Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
1.
Pediatr Transplant ; 26(2): e14158, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698432

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess improvements in long-term survival of pediatric patients after liver transplantation by analyzing outcomes in transplant recipients who survived beyond 1 year after transplantation. There has been a marked increase in the 1-year survival of pediatric patients, from 78% in transplant recipients between 1987 and 1990 to 95% in transplant recipients between 2011 and 2017. The long-term outcomes have not seen a similar trend, creating a disparity that warrants analysis. METHODS: We analyzed 13 753 pediatric patients who survived for 1 year after receiving orthotopic liver transplantation between 1987 and 2017. The study period was divided into six eras. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method for time-to-event analysis, and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: There were no significant gains in long-term outcomes among 1-year survivors over the past three decades. Log-rank tests for equality of survivor functions between each era and 1987-1990 were not statistically significant. Cause of death analysis revealed that although infections caused 20.6% of deaths in patients transplanted between 1987 and 1990, this number dropped to 5.6% in those transplanted between 2011 and 2017 (p = .01). Malignancy caused 10.6% of deaths in 1987-1990 but caused 22.2% of the deaths in 2011-2017 (p = .04). CONCLUSION: Despite the gratifying gains in short-term survival of pediatric patients, 1-year survivors have no significant improvements in long-term survival after undergoing a liver transplantation. Long-term sequelae of immunosuppression, such as malignancy and infection, continue to be the most common causes of death. This study highlights the necessity for better long-term management of immunosuppression.


Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
2.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(5): e13963, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33405330

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Of the 600 pediatric candidates added to the liver waiting list annually, 100 will remain waiting while over 100 liver allografts are discarded, often for subjective reasons. METHODS: We created a risk index to predict discard to better optimize donor supply. We used the UNOS database to retrospectively analyze 17 367 deceased donors (≤18 years old) through univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Deceased donor clinical characteristics and laboratory values were independent variables with discard being the dependent variable in the analysis. Significant univariate factors (P-value < .05) comprised the multivariate analysis. Significant variables from the multivariate analysis were incorporated into the pDSRI, producing a risk score for discard. RESULTS: From 17 potential factors, 11 were identified as significant predictors (P < .05) of pediatric liver allograft discard. The most significant risk factors were as follows: DCD; total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥500 IU/L. The pDSRI has a C-statistic of 0.846 for the training set and 0.840 for the validation set. CONCLUSION: The pDSRI uses 11 significant risk factors, including elevated liver function tests, donor demographics, and donor risk/type to accurately predict risk of pediatric liver allograft discard and serve as a tool that may maximize donor yield.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Donor Selection/methods , Donor Selection/standards , Liver Transplantation , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Waiting Lists
3.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(5): e13880, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979013

ABSTRACT

We describe the successful pediatric liver transplant for unresectable hepatoblastoma in a 4-year-old male with COVID-19 prior to transplant. The first negative NP swab was documented 1 month after initial diagnosis, when SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were also detected. The patient was actively listed for liver transplant after completing four blocks of a SIOPEL-4 based regimen due to his PRETEXT IV disease which remained unresectable. Following three additional negative NP swabs and resolution of symptoms for 4 weeks, he underwent a whole-organ pediatric liver transplant. COVID-19 positivity determined via NP swab SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR (Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay). IgG and IgM total SARS- CoV-2 antibodies detected by Ortho Clinical Diagnostics VITROS® Immunodiagnostics Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Test. Patient received standard prednisone and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression without induction therapy following transplant. Post-transplant course was remarkable for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with discharge home on post-transplant day #11. Surveillance tests have remained negative with persistent SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies at 6 weeks after transplant. We describe one of the earliest, if not the first case of liver transplant following recent recovery from COVID-19 in a pediatric patient with a lethal malignant liver tumor. A better understanding of how to balance the risk profile of transplant in the setting of COVID-19 with disease progression if transplant is not performed is needed. We followed existing ASTS guidelines to document clearance of the viral infection and resolution of symptoms before transplant. This case highlights that pediatric liver transplantation can be safely performed upon clearance of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Hepatoblastoma/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation/methods , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Testing , Child, Preschool , Disease Progression , Hepatoblastoma/complications , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Immunosuppression Therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Male , Neutropenia/complications , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Thrombocytopenia/complications , Treatment Outcome
4.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(3): e13868, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32949098

