The physiotherapist and the esophageal cancer patient: from prehabilitation to rehabilitation.

Esophageal cancer is a serious malignancy often treated with multimodal interventions and complex surgical resection. As treatment moves to centers of excellence with emphasis on enhanced recovery approaches, the role of the physiotherapist has expanded. The aim of this review is to discuss the rationale behind both the evolving prehabilitative role of the physiotherapist and more established postoperative interventions for patients with esophageal cancer. While a weak association between preoperative cardiopulmonary fitness and post-esophagectomy outcome is reported, cardiotoxicity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may heighten postoperative risk. Preliminary studies suggest that prehabilitative inspiratory muscle training may improve postoperative outcome. Weight and muscle loss are a recognized sequelae of esophageal cancer and the functional consequences of this should be assessed. Postoperative physiotherapy priorities include effective airway clearance and early mobilization. The benefits of respiratory physiotherapy post-esophagectomy are described by a small number of studies, however, practice increasingly recognizes the importance of early mobilization as a key component of postoperative recovery. The benefits of exercise training in patients with contraindications to mobilization remain to be explored. While there is a strong basis for tailored physiotherapy interventions in the management of patients with esophageal cancer, this review highlights the need for studies to inform prehabilitative and postoperative interventions.

Markedly poor physical functioning status of people experiencing homelessness admitted to an acute hospital setting.

Adults who are homeless experience poor health and frequently require hospital in-patient care but the physical functioning ability of this group is rarely considered. The objective of this study was to evaluate a broad range of physical functioning variables to enable better future planning of targeted health and accommodation services for this group. This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in a large acute hospital in Dublin, Ireland. A comprehensive ward-based test battery evaluated physical functioning in 65 in-patients registered as homeless with an age range of 23-80 years. Less than 10% (n = 5) were > 70 years. 58/65 (83%) of participants had mobility limitations and 35/65 (54%) reported at least one fall in the previous six months. Only 25/66 (35%) were able to walk for 6 min and 20/65 (31%) were able to climb one flight of stairs. 45/63 (70%) of participants were pre-frail or frail. Muscular mass was normal in the majority of participants but grip strength was low. This study revealed hospital in-patients registered as homeless displayed particularly poor physical functioning levels and mobility regardless of age. Health and housing services should address the unmet physical functioning needs of this vulnerable group.

Quantifying postoperative mobilisation following oesophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Early mobilisation is in integral component of postoperative recovery following complex surgical procedures such as oesophageal cancer resections, however evidence to guide early mobilisation protocols in critical care settings is limited. Furthermore, little is known about actual mobilisation levels postoperatively. This study quantified postoperative mobilisation post- oesophagectomy and investigated barriers to mobility. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Postoperative critical care setting in a tertiary care referral centre for oesophagectomy. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty participants (mean age 65 (SD 7) years, n=19 males) scheduled for oesophagectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome, postoperative physical activity, was measured objectively using the Actigraph GT3X+. Medical records were examined for a range of outcomes including medical status, pain scores and physiotherapy comments to identify factors which may have influenced mobility. RESULTS: During postoperative day (POD) 1-5, participants spent the majority of time (>96%) sedentary. Participation in light intensity activity was low but did increase daily from a median of 12 (IQR 19) minutes/day on POD1 to a median of 53 (IQR 73.25) minutes/day on POD5 p<0.001), with a corresponding increase in daily step count. Haemodynamic instability was the most common reason reported by physiotherapists for either not attempting mobility or limiting postoperative mobilisation levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that despite daily physiotherapy, there are multiple challenges to postoperative mobilisation. Haemodynamic instability, likely related to thoracic epidurals, was the key limitation to early mobilisation. Goal-directed mobilisation in collaboration with the multidisciplinary team may play a considerable role in overcoming modifiable barriers to postoperative mobilisation.