that include patients with skin predominant LE, disease activity and progression in the skin are often difficult to evaluate using multi-organ outcome measures. The need for new therapies for CLE and the lack of focus on skin outcomes has led to the development of the Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI), a validated organ-specific outcome measure that is not only responsive to change in disease activity and damage but also correlated to changes in a patient's QoL. This paper will emphasize the extensive validation studies performed in developing the CLASI, as well as the importance of clinical trials using the CLASI to address the need for improved therapies for patients with lupus skin manifestations.

16.
Lupus Sci Med ; 8(1)2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452954

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a need to identify concerns unique to patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), which may not be captured by current common-practice dermatological quality-of-life tools. This study formally characterises what bothers patients with CLE about their disease by conducting semistructured, qualitative interviews. METHODS: Sixteen patients with CLE were interviewed about how their cutaneous findings impact their daily life. Each interview was transcribed, coded and categorised for recurrent themes. Current CLE activity and damage were also assessed by the Cutaneous Lupus Activity and Severity Index tool. RESULTS: Responses were categorised into six themes, including Fear of Disease Progression, Unwanted Attention, Self-Consciousness, Physical Signs/Symptoms, Emotional Symptoms and Functional Decline. The most commonly reported themes were Self-Consciousness, mentioned by 13 of 16 (81.3%) patients, Physical Symptoms, mentioned by 12 of 16 (75%), and then Fear of Disease Progression, by 11 of 16 (68.8%). Frequently mentioned physical signs/symptoms included erythema, itch, dyspigmentation, scar and alopecia. The physical signs/symptoms were categorised as activity signs/symptoms, damage signs and other. For activity signs, erythema was mentioned most frequently (5 of 16), then scale (2 of 16). For activity symptoms, itch was mentioned most frequently (6 of 16), then pain (5 of 16). For damage signs, dyspigmentation was mentioned most frequently (4 of 16), followed by scarring (3 of 16). Patients less than 60 years old were more likely to report emotional symptoms than older patients (p<0.05), but there was no significant variation in frequency of reported themes between race, sex or subtype of CLE. CONCLUSIONS: These patient experiences and resultant themes elucidated by this study are worth noting in future standardised estimations of the quality of life of patients with CLE. Additionally, the concerns shown by these interviews are important topics for providers to discuss when evaluating patient disease progression.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous , Pigmentation Disorders , Cicatrix/pathology , Erythema , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Quality of Life
17.
J Invest Dermatol ; 141(12): 2858-2865.e4, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34126109

ABSTRACT

Pemphigus is a debilitating IgG-mediated autoimmune disease requiring better tolerated, more targeted, and rapid onset therapies. ALXN1830 is a humanized IgG4 antibody that blocks neonatal Fc receptor interactions with IgG. A multicenter, open-label safety and tolerability phase 1b/2 trial (NCT03075904) was conducted in North America from July 2017 to January 2019 and included patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of pemphigus (vulgaris or foliaceus) and active disease. Dosing included five weekly intravenous doses of ALXN1830 (10 mg/kg) and follow-up through day 112 (study termination). Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy, as evaluated by determining the change in the median pemphigus disease area index, were determined. In this pilot study of eight patients, five weekly infusions of ALXN1830 produced a rapid improvement in the pemphigus disease area index score within 14 days of the first dose. Pemphigus disease area index improvement increased further together with reductions in IgG, circulating immune complexes of IgG, and anti-desmoglein antibodies without affecting albumin, IgM, IgA, or C-reactive protein levels. ALXN1830 was well-tolerated, with headache as the most common adverse event. This study reveals the importance of neonatal Fc receptor in the biology of pemphigus and the potential for use of ALXN1830 in pemphigus treatment.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Pemphigus/drug therapy , Receptors, Fc/antagonists & inhibitors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Autoantibodies/blood , Chronic Disease , Female , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Pemphigus/immunology , Young Adult
18.
Lupus Sci Med ; 5(1): e000291, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30397497

ABSTRACT

Several patterns of hair loss can occur in lupus erythematosus (LE). Alopecias which show histological characteristics of LE are LE-specific, and include discoid LE (DLE), diffuse or patchy hair loss in acute LE, subacute cutaneous LE, and rarely tumid LE. Lupus hair in SLE is a poorly characterised entity and may be a form of telogen effluvium. Alopecia areata can coexist with LE and may mimic DLE. Non-lupus alopecias such as telogen effluvium and anagen effluvium have a myriad of causes which include disease flares, drugs and stress in the setting of LE. The latest validated Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for SLE includes non-scarring alopecia as a criterion; therefore, recognising the aetiology of hair loss in the setting of LE is crucial in classifying a patient to have systemic disease.

19.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 19(3): 391-403, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29392620

ABSTRACT

Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD), including pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and pemphigoid gestationis, pose significant therapeutic challenges, especially in pregnant and post-partum breastfeeding patients or those planning to conceive. Data on the safety and efficacy of therapeutic interventions during the perinatal period are lacking because randomized controlled trials are typically not performed in this setting. However, many of the treatments for AIBD are also used in other diseases, so data can be extrapolated from studies or case reports in these other patient populations. It appears that many of the treatments for AIBD can adversely affect the fetus or neonate, and alterations in immune status caused by pregnancy-associated hormonal changes can negatively impact disease control. This article summarizes and weighs the risks and benefits of the various agents used to treat AIBD during pregnancy. We also present the available information on lactation as well as effects on male fertility.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/therapy , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Oral , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Autoimmune Diseases/metabolism , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Immunosorbent Techniques/adverse effects , Incidence , Infertility, Male/chemically induced , Lactation/drug effects , Male , Paternal Exposure/adverse effects , Plasmapheresis/adverse effects , Plasmapheresis/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/metabolism , Prenatal Injuries/epidemiology , Prenatal Injuries/etiology , Risk Assessment , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/immunology , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL