[Self expandable metal stent as bridge-to-surgery in acute bowel obstruction]. / Le protesi colorettali come bridge to surgery nelle occlusioni intestinali acute.

AIM: Self expandable metal stent (SEMS) can be used to relieve malignant colorectal obstruction. The stent serves as a palliative measure for high-risk patients or those with unresectable tumor on subsequent workup. For low-risk patients with resectable disease, SEMS serves as a safe and effective bridge to subsequent laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: From August 2009 to April 2012 we have treated with SEMS 39 patients, 20 of whom with palliative purpose; 19 patients are treated with SEMS for bridge to surgery, out of these patients, 8 were women, 11 men with median age of 61.4 years (range 36-81 years). Technical success, defined as a successful stent placement and deployment in the stricture site, was achieved for 39/40 patients (97.5%). The average duration of the procedure was about 60 minutes (range 15-120). RESULTS: Clinical success was achieved for all the 39 patients, 19 of these could be subjected to bowel preparation and colon resection after 25 days from the positioning. No colostomy was performed. Among patients undergoing the procedure, perforation occurred in 1 case. CONCLUSION: In summary, the colonic stent placement is a complex method that needs qualified medical-nursing team, able to solve any difficult situation, such as the severe, irregular and distal obstruction. SEMS positioning guarantees a high percentage of clinical and technical success; however it is necessary to pay attention to the risk of complications like bowel perforation.

Infection prevention in endoscopy practice: comparative evaluation of re-usable vs single-use endoscopic valves.

Re-usable air/water and suction valves used in endoscopes often demonstrate risk of infection. To the authors' knowledge, the safety and efficacy of re-usable and single-use valves have not been compared to date. As such, a laboratory investigation was undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of re-usable and single-use valves at 11 Italian endoscopy sites. Safety was evaluated by analysing the rinse liquid of reprocessed re-usable valves ready for use, and efficacy was assessed based on the completion of endoscopic procedures without valve malfunction. This study found significantly lower contamination of single-use valves compared with re-usable valves (0 vs 29.1%, respectively; P=0.007) and similar efficacy (97.6 vs 98.8%, respectively; P=ns). Microbiological analysis of the rinse liquid of reprocessed re-usable valves identified various surviving micro-organisms and highlighted their potential pathogenicity. Such data suggest that sterile single-use valves may be safer than re-usable valves, and have comparable performance.