Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 49
Filter
1.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 43(1): 12-19, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36584245

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Trazodone is indicated for the treatment of major depressive disorder, but more frequently prescribed off-label at lower doses for insomnia in women of childbearing age. The aim of this study was to assess the risks linked to trazodone exposure during pregnancy for which limited safety data are available. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This multicenter, observational prospective cohort study compared pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to trazodone in early pregnancy against those in a reference group of women exposed to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) between 1996 and 2021. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The sample included 221 trazodone and 869 SSRI-exposed pregnancies. Exposure to trazodone in the first trimester was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of major congenital anomalies (trazodone [1/169, 0.6%]; SSRI [19/730, 2.6%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.77). The cumulative incidences of live birth were 61% and 73% in the trazodone and reference group, respectively (25% vs 18% for pregnancy loss and 14% vs 10% for pregnancy termination). Trazodone exposure was not associated with a significantly increased risk of pregnancy termination and pregnancy loss. The rate of small for gestational age infants did not differ between the groups. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: This study did not reveal a significant difference in the risk of major congenital anomalies after first trimester exposure to trazodone, compared with SSRI exposure. Although this study is the largest so far, these results call for confirmation through further studies.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Pregnancy Complications , Trazodone , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cohort Studies , Trazodone/adverse effects , Maternal Exposure , Prospective Studies , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(2): 630-640, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36403130

ABSTRACT

In March 2022, the Summary of Product Characteristics for the Lyrica brand of pregabalin was updated with warnings regarding malformation risks. This literature review and critical appraisal aims to explore whether these Summary of Product Characteristics updates are justified and provide clarity on the risk-benefit balance for pregabalin use in early pregnancy. A literature review was conducted in May 2022 to identify English language comparative studies of any design providing data about first trimester maternal pregabalin use and malformation risk. Five observational comparative cohort studies using data from 9 distinct datasets were located. Collectively these studies described at least 5300 unique pregabalin exposed pregnancies, with 4900 exposed in at least the first trimester. Three studies investigated overall major malformation risks, and 4 investigated specific malformation risks. The available evidence was found to be conflicting and generally of low quality, probably influenced by bias and data confounding, with no clear pattern of specific malformations observed. Findings from the largest study suggested absolute risks of major malformation of 4.8-5.6%, relative to a background risk of approximately 4%. Due to study methodology limitations, the available data were judged to only provide low quality evidence suggestive of a possible and unconfirmed small increased risk that cannot be solely attributed to foetal pregabalin exposure. This literature review and critical appraisal indicates that the Lyrica product literature updates are insufficiently substantiated and could result in confusion and misinformed clinical risk-benefit decision making.


Subject(s)
Pregabalin , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pregabalin/adverse effects , Pregnancy Trimester, First
3.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 2023 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110225

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, safety concerns about modafinil exposure during pregnancy have emerged. In particular, increased risks for major congenital anomalies (MCA) and impaired fetal growth were reported, although study results were conflicting. Our investigation aims to examine previously reported safety signals. METHOD: Multicenter case series based on data from 18 Teratology Information Services from 12 countries. Modafinil exposed pregnancies with an estimated date of birth before August 2019 were included in this study. For prospectively ascertained pregnancies, cumulative incidences of pregnancy outcomes, rate of nonchromosomal MCA in first trimester exposed pregnancies and percentiles of neonatal/infant weight and head circumference (HC) were calculated. Potential dose-dependent effects on fetal growth were explored by linear regression models. Retrospectively ascertained cases were screened for pattern of MCA and other adverse events. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five prospectively ascertained cases were included, of which 173 were exposed at least during the first trimester. Cumulative incidences for live birth, spontaneous abortion and elective termination of pregnancy were 76.9% (95% CI, 68.0%-84.8%), 9.3% (95% CI, 5.0%-16.9%), and 13.9% (95% CI, 8.1%-23.1%), respectively. Nonchromosomal MCA was present in 3/150 live births, corresponding to an MCA rate of 2.0% (95%CI, 0.6%-6.1%), none were reported in pregnancy losses. Compared to reference standards, birth weight (BW) tended to be lower and neonatal HC to be smaller in exposed newborns (data available for 144 and 73 of 153 live births, respectively). In nonadjusted linear regression models, each 100 mg increase of average dosage per pregnancy day was associated with a decrease in standard deviation score (SDS) of -0.28 SDS (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.10) for BW and of -0.28 SDS (95% CI, -0.56 to 0.01) for HC. Screening of 22 retrospectively reported cases did not reveal any specific pattern of MCA or other adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results do not indicate an increased risk of MCA after in utero exposure to modafinil, but a tendency toward lower BW and reduced neonatal HC. However, these findings should be regarded as preliminary. Until further studies allow for a definite conclusion, modafinil should not be used during pregnancy.

4.
Mult Scler ; 27(3): 475-478, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32538681

ABSTRACT

This prospective multicentre cohort study investigated pregnancy outcomes after fingolimod use for multiple sclerosis during pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes of 63 fingolimod and 62 interferon-ß-exposed pregnancies were compared. Rates of major congenital anomalies (MCA) were 4.8% (2/42) in the fingolimod group versus 2.3% (1/44) in the interferon-ß group (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-24.6). The adjusted hazard ratio for spontaneous abortion in fingolimod versus interferon-ß-exposed pregnancies was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.8). Further studies are needed to definitely rule out a moderately increased MCA risk after fingolimod exposure during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Fingolimod Hydrochloride , Pregnancy Outcome , Cohort Studies , Female , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prospective Studies
5.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e083550, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663923

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and more recently for weight loss. The aim of this study was to assess the risks associated with GLP1-RA exposure during early pregnancy. DESIGN: This multicentre, observational prospective cohort study compared pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to GLP1-RA in early pregnancy either for diabetes or obesity treatment with those in two reference groups: (1) women with diabetes exposed to at least one non-GLP1-RA antidiabetic drug during the first trimester and (2) a reference group of overweight/obese women without diabetes, between 2009 and 2022. SETTING: Data were collected from the databases of six Teratology Information Services. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 168 pregnancies of women exposed to GLP1-RA during the first trimester, alongside a reference group of 156 pregnancies of women with diabetes and 163 pregnancies of overweight/obese women. RESULTS: Exposure to GLP1-RA in the first trimester was not associated with a risk of major birth defects when compared with diabetes (2.6% vs 2.3%; adjusted OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.16 to 5.82)) or to overweight/obese (2.6% vs 3.9%; adjusted OR 0.54 (0.11 to 2.75)). For the GLP1-RA group, cumulative incidence for live births, pregnancy losses and pregnancy terminations was 59%, 23% and 18%, respectively. In the diabetes reference group, corresponding estimates were 69%, 26% and 6%, while in the overweight/obese reference group, they were 63%, 29% and 8%, respectively. Cox proportional cause-specific hazard models indicated no increased risk of pregnancy losses in the GLP1-RA versus the diabetes and the overweight/obese reference groups, in both crude and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers reassurance in cases of inadvertent exposure to GLP1-RA during the first trimester of pregnancy. Due to the limited sample size, larger studies are required to validate these findings.


Subject(s)
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor , Hypoglycemic Agents , Obesity , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Adult , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Databases, Factual , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy
6.
Drug Saf ; 47(3): 227-236, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38114757

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The ConcePTION project aims to improve the way medication use during pregnancy is studied. This includes exploring the possibility of developing a distributed data processing and analysis infrastructure using a common data model that could form a foundational platform for future surveillance and research. A prerequisite would be that data from various data access providers (DAPs) can be harmonised according to an agreed set of standard rules concerning the structure and content of the data. To do so, a reference framework of core data elements (CDEs) recommended for primary data studies on drug safety during pregnancy was previously developed. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of several public and private DAPs using different primary data sources focusing on multiple sclerosis, as a pilot, to map their respective data variables and definitions with the CDE recommendations framework. METHODS: Four pregnancy registries (Gilenya, Novartis; Aubagio, Sanofi; the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists [OTIS]; Aubagio, Sanofi; the Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register, Lareb), two enhanced pharmacovigilance programmes (Gilenya PRIM, Novartis; MAPLE-MS, Merck Healthcare KGaA) and four Teratology Information Services (UK TIS, Jerusalem TIS, Zerifin TIS, Swiss TIS) participated in the study. The ConcePTION primary data source CDE includes 51 items covering administrative functions, the description of pregnancy, maternal medical history, maternal illnesses arising in pregnancy, delivery details, and pregnancy and infant outcomes. For each variable in the CDE, the DAPs identified whether their variables were: identical to the one mentioned in the CDE; derived; similar but with a divergent definition; or not available. RESULTS: The majority of the DAP data variables were either directly taken (85%, n = 305/357, range 73-94% between DAPs) or derived by combining different variables (12%, n = 42/357, range 0-24% between DAPs) to conform to the CDE variables and definitions. For very few of the DAP variables, alignment with the CDE items was not possible, either because of divergent definitions (1%, n = 3/357, range 0-2% between DAPs) or because the variables were not available (2%, n = 7/357, range 0-4% between DAPs). CONCLUSIONS: Data access providers participating in this study presented a very high proportion of variables matching the CDE items, indicating that alignment of definitions and harmonisation of data analysis by different stakeholders to accelerate and strengthen pregnancy pharmacovigilance safety data analyses could be feasible.


Subject(s)
Crotonates , Fingolimod Hydrochloride , Hydroxybutyrates , Nitriles , Toluidines , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Data Collection , Registries
7.
Birth Defects Res ; 113(6): 511-515, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33463081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to collect outcome after vortioxetine exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy in a case series. METHODS: Callers who were counseled by the Israeli Teratology Information Service (TIS) regarding vortioxetine exposure during pregnancy were prospectively collected and followed-up by telephone using a structured questionnaire. Outcomes were confirmed by a pediatrician with medical records in the neonatal period. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 19 women were included in the TIS database after first trimester exposure to vortioxetine. Seventeen pregnancy follow-ups were obtained, while two pregnancies were lost to follow-up. Eleven pregnancies resulted in 12 live births with no malformations including one set of twins; there were three miscarriages, two terminations, and one stillbirth in week 22. One termination was performed due to prenatal diagnosis of acrania (the woman also took carbamazepine, folic acid and dipyrone), and the second due to fear of abnormalities after cystic hygroma was suspected at week 12 with nuchal translucency of 8.1 mm and no further cytogenetic testing. The twins were born in week 35. Two women continued using the medication until delivery; one of these women reported nursing her baby from birth to up to 1 year, while she continued taking vortioxetine. DISCUSSION: This case series provides preliminary outcome data on vortioxetine exposure in pregnancy. However, the small sample size calls for caution in the interpretation of results. Denominator-based studies are needed before conclusions can be drawn.


Subject(s)
Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Pregnancy Outcome , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prenatal Diagnosis , Vortioxetine
8.
Reprod Toxicol ; 99: 9-14, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33212170

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to evaluate the rate of major congenital anomalies after first trimester exposure to ondansetron for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP). The design is a prospective, comparative, observational cohort study, performed at the Israeli Teratology Information Service between 2010 and 2014. Follow-up was obtained for 195 ondansetron-exposed, 110 metoclopramide-exposed, and 778 pregnancies with non-teratogenic exposure (NTE). The overall rate of major anomalies did not significantly differ between the groups [4/200 = 2.0 % (ondansetron), 1/109 = 0.9 % (metoclopramide), and 13/731 = 1.8 % (NTE)]. All the anomalies in both the ondansetron and metoclopramide groups, and 6/13 anomalies in the NTE group, were cardiac septal defects most of which spontaneously resolved. Both ondansetron (adjHR = 0.29, 95 % CI 0.10-0.80) and metoclopramide (adjHR = 0.27, 95 % CI 0.08-0.86) were associated with lower miscarriage rate compared to NTE. Based on the present study, ondansetron during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk for overall major anomalies, nor for clinically important cardiac defects. It may be a reasonable alternative for women with severe NVP who do not respond to first line medications.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Antiemetics/toxicity , Metoclopramide/toxicity , Ondansetron/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Heart Septal Defects/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Nausea/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective Studies , Vomiting/drug therapy , Young Adult
9.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 128(4): 579-582, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33275828

ABSTRACT

Ondansetron is an effective antiemetic that is being widely used as a second-line treatment option for severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy in accordance with clinical guidelines. The safety of ondansetron during pregnancy has-following publication of controversial and seemingly contradictory results-been subject to considerable academic turmoil, specifically with respect to the risk of congenital cardiac malformations and oral cleft. In July 2019, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) released an updated, comprehensive assessment report on the use of ondansetron in the first trimester. The ensuing Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) was updated in November 2019 with important changes to section on "Fertility, pregnancy and lactation." The SmPC now states that ondansetron should not be used in the first trimester of pregnancy. ENTIS, The European Network of Teratology Information Services, believes that the implementation of this regulatory step-which has important clinical consequences-is insufficiently substantiated and is not serving the interest of pregnant women with severe nausea and vomiting. Herein, we discuss the underlying evidence and argue the case against the EMA decision.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/adverse effects , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Ondansetron/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Cleft Lip/chemically induced , Cleft Lip/prevention & control , Cleft Palate/chemically induced , Cleft Palate/prevention & control , Contraindications, Drug , Drug Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , European Union , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/chemically induced , Heart Defects, Congenital/prevention & control , Humans , Nausea/drug therapy , Pharmacovigilance , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Vomiting/drug therapy
10.
Curr Neuropharmacol ; 19(6): 896-906, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33655866

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An inconsistent association between exposure to SSRIs and SNRIs and the risk for ASD and ADHD in the Offspring was observed in observational studies. Some suggest that the reported association might be due to unmeasured confounding. We aimed to study this association and to look for sources of bias by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to June 2019 for studies reporting on ASD and ADHD in the Offspring following exposure during pregnancy. We followed the PRISMA 2009 guidelines for data selection and extraction. Outcomes were pooled using random- effects models and odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome using the adjusted point estimate of each study. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found an association between SSRIs/ SNRIs prenatal use and the risk for ASD and ADHD (OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.23-1.65, I2=58%; OR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.07-1.49, I2=48%, respectively). Similar findings were obtained in women who were exposed to SSRIs/SNRIs before pregnancy, representing statistically significant association with ASD (OR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.56, I2=33%) and ADHD (OR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.50-1.78, I2=0%) in the Offspring, although they were not exposed to those medications in utero. CONCLUSIONS: Although we found an association between exposure to SSRIs/SNRIs during pregnancy and the risk for ASD and ADHD, an association with those disorders was also present for exposure pre-pregnancy, suggesting that the association might be due to unmeasured confounding. We are aiming to further assess the role of potential unmeasured confounding in the estimation of the association and perform a network meta-analysis.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Norepinephrine , Pregnancy , Serotonin , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects
11.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 203(2): 144.e1-6, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20579964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the fetal safety of colchicine. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational comparative cohort study regarding colchicine exposure during pregnancy including contacts to 2 Teratology Information Services in Israel from 1994 through 2006. RESULTS: In all, 238 colchicine-exposed pregnancies (97.0% first trimester) and 964 pregnancies with nonteratogenic exposure were followed up. Treatment indications were: familial Mediterranean fever (87.3%), Behçet disease (7.5%), or other (5.2%). The rate of major congenital anomalies was comparable between the groups (10/221 [4.5%] vs 35/908 [3.9%]; P = .648). There were no cytogenetic anomalies in the colchicine group. The median gestational age at delivery was earlier (39 [38-40] vs 40 [38-41] weeks; P < .001), the rate of preterm deliveries was higher (32/214 [15.0%] vs 51/867 [5.9%]; P < .001), and the median birthweight was lower (3000 [2688-3300] vs 3300 [2900-3600] g; P < .001) in the colchicine group. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that colchicine does not appear to be a major human teratogen, and, probably, has no cytogenetic effect.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/diagnosis , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Colchicine/adverse effects , Fetus/drug effects , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/chemically induced , Adult , Behcet Syndrome/drug therapy , Birth Weight , Cohort Studies , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Familial Mediterranean Fever/diagnosis , Familial Mediterranean Fever/drug therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Israel , Maternal-Fetal Exchange/drug effects , Obstetric Labor, Premature , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Probability , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Teratogens
12.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(11): ofaa479, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33209957

ABSTRACT

We report the pregnancy outcomes of 6 women with cutaneous leishmaniasis; 5 of these women received topical antileishmenial therapy during gestation with paromomycin plus methylbenzethonium chloride combination ointment and/or sodium stibogluconate intralesional injections. No teratogenic effects were reported. Furthermore, no vertical transmission was observed.

13.
J Hypertens ; 38(1): 133-141, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31568057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The fetotoxic potential of prenatal exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) has been known for many years. Symptoms range from transient oligohydramnios to neonatal anuria and permanent renal damage, joint contractures, hypocalvaria, lung hypoplasia and intrauterine or neonatal death. This study aims to investigate the critical gestational time for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RAS-I)-induced fetopathy, to quantify the fetopathy risk and to evaluate factors associated with the occurrence and severity of fetopathy. METHODS: Prospectively and retrospectively ascertained RAS-I exposed pregnancies from the databases of six teratology information services were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine pregnancies with ACE-I and 101 with ARB exposure beyond the first trimester were identified. Fifty-nine of these 190 pregnancies were classified as having evidence of RAS-I fetopathy. All pregnancies affected with fetopathy were exposed after 20 0/7 gestational weeks. Limited to prospectively enrolled cases with exposure at least 20 0/7 gestational weeks, the rate of fetopathy was 3.2% for ACE-I and 29.2% for ARB. The chance of recovery of amniotic fluid volume was higher with RAS-I discontinuation before 30 gestational weeks and with a longer exposure-free interval before delivery. CONCLUSION: Exposure to ARBs is associated with a higher fetopathy risk than exposure to ACE-Is. RAS-I should ideally be discontinued prior to pregnancy or immediately after recognition of pregnancy. Because symptoms may improve in cases of RAS-I-induced oligohydramnios, pregnancy should be maintained as long as there is fetal well being. Physicians and patients need to be alerted to the fetotoxic risks of RAS-I.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Fetal Diseases , Fetus , Renin-Angiotensin System/drug effects , Female , Fetal Diseases/chemically induced , Fetal Diseases/pathology , Fetus/drug effects , Fetus/pathology , Humans , Maternal Exposure , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
14.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 68(4): 609-17, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19843064

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Propylthiouracil (PTU) is presently considered to be the treatment of choice for hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. It is known to cross the human placenta, and therefore may affect the fetus. The major aims of this study were to evaluate the rate of major anomalies and to report the rate of fetal goitre, accompanied by hypothyroidism, in fetuses/ newborns of mothers after in utero exposure to PTU. METHODS: Prospective observational controlled cohort study of PTU-exposed pregnancies of women counselled by the Israeli Teratology Information Service between the years 1994 and 2004 compared with women exposed to nonteratogens. RESULTS: We followed up 115 PTU-exposed pregnancies and 1141 controls. The rate of major anomalies was comparable between the groups [PTU 1/80 (1.3%), control 34/1066 (3.2%), P= 0.507]. Hypothyroidism was found in 9.5% of fetuses/neonates (56.8% of whom with goitre). Hyperthyroidism, possibly resulting from maternal disease, was found in 10.3%. Goitres prenatally diagnosed by ultrasound were successfully treated in utero by maternal dose adjustment. In most cases neonatal thyroid functions normalized during the first month of life without any treatment. Median neonatal birth weight was lower [PTU 3145 g (2655-3537) vs. control 3300 g (2968-3600), P= 0.018]. CONCLUSIONS: PTU does not seem to be a major human teratogen. However, it could cause fetal/neonatal hypothyroidism with or without goitre. Fetal thyroid size monitoring and neonatal thyroid function tests are important for appropriate prevention and treatment.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Antithyroid Agents/adverse effects , Goiter/chemically induced , Hyperthyroidism/drug therapy , Hypothyroidism/chemically induced , Propylthiouracil/adverse effects , Adult , Antithyroid Agents/administration & dosage , Birth Weight , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Maternal-Fetal Exchange/drug effects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Propylthiouracil/administration & dosage , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
15.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 65(12): 1259-64, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19707749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Montelukast (Singulair) is a selective leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) indicated for the maintenance treatment of asthma. Currently, there are limited prospective, comparative studies in the literature examining the safety of montelukast use in pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether exposure to montelukast during pregnancy increases the rate of major malformations above the 1­3% baseline risk or the rate of other adverse effects. METHODS: Pregnant women taking montelukast were enrolled in the study from six teratogen information services around the world. These women were compared to two other groups of women: (1) disease-matched, who used inhalers for a similar indication and (2) women not diagnosed with asthma and not exposed to any known teratogens. The primary outcome was major malformations and secondary endpoints included spontaneous abortion, fetal distress, gestational age at birth and birth weight. RESULTS: Out of 180 montelukast-exposed pregnancies, there were 160 live births including three sets of twins, 20 spontaneous abortions, 2 elective abortions and 1 major malformation reported. The mean birth weight was lower (3,214 ± 685 g) compared to controls [3,356 ± 657 (disease-matched) and 3,424 ± 551 (exposed to non-teratogens), P = 0.038] and the gestational age was shorter [37.8 ± 3.1 weeks (montelukast) and 37.6 ± 4.4 (disease-matched) versus 39.3 ± 2.4 weeks (exposed to non-teratogens), P = 0.045]. About 25% of the newborns had fetal distress, a higher rate than controls (P = 0.007). However, upon sub-analysis of women who continued the drug until delivery, only birth-weight difference (304 g) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast does not appear to increase the baseline rate of major malformations. The lower birth weight in both asthma groups is most likely associated with the severity of the maternal condition.


Subject(s)
Acetates/adverse effects , Acetates/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Outcome , Quinolines/adverse effects , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Adult , Cyclopropanes , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Leukotriene Antagonists/adverse effects , Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Sulfides
16.
CNS Drugs ; 22(4): 325-34, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18336060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Valproate is a first-line antiepileptic agent and is also used in the treatment of bipolar disorder and migraine. It is a known human teratogen. The objective of the study was to evaluate the teratogenic risk of valproate. METHODS: All callers who contacted the Israeli Teratology Information Service (TIS) between 1994 and 2004 for information about gestational exposure to valproate were enrolled in the study. After the expected date of delivery, these women were followed up by telephone interview about their pregnancy outcome using a structured questionnaire. Data obtained from women who contacted the TIS about valproate exposure during pregnancy were then compared with data obtained from callers who were counselled for nonteratogenic exposures over the same timeframe. The main outcome measure was the rate of major congenital anomalies. RESULTS: The outcomes of 154 valproate-exposed pregnancies (96.1% at least in the first trimester) were compared with those of 1315 pregnancies of women in the TIS database who were counselled for nonteratogenic exposures. The rate of major anomalies (some multiple) in the valproate group exposed in the first trimester was higher compared with controls after exclusion of genetic or cytogenetic anomalies (8 of 120 [6.7%] vs 31 of 1236 [2.5%], p = 0.018, relative risk [RR] = 2.66, 95% CI 1.25, 5.65). There were no cases of neural tube defect in the valproate-exposed group. Five of the eight major anomalies in the valproate group were cardiovascular, two of eight were mentally retarded, two of five male infants with major anomalies had hypospadias and three of eight were suspected of having fetal valproate syndrome. A daily dose > or =1000 mg was associated with the highest teratogenic risk (7 of 32 [21.9%] vs 31 of 1236 [2.5%], RR = 8.72, 95% CI 4.16, 18.30). In the subgroup exposed to polytherapy there was a 4-fold increase in the rate of major anomalies compared with controls. All major anomalies were in the group treated for epilepsy. CONCLUSION: When valproate treatment cannot be avoided in the first trimester of pregnancy, the lowest effective dose should be prescribed, preferably as monotherapy, to minimize its teratogenic risk.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Antimanic Agents/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Valproic Acid/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Teratology
17.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 66(5): 695-705, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18754846

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Recent studies have suggested a possible association between maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in early pregnancy and cardiovascular anomalies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the teratogenic risk of paroxetine and fluoxetine. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, controlled study evaluated the rate of major congenital anomalies after first-trimester gestational exposure to paroxetine, fluoxetine or nonteratogens. RESULTS: We followed up 410 paroxetine, 314 fluoxetine first-trimester exposed pregnancies and 1467 controls. After exclusion of genetic and cytogenetic anomalies, there was a higher rate of major anomalies in the SSRI groups compared with the controls [paroxetine 18/348 (5.2%), fluoxetine 12/253 (4.7%) and controls 34/1359 (2.5%)]. The main risk applied to cardiovascular anomalies [paroxetine 7/348 (2.0%), crude odds ratio (OR) 3.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13, 10.58; fluoxetine 7/253 (2.8%), crude OR, 4.81 95% CI 1.56, 14.71; and controls 8/1359 (0.6%)]. On logistic regression analysis only cigarette smoking of >or=10 cigarettes day(-1) and fluoxetine exposure were significant variables for cardiovascular anomalies. The adjusted ORs for paroxetine and fluoxetine were 2.66 (95% CI 0.80, 8.90) and 4.47 (95% CI 1.31, 15.27), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a possible association between cardiovascular anomalies and first-trimester exposure to fluoxetine.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/adverse effects , Fluoxetine/adverse effects , Heart Defects, Congenital/etiology , Paroxetine/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced , Adult , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Birth Weight , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Age , Odds Ratio , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prospective Studies , Risk , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
18.
Reprod Toxicol ; 25(4): 468-71, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18534816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of the most common human viruses. To date, there is limited information regarding the influence of maternal EBV infection on pregnancy outcome. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine the fetal safety of EBV infection in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively evaluated the rate of major anomalies and pregnancy outcome of women with serologic evidence of primary, recurrent or undefined infection (27, 56, and 43 women, respectively) compared to 1434 women who called the Israeli TIS for non-teratogenic exposure. RESULTS: Women's characteristics and pregnancy outcome were comparable between the EBV exposed and control groups. Similarly, the gestational age at delivery and birth weight were not significantly different. The rate of major congenital anomalies did not significantly differ between the EBV exposed compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that EBV infection during pregnancy does not represent a major teratogenic risk to the fetus.


Subject(s)
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
19.
Reprod Toxicol ; 25(3): 388-9, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18424066

ABSTRACT

In spite of a substantial increase in the use of topiramate at child bearing age, very little is known regarding its use in pregnancy. We describe the outcome of 52 pregnancies with 41 liveborn infants from which it seems that topiramate reduces birth weight without decreasing gestational age at delivery, but does not seem to increase the risk for structural defects. There was an increased rate of spontaneous abortions not related to the drug effects.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous/chemically induced , Anticonvulsants/toxicity , Birth Weight/drug effects , Fructose/analogs & derivatives , Female , Fructose/toxicity , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Topiramate
20.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 141(1): 31-4, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18760873

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the use of the new macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin) during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of major malformations. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective multi-center study, pregnancy outcome was compared between pregnant women exposed to one of the new macrolides during the first trimester of pregnancy and two comparison groups one exposed to other antibiotics and the other to other non-teratogenic medications. All women enrolled in the study called one of the three participating teratogen information services (TIS). Group 1 macrolides (n=161), group 2 other antibiotics (n=213) and group 3 non-teratogens (n=740). RESULTS: A total of 161 women exposed to the new macrolides (118 were exposed in the first trimester of pregnancy) and 953 from a comparison groups were followed up. The rate of major malformations in the study group was 4.1% compared to 2.1% in the other antibiotics exposed group (OR=1.41, 95% CI 0.47-4.23) and 3.0% in the non-teratogens exposed group. The rate of elective terminations of pregnancy was significantly higher in the exposed group in compare to both comparison groups. CONCLUSION: Our study, although relatively small sized, suggests that the use of the new macrolides during the first trimester of pregnancy does not represent an increased risk for congenital malformations strong enough for an induced abortion after such an exposure. Elective terminations of pregnancy because of early exposure to these medications should be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Macrolides/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL