Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
BMJ Mil Health ; 2023 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491135

ABSTRACT

Within the UK Armed Forces, musculoskeletal injuries account for over half of all medical downgrades and discharges. Data from other Armed Forces show that osteoarthritis (OA), more common in military personnel, is likely to contribute to this, both in its primary form and following injury (post-traumatic OA, PTOA), which typically presents in the third or fourth decade. OA is not a progressive 'wear and tear' disease, as previously thought, but a heterogenous condition with multiple aetiologies and modulators, including joint damage, abnormal morphology, altered biomechanics, genetics, low-grade inflammation and dysregulated metabolism. Currently, clinical diagnosis, based on symptomatic or radiological criteria, is followed by supportive measures, including education, exercise, analgesia, potentially surgical intervention, with a particular focus on exercise rehabilitation within the UK military. Developments in OA have led to a new paradigm of organ failure, with an emphasis on early diagnosis and risk stratification, prevention strategies (primary, secondary and tertiary) and improved aetiological classification using genotypes and phenotypes to guide management, with the introduction of biological markers (biomarkers) potentially having a role in all these areas. In the UK Armed Forces, there are multiple research studies focused on OA risk factors, epidemiology, biomarkers and effectiveness of different interventions. This review aims to highlight OA, especially PTOA, as an important diagnosis to consider in serving personnel, outline current and future management options, and detail current research trends within the Defence Medical Services.

2.
BMJ Mil Health ; 168(4): 308-313, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087538

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Correcting adverse biomechanics is key in rehabilitating musculoskeletal injuries. Verbal instruction remains the primary method for correcting biomechanics and therefore a patient's understanding of these instructions is believed to directly influence treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to establish the patients' perceptions of virtual reality-based gait education (VR-GEd) and to assess its influence on the standard military rehabilitation outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using routinely collected data was performed. Twenty patients with lower-limb musculoskeletal injuries undertook a VR-GEd session on the commencement of a 3-week, multidisciplinary, inpatient course of rehabilitation. Patient outcomes were compared with a group of matched controls, completing the same standardised course of inpatient treatment. RESULTS: The VR-GEd group exhibited greater reductions the interference pain had on their mood (p=0.022). Improvements in generalised anxiety (p=0.029) were greater in the VR-GEd group but were not large enough to be clinically meaningful. VR-GEd did not influence functional outcomes. Patients rated the sessions highly in terms of enjoyment and perceived value. Patient feedback highlighted that they understood their injury better and felt the session could positively influence their recovery. CONCLUSION: VR-GEd was proven to be an enjoyable and valued means of educating military inpatients about their injury mechanics. This study found no contraindications for the inclusion of VR-GEd in current rehabilitation programmes. However, current evidence suggests a single VR-GEd session cannot act as a replacement for biofeedback interventions, due to the lack of enhanced improvement across rehabilitation outcomes.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Virtual Reality , Gait , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
BMJ Mil Health ; 168(4): 279-285, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34417340

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Objective outcome measures that can quantify the force generating capacity of the lower limb are required to allow clinicians to accurately measure functional status and treatment adaptations over time. The aim of this prospective observational cohort study is to: (1) evaluate the acceptability of the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) test as a measure of functional strength with military personnel undergoing residential hip pain rehabilitation; (2) compare the peak force values recorded against the updated Army physical employment standards (PES) assessment criteria and (3) assess if the minimum PES required of military personnel has the potential to inform clinical decision making and return to duty criteria within UK Defence Rehabilitation. METHODS: Acceptability was assessed against patient's adherence to the testing procedures and test burden. Clinician acceptability was assessed against ease of administration and safety of test procedure. Hip pain was recorded before, immediately following and 1 hour after testing. Net peak force was recorded using portable force plates. RESULTS: Full patient and clinician acceptability to IMTP testing procedures were demonstrated. Minimal changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were demonstrated between baseline values at rest and follow-up. Despite being medically downgraded and functionally compromised due to chronic hip pain, 100% of patients met the PES expected on entry to the British Army and 79% met the PES expected at the end of basic training. CONCLUSION: The IMTP provides rehabilitation clinicians with an objective quantifiable measure of maximum muscle strength that can be used early in the rehabilitation care pathway. Based on our finding, it is unclear if the current British Army PES can be used as a criterion standard in Defence Rehabilitation. Therefore, further research focused on generating clinically relevant patient-specific IMTP score criteria, with a larger sample of diverse diagnostic sub-groups is required.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Thigh , Employment , Exercise Test/methods , Humans , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Pain , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom
4.
BMJ Mil Health ; 168(4): 266-272, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33619232

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hip and groin related pain is a common complaint among the military population across UK Defence Rehabilitation and addressing associated biomechanical dysfunction is a key treatment goal. Personnel are exposed to complex occupational loads, therefore assessing movement during demanding tasks may expose biomechanical deficits. Observing biomechanical and clinical outcomes in response to treatment is therefore an important consideration. The aims were to examine clinical and biomechanical outcomes prior to (T1) and 12 weeks post (T2) inpatient rehabilitation and explore the influence of pathological subgroup. METHODS: Prospective cohort study as part of a clinical service evaluation of 25 patients undergoing treatment for hip and groin related pain. Three-dimensional motion capture (3DM) during a single-leg squat, hip strength and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at T1 and T2. RESULTS: Increased abductor and external rotator strength with reductions in contralateral pelvic drop (1.9°; p=0.041) at T2 on the injured side. Pain reduced by 9.6 mm (p=0.017) but no differences were found for Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). No statistically significant differences were found between pathological subgroups. Kinematic profiles display variation between diagnostic subgroups and response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Strength and pain improved with treatment in this service evaluation although biomechanical adaptation and NAHS remain inconclusive. Small and uneven sample size prevents a firm conclusion regarding the effect of pathological subgroupings, however, the data can be considered hypothesis generating for future, larger studies to integrate 3DM for monitoring response to rehabilitation in pathological subgroups to support clinical decision making.


Subject(s)
Groin , Military Personnel , Hip Joint/physiology , Humans , Inpatients , Pain , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom
5.
BMJ Mil Health ; 168(4): 314-319, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087537

ABSTRACT

The use of strength and conditioning (S&C) in musculoskeletal rehabilitation has gained wide acceptance among the rehabilitation community. However, there is an absence of evidence demonstrating how to best integrate the principles of S&C into rehabilitation practice. This article discusses four broad themes: (1) an overview of the UK Defence Rehabilitation care pathway, (2) the historical and current approaches to physical training to support operational readiness of the British Armed Forces, (3) the current and future challenges of integrating S&C into Defence Rehabilitation practice and (4) research priorities relating to the use of S&C in Defence Rehabilitation. We detail the importance of strength/power-based physical attributes within our military population. We recommend that consideration be given to the benefits of an alternative education/coaching-based model to be used during the current 3-week residential care pathway, which aims to ensure effective implementation of therapeutic S&C over a longer period of care.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Resistance Training , Humans , United Kingdom
9.
J Strength Cond Res ; 15(4): 498-502, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11726263

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 6-week isokinetic training program on quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque (PT) and standing long-jump (SLJ) performance. Twelve untrained men (age 31.4 +/- 4.2 years, mean +/- SD) were tested at a velocity of 1.75 rad.s(-1) (100 degrees.s(-1)), before and after a 6-week control period and on completion of a 6-week training program. Training consisted of 3 sets of 10 repetitions, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. Repeated-measures analysis-of-variance analyses revealed that quadriceps PT increased, on average, by 10.5% as a result of training (p < 0.01). No significant changes in hamstrings PT (p = 0.062) and SLJ performance occurred as a result of training (p > 0.05). The major finding of this study was that PT gains subsequent to isokinetic resistance training did not influence functional performance. That open-chain training did not affect the performance of a closed-chain activity is unsurprising, but on these grounds of nonfunctionality, the use of moderate velocity isokinetic dynamometry in rehabilitation and performance assessment for closed-chain sports needs addressing in future research.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Physical Education and Training/methods , Sports/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Adult , Humans , Leg/physiology , Male , Program Evaluation , Time Factors , Torque
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL