Evaluation of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients with high-grade glioma treated with lomustine-a case series.

PURPOSE: Although lomustine has been used as a chemotherapeutic agent for decades, no recommendation on appropriate chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prophylaxis is available. As CINV is considered one of the most bothersome side effects of chemotherapy, adequate prophylaxis is of relevance to improve quality of life during cancer treatment. The aim of this retrospective case series was to report the incidence and severity of CINV in pediatric patients with high-grade glioma treated with lomustine and to formulate recommendations for appropriate CINV prophylaxis. METHODS: Pediatric patients treated with lomustine for high-grade glioma according to the ACNS 0423 protocol were identified retrospectively. Two researchers independently reviewed and classified complaints of CINV and administered CINV prophylaxis. Treatment details, tumor localization, and response to therapy were systematically extracted from the patients' files. RESULTS: Seventeen children aged 8-18 years received a median of four cycles of lomustine. CINV complaints and administered prophylaxis were evaluable in all patients. Moderate or severe CINV was observed in 13/17 (76%) patients. Administered prophylactic CINV regimens varied from no prophylaxis to triple-agent combinations. CONCLUSION: In this case series, we identified lomustine as a highly emetogenic chemotherapeutic agent. According to the current guidelines, CINV prophylaxis with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist in combination with dexamethasone and (fos)aprepitant is recommended.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Methotrexate in Plasma Using Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Necessary After Administration of Glucarpidase in Methotrexate Intoxications.

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is used to treat a variety of cancers. In all patients receiving HD-MTX, plasma MTX levels are monitored mainly to anticipate rescue therapy to prevent adverse events. We present 2 children treated with HD-MTX and afterward treated with glucarpidase at different time-points after their HD-MTX infusions. After the administration of glucarpidase, a nontoxic metabolite of MTX cross-reacts with MTX in the standard immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands) resulting in an artificially elevated MTX level. An artificially elevated MTX level results in unnecessarily long folinic acid administration, which decreases the effectivity of MTX. This grand round highlights the importance of measuring plasma MTX levels after the administration of glucarpidase with an ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry method instead of with an immunoassay.

Primary cardioprotection with dexrazoxane in patients with childhood cancer who are expected to receive anthracyclines: recommendations from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group.

Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, which might be prevented by dexrazoxane. However, concerns exist about the safety of dexrazoxane, and little guidance is available on its use in children. To facilitate global consensus, a working group within the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group reviewed the existing literature and used evidence-based methodology to develop a guideline for dexrazoxane administration in children with cancer who are expected to receive anthracyclines. Recommendations were made in consideration of evidence supporting the balance of potential benefits and harms, and clinical judgement by the expert panel. Given the dose-dependent risk of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, we concluded that the benefits of dexrazoxane probably outweigh the risk of subsequent neoplasms when the cumulative doxorubicin or equivalent dose is at least 250 mg/m2 (moderate recommendation). No recommendation could be formulated for cumulative doxorubicin or equivalent doses of lower than 250 mg/m2, due to insufficient evidence to determine whether the risk of cardiotoxicity outweighs the possible risk of subsequent neoplasms. Further research is encouraged to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of dexrazoxane in children with cancer.

Medicinal cannabis in oncology.

In The Netherlands, since September 2003, a legal medicinal cannabis product, constituting the whole range of cannabinoids, is available for clinical research, drug development strategies, and on prescription for patients. To date, this policy, initiated by the Dutch Government, has not yet led to the desired outcome; the amount of initiated clinical research is less than expected and only a minority of patients resorts to the legal product. This review aims to discuss the background for the introduction of legal medicinal cannabis in The Netherlands, the past years of Dutch clinical experience in oncology practice, possible reasons underlying the current outcome, and future perspectives.

Influence of ketoconazole on the fecal and urinary disposition of docetaxel.

OBJECTIVE: The anticancer drug docetaxel is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isozymes. Furthermore, docetaxel is also a substrate for the transmembrane ATP-binding cassette efflux transporter protein ABCB1. CYP3A-inhibition significantly reduces docetaxel total systemic clearance, on average by 50%. However, data on the effect of CYP3A-inhibition on the fecal and urinary excretion of docetaxel are lacking. To further elucidate the role of CYP3A- and ABCB1-mediated elimination pathways for docetaxel we investigated the effect of the potent CYP3A-inhibitor, and also ABCB1-inhibitor, ketoconazole on the fecal and urinary disposition of docetaxel in cancer patients. METHODS: Fifteen patients were treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m2), followed 3 weeks later by a reduced dose in combination with orally administered ketoconazole, or vice versa. Six patients were also administered [3H]-radiolabeled docetaxel. Fecal and urinary specimens, collected up to 72-h post-infusion, were analyzed for cumulative parent drug and radioactivity excretion. RESULTS: Ketoconazole coadministration increased fecal parent drug excretion twofold from 2.6 +/- 2.8 to 5.2 +/- 5.4% (mean +/- SD, P = 0.03) but did not affect urinary parent drug excretion (P = 0.69). The sum of fecal and urinary parent drug excretion was 5.3 +/- 3.0% for docetaxel alone and 7.8 +/- 5.6% in the presence of ketoconazole, respectively (P = 0.04). Total recovered radioactivity values were 45.8 +/- 19.1 and 32.4 +/- 19.7%, respectively (P = 0.23). CONCLUSION: CYP3A-inhibition by ketoconazole increases fecal parent drug excretion twofold in cancer patients. A more pronounced increase was not achieved, most likely due to concomitant intestinal ABCB1-inhibition.

Influence of high-dose ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics (PK) of docetaxel are characterized by large inter-individual variability in systemic drug exposure (AUC) and drug clearance. The PK variability is thought to be largely related to differences in the catalytic function of CYP3A, involved in docetaxel metabolism and elimination. As variability in efficacy and toxicity is associated with variability in docetaxel AUC and clearance, reducing inter-individual PK variability may help improve the risk-benefit ratio of docetaxel therapy. We investigated if high-dose ketoconazole, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, could result in a uniform reduction of docetaxel clearance and reduce the inter-individual variability in docetaxel AUC and clearance. METHODS: Seven patients were treated in a randomized-cross over design with intravenous docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) followed 3 weeks later by docetaxel (15 mg/m(2)) given in combination with orally administered ketoconazole (400 mg 3 times daily, up to 47 hours after docetaxel infusion) or vice versa. Docetaxel plasma concentration-time data were described by a three-compartment PK model. Ketoconazole plasma concentration-time data were described by a one-compartment PK model. RESULTS: Docetaxel clearance was reduced by 50% (P = .018) from 32.8 +/- 13.7 L/hr to 16.5 +/- 8.15 L/hr upon ketoconazole coadministration, albeit with large inter-individual variability (fractional change in clearance, range 0.31 - 0.66). In the presence of ketoconazole, inter-individual variability in clearance and AUC, expressed as coefficient of variation, was increased from 41.6 to 49.5% and from 28.0 to 35.1%, respectively, and not, as we had hypothesized, reduced. CONCLUSION: Inhibition of CYP3A by concomitant high-dose ketoconazole administration does not result in a uniform reduction of docetaxel clearance and does not reduce the inter-individual variability in docetaxel AUC or clearance. This approach is unsuitable as method to achieve a uniform docetaxel PK profile.

Docetaxel administration schedule: from fever to tears? A review of randomised studies.

The anti-cancer agent docetaxel is approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and for the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer. At the recommended dose of 60-100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks, severe neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity and a major concern especially when treating patients at high-risk from myelotoxic complications. A less toxic schedule, involving weekly docetaxel administration was developed for patients with poor performance status, multiple comorbidities, poor haematological reserves or those who were heavily pre-treated, elderly or patients for whom palliation is the focus of treatment. Recent randomised trials allow a comparison of efficacy and toxicity between weekly and 3-weekly treatments. Efficacy appears to be similar for the two schedules regardless of the disease while weekly docetaxel is significantly less myelotoxic. However, this benefit comes at the cost of cumulative increases in hyperlacrimation, skin- and nail-toxicity and negatively affects quality of life. Currently, 3-weekly docetaxel remains the standard schedule for treatment, whereas the weekly schedule offers a possibility of treatment individualisation for those patients where the risk of myelosuppression is considered unacceptable.

Effect of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.

OBJECTIVE: In vitro studies indicate that the anticancer drug docetaxel is primarily eliminated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated metabolism. Coadministration of drugs that modulate the activity of CYP3A4 is, therefore, likely to have undesirable clinical consequences. We investigated the effects of the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in patients with cancer. METHODS: Seven patients were treated in a randomized crossover design with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)), followed 3 weeks later by docetaxel (10 mg/m(2)) given in combination with orally administered ketoconazole (200 mg once daily for 3 days), or the reverse sequence. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed by noncompartmental analysis. RESULTS: Ketoconazole coadministration resulted in a 49% decrease in clearance of docetaxel (P =.018). The mean (+/-SD) clearance values were 35.0 +/- 11.8 L/h (95% confidence interval, 24.1-45.9 L/h) for docetaxel alone and 18.2 L/h (95% confidence interval, 9.22-27.1 L/h) in the presence of ketoconazole, respectively. The docetaxel clearance ratio in the presence and absence of ketoconazole was weakly related to the area under the curve of ketoconazole (R(2) = 0.529, P =.064). CONCLUSION: Inhibition of CYP3A4 by ketoconazole in vivo results in docetaxel clearance values that have previously been shown to be associated with a several-fold increase in the odds for febrile neutropenia at standard doses. Caution should be taken and substantial dose reductions are required if docetaxel has to be administered together with potent inhibitors of CYP3A4.

CYP3A4*22 genotype and systemic exposure affect paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is used for the treatment of several solid tumors and displays a high interindividual variation in exposure and toxicity. Neurotoxicity is one of the most prominent side effects of paclitaxel. This study explores potential predictive pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic determinants for the onset and severity of neurotoxicity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In an exploratory cohort of patients (n = 261) treated with paclitaxel, neurotoxicity incidence, and severity, pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacogenetic variants were determined. Paclitaxel plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography or liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, and individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from previously developed population pharmacokinetic models by nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Genetic variants of paclitaxel pharmacokinetics tested were CYP3A4*22, CYP2C8*3, CYP2C8*4, and ABCB1 3435 C>T. The association between CYP3A4*22 and neurotoxicity observed in the exploratory cohort was validated in an independent patient cohort (n = 239). RESULTS: Exposure to paclitaxel (logAUC) was correlated with severity of neurotoxicity (P < 0.00001). Female CYP3A4*22 carriers were at increased risk of developing neurotoxicity (P = 0.043) in the exploratory cohort. CYP3A4*22 carrier status itself was not associated with pharmacokinetic parameters (CL, AUC, Cmax, or T>0.05) of paclitaxel in males or females. Other genetic variants displayed no association with neurotoxicity. In the subsequent independent validation cohort, CYP3A4*22 carriers were at risk of developing grade 3 neurotoxicity (OR = 19.1; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel exposure showed a relationship with the severity of paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity. In this study, female CYP3A4*22 carriers had increased risk of developing severe neurotoxicity during paclitaxel therapy. These observations may guide future individualization of paclitaxel treatment.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for the individualization of docetaxel dosing: a randomized pharmacokinetic study.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, notably clearance and exposure (AUC), are characterized by large interindividual variability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of PK-guided [area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) targeted], individualized docetaxel dosing on interindividual variability in exposure. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A limited sampling strategy in combination with a validated population PK model, Bayesian analysis, and a predefined target AUC was used. Fifteen patients were treated for at least 2 courses with body surface area-based docetaxel and 15 with at least 1 course of PK-guided docetaxel dosing. RESULTS: Interindividual variability (SD of ln AUC) was decreased by 35% (N = 15) after 1 PK-guided course; when all courses were evaluated, variability was decreased by 39% (P = 0.055). PK-guided dosing also decreased the interindividual variability of percentage decrease in white blood cell and absolute neutrophil counts by approximately 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is required to determine whether the decrease in PK variability can contribute to a reduction in interindividual variability in efficacy and toxicity.

Application of prolonged microdialysis sampling in carboplatin-treated cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To better understand the mechanisms underlying (in)sensitivity of tumors to anticancer drugs, assessing intra-tumor drug pharmacokinetics (PKs) could be important. We explored the feasibility of microdialysis in tumor tissue for multiple days in a clinical setting, using carboplatin as model drug. METHODS: Plasma and microdialysate samples from tumor and adipose normal tissues were collected up to 47 h after dosing in eight carboplatin-treated patients with an accessible (sub)cutaneous tumor. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics were evaluable in tumor tissue in 6/8 patients and in adipose normal tissue in 3/8 patients. Concentration-time curves of unbound platinum in both the tissues followed the pattern of the curves in plasma, with exposure ratios of tissue versus plasma ranging from 0.64 to 1.46. CONCLUSIONS: Microdialysis can be successfully employed in ambulant patients for multiple days, which enables one to study tissue PK of anticancer drugs in normal and malignant tissues in more detail.

Alternative drug formulations of docetaxel: a review.

The anticancer drug docetaxel (Taxotere) is formulated in the nonionic surfactant polysorbate 80 (Tween 80). Early in the clinical development of docetaxel, it became clear that docetaxel administration is associated with the occurrence of unpredictable (acute) hypersensitivity reactions and cumulative fluid retention. These side-effects have been attributed, in part, to the presence of polysorbate 80 and have consequently initiated research focused on the development of a less-toxic, better-tolerated polysorbate 80-free formulation of docetaxel. More recently, there is an increasing interest in developing a (polysorbate 80-free) docetaxel formulation that selectively targets malignant tissue, thereby increasing efficacy while decreasing the occurrence of side-effects related to wide and nonspecific body distribution. This review aims to discuss the preclinical and clinical results of pharmaceutical strategies [PEGylated (immuno)liposomal docetaxel, docetaxel-fibrinogen-coated olive oil droplets, docetaxel encapsulated nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates, submicronic dispersion formulation] to develop an alternative, solvent-free, delivery form for docetaxel characterized by increased efficacy and decreased toxicity.

Medicinal cannabis does not influence the clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and docetaxel.

OBJECTIVE: To date, data regarding the potential of cannabinoids to modulate cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A (CYP3A) activity are contradictory. Recently, a standardized medicinal cannabis product was introduced in The Netherlands. We anticipated an increased use of medicinal cannabis concurrent with anticancer drugs, and undertook a drug-interaction study to evaluate the effect of concomitant medicinal cannabis on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and docetaxel, both subject to CYP3A-mediated biotransformation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four cancer patients were treated with i.v. irinotecan (600 mg, n = 12) or docetaxel (180 mg, n = 12), followed 3 weeks later by the same drugs concomitant with medicinal cannabis (200 ml herbal tea, 1 g/l) for 15 consecutive days, starting 12 days before the second treatment. Blood samples were obtained up to 55 hours after dosing and analyzed for irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G), respectively, or docetaxel. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed during both treatments. Results are reported as the mean ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the observed pharmacokinetic parameters with and without concomitant medicinal cannabis. RESULTS: Medicinal cannabis administration did not significantly influence exposure to and clearance of irinotecan (1.04; CI, 0.96-1.11 and 0.97; CI, 0.90-1.05, respectively) or docetaxel (1.11; CI, 0.94-1.28 and 0.95; CI, 0.82-1.08, respectively). CONCLUSION: Coadministration of medicinal cannabis, as herbal tea, in cancer patients treated with irinotecan or docetaxel does not significantly influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The evaluated variety of medicinal cannabis can be administered concomitantly with both anticancer agents without dose adjustments.

Quantification of [3H]docetaxel in feces and urine: development and validation of a combustion method.

Most radiolabeled biological samples require extensive sample preparation to reduce quenching interference before quantification of radioactivity is possible. Clearly, a more rapid and simple method ensuring a constant count rate and optimal counting efficiency has important advantages. We report on the development and analytical method validation of a rapid and simple combustion method to quantify [3H]docetaxel excreted in human feces and urine. A 3-day validation procedure was performed; quality control (QC) samples, prepared in blank feces and urine, were combusted 5 times and aliquots of the produced tritiated combustion water were counted in a liquid scintillation counter. The validation runs demonstrated adequate precision (below 7.6%) across all QC levels. Sensitivity at the lowest QC level was excellent and recovery of radioactivity constant (ranging from 85 to 91.8%). Clinical applicability of the method was tested in a cancer patient receiving docetaxel and a tracer amount of [3H]docetaxel; during the first 72 h after [3H]docetaxel infusion, 60% of total radioactivity was excreted in the collected feces and urine, which is within the expected range. Combustion of tritiated feces and urine samples is a simple, rapid, sensitive, precise and reproducible method with high recovery. It can be applied to quantify [3H]docetaxel excretion after i.v. administration.

Neuropsychiatric side effects of interferon-alfa therapy.

AIM: Immunotherapy with interferon-alfa (IFN-alfa) is used in a variety of diseases in- and outside clinical trials (e.g., chronic hepatitis, melanoma, chronic myelogenous leukemia, renal cell carcinoma, multiple myeloma). Treatment with IFN-alfa can cause (severe) neuropsychiatric side effects. The purpose of this article is to give an updated review of data on the incidence, manifestations and prediction of psychiatric side effects of immunotherapy with IFN-alfa. Furthermore, the article gives an overview of the management strategies and of the various theories on the pathophysiology of behavioural effects induced by cytokines. METHODS: Use was made of computerized searches and of checking cross-references of articles and book chapters. The data on the incidence, manifestations and prediction are arranged by source of information, by target symptoms and by method of ascertainment. RESULTS: Different sources of information exist, e.g. adverse event reports of clinical trials, case descriptions and research specifically targeted on neuropsychiatric side effects. IFN-alfa is capable of inducing depressive symptoms and syndromes; the evidence for the induction of other psychiatric side effects is weaker. The depressive syndromes induced by IFN-alfa are in need of a more precise characterization. The results of studies on prediction of side effects are contradictory. Guidelines on managing psychiatric side effects predominantly arise from practical experience and common sense. Patient education plays a pivotal role. At this moment, there is no comprehensive theory on the pathophysiology of cytokine-induced psychiatric side effects. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient empirical support for a causal relation between IFN-alfa and the development of depressive symptoms and syndromes. Practical management of neuropsychiatric side effects begins before the start of therapy and should consist of repeated patient education, drug treatment and supportive measures. There are diverging theories on the pathophysiological backgrounds.