Is low serum albumin level a significant predictor for the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-thrombosis?

The present study investigates the effect of albumin levels in patients who have developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-thrombosis (HITT). A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at King Abudlaziz Medical City (KAMC), a university teaching hospital, on patients diagnosed with HIT between June 2013 and December 2014. Clinical and laboratory findings were used to confirm HIT. Albumin levels were reported on admission as baseline and during HIT occurrence. Twenty-eight patients were identified as HIT positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with a cutoff value of ≥1 optical density units and pretest probability "4Ts" score of ≥4. Of the 28 patients, nine (32%) developed HITT. Demographic characteristics of the patients who developed HIT and HITT were similar. The mean albumin level for patients who developed HITT was significantly lower than that for patients who developed HIT (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that patients with low serum albumin levels are at greater risk of developing HITT. This finding awaits confirmation in larger prospective clinical trials.

Mortality outcomes in patients transfused with fresher versus older red blood cells: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Among transfused patients, the effect of the duration of red blood cell storage on mortality remains unclear. This study aims to compare the mortality of patients who were transfused with fresher versus older red blood cells. METHODS: We performed an updated systematic search in the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, from January 2015 to October 2016. RCTs of hospitalized patients of any age comparing transfusion of fresher versus older red blood cells were eligible. We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: We identified 14 randomized trials that enrolled 26 374 participants. All-cause mortality occurred in 1219 of 9531 (12·8%) patients who received a transfusion of fresher red blood cells and 1810 of 16 843 (10·7%) in those who received older red blood cells (RR: 1·04, 95% CI: 0·98-1·12, P = 0·90, I2 = 0%, high certainty for ruling out benefit of fresh blood, moderate certainty for ruling out harm of fresh blood). In six studies, in-hospital death occurred in 691 of 7479 (9·2%) patients receiving fresher red cells and 1291 of 14 757 (8·8%) receiving older red cells (RR: 1·06, 95% CI: 0·97-1·15, P = 0·81, I2 = 0%, high certainty for ruling out benefit of fresh blood, moderate certainty for ruling out harm of fresh blood). CONCLUSION: Transfusion of fresher red blood cells does not reduce overall or in-hospital mortality when compared with older red blood cells. Our results support the practice of transfusing patients with the oldest red blood cells available in the blood bank.

Evaluation of the appropriateness of frozen plasma usage after introduction of prothrombin complex concentrates: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) can be used instead of frozen plasma (FP) transfusion to reverse the effect of warfarin. Audits have demonstrated over usage of FP transfusions even before the introduction of PCC. The objective of this study was to determine the appropriateness of current FP transfusion practice in the current era since the introduction of PCCs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients receiving FP over 3 months was carried out. Each episode of FP use over a 24-h period was adjudicated independently by two reviewers as appropriate (consistent with Canadian/AABB guidelines), appropriate but inconsistent with guidelines or inappropriate. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Use of FP to reverse warfarin was considered inappropriate. FP usage from previous years was assessed as baseline. RESULTS: During the study period, 111 FP transfusions were administered. 74.8% of FP usage occurred in the ICU. The proportion of FP transfusions that were deemed appropriate, inconsistent yet appropriate or inappropriate were 33/89 (37.1%), 16/89 (18.0%) and 40/89 (44.9%), respectively, when use of FP for therapeutic plasma exchange was excluded. The most common reasons for inappropriate use were the absence of bleeding with an increased INR or warfarin reversal. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to audit FP transfusions in the post-PCC era in Canada. FP usage remains inappropriately high in INR prolongation without another indication or to reverse warfarin. Targeted interventions to reduce FP usage in the future should focus on the ICU and on education about warfarin reversal.

Weight-adjusted tinzaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in bariatric surgery patients weighing 160 kg or more.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery patients experience an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), however, the optimal dose of low-molecular-weight heparin for VTE prophylaxis remains uncertain. Currently, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton utilizes a weight-adjusted tinzaparin dosage (50 to 75 units/kg rounded to nearest pre-filled syringe) for postoperative VTE prophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the safety of weight-adjusted tinzaparin for VTE prophylaxis in bariatric surgery patients weighing ≥160 kg. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving patients weighing ≥160 kg that underwent bariatric surgery from September 2015 to September 2019. Patients received a single dose of weight-adjusted subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) [5000 or 7500 IU] immediately prior to surgery, subcutaneous UFH [5000 IU, 7500 IU, or unspecified] immediately postoperatively, and either 10,000 or 14,000 IU of tinzaparin, beginning on the day after surgery, for 10 days. Intra-operative sequential compression devices could be used at the attending surgeon's discretion. Occurrence of VTE and major bleeding within 30 days of surgery were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were included for analysis, all patients received in-hospital follow-up while 349 patients had also 30-day follow-up. For the primary safety and efficacy analysis of in-hospital events, VTE and major bleeding rates were 0.26% [95% CI 0.01%-1.44%] (1/389) and 0.77% [95% CI 0.21%-2.24%] (3/389) respectively. For patients with 30-day follow-up VTE and major bleeding rates were 0.57% [95% CI 0.1%-2.07%] (2/349) and 1.43% [95% CI 0.61%-3.3%] (5/349) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted tinzaparin was associated with a low risk of bleeding and VTE events, supporting its use for VTE prophylaxis for patients weighing ≥160 kg.

Blood transfusion rates following shoulder arthroplasty in a high volume UK centre and analysis of risk factors associated with transfusion.

AIMS: To determine the blood transfusion rates following shoulder arthroplasty and to establish risk factors associated with increased risk of transfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All shoulder arthroplasty cases performed between January 2012 and March 2017 in a tertiary upper limb unit were identified. Patients who received perioperative tranexamic acid were excluded. Retrospective review of case notes was completed to identify transfusion rate and risk factors. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to analyse the association between risk factors and transfusion rate. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-seven shoulder arthroplasties performed in 474 patients were included. Peri- or post-operative transfusion was required in 21 cases (3.9%). Univariate analysis suggested significant association with age (p = 0.005), female sex (0.015), preoperative haemoglobin/haematocrit (p < 0.001), perioperative drop in haemoglobin (p < 0.001), ASA grade (p < 0.001) and transfusion rate. Only perioperative drop in haemoglobin (p < 0.001) and American Society of Anaesthesiologist score (ASA) grade (p = 0.039) retained significance on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The blood transfusion rate following shoulder arthroplasty was 3.9%. Greater perioperative drop in haemoglobin and higher ASA grade were associated with increased risk of transfusion on multivariate analysis.

Resumption of anticoagulant therapy after anticoagulant-related gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is permanently discontinued in up to 50% of patients following a gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. A previous meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of thromboembolism and death, and a non-statistically significant increased risk of re-bleeding associated with resumption. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to determine the risks of recurrent GI bleeding, thromboembolism, and death in patients who resumed OAC compared to those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for new references from January 2014 to September 2017. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving adults with OAC-related GI bleeding were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's ROBINS-I tool. Pooled relative risk (RR) ratios were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 12 observational studies involving 3098 patients. There was an increased risk of recurrent GI bleeding (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.47-2.48, I2 = 0%, 11 studies), and a reduced risk of thromboembolism (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68, I2 = 59.8%, 9 studies) and death (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.70, I2 = 71.8%, 8 studies) in patients who resumed OAC compared to those who did not. Eleven studies were judged to be at serious risk of bias due to confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Resuming OAC after OAC-related GI bleeding appears to be associated with an increase in recurrent GI bleeding, but a reduction in thromboembolism and death. Further prospective data are needed to identify patients for whom the net clinical benefit favours OAC resumption and the optimal timing of resumption.

Weight-adjusted tinzaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after bariatric surgery.

Essentials The optimal dose and duration of thromboprophylaxis after bariatric surgery are unclear. We evaluated the safety of weight-adjusted tinzaparin prophylaxis in 1212 patients. In-hospital rates of venous thromboembolism and major bleeding were 0.2% and 1.8% respectively. In a sub-set of patients, trough anti-Xa levels did not show excessive anticoagulant activity. SUMMARY: Background Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The optimal dose and duration of anticoagulant prophylaxis is uncertain. Objective To evaluate the safety of extended-duration weight-adjusted tinzaparin after bariatric surgery. Patients/methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery who received weight-adjusted tinzaparin 4500-14 000 IU daily (75 IU kg-1 rounded to the nearest prefilled syringe) for 10 days after surgery (7-9 days post-hospital discharge). Primary safety outcomes were the frequency of VTE and major bleeding within 30 days of surgery in patients receiving at least one dose of tinzaparin. Results A total of 1279 patients undergoing bariatric surgery between July 2009 and December 2012 were reviewed, of whom 1212 received weight-adjusted tinzaparin. Safety outcomes were collected for 819 patients at 30 days, and for 1212 patients in-hospital only. The median age was 45.0 years, median weight was 130.0 kg and 98.8% of patients underwent gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. In patients completing 30 days of follow-up, VTE occurred in 4/819 (0.5%) and major bleeding occurred in 13/819 patients (1.6%). In-hospital rates of VTE and major bleeding during surgical admission were 3/1212 (0.2%) and 22/1212 (1.8%), respectively. Conclusions Extended thromboprophylaxis with weight-adjusted tinzaparin appears to be a safe strategy after bariatric surgery, with low rates of postoperative VTE and major bleeding.

Association of body weight with efficacy and safety outcomes in phase III randomized controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Essentials The association of body weight and patient-important outcomes remains unknown. Phase III randomized controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were searched. Risk of outcomes varying among body weight subgroups is not attributable to anticoagulant type. Dose adjustment of DOACs, outside that recommended, is unlikely to improve the outcomes. Click to hear Dr Braunwald's perspective on antithrombotic therapy in cardiovascular disease SUMMARY: Background Concerns have arisen in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-treated patients about safety and efficacy in extremes of body weight. The aims of this systematic review were to investigate the association of body weight and patient-important outcomes in patients treated with DOACs or warfarin, and to demonstrate the fixed-dose effect of DOACs. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until November 2016. Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using DOACs in atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) were included. Relative risk and 95% confidence interval were calculated. The pooled estimates were performed using a Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. Results A total of 11 phase III RCTs were included. Low body weight was associated with increased risk of thromboembolism compared with non-low body weight (relative risk [RR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-1.85). High body weight was not associated with risk of thromboembolism compared with non-high body weight (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.63-1.23). The subgroup of AF patients with high body weight had a lower risk of thromboembolism compared with non-high body weight (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.67). Bleeding outcomes were comparable for all body weight comparisons. There were no clear interactions between types of anticoagulant in all outcomes. Conclusion The pooled effect of both the DOAC and comparison arms was likely to be attributable to differences in baseline thrombotic risk in each body weight category, rather than an effect of the type or dose of DOAC used for each indication. Dose adjustment of DOACs, outside that recommended in the package insert, is unlikely to improve safety or efficacy.

Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study.

UNLABELLED: Essentials Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a thrombogenic condition that is difficult to treat. We evaluated rivaroxaban as a treatment option in patients with suspected or confirmed HIT. One patient had recurrent thrombosis and 9/10 patients with thrombocytopenia had platelet recovery. Rivaroxaban may be an effective and safe treatment option for HIT. SUMMARY: Background Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anti-Xa inhibitor that has the potential to greatly simplify treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in this patient population, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, prospective cohort study of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT. Patients/Methods Twenty-two consecutive adults with suspected or confirmed HIT received rivaroxaban 15 mg bid until a local HIT assay result was available. Participants with a positive local assay result continued rivaroxaban 15 mg bid until platelet recovery (or until day 21 if they had acute thrombosis at study entry), then stepped down to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily until day 30. Results and Conclusions The primary outcome measure, incidence of new symptomatic, objectively-confirmed venous and arterial thromboembolism at 30 days, occurred in one HIT-positive participant (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-23.5%) and one HIT-positive participant required limb amputation despite platelet recovery. Platelet recovery was achieved in nine out of 10 HIT-positive patients with thrombocytopenia. Rivaroxaban appears to be effective for treating patients with confirmed HIT, although the small number of patients enrolled limits precision.

Video laparoscopic surgery: is out-of-hospital thromboprophylaxis necessary?

Despite widespread use of laparoscopic procedures, no adequate data are available to support specific recommendations for venous thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. This prospective, randomized trial is the first to be designed to evaluate a regimen of out-of-hospital thromboprophylaxis after laparoscopic surgery. Consecutive patients admitted for laparoscopic surgery were considered for the study. The thromboprophylaxis regimen used for each patient was based on a risk score. Possible thromboprophylactic measures included elastic stockings and pre- and postoperative Dalteparin or early ambulation. At discharge, patients were randomly allocated either to continue Dalteparin for 1 week, or to receive no further prophylaxis. Patients judged to be at low risk were not randomized. Compression ultrasound of the leg veins was performed in all patients 4 weeks after hospital discharge. Fifty-three patients, all with acute appendicitis, were judged to be at low risk of deep vein thrombosis and were not included in the randomized study. The remaining 209 patients fell into two groups: 104 patients received postdischarge Dalteparin and 105 patients did not. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 0% (0 of 104) vs. 0.95% (one of 105), respectively (P = 1.00). The risk of postdischarge venous thromboembolism is low in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery who receive in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. Given this low risk, a clinical trial powered to determine if extending prophylaxis in such patients reduces the risk of clinically apparent deep vein thrombosis would be unfeasibly large.

Does the type of hormone replacement therapy influence the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A prospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), it is not clear if the risk differs in users of combined estrogen-progestin HRT and estrogen-only HRT. METHODS: We prospectively studied postmenopausal women with suspected DVT in whom HRT use status was ascertained and who subsequently had objective diagnostic testing to confirm or exclude DVT. Cases were patients with idiopathic DVT, in whom there were no DVT risk factors, and controls were patients without DVT, in whom there were also no DVT risk factors. The risk of DVT was determined in users of estrogen-progestin HRT and estrogen-only HRT by comparing the prevalence of current HRT use in cases with idiopathic DVT and controls without DVT (reference group). Multivariable regression analysis was done to adjust for factors that might confound an association between HRT use and the risk of DVT. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and sixty-eight postmenopausal women with suspected DVT were assessed, from whom 95 cases of idiopathic DVT and 610 controls without DVT and no DVT risk factors were identified. Estrogen-only HRT was associated with an increased risk for DVT that was not statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57, 2.61]. Estrogen-progestin HRT was associated with a greater than 2-fold increased risk for DVT (OR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.44, 5.07). CONCLUSION: The risk of developing DVT may be higher in users of combined estrogen-progestin HRT than in users of estrogen-only HRT.

Predictors of the post-thrombotic syndrome during long-term treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: The post-thrombotic syndrome is a chronic, poorly understood complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate predictors of the post-thrombotic syndrome, including intensity of long-term anticoagulation, and to assess the impact of the post-thrombotic syndrome on quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The setting was 13 Canadian hospitals and one US hospital. One hundred and forty-five patients with an unprovoked episode of proximal DVT who were initially treated with 3 months of conventional-intensity warfarin [target International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.5] then participated in a trial comparing two intensities of long-term warfarin therapy (target INR 2.5 vs. INR 1.7). Post-thrombotic syndrome was assessed at the end of the trial using a validated clinical scale. Generic and venous disease-specific quality of life was compared in patients with and without the post-thrombotic syndrome. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of the post-thrombotic syndrome and of its severity. RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 2.2 years, the prevalence of post-thrombotic syndrome was 37% and of severe post-thrombotic syndrome was 4%. Quality of life was worse in patients with the post-thrombotic syndrome compared with patients who did not have it. The presence of factor (F)V Leiden or the prothrombin gene mutation was an independent predictor of both a lower risk (P = 0.006) and reduced severity (P = 0.045) of the post-thrombotic syndrome. Intensity of anticoagulation did not influence the risk of developing the post-thrombotic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The post-thrombotic syndrome is a frequent and burdensome complication of proximal DVT, even among patients maintained on long-term oral anticoagulation. While the presence of FV Leiden or prothrombin gene mutation appears to be associated with a reduced risk of post-thrombotic syndrome, this finding requires further evaluation in prospective studies.

Neither baseline tests of molecular hypercoagulability nor D-dimer levels predict deep venous thrombosis in critically ill medical-surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE: Predicting patients who are harboring asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), or who are at particular risk of developing DVT, is a desirable clinical goal since prevention or early treatment of DVT might reduce the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism. Thus validation of simple laboratory tests that reliably predict venous thromboembolism (VTE) would be clinically very important. Tests that might be useful for these applications include markers of hypercoagulability (predicting patients at risk of DVT) and D-dimer (predicting which patients may have acute DVT). METHODS: In a prospective cohort study we measured a panel of hypercoagulability markers at the time of ICU admission, and six commercial D-dimer assays were performed serially during the ICU stay in medical-surgical ICU patients who were screened for DVT with biweekly lower limb compression ultrasonography. Ultrasonography was also performed at the time of any clinically suspected DVT events. We matched cases with DVT with controls without DVT for length of stay in the ICU to generate receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven patients were enrolled. Blood was collected on a total of 763 occasions (median number of occasions per patient: 3, range 1-21). None of the assays predicted DVT, as indicated by the areas under the ROC curves, that did not differ significantly from 50%. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, neither tests of hypercoagulability nor D-dimer levels predict patients at risk of DVT and thus they should not be used to guide diagnostic testing for DVT.

Clinical risk factors and timing of recurrent venous thromboembolism during the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy.

BACKGROUND: In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), identifying clinical risk factors for recurrence during the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy and knowledge of the time course of recurrence may help clinicians decide about the frequency of clinical surveillance and the appropriateness of outpatient treatment. METHODS: Analysis of a randomized controlled trial database involving 1021 patients with VTE (750 with deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and 271 with pulmonary embolism [PE]) who were followed up for 3 months after the start of anticoagulant therapy. All patients received initial treatment with unfractionated heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin (reviparin) and a coumarin derivative starting the first or second day of treatment, with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. RESULTS: Four independent clinical risk factors for recurrent VTE were identified: (1) cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1. 39-5.32), (2) chronic cardiovascular disease (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1. 08-4.97), (3) chronic respiratory disease (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.85-4. 26), and (4) other clinically significant medical disease (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.00-3.21). Older age was associated with a decreased risk for recurrent VTE (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92). Previous VTE, sex, and idiopathic VTE were not risk factors for recurrence. In patients with DVT or PE, there was no significant difference in the rates of recurrent nonfatal VTE (4.8% vs 4.1%; P =.62), major bleeding (2.9% vs 2.2%; P =.53), and non-VTE death (6.4% vs 7.8%; P =.45), but recurrent fatal PE was more frequent in patients with PE than DVT (2. 2% vs 0%; P<.01). There was a clustering of recurrent VTE episodes during the initial 2 to 3 weeks after the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: During the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy, recurrent VTE is more likely to occur in patients with cancer, chronic cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, or other clinically significant medical disease. Patients with PE are as likely to develop recurrent VTE as those with DVT; however, recurrence is more likely to be fatal in patients who initially present with PE. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3431-3436.

A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin sodium therapy is usually initiated with a loading dose to reduce the time required to elevate the international normalized ratio (INR). Warfarin loading doses are associated with early overanticoagulation and the development of a potential hypercoagulable state; they also may not hasten achieving an INR value between 2.0 and 3.0. This study was designed to prospectively confirm our observation that a 5-mg warfarin sodium loading dose is as effective as a 10-mg loading dose in achieving a therapeutic INR for 2 consecutive days on days 3 and 4 or 4 and 5 of therapy. METHODS: Fifty-three patients initiating warfarin therapy with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 were randomly allocated to receive an initial dose of 5 or 10 mg of warfarin. Subsequent doses were based on dosing algorithms. The INR was measured daily for 5 days. The primary end point of the study was the proportion of patients whose INR values were between 2.0 and 3.0 on 2 consecutive daily determinations on days 3, 4, or 5 of the study and whose INR did not exceed 3.0 at any point during the study. RESULTS: Five (24%) of 21 patients in the 10-mg group and 21 (66%) of 32 patients in the 5-mg group achieved the primary end point (relative risk 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.30-3.70 [P < .003]). A trend toward less overanticoagulation was seen in the 5-mg warfarin group. CONCLUSION: A 10-mg loading dose of warfarin is unlikely to be more effective than a 5-mg loading dose in achieving an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 by day 4 or 5 of therapy.

Propagation of stress fracture of the patella.

Anterior knee pain in athletes is common and usually self limited. There should be a high index of suspicion and low threshold for special imaging in cases with acute onset and specific tenderness. The risk of propagation of stress fracture of the patella in athletes is highlighted. The case report presented illustrates the potential sequence of events.

Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: diagnosis, pathogenesis and management.

Maternal thrombocytopenia is a common find during pregnancy. The rapid determination of its cause can often be difficult, with the diagnosis only being made in retrospect once the course of the platelet count is known. The majority of patients with thrombocytopenia in pregnancy will have incidental thrombocytopenia of pregnancy which is of no clinical significance.

Does the location of thrombosis determine the risk of disease recurrence in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis?

PURPOSE: To determine if the location of deep vein thrombosis is a predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism during the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1,149 consecutive patients with symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis. In all patients, deep vein thrombosis was confirmed by Duplex ultrasound or venography and was classified as popliteal, femoral, or iliofemoral. Patients received initial treatment with unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, or reviparin for least 4 days, as well as a coumarin derivative, with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0, starting on the 1st or 2nd day of treatment. All patients were followed for 3 months, and all episodes of recurrent venous thromboembolism were confirmed with objective diagnostic tests. RESULTS: The overall rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism during the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy was 5.5% (63/1,149). The rate of recurrence in patients with popliteal vein thrombosis was 5.1% (23/453); in patients with femoral vein thrombosis, it was 5.3% (34/645); and in patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis, it was 11.8% (6/51). Two clinical risk factors were associated with an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: iliofemoral vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95, 5.9), and cancer (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5, 4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with extensive iliofemoral vein thrombosis who receive conventional anticoagulant therapy have a greater than twofold higher risk of developing recurrent venous thromboembolism than patients without iliac vein involvement (i.e., 11.8% vs. 5.2%). Prospective studies are needed to determine whether alternative antithrombotic strategies are warranted in such patients.

Free protein S deficiency may be found in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies who do not have systemic lupus erythematosus.

In order to determine if there is a relationship between antiphospholipid antibodies and reduced free protein S levels, we evaluated 21 patients who had an antiphospholipid antibody but had neither a history of venous thromboembolism nor systemic lupus erythematosus (cases) and 55 matched controls, who did not have an antiphospholipid antibody, a history of thrombosis or systemic lupus erythematosus. Cases and controls had similar protein C and antithrombin levels. Six of 21 cases had reduced free protein S antigen levels, compared to 5 of 55 controls (chi 2 = 5.823 p < 0.025). In addition, the mean free protein S level was significantly lower in cases than in controls (0.30 +/- 0.09 units vs 0.39 +/- 0.13 units, p < 0.01, two-tailed Student's t-test). We conclude that antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with a significant decrease in free protein S levels, and that this acquired free protein S deficiency may contribute to the thrombotic diathesis seen in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Low-dose oral vitamin K reliably reverses over-anticoagulation due to warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving long-term warfarin frequently develop asymptomatic excessive prolongation of their international normalized ratio (INR) results. The most appropriate management strategy in these patients is unknown. This prospective cohort study was designed to address whether 1 mg of oral vitamin K effectively reduces the INR value of such patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in two tertiary care teaching hospitals, in which 62 patients receiving warfarin who had INR values between 4.5 and 10.0 received 1 mg of oral vitamin K. All patients had daily INR values and clinical assessments performed. RESULTS: The mean INR value at presentation was 5.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.48 to 6.09, range 4.5 to 9.5). Sixteen hours after receiving the 1 mg of oral vitamin K, the mean INR was 2.86 (95% CI 2.50 to 3.23). On the second and third days after vitamin K, the mean INR values were 2.20 (1.93 to 2.47) and 2.14 (1.85 to 2.44), respectively. No adverse events or bleeding complications were observed. In three patients (6%) the INR value rose between the time of vitamin K administration and the next INR determination; two patients received a further 2 mg dose of subcutaneous vitamin K. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving warfarin who have asymptomatic excessive prolongations in their INR results, 1 mg of oral vitamin K reliably reduces the INR to the therapeutic range within 24 h. This therapy is more convenient, less expensive, and might be safer than parenteral vitamin K. Thus, it should be considered in all non-bleeding patients receiving warfarin, who present with INR results of 4.5 to 9.5.