ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No data are available on the incidence of drug hypersensitivity (DH) reactions in outpatient settings of tertiary allergy/immunology clinics. Our aims were to document the frequency of outpatient hospital admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/immunology clinics in adults and the management of these reactions in real life. We also investigated whether drug allergy affected social and medical behaviours of the patients. METHODS: This multi-centre study was performed for one year with the participation of 11 out of 16 tertiary allergy/clinical immunology clinics in Turkey. The study group consisted of the patients with DH reactions. Results of a questionnaire including drug reactions and management were recorded. RESULTS: Among 54,863 patients, 1000 patients with DH were enrolled with a median of 2.1% of all admissions. In real life conditions, the majority of approaches were performed for finding safe alternatives (65.5%; 1102 out of 1683) with 11.7% positivity. Diagnostic procedures were positive in 27% (154/581) of the patients. The majority of the patients had higher VAS scores for anxiety. A total of 250 subjects (25%) reported that they delayed some medical procedures because of DH. CONCLUSION: Our results documented the frequency of admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/clinical immunology clinics for the first time. Although physicians mostly preferred to perform drug tests in order to find safe alternatives, considering the fact that DH was confirmed in 27% of the patients, use of diagnostic tests should be encouraged, if no contraindication exists in order to avoid mislabelling patients as DH.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hospitals, Special/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Healthcare/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Oral , Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Allergens/immunology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Immunization , Male , Perception , Turkey , beta-Lactams/adverse effects , beta-Lactams/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data are limited about the value of skin tests in the diagnosis of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-induced hypersensitivity reactions and the cross-reactivity between PPIs. We aimed to assess the role of skin testing in the diagnosis of PPI-related immediate hypersensitivity reactions and the cross-reactivity patterns among PPIs. METHODS: The study was designed in a prospective, national, multicentre nature. Sixty-five patients with a suggestive history of a PPI-induced immediate hypersensitivity reaction and 30 control subjects were included. Standardized skin prick and intradermal tests were carried out with a panel of PPIs. Single-blind, placebo-controlled oral provocation tests (OPTs) with the PPIs other than the culprit PPI that displayed negative results in skin tests (n = 61) and diagnostic OPTs with the suspected PPI (n = 12) were performed. RESULTS: The suspected PPIs were lansoprazole (n = 52), esomeprazole (n = 11), pantoprazole (n = 9), rabeprazole (n = 2), and omeprazole (n = 1). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the skin tests with PPIs were 58.8%, 100%, 70.8%, and 100%, respectively. Fifteen of the 31 patients with a hypersensitivity reaction to lansoprazole had a positive OPT or skin test result with at least one of the alternative PPIs (8/52 pantoprazole, 6/52 omeprazole, 5/52 esomeprazole, 3/52 rabeprazole). CONCLUSION: Considering the high specificity, skin testing seems to be a useful method for the diagnosis of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions to PPIs and for the evaluation of cross-reactivity among PPIs. However, OPT should be performed in case of negativity on skin tests.
Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Skin Tests/methods , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Cross Reactions/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Single-Blind Method , Young AdultABSTRACT
Tuberculous liver abscess is rare worldwide. We report a 26-year-old renal transplant recipient who presented with fever, fatigue, and weight loss. Ultrasound (US) of the abdomen showed a cystic mass of 7x6 cm in the subcapsular region of right liver lobe. US-guided percutaneous drainage was performed and 100 mL of yellow-colored pus was aspirated. The patient was empirically started on ampicillin sulbactam treatment. Despite this treatment, the symptoms persisted. Subsequent control abdominal US showed the persistence of a cystic mass of 7x6 cm with thin septation in the subcapsular region near the right liver lobe, which were subsequently diagnosed as a focal hepatic tuberculous abscess by positive culture in Löwenstein-Jensen medium. He was concomitantly started on systemic antituberculous therapy. A tuberculous liver abscess must be considered in the differential diagnosis. Percutaneous drainage along with systemic antituberculous chemotherapy must be considered as an alternative to surgery for the management. A greater awareness of this clinical entity is required for successful treatment.