Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Am J Prev Med ; 47(6): 703-14, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25455115

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Low-income and racial/ethnic minority populations experience disproportionate colorectal cancer (CRC) burden and poorer survival. Novel behavioral strategies are needed to improve screening rates in these groups. BACKGROUND: The study aimed to test a theoretically based "implementation intentions" intervention for improving CRC screening among unscreened adults in urban safety-net clinics. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=470) aged ≥50 years, due for CRC screening, from urban safety-net clinics were recruited. INTERVENTION: The intervention (conducted in 2009-2011) was delivered via touchscreen computers that tailored informational messages to decisional stage and screening barriers. The computer then randomized participants to generic health information on diet and exercise (Comparison group) or "implementation intentions" questions and planning (Experimental group) specific to the CRC screening test chosen (fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary study outcome was completion of CRC screening at 26 weeks based on test reports (analysis conducted in 2012-2013). RESULTS: The study population had a mean age of 57 years and was 42% non-Hispanic African American, 28% non-Hispanic white, and 27% Hispanic. Those receiving the implementation intentions-based intervention had higher odds (AOR=1.83, 95% CI=1.23, 2.73) of completing CRC screening than the Comparison group. Those with higher self-efficacy for screening (AOR=1.57, 95% CI=1.03, 2.39), history of asthma (AOR=2.20, 95% CI=1.26, 3.84), no history of diabetes (AOR=1.86, 95% CI=1.21, 2.86), and reporting they had never heard that "cutting on cancer" makes it spread (AOR=1.78, 95% CI=1.16, 2.72) were more likely to complete CRC screening. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that programs incorporating an implementation intentions approach can contribute to successful completion of CRC screening even among very low-income and diverse primary care populations. Future initiatives to reduce CRC incidence and mortality disparities may be able to employ implementation intentions in large-scale efforts to encourage screening and prevention behaviors.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Intention , Occult Blood , Black or African American , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Computer-Assisted Instruction/statistics & numerical data , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/psychology , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Poverty , Safety-net Providers/methods , United States , White People
2.
Technol Health Care ; 20(1): 25-35, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22297711

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this exploratory study was to assess factors deemed by patients as "important" as they planned and considered undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, and to use this data to design a computer-delivered intervention to promote screening. METHODS: Fifty participants 50 years or older, not up-to-date with current recommended CRC screening guidelines, were recruited from a primary care clinic. A semi-structured interview focused on aspects of preparing for colorectal cancer screening was administered; after transcription, researchers used triangulation and consensus to identify relevant themes and concepts. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified that dealt with issues important for both FOBT and colonoscopy planning: personal concerns, reminders, communication with healthcare providers and obtaining test results. FOBT specific themes included: sample collection and return. For colonoscopy screening, themes included: scheduling, intervention questions, colonoscopy preparation, and transportation. These can be classified as barrier, process and accessory themes. The developed computer-administered implementation intentions algorithm addressed all the identified concerns in a planned and sequential manner, in order to facilitate planning for CRC screening. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that appropriate reminders, explanations of procedures, and patient understanding of temporary life disruptions, help patients develop and accept a detailed screening plan.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Health Promotion/methods , Health Services Accessibility , Medically Underserved Area , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Colonoscopy/methods , Colonoscopy/psychology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Intention , Internet , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Midwestern United States , Occult Blood , Primary Health Care , Sigmoidoscopy/methods , Sigmoidoscopy/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL