Treatment of refractory cardiac allograft rejection with OKT3 monoclonal antibody.

OKT3 monoclonal antibody is a murine monoclonal antibody specific for the T lymphocyte T3 cell surface receptor that mediates antigen recognition. The use of OKT3 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection refractory to conventional therapy with high-dose steroids and antithymocyte globulin is described. Seven patients received 5 mg of OKT3 monoclonal antibody intravenously per day for 10 to 14 days. Diagnosis of moderate or severe rejection was made in all seven from right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. Biopsy was repeated 48 to 72 hours and seven to 10 days after OKT3 monoclonal antibody was begun. With treatment, four patients had a complete response, with improvement on both early and late biopsy. Two patients had partial responses, with improvement on early biopsy followed by worsening rejection on late biopsy. One patient died of graft failure six hours after receiving OKT3 monoclonal antibody. Adverse events were common in the first two days of therapy but were well tolerated. It is concluded that OKT3 monoclonal antibody is useful in the treatment of refractory cardiac allograft rejection.

Age-associated decline in cardiac allograft rejection.

The influence of age on cardiac allograft rejection was studied in 57 consecutive recipients. Twenty-one subjects were 54 years of age or older (mean, 57.7 +/- 0.6 years [+/- SEM]; range, 54 to 63 years) and 36 subjects were 52 years of age or younger (mean, 39.9 +/- 1.8 years; range, 16 to 52 years; p less than 0.001). The older recipients had fewer rejection episodes during the first four months following cardiac transplantation (0.24 +/- 0.05 episodes per month versus 0.72 +/- 0.09 episodes per month; p less than 0.001) and during the total duration of follow-up (0.20 +/- 0.03 episodes per month versus 0.40 +/- 0.07 episodes per month; p = 0.045), and experienced their first rejection episode later (50.4 +/- 4.0 days versus 27.7 +/- 8.5 days; p = 0.008). Younger age was found to add significantly as a predictor of rejection in a multivariate analysis that controlled for sex, immunosuppressive agents, cause of heart failure, and pretransplantation lymphocyte cross-match status (r = 0.64, p less than 0.05). Decreased rejection frequency occurred without a concomitant increase in the serious infection rate (67 percent in both groups). The 12-month actuarial survival was 100 percent in the older group and 94 percent in the younger group (p = NS). Decreased rejection in the older recipients is likely a manifestation of an age-associated decline in immune function and might represent an advantage in transplantation for carefully selected older patients.

Ag-F: serological and genetic identification of a new locus in the rat governing lymphocyte membrane antigens.

A new genetic locus in the rat (Ag-F) is described. It controls expression of lymphocyte membrane antigens as determined by allospecific cytotoxic antibody. It is linked by approximately two recombination units to the gene for albinism and is therefore in linkage group I. It is suggested that Ag-F is the homologue in the rat of mouse H-1. It appears to be highly polymorphic and yields antigens which are highly cross reactive serologically. Disparity at Af-F is the probable cause of alloantibody responses attributable to reciprocal immunization between the Lewis and Fischer strains.

Outcome of cardiac transplant recipients with a positive donor-specific crossmatch--preliminary results with plasmapheresis.

To assess the influence of a positive T or B cell IgG crossmatch on the development of rejection and mortality following cardiac transplantation, we reviewed all cardiac transplants performed in Utah between March 1985 and October 1990. Of the 328 cardiac allograft recipients, 11 (3.4%) had an IgG positive crossmatch. Actuarial survival at 24 months in the positive crossmatch group was 57.3% +/- 0.02 while that of the controls was 86.1% +/- 2.1 (P < 0.05). Allograft rejection occurred earlier in recipients with a positive crossmatch (10.0 +/- 5.8 days versus 34.0 +/- 2.3 days, P < 0.001). The first allograft rejection episode in patients with a positive crossmatch was characterized by immunoglobulin and complement deposition in small blood vessels and interstitial edema and endothelial cell activation in the absence of a lymphocytic infiltrate. Furthermore, the allograft rejection in the positive crossmatch group was accompanied by hemodynamic compromise in a large proportion of the patients (73%). In addition to augmentation of immunosuppression, plasma exchange therapy was performed within the first week following transplantation in 8 of the 11 positive crossmatch patients. Survival in the patients treated with plasma exchange (75%) appears to be better than in those not receiving plasma exchange (33%) within one week of transplantation. While immunosuppressive therapy aimed at the humoral arm of the immune system and plasma exchange therapy may improve survival in recipients with a positive donor-specific crossmatch, survival is worse in patients with a positive crossmatch than in patients with a negative crossmatch. Thus, it would appear prudent to prospectively crossmatch cardiac transplant candidates with a greater risk of developing a positive crossmatch, such as those potential recipients with an elevated level of panel-reactive antibodies.

Relationship of OKT3 sensitization and vascular rejection in cardiac transplant patients receiving OKT3 rejection prophylaxis.

We prospectively and serially monitored plasma levels of OKT3 in 20 patients who were receiving 14- or 21-day rejection prophylaxis with OKT3. We retrospectively compared plasma OKT3 levels with biopsy scores assessed by light microscopy and immunofluorescence, clinical findings, human antimouse antibody (HAMA) production assessed by a blocking assay and by ELISA, and circulating immune complex levels assessed by a flow cytometric Raji cell assay. Using these methods, we evaluated the relationship of OKT3 sensitization, a humorally mediated immune response, to the development of vascular rejection in these patients. We found that 6 of 20 patients had declines in plasma OKT3 levels to less than 50% of their steady-state value before the conclusion of therapy (OKT3 consumption). This fall in plasma OKT3 preceded a significant rise in the CD 3 lymphocyte level by up to 3 days. All 6 patients showed HAMA production by either blocking or ELISA assay (P = less than 0.02) and developed vascular rather than cellular rejection (P = less than 0.01). OKT3 sensitization was significantly more common in patients treated with 21-day rejection prophylaxis (4 of 6 patients, P = less than 0.01). Only 4 of 14 other patients showed vascular rejection; 2 of these 4 also developed HAMA without OKT3 consumption and both had been treated with 21-day rejection prophylaxis with OKT3. None of the 20 patients showed significant levels of circulating immune complexes. This study demonstrates that OKT3 sensitization is strongly associated with vascular rejection. Vascular rejection was usually demonstrated 7 days after OKT3 consumption was seen and was coincident with HAMA production. By contrast, 4 patients without OKT3 sensitization had vascular rejection demonstrable in the early posttransplant period; in such patients, prospective immunofluorescence of biopsies was the only reliable indicator of this rejection type. The higher incidence of vascular rejection in these 20 patients was definitely related to the use of 21-day OKT3 rejection prophylaxis. Overall, 7 of the 12 patients treated with this regimen developed vascular rejection. Allograft and patient survival among patients with vascular rejection was significantly worse than in patients with cellular rejection (P = less than 0.01). Prospective monitoring of patients treated with OKT3 by serial plasma levels and by biopsy immunofluorescence will identify patients at risk for these types of humoral rejection.

Efficacy of OKT3 retreatment for refractory cardiac allograft rejection.

Although OKT3 monoclonal antibody is a useful therapy for refractory cardiac allograft rejection, the use of OKT3 for prophylaxis may be limited by the potential of sensitization and subsequent loss of efficacy on retreatment. OKT3 was required for refractory rejection in 21 of 165 recipients transplanted between March 1985 and August 1988. Twelve of these patients had previously been exposed to OKT3, and the retreatment efficacy was evaluated. The study population averaged 42.1 +/- 15.3 years of age (mean +/- SEM) and had experienced 2 +/- 1 previous episodes of rejection. The prior episodes of rejection had been treated with pulse methylprednisolone and antithymocyte globulin, and in addition 3 patients (25%) also required a course of antilymphoblast globulin. Retreatment OKT3 for refractory rejection was required 120 +/- 94 days following transplantation. CD3+ lymphocytes were eliminated from the circulation within 24-48 hr in 11 of 12 patients, all of whom showed histologic improvement within the first week. Total resolution on the initial follow-up biopsy was noted in 9 (75%) during the course of therapy. Subsequent rejection episodes occurred in 9 (82%) of the survivors at 71 +/- 64 days. One-year survival was 83% in this vigorously rejecting patient population. Serious infections occurred within 3 months of therapy in 4 (36%). The side effects of OKT3 retreatment were similar to those seen with first exposure and did not require OKT3 discontinuation. Thus OKT3 may be administered with success in most patients who have previously been exposed to it.

HLA A, B and DR typing in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a search for immune response factors.

Several autoimmune diseases have been associated with increased frequencies of various histocompatibility antigen (HLA) types that may be linked to immune response genes. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) has been proposed as a disease with autoimmune features, but HLA associations have not been evaluated. We performed HLA typing in 37 consecutive patients with IDC. Patients with habitual alcoholism were excluded. Results showed that no single HLA type could account for most cases; IDC is a genetically heterogeneous disease. However, uneven distributions were noted for certain types. Haplotype frequency of B27 was 0.145 in patients vs 0.033 in 5,726 local control subjects (p less than 0.001). Other A and B frequencies (except A2) were evenly distributed. HLA DR typing also revealed differences. The DR4 locus was present in 54% (19 of 35) of patients, vs 32% (26 of 82) of blood bank control subjects (p less than 0.02). The associated relative risk of DR4 was 2.2 and the etiologic fraction 0.29. Sex, disease chronicity, functional class, ejection fraction and biopsy evidence of myocarditis did not distinguish DR4-positive from DR4-negative patients, but they were older (54 +/- 12 vs 42 +/- 14 years, p less than 0.02). Of note, 68% were positive for DR4 or B27, or both. HLA DR6Y was underrepresented; it was present in 9% (3 of 35) of patients, vs 26% (21 of 82) of control subjects (p less than 0.04). The relative risk of DR6Y was 0.27 and the preventive fraction 0.19. These associations will require independent confirmation. However, they suggest that genetically determined immune response factors associated with HLA loci may play a role in pathogenesis in certain patients with IDC.

Sensitization to OKT3 monoclonal antibody in heart transplantation: correlation with early allograft loss.

Because administration of murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3) may result in the formation of human antimouse antibody, which complexes with OKT3, we conducted this study to assess the incidence and effect of human antimouse antibody formation during prophylactic administration of OKT3 in heart transplantation. Human antimouse antibody developed in eight of 55 (14%) cardiac allograft recipients receiving OKT3 prophylaxis as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, two recipients had an inexplicable rise in CD3+ lymphocytes during therapy without detectable antibody. The outcome of these 10 sensitized recipients was compared with that of 45 nonsensitized recipients. Age, preoperative diagnosis, hemodynamics, and the need for intravenous inotropes or mechanical assistance before transplantation were similar in both groups. No female patients were in the sensitized group, whereas 33% of the nonsensitized group were female patients. A trend toward greater sensitization when prophylaxis was extended to 21 days (28%) compared with the more conventional 14-day administration (10%) was not statistically significant. Retransplantation because of rejection was required in a single patient in each group. Allograft survival was significantly lower by 3 months in the sensitized group, and allograft loss caused by rejection selectively accounted for that difference. In survivors, rejection frequency and infectious complications were similar. These findings suggest that sensitization to OKT3 occurs at low frequency after prophylactic administration in heart transplantation but is associated with an increased frequency of graft loss because of rejection.