ABSTRACT

The clinical course of COVID-19 in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients remains ambiguous. Though preliminary experiences with adult transplant recipients have been published, literature centered on the pediatric population is limited. We herein report a multi-center, multi-organ cohort analysis of COVID-19-positive transplant recipients ≤ 18 years at time of transplant. Data were collected via institutions' respective electronic medical record systems. Local review boards approved this cross-institutional study. Among 5 transplant centers, 26 patients (62% male) were reviewed with a median age of 8 years. Six were heart recipients, 8 kidney, 10 liver, and 2 lung. Presenting symptoms included cough (n = 12 (46%)), fever (n = 9 (35%)), dry/sore throat (n = 3 (12%)), rhinorrhea (n = 3 (12%)), anosmia (n = 2 (8%)), chest pain (n = 2 (8%)), diarrhea (n = 2 (8%)), dyspnea (n = 1 (4%)), and headache (n = 1 (4%)). Six patients (23%) were asymptomatic. No patient required supplemental oxygen, intubation, or ECMO. Eight patients (31%) were hospitalized at time of diagnosis, 3 of whom were already admitted for unrelated problems. Post-transplant immunosuppression was reduced for only 2 patients (8%). All symptomatic patients recovered within 7 days. Our multi-institutional experience suggests the prognoses of pediatric transplant recipients infected with COVID-19 may mirror those of immunocompetent children, with infrequent hospitalization and minimal treatment, if any, required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/immunology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Organ Transplantation , Perioperative Care/methods , Adolescent , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Perioperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
5.
Clin Transplant ; 34(4): e13821, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034946

ABSTRACT

Given the critical shortage of donor livers, marginal liver allografts have potential to increase donor supply. We investigate trends and long-term outcomes of liver transplant using national share allografts transplanted after rejection at the local and regional levels. We studied a cohort of 75 050 candidates listed in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for liver transplantation between 2002 and 2016. We compared patients receiving national share and regional/local share allografts from 2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016, performing multivariate Cox regression for graft survival. Recipient and center-level covariates that were not significant (P < .05) were removed. Graft survival of national share allografts improved over time. National share allografts had a 26% increased risk for graft failure in 2002-2006 but no impact on graft survival in 2007-2011 and 2012-2016. The cold ischemia time (CIT) of national share allografts decreased from 10.4 to 8.0 hours. We demonstrate that CIT had significant impact on graft survival using national share allografts (CIT <6 hours: hazard ratio 0.75 and CIT >12 hours: hazard ratio 1.25). Despite a trend toward sicker recipients and poorer quality allografts, graft survival outcomes using national share allografts have improved to benchmark levels. Reduction in cold ischemia time is a possible explanation.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Learning Curve , Allografts , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Liver , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Pediatr Transplant ; 24(7): e13779, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32720748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: PELD scores are used to reduce waitlist mortality, but they do not accurately predict likelihood of prolonged length-of-stay or higher costs associated with it. This study aims to create a pediatric length-of-stay (LOS) index to predict increased risk of prolonged stay following liver transplantation. METHODS: The scoring system generated predicts length-of-stay following pediatric liver transplantation. With univariate and multivariate analyses on data from 5669 pediatric liver transplant recipients, independent recipient/donor risk factors for prolonged stay (>30 days) were identified. Multiple imputations accounted for missing variables. RESULTS: The most significant factors were ICU admission (OR 2.92, CI 2.27-3.75), recipient bilirubin >32 (OR 2.35, CI 1.70-3.25), and hemodialysis 1 week before transplantation (OR 2.27, CI 1.57-3.27). The LOS index assigns weighted scoring points to factors to predict prolonged stay (C-statistic of .72). The index demonstrated discrimination across the population after dividing it into quartiles for prolonged stay. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric LOS index, utilizing 13 donor/recipient factors, can assess the risk for pediatric liver transplantation prolonged stay. Important predictive factors are hemodialysis, ICU admission, recipient weight and bilirubin, and recipient life support status.


Subject(s)
Length of Stay/trends , Liver Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Waiting Lists/mortality , Young Adult
7.
Am J Transplant ; 19(12): 3299-3307, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31394020

ABSTRACT

The field of liver transplantation has shifted considerably in the MELD era, including changing allocation, immunosuppression, and liver failure etiologies, as well as better supportive therapies. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the MELD score over time. The United Network for Organ Sharing provided de-identified data on 120 156 patients listed for liver transplant from 2002-2016. The ability of the MELD score to predict 90-day mortality was evaluated by a concordance (C-) statistic and corroborated with competing risk analysis. The MELD score's concordance with 90-day mortality has downtrended from 0.80 in 2003 to 0.70 in 2015. While lab MELD scores at listing and transplant climbed in that interval, score at waitlist death remained steady near 35. Listing age increased from 50 to 54 years. HCV-positive status at listing dropped from 33 to 17%. The concordance of MELD and mortality does not differ with age (>60 = 0.73, <60 = 0.74), but is lower in diseases that are increasing most rapidly-alcoholic liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-and higher in those that are declining, particularly in HCV-positive patients (HCV positive = 0.77; negative = 0.73). While MELD still predicts mortality, its accuracy has decreased; changing etiology of disease may contribute.


Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease/mortality , Graft Rejection/mortality , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data , Waiting Lists/mortality , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Tissue and Organ Procurement/standards
8.
Ann Surg ; 269(1): 20-27, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29303806

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess improvements in long-term survival after liver transplant by analyzing outcomes in transplant recipients who survived beyond 1 year. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Gains in short-term survival following liver transplantation have been gratifying. One-year survival in 1986 was 66% improved to over 92% in 2015. However, little is known about why long-term has not seen similar success. METHODS: We analyzed 111,568 recipients from 1987 to 2016 using the Kaplan-Meier method for time-to-event analysis and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: There were no significant gains in unadjusted long-term outcomes among 1-year survivors over the past 30 years. Only the time periods of 1987 to 1990 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, confidence interval CI) 1.28-1.42] and 1991 to 1995 (HR 1.17, CI 1.13-1.21) had a minor increase in risk compared with the period 2011 to 2016. Cause of death analysis suggests malignancy after transplantation is a growing problem and preventing recurrent hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals (DDAs) may only have a limited impact. Furthermore, rejection leading to graft failure and death had a rare occurrence (1.7% of long-term deaths) especially when compared with the sequelae of long-term immunosuppression: malignancy (16.4%), nonrejection graft failure (9.8%), and infection (10.5%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In stark contrast to short-term survival, there have been no appreciable improvements in long-term survival following liver transplantation among 1-year survivors. Long-term sequelae of immunosuppression, including malignancy and infection, are the most common causes of death. This study highlights the need for better long-term immunosuppression management.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Transplant Recipients , Adult , Aged , Cause of Death/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Hepatology ; 68(5): 1879-1889, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30070392

ABSTRACT

Multidisciplinary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment is associated with optimal outcomes. There are few data analyzing the impact of treating hospitals' therapeutic offerings on survival. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-70 years with HCC in the National Cancer Database (2004-2012). Hospitals were categorized based on the level of treatment offered (Type I-nonsurgical; Type II-ablation; Type III-resection; Type IV-transplant). Associations between overall risk of death and hospital type were evaluated with multivariable Cox shared frailty modeling. Among 50,381 patients, 65% received care in Type IV hospitals, 26% in Type III, 3% in Type II, and 6% in Type I. Overall 5-year survival across modalities was highest at Type IV hospitals (untreated: Type IV-13.1% versus Type I-5.7%, Type II-7.0%, Type III-7.4% [log-rank, P < 0.001]; chemotherapy and/or radiation: Type IV-18.1% versus Type I-3.6%, Type II-4.6%, Type III-7.7% [log-rank, P < 0.001]; ablation: Type IV-33.3% versus Type II-13.6%, Type III-23.6% [log-rank, P < 0.001]; resection: Type IV-48.4% versus Type III-39.1% [log-rank, P < 0.001]). Risk of death demonstrated a dose-response relationship with the hospital type-Type I (ref); Type II (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [0.73-0.90]); Type III (HR 0.67 [0.62-0.72]); Type IV hospitals (HR 0.43 [0.39-0.47]). Conclusion: Although care at hospitals offering the full complement of HCC treatments is associated with decreased risk of death, one third of patients are not treated at these hospitals. These data can inform the value of health policy initiatives regarding regionalization of HCC care.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
10.
Pediatr Transplant ; 23(6): e13497, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31210008

ABSTRACT

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice in pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease. This population presents technical challenges particularly in those less than 20 kg due to anomalous anatomy, vascular access issues prior to transplantation, and a generally small size for age. Standard allograft outflow is usually achieved utilizing the iliac veins or IVC. When use of the iliocaval system is not feasible, alternative anastomosis must be considered. Herein, we report a case of a pediatric kidney transplantation where successful allograft outflow was achieved using the SMV when he was found to have an atretic IVC intraoperatively. In this setting, use of the portal system was required to achieve adequate allograft outflow. We created a donor iliac graft for added length to anastomose the renal vein with the SMV. In the setting of IVC occlusion with poor drainage, we utilized a patent vessel with larger caliber for outflow to reduce the risk of high venous pressures, allograft failure, venous rotation, and thrombosis. We conclude that the SMV may serve as an alternative outflow tract in the small pediatric patient and provides the vessel caliber needed to reduce the risks of complications.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgery , Allografts , Anastomosis, Surgical , Aorta/pathology , Child, Preschool , Humans , Iliac Vein/surgery , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Kidney/surgery , Male , Pediatrics , Postoperative Period , Renal Veins/surgery , Tetrazoles/adverse effects , Thrombosis/surgery , Vascular Grafting , Vena Cava, Inferior/pathology , Venous Thrombosis/complications
11.
Pediatr Transplant ; 23(4): e13449, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066990

ABSTRACT

Children undergoing liver transplantation are at a significant risk for intraoperative hemorrhage and thrombotic complications, we aim to identify novel risk factors for massive intraoperative blood loss and transfusion in PLT recipients and describe its impact on graft survival and hospital LOS. We reviewed all primary PLTs performed at our institution between September 2007 and September 2016. Data are presented as n (%) or median (interquartile range). EBL was standardized by weight. Massive EBL and MT were defined as greater than the 85th percentile of the cohort. 250 transplantations were performed during the study period. 38 (15%) recipients had massive EBL, and LOS was 31.5 (15-58) days compared to 11 (7-21) days among those without massive EBL (P < 0.001). MT median LOS was 34 (14-59) days compared to 11 (7-21) days among those without MT (P = 0.001). Upon backward stepwise regression, technical variant graft, operative time, and transfusion of FFP, platelet, and/or cryoprecipitate were significant independent risk factors for massive EBL and MT, while admission from home was a protective factor. Recipient weight was a significant independent risk factor for MT alone. Massive EBL and MT were not statistically significant for overall graft survival. MT was, however, a significant risk factor for 30-day graft loss. PLT recipients with massive EBL or MT had significantly longer LOS and increased 30-day graft loss in patients who required MT. We identified longer operative time and technical variant graft were significant independent risk factors for massive EBL and MT, while being admitted from home was a protective factor.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Liver Transplantation , Body Weight , Child , Child, Preschool , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Intraoperative Care , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Length of Stay , Operative Time , Organ Transplantation , Proportional Hazards Models , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
12.
Liver Transpl ; 24(6): 762-768, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29476693

ABSTRACT

Risk analysis of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation has largely focused on patient and graft survival. Posttransplant length of stay is a sensitive marker of morbidity and cost. We hypothesize that CIT is a risk factor for posttransplant prolonged length of stay (PLOS) and aim to conduct an hour-by-hour analysis of CIT and PLOS. We retrospectively reviewed all adult, first-time liver transplants between March 2002 and September 2016 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The 67,426 recipients were categorized by hourly CIT increments. Multivariate logistic regression of PLOS (defined as >30 days), CIT groups, and an extensive list of confounding variables was performed. Linear regression between length of stay and CIT as continuous variables was also performed. CIT 1-6 hours was protective against PLOS, whereas CIT >7 hours was associated with increased odds for PLOS. The lowest odds for PLOS were observed with 1-2 hours (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.92) and 2-3 hours (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78) of CIT. OR for PLOS steadily increased with increasing CIT, reaching the greatest odds for PLOS with 13-14 hours (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.57-2.67) and 15-16 hours (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.27-3.33) of CIT. Linear regression revealed a positive correlation between length of stay and CIT with a correlation coefficient of +0.35 (P < 0.001). In conclusion, post-liver transplant length of stay is sensitive to CIT, with a substantial increase in the odds of PLOS observed with nearly every additional hour of cold ischemia. We conclude that CIT should be minimized to protect against the morbidity and cost associated with posttransplant PLOS. Liver Transplantation 24 762-768 2018 AASLD.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/adverse effects , Adult , End Stage Liver Disease/economics , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Liver/surgery , Liver Transplantation/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/economics , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data
13.
Pediatr Transplant ; 22(1)2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29076289

ABSTRACT

Sensenbrenner syndrome, or cranioectodermal dysplasia, is a rare heterogeneic autosomal recessive disorder, affecting ~1 of 1 000 000 live births. The syndrome usually manifests within the first year of life and can present with progressive liver and renal involvement. For all Sensenbrenner patients, renal and liver diseases are the main contributors of morbidity and mortality. In this report, we present the case of a 7-year-old boy with congenital liver disease progressing to liver failure secondary to Sensenbrenner syndrome. For this patient, evidence of liver dysfunction was evident from 2 months of age and progressed to frank cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension with multiple episodes of life-threatening variceal bleeding by age 6. This report illustrates the capability of orthotopic liver transplantation as a viable therapy for those pediatric patients suffering from severe liver failure secondary to a congenital ciliopathy, such as Sensenbrenner syndrome. In fact, early emphasis should be placed on the renal and liver involvement associated with Sensenbrenner syndrome with particular consideration for early referral for transplantation in cases with severe disease. Although the condition is rare, clinicians should be aware of it and its association with fatal liver disease to facilitate appropriate evaluation and referral.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/abnormalities , Craniosynostoses/complications , Ectodermal Dysplasia/complications , Liver Failure/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Child , Humans , Liver Failure/congenital , Male
14.
Clin Transplant ; 31(12)2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29044759

ABSTRACT

An index to predict hospital length of stay after liver transplantation could address unmet clinical needs. Length of stay is an important surrogate for hospital costs and efforts to limit stays can preserve our healthcare resources. Here, we devised a scoring system that predicts hospital length of stay following liver transplantation. We used univariate and multivariate analyses on 73 635 adult liver transplant recipient data and identified independent recipient and donor risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (>30 days). Multiple imputation was used to account for missing variables. We identified 22 factors as significant predictors of prolonged hospital stay, including the most significant risk factors: intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR 1.75, CI 1.58-1.95) and previous transplant (OR 1.60, CI 1.47-1.75). The length of stay (LOS) index assigns weighted risk points to each significant factor in a scoring system to predict prolonged hospital stay after liver transplantation with a c-statistic of 0.75. The LOS index demonstrated good discrimination across the entire population, dividing the cohort into tertiles, which had odds ratios of 2.25 (CI 2.06-2.46) and 7.90 (7.29-8.56) for prolonged hospital stay (>30 days). The LOS index utilizes 22 significant donor and recipient factors to accurately predict hospital length of stay following liver transplantation. The index further demonstrates the basis for a clear clinical recommendation to mitigate risk of long hospitalization by minimizing cold ischemia time.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Liver Failure/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Models, Statistical , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
15.
Pediatr Transplant ; 21(6)2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28670770

ABSTRACT

Drowning, a common cause of death in the pediatric population, is a potentially large donor pool for OLT. Anecdotally, transplant centers have deemed these organs high risk over concerns for infection and graft dysfunction. We theorized drowned donor liver allografts do not portend worse outcomes and therefore should not be excluded from the donation pool. We reviewed our single-center experience of pediatric OLTs between 1988 and 2015 and identified 33 drowned donor recipients. These OLTs were matched 1:2 to head trauma donor OLTs from our center. A chart review assessed postoperative peak AST and ALT, incidence of HAT, graft and recipient survival. Recipient survival at one year between patients with drowned donor vs head trauma donor allografts was not statistically significant (94% vs 97%, P=.63). HAT incidence was 6.1% in the drowned donor group vs 7.6% in the control group (P=.78). Mean postoperative peak AST and ALT was 683 U/L and 450 U/L for drowned donors vs 1119 U/L and 828 U/L in the matched cohort. These results suggest drowned donor liver allografts do not portend worse outcomes in comparison with those procured from head trauma donors.


Subject(s)
Donor Selection/methods , Drowning , Liver Transplantation , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniocerebral Trauma , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Homologous
16.
Pediatr Transplant ; 21(4)2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28295949

ABSTRACT

Portosystemic shunts can serve as a bridge to liver transplantation in patients with end-stage liver disease by providing portal decompression to treat life-threatening variceal bleeding and prevent recurrent episodes until an organ becomes available. The conventional TIPS procedure, however, is technically challenging to perform in infants due to the small size of their intrahepatic vasculature. We report two cases of emergent creation of portosystemic shunts as a bridge to liver transplantation in infants with life-threatening variceal bleeding using a conventional TIPS technique in the first case and a percutaneous DIPS technique in the other. Both procedures were successful at reducing the portosystemic pressure gradient and preventing further variceal bleeds until a liver transplant could be performed. The novel percutaneous DIPS procedure is a valuable alternative to the conventional TIPS in infants, as it is better suited for small or challenging intrahepatic vascular anatomy.


Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical/methods , End Stage Liver Disease/complications , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Infant , Male
17.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 32(4): 669-678, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27757587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low case volume has been associated with worse survival outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Our aim was to analyze wait-list outcomes in conjunction with posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 11,488 candidates waitlisted in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) for pediatric kidney transplant between 2002 and 2014, including both deceased- and living-donor transplants; 8757 (76 %) candidates received a transplant. Candidates were divided into four groups according to the average volume of yearly transplants performed in the listing center over a 12-year period: more than ten, six to nine, three to five, and fewer than three. We used multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for wait list and posttransplant mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of candidates were listed at low-volume centers in which fewer than three transplants were performed annually. These candidates had a limited transplant rate; only 49 % received a transplant versus 88 % in high-volume centers (more than ten transplants annually) (p < 0.001). Being listed at a low-volume center showed a fourfold increased risk for death while on the wait list [hazard ratio (HR) 4.0 in multivariate Cox regression and 6.1 in multivariate competing risk regression]. It was not a significant risk factor for posttransplant death in multivariate Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric transplant candidates are listed at low-volume transplant centers are transplanted less frequently and have a much greater risk of dying while on the wait list. Further studies are needed to elucidate the reasons behind the significant outcome differences.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Waiting Lists , Adolescent , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Cause of Death , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Critical Care , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
18.
Pediatr Transplant ; 20(4): 515-22, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27018238

ABSTRACT

The purposes of this study were to analyze the effects of an ERS on time to transplantation and to describe our center's experience with OLT for HB. Patients who received OLT for HB between 2000 and 2013 were included. Patient and allograft characteristics, chemotherapy regimens, and prior surgical therapies were examined. The interval between diagnosis and OLT prior to and following the institution of an ERS for transplant was compared. Survival and tumor recurrence were analyzed. Nineteen patients received OLT for HB (mean age 33 months). All children received grafts from deceased donors. Two patients underwent prior resections. Tumor recurred in four patients (21.1%). Both patients who received salvage transplants experienced post-OLT recurrence. Three of the four recurrences occurred in spite of adjuvant chemotherapy. There were three deaths: two from metastatic disease. One- and five-yr survivals were 86.1% and 73.8%. After the institution of the ERS, the mean interval between tissue diagnosis and OLT was significantly reduced. Our series of 19 patients demonstrates a 21% recurrence of HB following OLT despite chemotherapy. Five-yr survival reached 73.8%. A system of early referral can effectively reduce times between diagnosis and transplant.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Hepatoblastoma/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatoblastoma/diagnosis , Hepatoblastoma/drug therapy , Hepatoblastoma/mortality , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Humans , Infant , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Texas , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 859: 455-72, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26238064

ABSTRACT

Studies in several important areas of neuroscience, including analysis of single neurons as well as neural networks, continue to be limited by currently available experimental tools. By combining molecular probes of cellular function, such as voltage-sensitive or calcium-sensitive dyes, with advanced microscopy techniques such as multiphoton microscopy, experimental neurophysiologists have been able to partially reduce this limitation. These approaches usually provide the needed spatial resolution along with convenient optical sectioning capabilities for isolating regions of interest. However, they often fall short in providing the necessary temporal resolution, primarily due to their restrained laser scanning mechanisms. In this regard, we review a method of laser scanning for multiphoton microscopy that overcomes the temporal limitations of pervious approaches and allows for what is known as 3D Random Access Multiphoton (3D RAMP) microscopy, an imaging technique that supports full three dimensional recording of many sites of interest on physiologically relevant time scales.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Microscopy, Fluorescence, Multiphoton/methods , Neurons/physiology , Optical Imaging/methods , Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging/methods , Animals , Calcium/metabolism , Fluorescent Dyes/chemistry , Hippocampus/physiology , Hippocampus/ultrastructure , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Microscopy, Fluorescence, Multiphoton/instrumentation , Nerve Net/physiology , Nerve Net/ultrastructure , Neurons/ultrastructure , Optical Imaging/instrumentation , Time Factors , Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL