ABSTRACT
The rare PEL-negative phenotype is one of the last blood groups with an unknown genetic basis. By combining whole-exome sequencing and comparative global proteomic investigations, we found a large deletion in the ABCC4/MRP4 gene encoding an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter in PEL-negative individuals. The loss of PEL expression on ABCC4-CRISPR-Cas9 K562 cells and its overexpression in ABCC4-transfected cells provided evidence that ABCC4 is the gene underlying the PEL blood group antigen. Although ABCC4 is an important cyclic nucleotide exporter, red blood cells from ABCC4null/PEL-negative individuals exhibited a normal guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate level, suggesting a compensatory mechanism by other erythroid ABC transporters. Interestingly, PEL-negative individuals showed an impaired platelet aggregation, confirming a role for ABCC4 in platelet function. Finally, we showed that loss-of-function mutations in the ABCC4 gene, associated with leukemia outcome, altered the expression of the PEL antigen. In addition to ABCC4 genotyping, PEL phenotyping could open a new way toward drug dose adjustment for leukemia treatment.
Subject(s)
Blood Group Antigens/genetics , Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins/genetics , Platelet Aggregation , Blood Platelets/cytology , Blood Platelets/metabolism , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Erythroid Cells/cytology , Erythroid Cells/metabolism , Gene Deletion , Humans , PhenotypeABSTRACT
CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies against Lutheran blood group antigens have been observed during first-time pregnancy. Samples from a woman of African descent were tested in our immunohematology laboratory on several occasions since 2001. Her samples were phenotyped as Lu(a+b-), and anti-Lub was suspected but not identified. She was asked to make autologous donations in preparation for her delivery, which she did. In 2010, two antibodies were identified: anti-Lea and -Lub. Six years later, a third investigation was requested. This time, an antibody directed at a high-prevalence Lutheran antigen was found in addition to the anti-Lea and -Lub previously observed. Her serum was compatible with three out of five Lu(a-b-) reagent red blood cells (RBCs). One of the incompatible Lu(a-b-) reagent RBCs was known to be In(Lu) (KLF1 mutation). The genetic background of the other reagent RBC was unknown. The LU cDNA sequence analysis revealed the presence of the c.230G>A (Lua), c.679C>T (LU:-16), and a silent polymorphism c.1227G>T. Anti-Lu16 was highly suspected. This would be the fifth case of LU:-16 with antibodies reported, all within women of African heritage with the Lu(a+b-) phenotype. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn was not noted in these cases.
Subject(s)
Antibodies/genetics , Lutheran Blood-Group System , Blood Group Antigens , Erythrocytes , Female , Humans , PhenotypeSubject(s)
ADP Ribose Transferases/genetics , Codon, Nonsense , Membrane Proteins/genetics , ADP Ribose Transferases/immunology , Adolescent , Alleles , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Female , Frameshift Mutation , Hemophilia A/complications , Humans , Isoantibodies/blood , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Membrane Proteins/immunology , Parents , Phenotype , Point Mutation , Sequence Deletion , SyriaSubject(s)
Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/genetics , Adult , Alleles , Female , Humans , Phenotype , Pregnancy , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionABSTRACT
Patient samples were referred to our immunohematology reference laboratory to investigate the presence of a weak D antigen. In the last 3 years, 26 samples were received. Serology and molecular analyses were performed to identify the weak D variant. RHD mRNA from all patients was reverse transcribed, and cDNA was sequenced. The results were compared with a normal RHD sequence to identify the polymorphisms causing the weak D phenotype. Five different already known RHD variants were observed: weak D type 1 (5 individuals), weak D type 2 (1 individual), weak D type 42 (17 individuals), weak D type 45 (1 individual), and partial D DNB (2 individuals). Surprisingly, weak D type 42 was prevalent in our population, whereas weak D type 1, 2, and 3 are the most prevalent variants elsewhere. Anti-D was found in six cases of weak D type 42. The higher prevalence of weak D type 42 could be the result of a founder effect. Additional studies are needed to estimate the frequency of this variant in the general population.