Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Neurol ; 252(9): 1060-6, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15789127

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Drug-induced psychosis is a frequent side-effect in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). We sought to develop and evaluate a brief instrument for early recognition of drug-induced psychosis in PD. METHODS: We developed the "Parkinson Psychosis Questionnaire" (PPQ), which consists of screening questions for typical early signs and psychotic symptoms in PD and which quantifies the frequency and severity of four clinical categories-sleep disturbances, hallucinations/illusions, delusions and orientation. We performed an internal validation of the PPQ in 50 unselected patients with parkinsonism. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the "Structurized Clinical Interview" (SCID) for DSM IV were applied to the same patients as external references. RESULTS: Of 50 subjects, 49 suffered from idiopathic PD and one from probable MSA-P. Hoehn and Yahr stages in "on" ranged from 1.5 to 4. Sensitivity of the PPQ test for drug-induced psychosis according to SCID was 100 % (95 % CI: 73.5%, 100%); while specificity was 92.1 % (95% CI: 78.6%, 98.3 %). The PPQ severity score was highly correlated with BPRS. We derived a linear prediction formula, which transformed PPQ into BPRS scores. CONCLUSION: The PPQ appears to be a suitable, and easily administered instrument for early diagnosis of drug induced psychosis in routine PD care. Whether the PPQ could also be a valuable tool for monitoring follow-up studies and therapeutic intervention trials remains to be tested.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Parkinsonian Disorders/drug therapy , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Female , Humans , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Mov Disord ; 16(6): 1176-7, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11748757

ABSTRACT

We describe an open study of macrogol 3350 in 10 cases of constipated patients with Parkinson's disease or multiple system atrophy. The agent produced a marked improvement in symptoms in all cases.


Subject(s)
Cathartics/therapeutic use , Constipation/drug therapy , Electrolytes/therapeutic use , Multiple System Atrophy/complications , Parkinson Disease/complications , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Aged , Chronic Disease , Constipation/etiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
4.
Nervenarzt ; 66(12): 933-41, 1995 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8584079

ABSTRACT

In an open label study 63 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease suffering from end-of-dose akinesia were switched from a treatment with a L-DOPA standard formulation to a combined therapy of L-DOPA standard in the morning and L-DOPA slow release (levodopa, benserazide, Madopar Depot) at the remaining single doses. Substitution of L-DOPA standard by L-DOPA slow release took on average 2-4 weeks. Patients were subsequently treated for 6 months. Due to a lower bioavailability of the slow release formulation--the latter is based on the "hydrodynamically balanced system" (HBS)--, the patients remained initially on their time schedule of drug intake but received a higher dose of L-DOPA slow release compared to the preceding L-DOPA standard therapy. In 20 centers 37 men and 26 women were included into the study. 27 males and 20 females completed the 6 month treatment period. Before switching, the patients received 438 +/- 213 mg a day L-DOPA standard, after conversion, the average dose was 617 +/- 323 mg L-DOPA slow release and 107 +/- 95 mg L-DOPA standard a day. Fluctuations during the day and at night which were rated according to a newly developed clinical 5-point rating scale were significantly improved by the treatment regimen from 2.8 +/- 0.9 to 1.4 +/- 1.2. Additionally, parkinsonian symptoms were significantly reduced during the ON-phase as there was a significant decrease of the Webster rating score from 12.0 +/- 4.6 to 7.1 +/- 4.0. Quality of life as measured by subjective ratings of the patients improved. The tolerability of the new formulation of L-DOPA was rated to be good in 51.1% and very good in 48.9%. The results of this open label study suggest that the combination of L-DOPA standard in the morning and L-DOPA slow release formulation at the following time points can be an efficient therapy in parkinsonian patients who suffer form L-DOPA related end-of-dose motor akinesia.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Benserazide/administration & dosage , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/drug therapy , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacokinetics , Benserazide/adverse effects , Benserazide/pharmacokinetics , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/blood , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Levodopa/adverse effects , Levodopa/pharmacokinetics , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination/drug effects , Parkinson Disease/blood , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis
5.
Mov Disord ; 11(3): 289-97, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8723147

ABSTRACT

We used a computational analysis of open loop handwriting movements and a clinical rating scale for monitoring the effect of apomorphine in 16 patients with early untreated parkinsonism [subsequently L-DOPA responsive, probable Parkinson's disease (PD)], six patients with long-standing PD with L-DOPA associated motor fluctuations, and seven patients with known L-DOPA unresponsive parkinsonism. Subjects were instructed to write fluently concentric circles of approximately 12 mm in diameter. Movements were recorded for two periods of 3 s each, using a digitizing tablet. Mean peak velocity (Vmax) and mean peak acceleration (Amax) were determined. In addition, two sensitive indices describing the degree of automation of handwriting were derived: (a) NCV, calculated as the mean Number of Changes in direction of Velocity per half circle, and (b) NCA, the mean Number of Changes in the direction of Acceleration. Clinical rating was performed according to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III). After apomorphine injection, the patients with early untreated probable PD showed significant improvement of Vmax, Amax, NCV, NCA, and UPDRS III scores. Likewise, the patients with long-standing PD improved significantly in all kinematic parameters and UPDRS III scores. Patients with L-DOPA unresponsive parkinsonism failed to change significantly in any of the parameters tested. These observations suggest that the computer-assisted analysis of automated handwriting movements can be used as an objective quick method for quantifying dopamimetic effects on the kinematics of handwriting movements in parkinsonian patients.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Apomorphine/administration & dosage , Handwriting , Microcomputers , Neurologic Examination/instrumentation , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Apomorphine/adverse effects , Brain/drug effects , Brain/physiopathology , Carbidopa/administration & dosage , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Levodopa/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination/drug effects , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease, Secondary/drug therapy , Parkinson Disease, Secondary/etiology , Parkinson Disease, Secondary/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Mov Disord ; 13(2): 249-54, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9539337

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) has a major socioeconomic impact on society. The chronic, progressive course of the disease, which often leads to severe disability, results in high expenses for the medical resources used for treatment, care, and rehabilitation of patients as well as reduced or lost productivity as a result of illness or premature death. In Great Britain, it has been estimated that the National Health Service spends up to 383 million pound sterling (1992) annually for the care of PD. This emphasizes the importance of assessing the costs related to this disease. A detailed knowledge of the cost allocation would provide a solid basis on which health care priorities can be rationally set. Next to hospitalization, drug treatment accounts for the highest expense for direct medical costs of PD. Therefore, this analysis focuses on the costs of drug treatment for PD. The cost analysis was based on a retrospective study of 409 patients with PD who were seen over a 1-year period in our movement disorders clinic. The cost of therapy varied considerably depending on the severity of the condition (assessed in the "off" phase), the incidence of motor fluctuations, and the type of PD. In the early stage of the disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage I [HY I]), mean daily costs for therapy were DM (German marks) 6.60, which increased in later stages of the disease (HY V) to DM 22.00. If rare cases requiring continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion were included, mean daily costs of patients in HY V rose to DM 32.50 (the mean daily costs of subcutaneous apomorphine-treated patients in HY V: DM 74.30). Patients with motor fluctuations accounted for higher costs (DM 16.50) compared with those without motor fluctuations (DM 7.80). With respect to the three subtypes of PD, the mean daily expenditure was DM 7.00 for the tremor-dominant type, DM 12.40 for the akinetic-rigid type, and DM 10.80 for the mixed type. In the group of 409 PD patients included in this analysis, the average daily expenditure for drug treatment totaled DM 10.70 per patient (including patients on subcutaneous apomorphine).


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/economics , Parkinson Disease/economics , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Costs and Cost Analysis , Dopamine Agonists/adverse effects , Dopamine Agonists/economics , Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Germany , Humans , Levodopa/adverse effects , Levodopa/economics , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Neurologic Examination/drug effects , Parkinson Disease/classification , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL