Patterns of bisphosphonate treatment among patients with multiple myeloma treated at oncology clinics across the USA: observations from real-world data.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend that intravenous bisphosphonates be initiated in all patients with multiple myeloma for management of bone disease. The objective of this study was to describe real-world bisphosphonate treatment patterns. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using oncology electronic health record (EHR) data contained in Amgen's Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database, generated by Flatiron Health (New York, NY), representing over 1.5 million US oncology patients. Patients were newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma between January 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016. Timing of bisphosphonate administration, frequency, schedule, changes in dosing schedule, and discontinuations were calculated. Bisphosphonate treatment relative to renal function and anti-multiple myeloma therapy regimens were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 11,112 patients were enrolled in the study with a median follow-up of 687 days. Sixty-three percent received ≥ 1 bisphosphonate administration, primarily every 4 weeks (67.7%). Mean time from diagnosis to bisphosphonate administration was 106 days (median, 29). Most patients (58.2%) initiated treatment in first year after diagnosis and about half (51.9%) either discontinued or changed dosing. Patients with poorer renal function by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stage at baseline were less likely to receive bisphosphonates (eGFR stage 5 vs 1: 24 vs 72%) and more likely to have delayed initiation of bisphosphonate treatment from diagnosis (eGFR stage 5 vs 1: median 70 vs 25 days). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data from US oncology practices indicate that many patients with multiple myeloma may not receive optimal therapy for bone disease, particularly those with renal impairment.

Migraine Characteristics, Comorbidities, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Associated Costs of Early Users of Erenumab in the USA: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Administrative Claims Data.

INTRODUCTION: Erenumab is indicated for migraine preventive treatment in adults. The objective of this study was to provide descriptive information on real-world use of erenumab including patient profile and treatment patterns. METHODS: We completed a retrospective review of US data (through May 2019) from the IBM MarketScan® Early View Databases, identifying adult patients newly treated with erenumab with a migraine claim in the year prior to first erenumab claim (index) and at least 1 year of continuous pre-index medical and pharmacy insurance coverage, to assess pre- and post-erenumab migraine characteristics, comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization, and associated costs. All data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 9753 patients met inclusion criteria. The average (SD) age was 46 (12) years, 85% of patients were female, and 64% had at least one claim for chronic migraine; 70% of erenumab users had an initial dose of 70 mg; 77% of patients in the 6-month follow-up sample (n = 4437) remained on their initial erenumab dose. Persistence at 6-month follow-up was 47.3% with a mean (95% CI) proportion of days covered of 0.68 (0.67, 0.68). In the post-erenumab period, claims for comorbidities of non-migraine headaches and anxiety were reduced and there was a shift to decreased use of acute and preventive medications. Reductions in overall use and associated cost of healthcare resources such as inpatient hospitalization and outpatient office visits were minimal, with slightly more pronounced reductions in the subgroup of patients that were persistent to erenumab. CONCLUSIONS: We observed reductions in claims for important migraine characteristics, comorbidities, and a shift to decreased use of acute and preventive migraine medications-observations indicative of the real-world effectiveness of erenumab. Further examination is required as persistence to erenumab, which may be influenced by dose titration, appears to be an important factor in changes to healthcare resource utilization and costs.

Incidence of skeletal-related events among multiple myeloma patients in the United States at oncology clinics: Observations from real-world data.

Skeletal-related events (SREs) are common bone complications in multiple myeloma (MM). However, there are few real-world reports of their incidence. In this study, a database of oncology electronic health records was linked to administrative claims data. Patients identified were aged ≥18 years and newly diagnosed with MM, had ≥1 clinic visit within 1 month of diagnosis, and ≥1 year of follow-up after diagnosis. The study period was January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2016. 343 patients were included, 35% of whom had a baseline history of any SRE. During a median follow-up of 25.7 months, 34% of patients experienced SREs after diagnosis. Median time to SRE was 167 days. Among patients experiencing an SRE, 68% had an SRE within the first year. The incidence rate of SREs at 1 year following MM diagnosis for patients with baseline history was 103/100 person-years (PY) versus 16/100PY for patients without baseline history. SRE incidence rates within 3 months of initiating a line of therapy increased with subsequent lines (line 1: 81/100PY, line 2: 118/100PY, line 3: 150/100PY). Risk of SREs was similar across different anti-MM regimens, including proteasome inhibitor-based regimens. These results highlight the importance of continued surveillance and management of MM-associated bone disease.

Gastrointestinal bleeding rates among managed care patients newly started on cox-2 inhibitors or nonselective NSAIDs.

OBJECTIVE: While cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors were introduced to the U.S. market with the promise of less gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity than nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), additional research is needed to examine this outcome in the naturalistic setting. The objective of this study was to examine whether use of COX-2 inhibitors is associated with reduced risk of GI bleed in a managed care population. METHODS: Adult patients in a multistate managed care organization that were initiated on a nonselective NSAID between January 1999 and August 2002 were identified and matched using propensity scoring with patients in the same managed care organization that were initiated on a COX-2 inhibitor. Matching variables included age, gender, geographical state, comorbidity index, corticosteroid use, warfarin use, arthritis indication, and history of recent GI bleed. Patients were followed until they switched or discontinued their NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor, disenrolled from the health plan, developed a GI bleed, or reached the end of the 1-year follow-up period. A GI bleed was defined as an inpatient hospitalization for GI bleed or at least 2 medical claims with a primary diagnosis for GI bleed. The relative risk (RR) of GI bleed was calculated using proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Overall, 35,007 pairs of COX-2 inhibitor and nonselective NSAID users were evaluated. Mean age was 63 years, and 65% were female. There were 375 cases of GI bleed among 19,201 follow-up years for COX-2 users (19.5 cases per 1,000 person-years) versus 228 cases of GI bleed among 12,680 follow-up years for NSAID users (18.0 cases per 1,000 person-years). The risk of GI bleed was not significantly different for COX-2 users compared with nonselective NSAID users (RR 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.26). Even among high-risk patients, there was no reduction in the risk of a GI bleed among users of COX-2 inhibitors (RR 0.995; 95% CI, 0.84 -1.19). CONCLUSION: Overall, within this managed care population, COX-2 inhibitor users did not have a reduced risk of a GI bleed compared with patients with similar baseline characteristics using nonselective NSAIDs.