Effects of left bundle branch block on echocardiographic coronary flow assessment: A systematic review.

This systematic review investigates the diagnostic and prognostic utility of coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment through echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), a condition known to complicate the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). The literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, was guided by PRISMA standards up to March 2024, and yielded six observational studies that met inclusion criteria. These studies involved a diverse population of patients with LBBB, employing echocardiographic protocols to clarify the impact of LBBB on coronary flow dynamics. The findings emphasize the importance of CFR in stratifying cardiovascular risk and guiding clinical decision-making in patients with LBBB. Pooled results reveal that patients with LBBB and significant left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis exhibited a marked decrease in stress-peak diastolic velocity (MD = -19.03 [-23.58; -14.48] cm/s; p < .0001) and CFR (MD = -.60 [-.71; -.50]; p < .0001), compared to those without significant LAD lesions, suggesting the efficacy of stress echocardiography CFR assessment in the identification of clinically significant CAD among the LBBB population. This review highlights the clinical relevance of echocardiography CFR assessment as a noninvasive tool for evaluating CAD and stratifying risk in the presence of LBBB and underscores the need for standardized protocols in CFR measurement.

Stress Echo 2030: the new ABCDE protocol defining the future of cardiac imaging.

Functional testing with stress echocardiography is based on the detection of regional wall motion abnormality with two-dimensional echocardiography and is embedded in clinical guidelines. Yet, it under-uses the unique versatility of the technique, ideally suited to describe the different functional abnormalities underlying the same wall motion response during stress. Five parameters converge conceptually and methodologically in the state-of-the-art ABCDE protocol, assessing multiple vulnerabilities of the ischemic patient. The five steps of the ABCDE protocol are (1) step A: regional wall motion; (2) step B: B-lines by lung ultrasound assessing extravascular lung water; (3) step C: left ventricular contractile reserve by volumetric two-dimensional echocardiography; (4) step D: coronary flow velocity reserve in mid-distal left anterior descending coronary with pulsed-wave Doppler; and (5) step E: assessment of heart rate reserve with a one-lead electrocardiogram. ABCDE stress echo offers insight into five functional reserves: epicardial flow (A); diastolic (B), contractile (C), coronary microcirculatory (D), and chronotropic reserve (E). The new format is more comprehensive and allows better functional characterization, risk stratification, and personalized tailoring of therapy. ABCDE protocol is an 'ecumenic' and 'omnivorous' functional test, suitable for all stresses and all patients also beyond coronary artery disease. It fits the need for sustainability of the current era in healthcare, since it requires universally available technology, and is low-cost, radiation-free, and nearly carbon-neutral.

Prognostic value of stress echocardiography assessed by the ABCDE protocol.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large scale, multicentre, international, effectiveness study. Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, electrocardiogram-based heart rate reserve. METHODS AND RESULTS: From July 2016 to November 2020, we enrolled 3574 all-comers (age 65 ± 11 years, 2070 males, 58%; ejection fraction 60 ± 10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes referred from 13 certified laboratories. All patients underwent clinically indicated ABCDE-SE. The employed stress modality was exercise (n = 952, with semi-supine bike, n = 887, or treadmill, n = 65 with adenosine for step D) or pharmacological stress (n = 2622, with vasodilator, n = 2151; or dobutamine, n = 471). SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only endpoint. Rate of abnormal results was 16% for A, 30% for B, 36% for C, 28% for D, and 37% for E steps. During a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range: 13-36), 73 deaths occurred. Global X2 was 49.5 considering clinical variables, 50.7 after step A only (P = NS (not significant)) and 80.6 after B-E steps (P < 0.001 vs. step A). Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% person-year for score 0 up to 2.7% person-year for score 5. CONCLUSION: ABCDE-SE allows an effective prediction of survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.

The obesity paradox in the stress echo lab: fat is better for hearts with ischemia or coronary microvascular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), but once CAD has developed it has been associated with improved survival ("obesity paradox"). AIM: To assess how obesity affects prognosis in patients with or without inducible ischemic regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) and/or abnormal coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) during stress echocardiography (SE). METHODS: In an observational retrospective two- center study design, we analyzed 3249 consecutive patients (1907 men; age 66 ± 12 years; body mass index, BMI, 26.9 ± 4.1 kg/m2) with known (n = 1306) or suspected (n = 1943) CAD who underwent dipyridamole SE with simultaneous evaluation of RWMA and CFVR. All-cause death was the outcome end-point. RESULTS: 1075 patients were lean (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2), 1523 overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and 651 obese (≥30.0 kg/m2). Ischemic test result for RWMA occurred in 28 (3%) lean, 69 (4%) overweight, and 28 (4%) obese patients (p = 0.03). An abnormal CFVR (≤2.0) was found in 281 (26%) lean, 402 (26%) overweight and 170 (26%) obese patients (p = 0.99). During 68 ± 44 months of follow-up, 496 (15%) patients died. At multivariable Cox analysis, BMI ≥ 30 was an independent predictor of reduced mortality in the 878 patients with stress-induced (≥2 segments) RWMA and/or CFVR abnormality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.84; p = 0.003), while showed no effect at univariate analysis in the 2371 patients with no RWMA and normal CFVR (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.46; p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity exerts a "paradoxical" protective effect in patients with stress-induced ischemia and/ or coronary microvascular dysfunction, and shows a neutral effect in patients with normal CFVR and no stress-induced RWMA.

Clinical, hemodynamic, and functional variables affecting success rate of coronary flow velocity reserve detection during vasodilator stress echocardiography.

AIM: Stress echocardiography (SE) with state-of-the-art imaging protocol allows a comprehensive assessment of regional wall-motion abnormalities and Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in left anterior descending artery (LAD). We sought to assess the variables potentially impacting on success rate of SE with CFVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center, prospective, observational study design, from 2007 to 2019, we enrolled 2989 consecutive patients (age 67 ± 12 years; 1723 men) referred for SE, without contrast, for chronic known (n = 1130) or suspected (n = 1859) coronary syndromes. Coronary flow velocity reserve was measured as stress/rest peak diastolic flow velocity. The same operator (LC) performed all examinations with the same machine (GE Vivid 7). Interpretable CFVR was obtained in 2808 patients (feasibility = 93.9%). Overall success rate was lowest (91.4%) in 2007-2008 and steadily rose to 97.8% in 2017-2019 (P for trend <.0001). Feasibility was excellent for men (93.7%) and women (94.3%) (P = .47) across all values of body mass index (BMI): <25 (P = .09), 25-29 (P = .84), and ≥30 (P = .23). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, women with BMI ≥ 30 (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.14-3.29, P = .02), resting heart rate ≥77 beats/min (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.64-3.11; P < .0001), and stress-induced ischemia in the LAD territory (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.67-5.90; P < .0001) predicted unfeasible CFVR. CONCLUSION: Vasodilator SE with CFVR combined with wall-motion analysis is highly feasible also without contrast although with a slight decline in presence of high resting heart rate (reducing diastolic time essential for flow imaging), women with BMI ≥ 30 (increasing tissue thickness interposed between transducer and artery), and anterior ischemia (for underlying low-absent anterograde flow for severely stenotic or occluded LAD).

Quality control of B-lines analysis in stress Echo 2020.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness trial "Stress echo (SE) 2020" evaluates novel applications of SE in and beyond coronary artery disease. The core protocol also includes 4-site simplified scan of B-lines by lung ultrasound, useful to assess pulmonary congestion. PURPOSE: To provide web-based upstream quality control and harmonization of B-lines reading criteria. METHODS: 60 readers (all previously accredited for regional wall motion, 53 B-lines naive) from 52 centers of 16 countries of SE 2020 network read a set of 20 lung ultrasound video-clips selected by the Pisa lab serving as reference standard, after taking an obligatory web-based learning 2-h module ( http://se2020.altervista.org ). Each test clip was scored for B-lines from 0 (black lung, A-lines, no B-lines) to 10 (white lung, coalescing B-lines). The diagnostic gold standard was the concordant assessment of two experienced readers of the Pisa lab. The answer of the reader was considered correct if concordant with reference standard reading ±1 (for instance, reference standard reading of 5 B-lines; correct answer 4, 5, or 6). The a priori determined pass threshold was 18/20 (≥ 90%) with R value (intra-class correlation coefficient) between reference standard and recruiting center) > 0.90. Inter-observer agreement was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficient statistics. RESULTS: All 60 readers were successfully accredited: 26 (43%) on first, 24 (40%) on second, and 10 (17%) on third attempt. The average diagnostic accuracy of the 60 accredited readers was 95%, with R value of 0.95 compared to reference standard reading. The 53 B-lines naive scored similarly to the 7 B-lines expert on first attempt (90 versus 95%, p = NS). Compared to the step-1 of quality control for regional wall motion abnormalities, the mean reading time per attempt was shorter (17 ± 3 vs 29 ± 12 min, p < .01), the first attempt success rate was higher (43 vs 28%, p < 0.01), and the drop-out of readers smaller (0 vs 28%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Web-based learning is highly effective for teaching and harmonizing B-lines reading. Echocardiographers without previous experience with B-lines learn quickly.

The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease.

Stress echocardiography is an established technique for the assessment of extent and severity of coronary artery disease. The combination of echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress allows to detect myocardial ischemia with an excellent accuracy. A transient worsening of regional function during stress is the hallmark of inducible ischemia. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging or magnetic resonance, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician.The evidence on its clinical impact has been collected over 35 years, based on solid experimental, pathophysiological, technological and clinical foundations. There is the need to implement the combination of wall motion and coronary flow reserve, assessed in the left anterior descending artery, into a single test. The improvement of technology and in imaging quality will make this approach more and more feasible. The future issues in stress echo will be the possibility of obtaining quantitative information translating the current qualitative assessment of regional wall motion into a number. The next challenge for stress echocardiography is to overcome its main weaknesses: dependance on operator expertise, the lack of outcome data (a widesperad problem in clinical imaging) to document the improvement of patient outcomes. This paper summarizes the main indications for the clinical applications of stress echocardiography to ischemic heart disease.

Stress echo 2020: the international stress echo study in ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Stress echocardiography (SE) has an established role in evidence-based guidelines, but recently its breadth and variety of applications have extended well beyond coronary artery disease (CAD). We lack a prospective research study of SE applications, in and beyond CAD, also considering a variety of signs in addition to regional wall motion abnormalities. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study design, > 100 certified high-volume SE labs (initially from Italy, Brazil, Hungary, and Serbia) will be networked with an organized system of clinical, laboratory and imaging data collection at the time of physical or pharmacological SE, with structured follow-up information. The study is endorsed by the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography and organized in 10 subprojects focusing on: contractile reserve for prediction of cardiac resynchronization or medical therapy response; stress B-lines in heart failure; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; mitral regurgitation after either transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement; outdoor SE in extreme physiology; right ventricular contractile reserve in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot; suspected or initial pulmonary arterial hypertension; coronary flow velocity, left ventricular elastance reserve and B-lines in known or suspected CAD; identification of subclinical familial disease in genotype-positive, phenotype- negative healthy relatives of inherited disease (such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). RESULTS: We expect to recruit about 10,000 patients over a 5-year period (2016-2020), with sample sizes ranging from 5,000 for coronary flow velocity/ left ventricular elastance/ B-lines in CAD to around 250 for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or repaired Tetralogy of Fallot. This data-base will allow to investigate technical questions such as feasibility and reproducibility of various SE parameters and to assess their prognostic value in different clinical scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The study will create the cultural, informatic and scientific infrastructure connecting high-volume, accredited SE labs, sharing common criteria of indication, execution, reporting and image storage of SE to obtain original safety, feasibility, and outcome data in evidence-poor diagnostic fields, also outside the established core application of SE in CAD based on regional wall motion abnormalities. The study will standardize procedures, validate emerging signs, and integrate the new information with established knowledge, helping to build a next-generation SE lab without inner walls.

Dual imaging stress echocardiography versus computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification of patients with chest pain of unknown origin.

BACKGROUND: Dual imaging stress echocardiography, combining the evaluation of wall motion and coronary flow reserve (CFR) on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) are established techniques for assessing prognosis in chest pain patients. In this study we compared the prognostic value of the two methods in a cohort of patients with chest pain having suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: A total of 131 patients (76 men; age 68 ± 9 years) with chest pain of unknown origin underwent dipyridamole (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 6 min) stress echo with CFR assessment of LAD by Doppler and CTCA. A CFR ≤ 1.9 was considered abnormal, while > 50% lumen diameter reduction was the criterion for significant CAD at CTCA. RESULTS: Of 131 patients, 34 (26%) had ischemia at stress echo (new wall motion abnormalities), and 56 (43%) had reduced CFR on LAD. Significant coronary stenosis at CTCA was found in 69 (53%) patients. Forty-six patients (84%) with abnormal CFR on LAD showed significant CAD at CTCA (p < 0.001). Calcium score was higher in patients with reduced than in those with normal CFR (265 ± 404 vs 131 ± 336, p = 0.04). During a median follow-up of 7 months (1st to 3rd quartile: 5-13 months), there were 45 major cardiac events (4 deaths, 11 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 30 late [≥6 months] coronary revascularizations). At Cox analysis, independent prognostic indicators were calcium score > 100 (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.33-6.07, p = 0.007), significant CAD at CTCA (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.23-5.82, p = 0.013), and inducible ischemia or CFR <1.9R on LAD on dual imaging stress echo (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.05-4.84, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Functional and anatomical evaluation using, respectively, dual imaging stress echocardiography and CTCA are both effective modalities to risk stratify patients with chest pain of unknown origin, yielding independent and comparable prognostic value. Compared to CTCA, however, stress echocardiography has the advantage of lower cost and of being free of radiations.

Prognostic implication of Doppler echocardiographic derived coronary flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block.

AIMS: Myocardial ischaemia during pharmacological stress echocardiography is a strong prognostic predictor in patients with a left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, the additive value of Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) during pharmacological stress testing remains to be investigated in this subset of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group consisted of 324 LBBB patients (187 men; age 68 ± 10 years) with known (n = 74) or suspected (n = 250) coronary artery disease who had undergone dipyridamole (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 6') stress echocardiography with CFR assessment of left anterior descending (LAD) by Doppler. A value of CFR ≤ 2.0 was considered abnormal. The median duration of follow-up was 15 months (first to third quartile: 8-34 months). Of the 324 patients, 52 (16%) had ischaemia at stress echo by wall motion criteria, and 139 (43%) had a CFR ≤ 2. During follow-up, 51 (16%) events occurred: 37 deaths and 14 myocardial infarctions (MIs). Age (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.15, P < 0.0001), resting wall motion score index (HR: 5.29, 95% CI: 2.36-11.89, P < 0.0001), smoking habit (HR: 4.38, 95% CI: 1.93-9.91, P < 0.0001), and CFR ≤ 2 (4.69, 95% CI: 1.96-11.19, P = 0.001) were independently correlated with mortality, while CFR ≤ 2 (HR: 3.91, 95% CI: 1.90-8.04, P < 0.0001), age (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, P = 0.001), smoking habit (HR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.18-4.30, P = 0.01), ischaemia at stress echo (HR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.11-4.77, P = 0.02), and resting wall motion score index (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.11-4.25, P = 0.02) were independently correlated with death or MI. Four-year mortality and 4-year hard event rate were markedly higher in patients with CFR ≤ 2 than in those with CFR >2 (49 vs. 6% and 56 vs. 8%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both). A CFR of ≤ 2 was associated with a significantly higher annual hard event rate independently of age, sex, ejection fraction, history of coronary artery disease, diabetes, and hypertension. Moreover, it was correlated with an increased (P < 0.0001) yearly mortality and event rate in patients with non-ischaemic stress echo conducted on therapy. At incremental analysis, a CFR of ≤ 2 added prognostic value to clinical findings, resting wall motion score index, ongoing anti-ischaemic therapy, and ischaemia at stress echo when both death and death or MI were the clinical endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal CFR on LAD is a strong and independent indicator of mortality and death or MI in patients with LBBB, and is associated with markedly increased risk also in the subset of patients with stress echo negative for ischaemia on therapy.

Reversible ischaemia and outcome after adjustment for coronary artery disease severity: a multicentre stress-echocardiography registry.

AIMS: To assess the potential association of reversible ischaemia and Doppler coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery (CFVR-LAD) during stress echocardiography (SE) with all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), after correction for anatomic coronary artery disease (CAD) burden and other significant clinical variables. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected 3191 patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years) from our multicentre SE registry, who underwent both high-dose dipyridamole SE (comprehensive of CFVR-LAD measurement) and coronary angiography within 2 months. All-cause mortality and non-fatal MI were the primary end points. The association of the primary end point with ischaemia severity and CFVR-LAD was assessed, after multivariable adjustment for all other significant clinical and imaging variables, including anatomic CAD severity by the modified Duke Prognostic Index. The primary end point occurred in 767 (24%) patients (death in 409 and non-fatal MI in 375 patients) during a median follow-up of 42 months. Multivariable Cox regression analyses indicated that, among other significant variables, anatomic CAD severity, reversible ischaemia, and CFVR-LAD were all independently associated with the primary end point; reversible ischaemia was also associated with subsequent MI, while CFVR-LAD with mortality, independent of anatomic CAD severity. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that reversible ischaemia by wall motion assessment and CFVR-LAD on dipyridamole SE are independently associated with dismal outcome in patients with suspected or known stable CAD, even after accounting for angiographic anatomic CAD severity and also independently from which coronary artery is diseased.

Noninvasive evaluation of dynamic microvascular dysfunction in ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease patients with suspected vasospasm.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA), a dynamic coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is frequent but difficult to capture by noninvasive means.The aim of our study was to assess dynamic CMD in INOCA patients with stress echocardiography after vasoconstrictive and vasodilator stimuli. METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, we have enrolled 40 INOCA patients (age 56.3 ±â€Š13 years, 32 women). All participants underwent stress echocardiography with hyperventilation (HYP), followed by supine bicycle exercise (HYP+EXE) and adenosine (ADO). Stress echocardiography included an assessment of regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) and coronary flow velocity (CFV) in the distal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. RESULTS: HYP induced a 30% increase in rate pressure product (rest = 10 244 ±â€Š2353 vs. HYP = 13 214 ±â€Š3266 mmHg x bpm, P  < 0.001) accompanied by a paradoxical reduction in CFV (HYP< rest) in 21 patients (52%). HYP alone was less effective than HYP+EXE in inducing anginal pain (6/40, 15% vs. 10/40, 25%, P  = 0.046), ST segment changes (6/40, 15% vs. 24/40, 60%, P  < 0.001), and RWMA (6/40, 15% vs. 13/40, 32.5%, P  = 0.008). ADO-induced vasodilation was preserved (≥2.0) in all patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with INOCA, a coronary vasoconstriction after HYP is common, in absence of structural CMD detectable with ADO. HYP+EXE test represents a more powerful ischemia inducer than HYP alone. Stress echocardiography with LAD-CFV may allow the noninvasive assessment of dynamic and structural coronary microcirculation during stress.

The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC.

Since the 2009 publication of the stress echocardiography expert consensus of the European Association of Echocardiography, and after the 2016 advice of the American Society of Echocardiography-European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging for applications beyond coronary artery disease, new information has become available regarding stress echo. Until recently, the assessment of regional wall motion abnormality was the only universally practiced step of stress echo. In the state-of-the-art ABCDE protocol, regional wall motion abnormality remains the main step A, but at the same time, regional perfusion using ultrasound-contrast agents may be assessed. Diastolic function and pulmonary B-lines are assessed in step B; left ventricular contractile and preload reserve with volumetric echocardiography in step C; Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery in step D; and ECG-based heart rate reserve in non-imaging step E. These five biomarkers converge, conceptually and methodologically, in the ABCDE protocol allowing comprehensive risk stratification of the vulnerable patient with chronic coronary syndromes. The present document summarizes current practice guidelines recommendations and training requirements and harmonizes the clinical guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology in many diverse cardiac conditions, from chronic coronary syndromes to valvular heart disease. The continuous refinement of imaging technology and the diffusion of ultrasound-contrast agents improve image quality, feasibility, and reader accuracy in assessing wall motion and perfusion, left ventricular volumes, and coronary flow velocity. Carotid imaging detects pre-obstructive atherosclerosis and improves risk prediction similarly to coronary atherosclerosis. The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence on echocardiographic image acquisition and analysis makes stress echo more operator-independent and objective. Stress echo has unique features of low cost, versatility, and universal availability. It does not need ionizing radiation exposure and has near-zero carbon dioxide emissions. Stress echo is a convenient and sustainable choice for functional testing within and beyond coronary artery disease.

High Resting Coronary Flow Velocity by Echocardiography Is Associated With Worse Survival in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Resting coronary flow velocity (CFV) in the mid-distal left anterior descending coronary artery can be easily assessed with transthoracic echocardiography. In this observational study, the authors sought to assess the relationship between resting CFV, CFV reserve (CFVR), and outcome in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective multicenter study design, the authors retrospectively analyzed 7576 patients (age, 66±11 years; 4312 men) with chronic coronary syndromes and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Recruitment (years 2003-2021) involved 7 accredited laboratories, with interobserver variability <10% for CFV measurement at study entry. Baseline peak diastolic CFV was obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler in the mid-distal left anterior descending coronary artery. CFVR (abnormal value ≤2.0) was assessed with dipyridamole. All-cause death was the only end point. The mean CFV of the left anterior descending coronary artery was 31±12 cm/s. The mean CFVR was 2.32±0.60. During a median follow-up of 5.9±4.3 years, 1121 (15%) patients died. At multivariable analysis, resting CFV ≥32 cm/s was identified by a receiver operating curve as the best cutoff and was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10-1.40]; P<0.0001) together with CFVR ≤2.0 (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.57-2.02]; P<0.0001), age, diabetes, history of coronary surgery, and left ventricular ejection fraction. When both CFV and CFVR were considered, the mortality rate was highest in patients with resting CFV ≥32 cm/s and CFVR ≤2.0 and lowest in patients with resting CFV <32 cm/s and CFVR >2.0. CONCLUSIONS: High resting CFV is associated with worse survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The value is independent and additive to CFVR. The combination of high resting CFV and low CFVR is associated with the worst survival.

Myocardial contractility in the stress echo lab: from pathophysiological toy to clinical tool.

Up-regulation of Ca2+ entry through Ca2+ channels by high rates of beating is involved in the frequency-dependent regulation of contractility: this process is crucial in adaptation to exercise and stress and is universally known as force-frequency relation (FFR). Disturbances in calcium handling play a central role in the disturbed contractile function in myocardial failure. Measurements of twitch tension in isolated left-ventricular strips from explanted cardiomyopathic hearts compared with non-failing hearts show flat or biphasic FFR, while it is up-sloping in normal hearts. Starting in 2003 we introduced the FFR measurement in the stress echo lab using the end-systolic pressure (ESP)/End-systolic volume index (ESVi) ratio (the Suga index) at increasing heart rates. We studied a total of 2,031 patients reported in peer-reviewed journals: 483 during exercise, 34 with pacing, 850 with dobutamine and 664 during dipyridamole stress echo. We demonstrated the feasibility of FFR in the stress echo lab, the clinical usefulness of FFR for diagnosing latent contractile dysfunction in apparently normal hearts, and residual contractile reserve in dilated idiopathic and ischemic cardiomyopathy. In 400 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 30 ± 9%) with negative stress echocardiography results, event-free survival was higher (p < 0.001) in patients with ΔESPVR (the difference between peak and rest end-systolic pressure-volume ratio, ESPVR) ≥ 0.4 mmHg/mL/m2. The prognostic stratification of patients was better with FFR, beyond the standard LV ejection fraction evaluation, also in the particular settings of severe mitral regurgitation or diabetics without stress-induced ischemia. In the particular setting of selection of heart transplant donors, the stress echo FFR was able to correctly select 34 marginal donor hearts efficiently transplanted in emergency recipients. Starting in 2007, we introduced an operator-independent cutaneous sensor to monitor the FFR: the force is quantified as the sensed pre-ejection myocardial vibration amplitude. We demonstrated that the sensor-derived force changes at increasing heart rates are highly related with both max dP/dt in animal models, and with the stress echo FFR in 220 humans, opening a new window for pervasive cardiac heart failure monitoring in telemedicine systems.

ABCDEG Stress Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis.

Rest and stress echocardiography (SE) plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of valvular heart disease. The use of SE is recommended in valvular heart disease when there is a mismatch between resting transthoracic echocardiography findings and symptoms. In aortic stenosis (AS), rest echocardiographic analysis is a stepwise approach that begins with the evaluation of aortic valve morphology and proceeds to the measurement of the transvalvular aortic gradient and aortic valve area (AVA) using continuity equations or planimetry. The presence of the following three criteria suggests severe AS: AVA < 1.0 cm2, a peak velocity > 4.0 m/s, or a mean gradient > 40 mmHg. However, in approximately one in three cases, we can observe a discordant AVA < 1 cm2 with a peak velocity < 4.0 m/s or a mean gradient <40 mmHg. This is due to reduced transvalvular flow associated with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) defined as "classical" low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS or normal LVEF "paradoxical" LFLG AS. SE has an established role in evaluating LV contractile reserve (CR) patients with reduced LVEF. In classical LFLG AS, LV CR distinguished pseudo-severe AS from truly severe AS. Some observational data suggest that long-term prognosis in asymptomatic severe AS may not be as favorable as previously thought, offering a window of opportunity for intervention prior to the onset of symptoms. Therefore, guidelines recommend evaluating asymptomatic AS with exercise stress in physically active patients, particularly those younger than 70 years, and symptomatic classical LFLG severe AS with low-dose dobutamine SE. A comprehensive SE assessment includes evaluating valve function (gradients), the global systolic function of the LV, and pulmonary congestion. This assessment integrates considerations of blood pressure response, chronotropic reserve, and symptoms. StressEcho 2030 is a prospective, large-scale study that employs a comprehensive protocol (ABCDEG) to analyze the clinical and echocardiographic phenotypes of AS, capturing various vulnerability sources which support stress echo-driven treatment strategies.

Echocardiographic functional determinants of survival in heart failure with abnormal ejection fraction.

Background and Aims: Patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) have a heterogeneous prognosis, and assessment of coronary physiology with coronary flow velocity (CFV) and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) may complement established predictors based on wall motion and EF. Methods and results: In a prospective multicenter study design, we enrolled 1,408 HF patients (age 66 ± 12 years, 1,035 men), with EF <50%, 743 (53%) with coronary artery disease, and 665 (47%) with normal coronary arteries. Recruitment (years 2004-2022) involved 8 accredited laboratories, with inter-observer variability <10% for CFV measurement. Baseline CFV (abnormal value >31 cm/s) was obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler in mid-distal LAD. CFVR (abnormal value ≤2.0) was assessed with exercise (n = 99), dobutamine (n = 100), and vasodilator stress (dipyridamole in 1,149, adenosine in 60). Inducible myocardial ischemia was identified with wall motion score index (WMSI) stress > rest (cut-off Δ ≥ 0.12). LV contractile reserve (CR) was identified with WMSI stress < rest (cutoff Δ ≥ 0.25). Test response ranged from score 0 (EF > 30%, CFV ≥ 32 cm/s, CFVR > 2.0, LVCR present, ischemia absent) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only endpoint. Results. During a median follow-up of 990 days, 253 patients died. Independent predictors of death were EF (HR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.943-0.968, p < 0.0001), CFV (HR: 2.407, 95% CI: 1.871-3.096, p < 0.001), CFVR (HR: 3.908, 95% CI: 2.903-5.260, p < 0.001), stress-induced ischemia (HR: 2.223, 95% CI: 1.642-3.009, p < 0.001), and LVCR (HR: 0.524, 95% CI: 0.324-.647, p = 0.008). The annual mortality rate was lowest (1.2%) in patients with a score of 0 (n = 61) and highest (31.9%) in patients with a score of 5 (n = 15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: High resting CFV is associated with worse survival in ischemic and nonischemic HF with reduced EF. The value is independent and additive to resting EF, CFVR, LVCR, and inducible ischemia.

Multiple Phenotypes of Chronic Coronary Syndromes Identified by ABCDE Stress Echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Regional wall motion abnormality is considered a sensitive and specific marker of ischemia during stress echocardiography (SE). However, ischemia is a multifaceted entity associated with either coronary artery disease (CAD) or angina with normal coronary arteries, a distinction difficult to make using a single sign. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of the five-step ABCDE SE protocol for CAD detection. METHODS: From the 2016-2022 Stress Echo 2030 study data bank, 3,229 patients were selected (mean age, 66 ± 12 years; 2,089 men [65%]) with known CAD (n = 1,792) or angina with normal coronary arteries (n = 1,437). All patients were studied using both the ABCDE SE protocol and coronary angiography, within 3 months. In step A, regional wall motion abnormality is assessed; in step B, B-lines and diastolic function; in step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; in step D, coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery; and in step E, heart rate reserve. RESULTS: SE response ranged from a score of 0 (all steps normal) to a score of 5 (all steps abnormal). For CAD, rates of abnormal results were 347 for step A (19.4%), 547 (30.5%) for step B, 720 (40.2%) for step C, 615 (34.3%) for step D, and 633 (35.3%) for step E. For angina with normal coronary arteries, rates of abnormal results were 81 (5.6%) for step A, 429 (29.9%) for step B, 432 (30.1%) for step C, 354 (24.6%) for step D, and 445 (31.0%) for step E. The dominant "solitary phenotype" was step B in 109 patients (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Stress-induced ischemia presents with a wide range of diagnostic phenotypes, highlighting its complex nature. Using a comprehensive approach such as the advanced ABCDE score, which combines multiple markers, proves to be more valuable than relying on a single marker in isolation.

The impact of aging and atherosclerotic risk factors on transthoracic coronary flow reserve in subjects with normal coronary angiography.

Age may affect coronary flow reserve (CFR) especially in subjects with atherosclerotic risk factors (ARFs). The aim of this prospective, multicenter, observational study was to determine the effects of aging on CFR in patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries and ARFs. Three-hundred-thirty-five subjects (mean age = 61 years) with at least one ARF but normal coronary angiography underwent high-dose dipyridamole stress-echo with Doppler evaluation of left anterior descending artery. CFR was calculated as the ratio between hyperemic and resting coronary diastolic peak velocities. Patients were divided in age quartiles. CFR was progressively reduced with aging (1st quartile: 3.01 ± 0.69, 4th quartile: 2.39 ± 0.49, p < 0.001). This was mainly due to a gradual increase of resting velocities (1st quartile = 26.3 ± 6.1 cm/s, 4th quartile = 30.2 ± 6.4 cm/s, p < 0.001) while the reduction of hyperemic velocities remained unaffected (1st quartile = 77.7 ± 18.9 cm/s, 4th quartile = 70.9 ± 18.4 cm/s, NS). When age quartiles and ARFs were entered into a regression model, third and fourth age quartile (p < 0.0005 and p < 0.0001 respectively), left ventricular mass index (p < 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p < 0.002), fasting blood glucose (p < 0.01) and male gender (p < 0.05) were independent determinants of CFR in the whole population. Aging reduces coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries due to a gradual increase of resting coronary flow velocity. CFR is also affected by atherosclerotic risk factors and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Prognostic implication of stress echocardiography in 6214 hypertensive and 5328 normotensive patients.

Aims To compare the prognostic implication of stress echocardiography (SE) in a large cohort of hypertensive and normotensive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The relative prognostic meaning of the SE result in hypertensive and normotensive patients remains to be addressed. Methods and results The study group was formed by 11 542 patients (6214 hypertensive patients; 5328 normotensive patients) who underwent exercise (n= 686), dobutamine (n= 2524), or dipyridamole (n= 8332) SE for evaluation of known (n= 4563) or suspected (n= 6979) CAD. Patients were followed up for a median of 25 months (1st quartile, 7; 3rd quartile, 57). Ischaemia on SE (new wall motion abnormality) was detected in 3209 (28%) patients. During follow-up, 1587 events (924 deaths, 663 non-fatal infarctions) occurred. Patients (n= 2764) undergoing revascularization were censored. The annual event rate was 7.0% in hypertensive and 5.7% in normotensive patients (P = 0.02) with known CAD, and 3.7% in hypertensive and 2.4% in normotensive patients (P< 0.0001) with suspected CAD. Ischaemia on stress echo, resting wall motion abnormality (RWMA), age, male sex, and diabetes mellitus were multivariable prognostic predictors in both patient groups. Analysing data according to the interaction of prognostically important echocardiographic covariates, such as ischaemia on SE and RWMA, an effective risk assessment was obtained in hypertensive as well as normotensive patients. The annual event rate was markedly higher in hypertensive than in normotensive patients with no ischaemia and no RWMA (2.5 and 1.7%, P = 0.0001). Finally, the incremental prognostic value of inducible ischaemia over clinical evaluation and resting left ventricular function was greater in hypertensive than in normotensive patients both with known and suspected CAD. Conclusion The SE result allows an effective prognostication in hypertensive and normotensive patients. However, a non-ischaemic test predicts better survival in normotensive than in hypertensive patients with no RWMA.