Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 45
Filter
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 35(1): 93-103, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721557

ABSTRACT

Secondary-level healthcare professionals, mainly rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons, were invited to participate in an online survey questionnaire to assess knowledge and compliance with osteoporosis management guidelines and strategies, as well as self-reported quality of care. About 51% of the participants admit that they do not implement specific guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in their standard practice and depend on their experience and their clinical judgments. Moreover, although a good percentage (58%) had satisfactory knowledge levels in domains on the risk of osteoporotic fractures and investigations of osteoporosis, 47.5% of the participants did not score satisfactorily in questions on pharmacotherapy, especially for those patients at high risk for fractures. INTRODUCTION: A recently published study demonstrated a treatment gap among those eligible for osteoporosis therapy in Egypt of about 82.1% in postmenopausal women and 100% in men. The current survey aimed to address some of the factors that may contribute to this wide gap. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of secondary care healthcare professionals (both physicians and orthopedic surgeons) who were invited to complete an online questionnaire, which gathered information about physicians' socio-demographic data, knowledge, and compliance with osteoporosis management guidelines and strategies, as well as self-reported quality of care. Additionally, a knowledge score was calculated for all the participants. RESULTS: A good percentage (58%) had a satisfactory knowledge level in domains on the risk of osteoporotic fractures and investigations of osteoporosis; however, 47.5% did not score satisfactorily in questions on pharmacotherapy, especially for those patients at high risk for fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This work has identified some of the barriers to implementing guidelines for osteoporosis and fragility fracture management. In the meantime, it highlights the urgency of intensifying efforts to develop the knowledge and attitude of the healthcare professionals dealing with this condition in Egypt.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Male , Humans , Female , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/complications , Egypt , Bone Density , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 26(12s): 48-56, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37585160

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to explore some correlates and potential reproductive consequences of consanguinity. We analysed data for 8515 ever-married women aged 15-49 derived from a household survey conducted in 2017 in six governorates. The prevalence of consanguineous marriage was 35.9%. The odds (OR (95%CI)) of consanguinity were higher in rural southern governorates (3.68 (3.03-4.46)), with less than secondary education (1.55 (1.42-1.7)), with unemployment (1.74(1.48-2.04)) and in the lowest wealth quintile (3.09 (2.66-3.6)). After adjusting for residence, education, wealth, age at marriage and the number of children; the OR (95%CI) for spontaneous abortion and still births with consanguinity were 1.31 (1.09-1.59) and 1.63 (1.18-2.25) respectively. Consanguinity remains highly prevalent in Egypt especially in rural southern governorates. Women empowerment in terms of attaining higher education and employment may reduce the problem. Consanguinity appears to be associated with adverse reproductive outcomes including spontaneous abortion and still birth.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Pregnancy , Child , Humans , Female , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Consanguinity , Egypt/epidemiology , Prevalence , Educational Status , Stillbirth
3.
Rheumatol Int ; 38(Suppl 1): 155-161, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29637348

ABSTRACT

The Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) is a new parent/patient-reported outcome measure that enables a thorough assessment of the disease status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We report the results of the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the parent and patient versions of the JAMAR in the Egyptian Arabic language. The reading comprehension of the questionnaire was tested in ten JIA parents and patients. Each participating centre was asked to collect demographic, clinical data and the JAMAR in 100 consecutive JIA patients or all consecutive patients seen in a 6-month period and to administer the JAMAR to 100 healthy children and their parents. The statistical validation phase explored descriptive statistics and the psychometric issues of the JAMAR: the 3 Likert assumptions, floor/ceiling effects, internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha, interscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity). A total of 100 JIA patients (20.0% systemic JIA, 40.0% undifferentiated arthritis, 24.0% RF negative polyarthritis, 16.0% other categories) and 100 healthy children were enrolled in one paediatric rheumatology centre. The JAMAR components discriminated well healthy subjects from JIA patients. All JAMAR components revealed satisfactory psychometric performances. In conclusion, the Egyptian Arabic version of the JAMAR is a valid tool for the assessment of children with JIA and is suitable for use both in routine clinical practice and in clinical research.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/diagnosis , Disability Evaluation , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Rheumatology/methods , Adolescent , Age of Onset , Arthritis, Juvenile/physiopathology , Arthritis, Juvenile/psychology , Arthritis, Juvenile/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cultural Characteristics , Egypt , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Parents/psychology , Patients/psychology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Translating
4.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 32(4): 547-52, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24984075

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) questionnaire which can be used in standard clinical practice to measure self-defined important experiences of inflammatory arthritis patients. METHODS: The Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) questionnaire was conceptualised based on frameworks used by the WHO Quality of Life tool, as well as the PRO measurement information system (PROMIS). Cognitive interviews were conducted with 94 inflammatory arthritis patients (diagnosed according to EULAR/ACR criteria 2010), with a range of severity and disease activity to identify item pool of questions. Item selection and reduction was achieved based on patients as well as an interdisciplinary group of physicians, nurses, health educators and occupational therapy (OTs) feedback, in addition to clinometric and psychometric methods. The latter included Rasch and internal consistency reliability analyses. The PREMs questionnaire was developed centered around 5 categories: 1. Journey to diagnosis, 2. Impact of the disease on the patients' everyday life, 3. knowledge about the disease, 4. the care in the hospital, and 5. patient education and aftercare (including what to do in case of exacerbation). After analysis for ordered response options, content analysis and semi structured group discussion to cover these 5 categories, 32 questions were identified as the final item set. The routine clinic was used as a setting for the questionnaire evaluation. 183 patients were asked to complete the PROMs as well as PREMs questionnaires whilst sitting in the waiting area before being examined by the treating physician. Reliability and comprehensibility was assessed using the Test-retest reliability (reproducibility). RESULTS: The tool was derived from RA patients, therefore establishing its face validity. The PREMs questionnaire showed a high degree of comprehensibility (9.3). It demonstrated a relatively high-standardised alpha (0.892). The questionnaire items correlated significantly (p<0.01) with clinical parameters of disease activity, PROMs, self-helplessness and DAS-28 score supporting its construct validity. The domain of impact of arthritis correlated significantly (p<0.01) with health related quality of life (HRQOL) score as well as disease activity and damage measures, establishing its criterion validity. Patient education and aftercare correlated significantly (p<0.01) with adherence to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The studied PREMs questionnaire had fair psychometric properties as it was valid, reliable and comprehensible. The patients were able to comprehend varying response options on a categorical scale, and could accurately respond to items using a 7-day recall period. It provides informative measure for the patients' experience with their disease, and in the meantime, facilitates incorporating the patients' feedback into the patients' management algorithm.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/diagnosis , Arthritis/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Patients/psychology , Perception , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis/physiopathology , Arthritis/psychology , Comprehension , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Recall , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Egypt J Immunol ; 31(2): 112-121, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615268

ABSTRACT

In the first phase of its treatment program, Egypt aimed to treat 250,000 people annually until 2020, thereby reducing the number of viremic patients and limiting hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission. Egypt strives to eradicate HCV and HCV-associated morbidity by 2030. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HCV infection among end-stage renal disease patients and the reasons for non-treatment among those offered free medication. This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted during the period from November 2022 to April 2023. The study included 500 patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) sessions on a regular basis for more than three months in Dakahlia Governorate. According to patients` medical history, we found that 23.4% of patients had previous HCV infection. Of these, 12.6% received treatment, and 10.8% did not receive treatment due to a variety of reasons. For instance, some patients were unaware of the drug's availability, five patients (1%) feared side effects, 43 patients (8.6%) did not require treatment, and five patients (1%) had other causes as contraindications of drugs, noncompliance and deterioration of health status. In addition, 20.4% of patients were reported to have fully recovered, while 0.8% had a recurrence. After investigations, 1% of patients had positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg), 23.4% positive HCV Ab, and 4.2% positive HCV by the polymerase chain reaction. In conclusion, the low prevalence of HCV among HD patients confirms that HCV infection is not currently a significant health concern among patients on maintenance HD.


Subject(s)
Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C , Humans , Hepacivirus/genetics , Egypt/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects
6.
Pediatr Neurol ; 158: 135-143, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are the recommended first-line treatment of acute seizures. We wished to compare the efficacy, side effects, and satisfaction after midazolam administration by the buccal, intranasal, or intramuscular route in the treatment of acute seizures in children at homes and in emergency room (ER). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed in children aged one month to 17 years with acute seizures lasting longer than five minutes. The primary end point was seizure cessation within 10 minutes of drug administration and no seizure recurrence within 30 minutes. RESULTS: In the home group, 67 patients received midazolam via buccal route, 60 via intranasal route, and 69 via intramuscular route, whereas in the ER group, 37 patients received buccal, 34 received intranasal, and 34 received intramuscular midazolam. The primary end point was achieved in 94.2% and 85.3% after intramuscular midazolam in the home and ER groups, respectively. The intranasal midazolam was successful in stopping seizures in 93.3% in the home group and 88.2% in the ER group. The buccal route was effective in 91% in the home group and 78.4% in the ER group. There were no significant differences in efficacy between all groups (P = 0.763 and P = 0.509) among the home and ER groups, respectively. There were no significant cardiorespiratory events in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular, intranasal, and buccal doses of midazolam resolved most seizures in prehospital and emergency settings. Our results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference detected between different routes of midazolam. Intranasal route showed the highest satisfaction rate among caregivers.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal , Midazolam , Seizures , Humans , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Child , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Administration, Buccal , Injections, Intramuscular , Seizures/drug therapy , Adolescent , Infant , Treatment Outcome , Prospective Studies , Acute Disease
7.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 4(2): e0002821, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358962

ABSTRACT

When compliance with infection control recommendations is non-optimal, hospitals may play an important role in hepatitis C (HCV) transmission. However, few studies have analyzed the nosocomial HCV acquisition risk based on detailed empirical data. Here, we used data from a prospective cohort study conducted on 500 patients in the Ain Shams hospital (Cairo, Egypt) in 2017 with the objective of identifying (i) high-risk patient profiles and (ii) transmission hotspots within the hospital. Data included information on patient HCV status upon admission, their trajectories between wards and the invasive procedures they underwent. We first performed a sequence analysis to identify different hospitalization profiles. Second, we estimated each patient's individual risk of HCV acquisition based on ward-specific prevalence and procedures undergone, and risk hotspots by computing ward-level risks. Then, using a beta regression model, we evaluated upon-admission factors linked to HCV acquisition risk and built a score estimating the risk of HCV infection during hospitalization based on these factors. Finally, we assessed and compared ward-focused and patient-focused HCV control strategies. The sequence analysis based on patient trajectories allowed us to identify four distinct patient trajectory profiles. The risk of HCV infection was greater in the internal medicine department, compared to the surgery department (0·188% [0·142%-0·235%] vs. 0·043%, CI 95%: [0·036%-0·050%]), with risk hotspots in the geriatric, tropical medicine and intensive-care wards. Upon-admission risk predictors included source of admission, age, reason for hospitalization, and medical history. Interventions focused on the most at-risk patients were most effective to reduce HCV infection risk. Our results might help reduce the risk of HCV acquisition during hospitalization in Egypt by targeting enhanced control measures to ward-level transmission hotspots and to at-risk patients identified upon admission.

8.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 20(7): 345-352, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The peripheral microangiopathy may be well evaluated and studied by nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) which is a safe and non-invasive technique. NFC has been reported to have both diagnostic and prognostic values in patients presenting with Raynaud's phenomenon. OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of this work was to make a consensus on what domains should be included in a capillaroscopy report and that it can be used in daily clinical practice and clinical research in the area of rheumatology. METHODS: A Delphi questionnaire was developed regarding capillaroscopy report from a literature review and expert consensus. The first Delphi round included 14 core areas, its 18 domains with 50 subdomains, derived from a systematic literature review. The level of evidence was determined for each core set using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. Nine response categories have been set per each item ranging between 1 and 9. Round 2, aimed to reach preliminary consensus "in" or "out" for domains. It included all items that were rated "critical" by at least 80% of the participants as well as any new domains proposed in round 1. RESULTS: The participants to the first, and second round were 11 experts. Fourteen domains were discussed in the two rounds. At the end of the survey, the final report template of NFC in rheumatology reached a consensus. CONCLUSION: A nailfold capillaroscopy report template has been developed by this study, based on outcomes of a Delphi process, by international participants panel. All domains met the 80% voting threshold set in this work. The reporting template can be used for both clinical research as well as day to day practice to provide guidance and standardize the NFC reporting.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Microscopic Angioscopy , Humans , Consensus , Raynaud Disease/diagnosis , Nails/blood supply , Nails/diagnostic imaging
9.
Arch Osteoporos ; 18(1): 58, 2023 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37127804

ABSTRACT

Despite the wide availability of a wide variety of approved osteoporosis medications and DXA scan centers in Egypt, only a minority of patients at high risk of sustaining a fragility fracture receive treatment, even after their first fracture. Such big "treatment gap" leaves the most high-risk individuals unprotected against fragility fractures. This study provides a benchmark to monitor national trends in osteoporosis management and service uptake. PURPOSE: To assess the treatment gap among men and postmenopausal women presenting with a fragility fracture, and to analyze the characteristics and fracture risks of the patients presenting with an index fragility fracture. METHODS: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study. Both men and postmenopausal women, admitted with an osteoporotic fracture (whether major osteoporosis or hip fracture), were consecutively recruited for this work. The fracture risk was assessed based on their FRAX calculation prior to the index fracture. All the patients were assessed for their falls and sarcopenia risks. Blood tests for bone profile as well as DXA scan were offered to all the patients. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients presenting with fragility fractures were included in this work. 70.8% were women and 29.2% were men. Mean age was 70.1 (SD = 9.2) years. Ten-year probability of fracture (without BMD) was high in 65.9% of the postmenopausal women and 40.3% of the men. 82.1% of the postmenopausal women and 100% in men identified to be eligible for osteoporosis therapy did not receive any form of osteoporosis therapy. FRAX score correlated significantly with bone mineral density assessment at both hip and spine. Falls, sarcopenia, and functional disability showed significant relation to the fracture risk. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large treatment gap in Egyptian older adults. The recent guidelines for osteoporosis management in Egypt endorsed fracture centric approach to identify people at risk. The gap appears to be related to a low rate of osteoporosis diagnosis and lack of patient education.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Sarcopenia , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Egypt , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bone Density , Risk Assessment
10.
Arch Rheumatol ; 38(3): 451-460, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38046253

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Based on the mainstream adoption of nailfold capillaroscopy as an investigative tool for rheumatologists, this work was carried out by a panel of experts in the field of capillaroscopy and microcirculation to issue a consensus view on capillaroscopic image acquisition and analysis standardization. Patients and methods: After the key clinical questions were identified by the core team, a systematic review of the published research was carried out focusing on variable capillaroscopic techniques, definitions, and characteristics, including capillary density (number of capillaries), capillary morphology (shape of each capillary), capillary dimensions (width of apical, arterial, and venous limb of the capillary), and the presence of hemorrhages. The expert panel attained a consensus and developed recommendations for the standardization of capillaroscopy in clinical practice. These included recommendations for normality and abnormality and the different capillaroscopic patterns. It also involved recommendations for scoring systems, reliability, and reporting. Results: A panel of 11 experts participated in the two rounds with a response rate of 100%. A total of nine recommendations were obtained. The agreement with the recommendations (a score of 7-9) ranged from 81.8 to 90.9%. A consensus (i.e., ≥75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) was reached on all the clinical standards. Conclusion: This work highlighted the main NFC indications, the technical equipment that should be used, how to carry out the procedure, standardization of the terminology of the parameters, and the interpretation of NFC findings. An evidence-based consensus incorporating the advice and experience of a diverse international expert panel was reached.

11.
Arch Osteoporos ; 18(1): 139, 2023 11 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37985519

ABSTRACT

Since falling is the third cause of chronic disability, a better understanding of the frequency, severity, and risk factors of falls across diagnostic groups is needed to design and implement customized, effective fall prevention, and management programs for these individuals, particularly those at risk of sustaining a fragility fracture. OBJECTIVE: (1) To assess the incidence of falls among osteoporotic patients with fragility fractures. (2) To evaluate the potential for stratifying the people at risk of falling in bone health setting aiming to provide targeted optimum care for them. METHODS: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study. Both men and postmenopausal women, admitted with an osteoporotic fracture (whether major osteoporosis or hip fracture), were consecutively recruited for this work and managed under Fracture Liaison Service. All the patients were assessed for their Fracture risk (FRAX), falls risk (FRAS), and sarcopenia risk (SARC-F) as well as functional disability (HAQ). Blood tests for bone profile as well as DXA scan were offered to all the patients. RESULTS: Four hundred five patients (121 males, 284 females) were included in this work. Mean age was 70.1 (SD = 9.2) years. The incidence of falls was 64.9%. The prevalence of falls was high (64.8%) in the patients presenting with major osteoporosis fractures and in those with hip fractures (61.8%). The prevalence of fragility fractures was positively correlated with HAQ score and the SARC-F score (p = 0.01 and 0.021 respectively). Falls risk score was positively correlated with FRAX score of major osteoporotic fractures, HAQ score, and SARC-F score (p = 0.01, 0.013, and 0.003 respectively). Seventy percent of the osteopenia patients who sustained fragility fracture had high falls risk and/or SARC-F score. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the importance of falls risk stratification in osteoporotic patients presenting with fragility fractures. Identification of the patients at increased risk of falls should be a component of the standard practice.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Bone Density , Cross-Sectional Studies , Egypt , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/therapy , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment
12.
Arch Osteoporos ; 18(1): 115, 2023 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37688741

ABSTRACT

This work studies the epidemiology of hip fracture in Egypt. While the incidence of hip fracture in Egypt matches that of the Mediterranean region, there was geographic variation in osteoporotic hip fracture incidence between the north and south of Egypt. PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of hip fracture in Egypt, with special emphasis on the geographic and demographic variation among the Egyptian population. METHODS: The incidence of hip fractures treated in two Egyptian FLS centers was calculated for the period of February 2022-February 2023. Demographic information was recorded for every patient on the national register. All patients completed a baseline questionnaire, had clinical evaluation, fracture risk, falls, and sarcopenia risk assessment. A DXA scan was carried out for every patient. RESULTS: The annual incidence of low-energy hip fracture in individuals aged 40 years or more in Egypt in 2022-2023 was 123.34 per 100,000 in women and 55.19 per 100,000 in men. The incidence of hip fractures was higher in south Egypt (113.62) versus north Egypt (64.8). This was consistent for both genders. Bone mineral density was significantly (p < 0.01) lower in south Egypt at both the spine, distal forearm, as well as hip trochanters, whereas there was no significant difference between both locations in terms of the total hip and neck of the femur. Yet, falls risk, sarcopenia, as well as functional disability rates were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the north. CONCLUSION: In Egypt, the hip fracture incidence was higher in the south compared to the north. Several modifiable factors contribute to fragility fracture risk independent of BMD, creating complex interrelationships between BMD, risk factors, and fracture risk.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Osteoporotic Fractures , Sarcopenia , Female , Humans , Male , Egypt/epidemiology , Bone Density , Incidence , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology
13.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 30(6): 899-904, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22992291

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the integration of PROMs and patient education, using the joint-fitness programme, and the effectiveness of this combined approach on disease activity and adherence to therapy. METHODS: This was a double-blind randomised controlled study which included 147 arthritic patients monitored over 18 months. Every patient completed a PROMs questionnaire. By the 6th month of treatment, the patients were randomly allocated to an active group (74 patients) that was able to view former self-reported PROMs scores and discuss the implementation of the joint fitness programme as a tool for psycho-educational interventions. The control group (73 patients) continued their treatment and management based on viewing their recorded PROMs and clinical assessment. The patients were assessed at 3 monthly intervals for another 12 months. The primary outcome was the change in the patients' adherence to their medications, disease activity score (DAS-28) and PROMs domains. RESULTS: The integration of patient education and PROMs led to a significant greater reduction of disease activity parameters, DAS-28 score, as well as improvement of the patients' adherence to therapy (p<0.01). The improvement of disease activity parameters was associated with the improvement in functional disability and quality of life scores. At 18-month-follow-up, both the self-management and cognitive behavioural therapy intervention demonstrated improvement for disease activity (effect size 1.4 and 1.2 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of patient education and PROMs succeeded in improving self-perceived health as well as disease activity. The patient education for patients with inflammatory arthritis is feasible in the standard clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Joints/physiopathology , Patient Education as Topic , Self Care , Self Report , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis/diagnosis , Arthritis/physiopathology , Arthritis/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy , Disability Evaluation , Double-Blind Method , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Joints/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Perception , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
East Mediterr Health J ; 28(5): 336-344, 2022 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35670438

ABSTRACT

Background: Caesarean section (CS) is a life-saving operation when vaginal delivery is risky to the mother or baby. However, if not medically indicated or performed under suboptimal conditions, it can be harmful and resource-intensive. Aims: To estimate the prevalence of CS in 6 Egyptian governorates and identify possible risk factors (including demographic, social and healthcare services factors) stratified according to geographical areas. Methods: We used secondary data collected from a large survey to investigate the sociodemographic and health indicators of 6 purposefully selected Egyptian governorates with suboptimal health indicators: 3 from Upper Egypt (Sohag, Assiut and Menia) and 3 from Lower Egypt (Sharkia, Beheira and Ismailia). The survey data were gathered using an interview questionnaire that targeted household members. Results: The CS rate was estimated at 55.1% for the 3 years preceding the study, and the highest rate was 67.8% in Behira and the lowest was 49.0% in Assiut. In most governorates, the CS rate was higher in rural than in urban areas, but the difference was not significant. High CS rates were significantly related to higher social class and lower number of children (≤ 3). Conclusion: In the governorates investigated, CS was performed more often, with higher rates than those reported in the 2015 Egypt Health Issue Survey. The adoption of protocols for elective CS should be enforced with a more multisectoral effort. Pregnant women should be well informed of the risks associated with CS and its medical indications.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Delivery, Obstetric , Child , Egypt/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Risk Factors
15.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(7): 1138-1147, 2022 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35905018

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 severity and mortality predictors could determine admission criteria and reduce mortality. We aimed to evaluate the clinical-laboratory features of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to develop a novel score of severity and mortality. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to five Egyptian university hospitals. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical manifestations, laboratory parameters, the duration of hospitalization, and disease outcome were analyzed, and a score to predict severity and mortality was developed. RESULTS: A total of 1308 patients with COVID-19, with 996 (76.1%) being moderate and 312 (23.9%) being severe cases, were included. The mean age was 46.5 ± 17.1 years, and 61.6% were males. The overall mortality was 12.6%. Regression analysis determined significant predictors, and a ROC curve defined cut-off values. The COVEG severity score was defined by age ≥ 54, D-dimer ≥ 0.795, serum ferritin ≥ 406, C-reactive protein ≥ 30.1, and neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio ≥ 2.88. The COVEG mortality score was based on COVEG severity and the presence of cardiac diseases. Both COVEG scores had high predictive values (area under the curve 0.882 and 0.883, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: COVEG score predicts the severity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 accurately.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Kidney Dis (Basel) ; 8(5): 392-407, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36466074

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on an updated version of the recommendations for the diagnosis and Treat-to-Target management of osteoporosis that is effective and safe for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G4-G5D/kidney transplant. Methods: Delphi process was implemented (3 rounds) to establish a consensus on 10 clinical domains: (1) study targets, (2) risk factors, (3) diagnosis, (4) case stratification, (5) treatment targets, (6) investigations, (7) medical management, (8) monitoring, (9) management of special groups, (10) fracture liaison service. After each round, statements were retired, modified, or added in view of the experts' suggestions, and the percent agreement was calculated. Statements receiving rates of 7-9 by more than 75% of experts' votes were considered as achieving consensus. Results: The surveys were sent to an expert panel (n = 26), of whom 23 participated in the three rounds (2 were international experts and 21 were national). Most of the participants were rheumatologists (87%), followed by nephrologists (8.7%), and geriatric physicians (4.3%). Eighteen recommendations, categorized into 10 domains, were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7-9) ranged from 80 to 100%. Consensus was reached on the wording of all 10 clinical domains identified by the scientific committee. An algorithm for the management of osteoporosis in CKD has been suggested. Conclusion: A panel of international and national experts established a consensus regarding the management of osteoporosis in CKD patients. The developed recommendations provide a comprehensive approach to assessing and managing osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals involved in its management.

17.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 29(5): 801-10, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22011622

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of a new questionnaire for assessment of functional disability and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. METHODS: Using Rasch analysis and 71 questions item pool, content analysis and semi structured group discussion, the combined AS questionnaire (CASQ) was developed including: 10-item scale to assess functional impairment (CASQ-FI), and 10 items to assess quality of life (CASQ-QoL). Construct validity was assessed by correlating the score of the questionnaire to parameters of disease activity namely, the BAS-FI, BAS-DAI, BAS-G, BAS-Metrology Index, and the occupational status. In addition, the CASQ was compared to both HAQS and ASQoL. Sensitivity to change of the developed CASQ was also assessed. RESULTS: The CASQ questionnaire for functional impairment (CASQ-FI: 10 items) and quality of life (CASQ-QoL: 10 items) showed acceptable validity as it correlated significantly with clinical parameters of disease activity: BAS-FI (CASQ-FI: r=0.85, CASQ-QoL: r=0.86), BAS-DAI (CASQ-FI: r=0.71, CASQ-QoL: r=0.87) and BAS-G (CASQ-FI: r=0.64, CASQ-QoL: r=0.79). Compared to HAQS and ASQoL, the CASQ-QoL was as well or better correlated with clinical and outcome measures. The CASQ was also reliable (Cronbach's alpha for CASQ-FI 0.958, and CASQ-QoL 0.966) and had no misfitting items. In addition, both CASQ questionnaires were sensitive to change (p<0.01) CONCLUSIONS: The CASQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessment of functional impairment and quality of life in AS. The CASQ is well accepted by patients, sensitive to change, easy to administer and score. The CASQ-FI and CASQ-QoL questionnaires can either be used and scored separately to assess for functional disability as well as quality of life or in combination as tools to assess for both parameters.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/physiopathology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Employment , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Social Behavior , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/psychology , Treatment Outcome
18.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246836, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33556152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitals are suspected of playing a key role in HCV epidemic dynamics in Egypt. This work aimed at assessing HCV prevalence and associated risk factors in patients and health-care workers (HCWs) of Ain Shams University (ASU) hospitals in Cairo. METHODS: We included 500 patients admitted to the internal medicine or surgery hospital from February to July, 2017, as well as 50 HCWs working in these same hospitals. Participants were screened for anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA. A questionnaire was administered to collect data on demographic characteristics and medical/surgical history. For HCWs, questions on occupational exposures and infection control practices were also included. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies was 19.80% (95% CI: 16.54-23.52) among participating patients, and 8.00% (95% CI: 0.48-15.52) among participating HCWs. In HCWs, the only risk factors significantly associated with anti-HCV antibodies were age and profession, with higher prevalence in older HCWs and those working as cleaners or porters. In patients, in a multivariate logistic regression, age over 50 (aOR: 3.4 [1.9-5.8]), living outside Cairo (aOR: 2.1 [1.2-3.4]), admission for liver or gastro-intestinal complaints (aOR: 4.2 [1.8-9.9]), and history of receiving parenteral anti-schistosomiasis treatment (aOR: 2.7 [1.2-5.9]) were found associated with anti-HCV antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: While HCV prevalence among patients has decreased since the last survey performed within ASU hospitals in 2008, it is still significantly higher than in the general population. These results may help better control further HCV spread within healthcare settings in Egypt by identifying at-risk patient profiles upon admission.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C , Hospitals, University , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Egypt/epidemiology , Female , Hepatitis C/blood , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence
19.
Arch Osteoporos ; 16(1): 176, 2021 11 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34792646

ABSTRACT

The objective of this consensus statement is to inform the clinical practice communities, research centres and policymakers across Africa of the results of the recommendations for osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management. The developed guideline provides state-of-the-art information and presents the conclusions and recommendations of the consensus panel regarding these issues. PURPOSE: To reach an African expert consensus on a treat-to-target strategy, based on current evidence for best practice, for the management of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures. METHOD: A 3-round Delphi process was conducted with 17 osteoporosis experts from different African countries. All rounds were conducted online. In round 1, experts reviewed a list of 21 key clinical questions. In rounds 2 and 3, they rated the statements stratified under each domain for its fit (on a scale of 1-9). After each round, statements were retired, modified or added in view of the experts' suggestions and the percent agreement was calculated. Statements receiving rates of 7-9 by more than 75% of experts' votes were considered as achieving consensus. RESULTS: The developed guidelines adopted a fracture risk-centric approach. Results of round 1 revealed that of the 21 proposed domains, 10 were accepted whereas 11 were amended. In round 2, 32 statements were presented: 2 statements were retired for similarity, 9 statements reached consensus, whereas modifications were suggested for 21 statements. After the 3rd round of rating, the experts came to consensus on the 32 statements. Frequency of high-rate recommendation ranged from 83.33 to 100%. The response rate of the experts was 100%. An algorithm for the osteoporosis management osteoporosis was suggested. CONCLUSION: This study is an important step in setting up a standardised osteoporosis service across the continent. Building a single model that can be applied in standard practice across Africa will enable the clinicians to face the key challenges of managing osteoporosis; furthermore, it highlights the unmet needs for the policymakers responsible for providing bone health care together with and positive outcomes of patients' care.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Osteoporosis , Bone Density , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Humans , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/drug therapy
20.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis ; 13: 1759720X211059610, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34917176

ABSTRACT

IgA vasculitis (IgAV), formerly known as Henoch-Schönlein purpura, is the most common cause of systemic vasculitis in childhood. Given its potential life-threatening systemic complications, early and accurate diagnosis as well as management of IgAV represent a major challenge for health care professionals. This study was carried out to attain an evidence-based expert consensus on a treat-to-target management approach for IgAV using Delphi technique. The preliminary scientific committee identified a total of 16 key clinical questions according to the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) approach. An evidence-based, systematic, literature review was conducted to compile evidence for the IgAV management. The core leadership team identified researchers and clinicians with expertise in IgAV management in Egypt upon which experts were gathered from different governorates and health centers across Egypt. Delphi process was implemented (two rounds) to reach a consensus. An online questionnaire was sent to expert panel (n = 26) who participated in the two rounds. After completing round 2, a total of 20 recommendation items, categorized into two sections were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7-9) ranged from 91.7-100%. Consensus was reached (i.e. ⩾75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) on the wording of all the 20 clinical standards identified by the scientific committee. Algorithms for the diagnosis and management have been suggested. This was an expert, consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of IgAV and IgA vasculitic nephritis, based on best available evidence and expert opinion. The guideline presented a strategy of care with a pathway to achieve a state of remission as early as possible. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Given its potential life-threatening systemic complications, early and accurate diagnosis of immunoglobulin A vasculitis represents a major challenge for health care professionals. This work provided cornerstone principles for the management of the condition. Adopting PICO approach and implementing Delphi process a consensus was reached on evidence-based treat-to-target treatment recommendations. This will endorse enhancement and consistency of care of this cohort of patients in standard practice.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL