ABSTRACT
There is a lack of consensus on quality indicators suitable for neonatal transport. The aim of this study is to make a proposal for specific quality indicators for newborn transport. A retrospective descriptive study was performed (2009 to 2015) where twenty-four indicators were selected, evaluated and classified according to the 6 dimensions of quality of the Institute of Medicine. Among the 24 evaluated quality metrics, there were 3 of them which needed a correction when evaluating neonatal transport performance, because they were significantly correlated with gestational age. They were (a) stabilisation time, (b) prevalence of newborn arterial hypotension (defined by gestational age) and (c) unnoticed hypothermia at referral hospital.Conclusion: Quality evaluation through the definition of specific metrics in newborn transport is feasible. These indicators should be defined or adjusted for newborn population to measure the actual performance of the transport service.What is Known:⢠Quality indicators may help in defining metrics for clinical practice, promoting benchmarking and defining areas of improvement.⢠Newborn characteristics call for a specialised care, and quality measure during newborn transport require specific metrics. Quality metrics for paediatric transport have been defined using Delphi method. Some of these measures need to be specific for newborn, due to their intrinsic characteristics.What is New:⢠Using evidence-based literature and our newborn transport experience, specific quality indicators for newborn transport are suggested.⢠Data analysis shows how some indicators need to be adjusted for gestational age.
Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy , Neonatology/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Transportation of Patients/standards , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Linear Models , Logistic Models , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advances in perinatal care have led to a significant reduction in morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. Much of this progress is related to the prevention and management of respiratory disease. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in perinatal care and its influence on respiratory morbidity and mortality among VLBW infants in Spain in 2 consecutive periods (2002-2006 and 2007-2011). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected of all VLBW infants included in the Spanish SEN1500 network. Patients with major congenital anomalies, those who died in the delivery room (DR) and infants <230 or >346 weeks of gestational age (GA) were excluded. RESULTS: During the study period, out of 27,205 eligible VLBW infants, 24,598 (90.4%) met inclusion criteria. The most striking and statistically significant results found in the second period were: (i) reduction in the proportion of "outborn" patients; (ii) an increase in prenatal steroid administration; (iii) enhanced non-invasive respiratory support in the DR and NICU; (iv) reduction in invasive mechanical ventilation, surfactant administration, and steroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Moreover, survival to hospital discharge increased (83.5 vs. 84.7%; p = 0.015); however, survival without BPD increased only among the most immature (230 to 266 weeks' GA) from 26.6 to 31.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced adherence to international recommendations in perinatal care and a significant reduction in mortality were found during the second period. Survival without BPD increased only among the most immature. Further investigation is needed to optimize the strategies to prevent and manage respiratory disease in this group of patients.