Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 21(10): 893-901, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39302881

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Medical Device Regulation (EU)745/2017, increased the regulatory requirements and thus the time and the cost associated with marketing medical devices. For a majority of medical device manufacturers, this has lead to reconsiderations of their product portfolio. The risk of important or essential devices being withdrawn is particularly relevant for pediatric patients and other rare disease patients where limited numbers of devices can be sold and hence the investment needed may not be recovered. This generates critical challenges and opportunities from a regulatory and public health perspective. AREAS COVERED: This paper is based upon the experience of the authors who contributed to working groups, guidance development and research related to orphan and pediatric devices. We examine the use of medical devices in orphan and pediatric conditions, the relevant aspects of regulations and associated guidance, and we suggest possible policy and practice interventions to ensure the continued availability of essential devices for children and people with rare diseases. EXPERT OPINION: We recommend a more proactive approach to identifying devices at risk and essential devices, increasing the use of exceptional market approvals, expanding the role of expert panels, engaging with the rare disease communities and supporting registries and standards.


Subject(s)
Equipment and Supplies , Humans , Equipment and Supplies/economics , Europe , Child , Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Off-Label Use/legislation & jurisprudence , Rare Diseases/therapy , Medical Device Legislation , Pediatrics
2.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 11: 22, 2016 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26939863

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regulatory and economic frameworks stimulated the research and development of orphan drugs, but very little has been done for devices necessary for the in-vivo diagnosis, prevention and treatment of life-threatening conditions with a low prevalence/incidence. DISCUSSION: A general public consultation in Europe has shown a positive attitude towards an "orphan device" directive. The United States of America have a Humanitarian Use Device exemption, but Europe is still waiting for such a stimulating framework. Post-marketing surveillance ("materio-vigilance") will be necessary for follow-up, patient-reported outcome measures (quality of life versus survival) needed and off-label use data available for patient-safety reasons. The marketing period for devices is shorter than for medicinal products. Incentives are necessary to stimulate research and development of such "orphan devices" especially when surgical intervention is the only option.


Subject(s)
Equipment and Supplies , Rare Diseases , Europe , Humans , Manufacturing Industry , Quality of Life
3.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 10: 161, 2015 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26691530

ABSTRACT

In 1581 Rembert Dodoens wrote "Medicinalium observationum exempla rara, recognita et aucta" a Latin book about the diagnosis and treatment of disorders with a low prevalence.


Subject(s)
Orphan Drug Production/history , Rare Diseases/history , Belgium , History, 16th Century , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL