ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-infection and reactivation remain a relevant complication after liver transplantation (LT). The recipient and donor serum CMV-IgG-status has been established for risk stratification when choosing various pharmaceutical regimens for CMV-prophylaxis in the last two decades. However, factors influencing course of CMV-infection in LT remain largely unknown. In this study, the impact of immunosuppressive regimen was examined in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: All patients that underwent primary LT between 2006 and 2018 at the Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, were included. Clinical course as well as histological and laboratory findings of patients were analyzed our prospectively maintained database. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis for impact of variables on CMV-occurrence was conducted, and survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 867 patients were included in the final analysis. CMV-infection was diagnosed in 325 (37.5%) patients after transplantation. Significantly improved overall survival was observed in these patients (Log rank = 0.03). As shown by correlation and regression tree classification and regression tree analysis, the recipient/donor CMV-IgG-status with either positivity had the largest influence on CMV-occurrence. Analysis of immunosuppressive burden did not reveal statistical impact on CMV-infection, but statistically significant inverse correlation of cumulative tacrolimus trough levels and survival was found (Log rank < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings (p = .02). DISCUSSION: CMV-infection remains of clinical importance after LT. Undergone CMV-infection of either recipient or donor requires prophylactic treatment. Additionally, we found a highly significant, dosage-dependent impact of immunosuppression (IS) on long-term outcomes for these patients, underlying the importance of minimization of IS in liver transplant recipients.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Cytomegalovirus , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Retrospective Studies , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In times of critical organ shortage, poor organ pool utilization and increased use of extended-criteria donor (ECD) allografts remain a major problem. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) has emerged as a promising and feasible strategy in ECD liver transplantation (LT). However, potential safety limits regarding the duration of perfusion are yet to be explored. Besides marginal allograft quality (steatosis), prolonged cold ischemia time remains the most important factor for a high number of liver allografts being declined for transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two ECD-allografts were each allocated to two recipients, who proved to be unsuitable to receive the assigned allograft upon arrival at the transplant center. The organs were reallocated by Eurotransplant and accepted by our center for two different backup patients. During that time, HOPE was commenced and continued until the recipient hepatectomy was completed. Postoperative allograft function was assessed by serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, and International Normalized Ratio. Incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: HOPE was applied for 4 h 35 min and 4 h 20 min, resulting in a total cold preservation time of 17 h 29 min and 15 h 20 min, respectively. Both recipients displayed decreasing serum transaminases and bilirubin levels postoperatively. No EAD or major postoperative complications occurred in either patient. Serum ALT and AST levels were within the normal range at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Extended HOPE enables the safe extension of preservation time for up to 18 h in human LT. End-ischemic HOPE may significantly improve organ pool utilization, while simultaneously facilitating operating room logistics and preventing organ injury.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation/methods , Organ Preservation/methods , Perfusion/methods , Aged , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Allografts , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Bilirubin/blood , Cold Ischemia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: After liver transplantation (LT), long-term immunosuppression (IS) is essential. IS is associated with de novo malignancies, and the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increased in LT patients. We assessed course of disease in patients with de novo CRC after LT with focus of IS and impact on survival in a retrospective, single-center study. Materials and Methods: All patients diagnosed with CRC after LT between 1988 and 2019 were included. The management of IS regimen following diagnosis and the oncological treatment approach were analyzed: Kaplan−Meier analysis as well as univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Results: A total of 33 out of 2744 patients were diagnosed with CRC after LT. Two groups were identified: patients with restrictive IS management undergoing dose reduction (RIM group, n = 20) and those with unaltered regimen (maintenance group, n = 13). The groups did not differ in clinical and oncological characteristics. Statistically significant improved survival was found in Kaplan−Meier analysis for patients in the RIM group with 83.46 (8.4−193.1) months in RIM and 24.8 (0.5−298.9) months in the maintenance group (log rank = 0.02) and showed a trend in multivariate cox regression (p = 0.054, HR = 14.3, CI = 0.96−213.67). Conclusions: Immunosuppressive therapy should be reduced further in patients suffering from CRC after LT in an individualized manner to enable optimal oncological therapy and enable improved survival.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT-) cells represent a semi-invariant T cell population responsive to microbial vitamin B metabolite and innate cytokine stimulation, executing border tissue protection and particularly contributing to human liver immunity. The impact of immunosuppressants on MAIT cell biology alone and in context with solid organ transplantation has not been thoroughly examined. Here, we demonstrate that in vitro cytokine activation of peripheral MAIT cells from healthy individuals was impaired by glucocorticoids, whereas antigen-specific stimulation was additionally sensitive to calcineurin inhibitors. In liver transplant (LTx) recipients, significant depletion of peripheral MAIT cells was observed that was largely independent of the type and dosage of immunosuppression, equally applied to tolerant patients, and was reproducible in kidney transplant recipients. However, MAIT cells from tolerant LTx patients exhibited a markedly diminished ex vivo activation signature, associated with individual regain of functional competence toward antigenic and cytokine stimulation. Still, MAIT cells from tolerant and treated liver recipients exhibited high levels of PD1, accompanied by functional impairment particularly toward bacterial stimulation that also affected polyfunctionality. Our data suggest interlinked effects of primary liver pathology and immunosuppressive treatment on overall MAIT cell fitness after transplantation and propose their monitoring in context with tolerance induction protocols.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Mucosal-Associated Invariant T Cells , Cytokines , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation , PhenotypeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management of long-term immunosuppression following liver transplantation (LT) remains empirical. Surveillance liver biopsies in combination with transcriptional profiling could overcome this challenge by identifying recipients with active alloimmune-mediated liver damage despite normal liver tests, but this approach lacks applicability. Our aim was to investigate the utility of non-invasive tools for the stratification of stable long-term survivors of LT, according to their immunological risk and need for immunosuppression. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study of 190 adult LT recipients assessed to determine their eligibility to participate in an immunosuppression withdrawal trial. Patients had stable liver allograft function and had been transplanted for non-autoimmune non-replicative viral liver disease >3 years before inclusion. We performed histological, immunogenetic and serological studies and measured the intrahepatic transcript levels of an 11-gene classifier highly specific for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). RESULTS: In this cohort, 35.8% of patients harboured clinically silent fibro-inflammatory liver lesions (13.7% had mild damage and 22.1% had moderate-to-severe damage). The severity of liver allograft damage was positively associated with TCMR-related transcripts, class II donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), ALT, AST, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and negatively correlated with serum creatinine and tacrolimus trough levels. Liver biopsies were stratified according to their TCMR transcript levels using a cut-off derived from biopsies with clinically significant TCMR. Two multivariable prediction models, integrating ALT+LSM or ALT+class II DSAs, had a high discriminative capacity for classifying patients with or without alloimmune damage. The latter model performed well in an independent cohort of 156 liver biopsies obtained from paediatric liver recipients with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: ALT, class II DSAs and LSM are valuable tools to non-invasively identify stable LT recipients without significant underlying alloimmunity who could benefit from minimisation of immunosuppression. LAY SUMMARY: A large proportion of liver transplant patients with normal liver tests have inflammatory liver lesions, which in 17% of cases are molecularly indistinguishable from those seen at the time of rejection. ALT, class II donor-specific antibodies and liver stiffness are useful in identifying patients with this form of subclinical rejection. We propose these markers as a useful tool to help clinicians determine if the immunosuppression administered is adequate.
Subject(s)
Hemochromatosis/diagnosis , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Risk Assessment/standards , Adult , Aged , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hemochromatosis/epidemiology , Humans , Liver Transplantation/methods , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Transplantation ToleranceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A self-limited hepatitis B infection can reactivate in patients under immunosuppression or chemotherapy (reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV-DNA). Exact circumstances of HBV reactivation in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver diseases (ESLD) unrelated to HBV are unknown, and recommendations on HBV prophylaxis remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 1273 liver transplants, 168 patients with a self-limited HBV hepatitis B infection prior to LT were identified from our prospective liver transplant database. Patients with underlying chronic HBV infection and recipients of an anti-HBc-positive liver were not included in the analysis. Demographic, laboratory, serological, and virological data were analyzed retrospectively. Appearance of HBsAg or HBV-DNA was defined as reactivation. RESULTS: The median follow-up after LT was 12.0 years (0.6-30.7 years). The rate of HBV reactivation was 0% independent of antiviral prophylaxis (n = 7; 4.2%), the etiology of ESLD, hepatitis C treatment, or the anti-HBs concentration. The overall patient survival with a history of a self-limited HBV infection before LT did not significantly differ from the rest of the cohort. CONCLUSION: Antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues post-liver transplantation in order to prevent HBV reactivation in patients with a resolved self-limited hepatitis B infection prior to LT seems to be omittable since the main viral reservoir is removed by the hepatectomy. These findings may clarify the current uncertainty in the recommendations regarding the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with self-limited hepatitis B prior to LT.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis B , Liver Transplantation , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Hepatitis B Antibodies , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Virus ActivationABSTRACT
Background and objectives Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) refers to a complete thrombotic obstruction of the venous hepatic outflow tract due to various etiologies and constitutes a rare indication for ortothopic liver transplantation (LT). Few studies investigated long-term outcomes after LT for BCS. The aim of this study was to examine potential risk factors for late mortality and to evaluate long-term outcomes after LT for BCS. Materials and methods: 46 patients received an LT for BCS between 1989 and 2019 at the transplant center of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin. We analyzed potential effects of disease etiology, vascular events, rejection, and immunosuppression on long-term survival after transplantation using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox logistic regression. Results: Of the 46 patients, 70% were female and 30% were male. Median age at the time of transplantation was 36 years. A total of 41 vascular events, including 26 thrombotic and 17 hemorrhagic incidents, occurred. The 1 year, the 5 year, the 10 year, and the 20 year survival rates were 87%, 83%, 76%, and 60%, respectively. By comparison, survival rates of the liver transplant cohort across all other indications at our center were slightly inferior with 85%, 75%, 65%, and 46%, respectively. In the study population, patients with myeloproliferative disorders showed worse outcomes compared to patients with other causes of BCS. Conclusion: Liver transplantation for BCS showed excellent results, even superior to those for other indications. Vascular events (i.e., thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications) did not have any prognostic value for overall mortality. Patients with myeloproliferative disorders seem to have a disadvantage in survival.
Subject(s)
Budd-Chiari Syndrome , Liver Transplantation , Myeloproliferative Disorders , Thrombosis , Budd-Chiari Syndrome/surgery , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Thrombosis/etiologyABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Development of hepatitis-B is considered a serious complication after liver transplantation. HBV de novo infection is a rather rare phenomenon, however it deserves attention in the era of donor organ shortage. The aim of the present analysis was to examine its course in liver transplant patients. Materials and Methods: Prevalence of de novo HBV-infections was extracted from our local transplant data base. Analysis focused on the moment of HBV-detection and on the long-term follow-up in terms of biochemical and histological changes over 30 years. Results: 46 patients were identified with the diagnosis of de novo hepatitis B. Median time from liver transplantation to diagnosis was 397 days (7-5505). 39 patients received antiviral therapy. No fibrosis progression could be detected, whereas the grade of inflammation significantly lessened from the moment of HBV detection to the end of histological follow-up over a median of 4344 days (range 123-9490). Patients with a poor virological control demonstrated a significantly poorer overall survival. Conclusions: De novo hepatitis B in liver transplant patients is a condition that can be controlled very well without significant fibrosis progression or graft loss if recognized on time within a regular transplant follow-up schedule.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis B , Liver Transplantation , Transplants , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B virus , Humans , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT) is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the current standard therapy for PBC. We investigated the effect of preventive exposure to UDCA on the incidence and long-term consequences of PBC recurrence after LT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 780 patients transplanted for PBC, between 1983-2017 in 16 centers (9 countries), and followed-up for a median of 11 years. Among them, 190 received preventive UDCA (10-15 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome was histological evidence of PBC recurrence. The secondary outcomes were graft loss, liver-related death, and all-cause death. The association between preventive UDCA and outcomes was quantified using multivariable-adjusted Cox and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models. RESULTS: While recurrence of PBC significantly shortened graft and patient survival, preventive exposure to UDCA was associated with reduced risk of PBC recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.41; 95% CI 0.28-0.61; p <0.0001), graft loss (aHR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.82; p <0.05), liver-related death (aHR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.98; p <0.05), and all-cause death (aHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.96; p <0.05). On RMST analysis, preventive UDCA led to a survival gain of 2.26 years (95% CI 1.28-3.25) over a period of 20 years. Exposure to cyclosporine rather than tacrolimus had a complementary protective effect alongside preventive UDCA, reducing the cumulative incidence of PBC recurrence and all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive UDCA after LT for PBC is associated with a reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, and death. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive UDCA is associated with the lowest risk of PBC recurrence and mortality. LAY SUMMARY: Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. We performed the largest international study of transplanted patients with primary biliary cholangitis to date. Preventive administration of ursodeoxycholic acid after liver transplantation was associated with reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, liver-related and all-cause mortality. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with the best outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cholagogues and Choleretics/administration & dosage , Graft Rejection/mortality , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/etiology , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/prevention & control , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Ursodeoxycholic Acid/administration & dosage , Aged , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/mortality , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In contrast to donor factors predicting outcomes of liver transplantation (LT), few suitable recipient parameters have been identified. To this end, we performed an in-depth analysis of hospitalization status and duration prior to LT as a potential risk factor for posttransplant outcome. The pretransplant hospitalization status of all patients undergoing LT between 2005 and 2016 at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin was analyzed retrospectively using propensity score matching. At the time of organ acceptance, 226 of 1134 (19.9%) recipients were hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU), 146 (12.9%) in a regular ward (RW) and 762 patients (67.2%) were at home. Hospitalized patients (RW and ICU) compared with patients from home showed a dramatically shorter 3-month survival (78.7% versus 94.4%), 1-year survival (66.3% versus 87.3%), and 3-year survival (61.7% versus 81.7%; all P < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was detected for 3-year survival between ICU and RW patients (61.5% versus 62.3%; P = 0.60). These results remained significant after propensity score matching. Furthermore, in ICU patients, but not in RW patients, survival correlated with days spent in the ICU before LT (1-year survival: 1-6 versus 7-14 days: 73.7% versus 60.5%, P = 0.04; 7-14 days versus >14 days, 60.5% versus 51.0%, P = 0.006). In conclusion, hospitalization status before transplantation is a valuable predictor of patient survival following LT.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Hospitalization , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis has become one of the leading causes of liver transplantation. The development of steatosis, as well as the link to inflammation and fibrosis, after transplantation remain poorly understood. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the influence of obesity on histopathological changes of the graft during long-term follow-up. METHODS: A total of 1494 longitudinal liver biopsies of 271 recipients were evaluated during a follow-up period of 5 to 10 years. Clinical and laboratory parameters as well as histopathological categories of steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis were explored by routine protocol biopsies. RESULTS: The BMI and prevalence of diabetes mellitus significantly increased after transplantation (P < .01). Diabetes and de novo obesity were significantly associated with the degree of graft steatosis. There was no correlation between former steatosis and inflammation or fibrosis. Inflammation was a precursor of fibrosis, and fibrosis increased over the first 3 years (P < .01). No severe graft dysfunction was observed. CONCLUSION: Obesity and diabetes mellitus correlated with higher grades of steatosis and de novo steatosis after transplantation. Metabolic syndrome must be considered as a serious post-transplant complication that can cause histopathological alteration. However, the progress from steatosis to steatohepatitis is not as common as expected.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Biopsy , Fibrosis , Humans , Inflammation/etiology , Inflammation/pathology , Liver/pathology , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/etiology , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/pathology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/pathology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed liver transplant (LT) patients are considered to be at high risk for any kind of infection. What the outbreak of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) means for the transplant cohort is a question that, as of now, cannot easily be answered. Data on prevalence, relevance of the novel virus, and clinical course of the infection in stable LT patients are limited. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs were performed in our outpatient department during the shutdown between March and April 2020 in Germany. RESULTS: The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 3%. Three out of a cohort of 101 LT patients were asymptomatic for respiratory diseases. Respiratory complaints were common and not associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The overall monthly mortality rate was 0.22% and did not show alterations during the shutdown in Germany. CONCLUSIONS: If preventive measures are applied, LT patients do not seem to be at a higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Telemedicine in the outpatient setting may help to maintain distance and to reduce direct patient contact. However, standard of care must be guaranteed for patients with relevant comorbidities in spite of pandemics, because complications may arise from preexisting conditions.
Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation , Telemedicine , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Infection Control , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-as a monotherapy or combined with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs)-has effectively lowered Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. However, it is associated with high costs and viral resistance. HBIG-free prophylaxis with novel NUCs (tenofovir, entecavir) composes a viable alternative. We evaluated reinfection rate, histological changes, and outcome associated with HBIG discontinuation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease at our center since 1988. A controlled HBIG discontinuation was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in 65 patients. Recurrent infection was determined by HbsAg values. Fibrosis and inflammation were evaluated by routine biopsy. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was compared to a control population on HBIG for prophylaxis. RESULTS: From 1988 to 2013, 352 patients underwent liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease. 169 patients could be included for analysis. 104 (51.5%) patients continued a prophylaxis containing HBIG. HBIG was discontinued in 65 (38.5%) patients in a controlled manner, maintaining an oral NUC. None of those patients showed HBV reinfection or graft dysfunction. No significant changes of inflammation grades (P = .067) or fibrosis stages (P = .051) were detected. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was comparable to the control (P = .95). CONCLUSION: HBIG withdrawal under continuation of oral NUC therapy is safe and not related to graft dysfunction, based on blood tests and histology. HBIG-free prophylaxis is not associated with a worse outcome and displays a financial relief as well as a logistic simplification during long-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Immunoglobulins/administration & dosage , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Withholding Treatment , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hepatitis B/therapy , Hepatitis B, Chronic/prevention & control , Hepatitis B, Chronic/therapy , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The effect of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the response to interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection remains unclear. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we aimed to investigate the effect of DAA therapy on sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients with CHC and either active, inactive or no HCC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1/1/2013 to 9/24/2018. The pooled SVR rates were computed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. RESULTS: We included 49 studies from 15 countries, comprised of 3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC. Overall, the pooled SVR was lower in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (89.6%, 95% CI 86.8-92.1%, I2â¯=â¯79.1% vs. 93.3%, 95% CI 91.9-94.7%, I2â¯=â¯95.0%, pâ¯=â¯0.0012), translating to a 4.8% (95% CI 0.2-7.4%) SVR reduction by meta-regression analysis. The largest SVR reduction (18.8%) occurred in patients with active/residual HCC vs. inactive/ablated HCC (SVR 73.1% vs. 92.6%, pâ¯=â¯0.002). Meanwhile, patients with HCC who received a prior liver transplant had higher SVR rates than those who did not (pâ¯<0.001). Regarding specific DAA regimens, patients with HCC treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had lower SVR rates than patients without HCC (92.6%, nâ¯=â¯884 vs. 97.8%, nâ¯=â¯13,141, pâ¯=â¯0.026), but heterogeneity was high (I2â¯=â¯84.7%, pâ¯<0.001). The SVR rate was similar in patients with/without HCC who were treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir⯱â¯dasabuvir (nâ¯=â¯101) (97.2% vs. 94.8%, pâ¯=â¯0.79), or daclatasvir/asunaprevir (91.7% vs. 89.8%, pâ¯=â¯0.66). CONCLUSION: Overall, SVR rates were lower in patients with HCC, especially with active HCC, compared to those without HCC, though heterogeneity was high. Continued efforts are needed to aggressively screen, diagnose, and treat HCC to ensure higher CHC cure rates. LAY SUMMARY: There are now medications (direct-acting antivirals or "DAAs") that can "cure" hepatitis C virus, but patients with hepatitis C and liver cancer may be less likely to achieve cure than those without liver cancer. However, patients with liver cancer are also more likely to have advanced liver disease and risk factors that can decrease cure rates, so better controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/complications , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Sustained Virologic Response , 2-Naphthylamine , Adolescent , Adult , Anilides/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Carbamates/therapeutic use , Cyclopropanes , Female , Fluorenes/therapeutic use , Humans , Isoquinolines/therapeutic use , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Liver Transplantation , Macrocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Male , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , Uracil/therapeutic use , Valine , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B (HBV)-associated end-stage liver disease used to be a relevant indication for liver transplantation (LT). After transplantation, HBV-reinfection remains a serious issue. Different strategies to prevent HBV-reinfection range from the single application of immunoglobulins (HBIG), to the use of modern nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NUC) in combination with HBIG, followed by HBIG-discontinuation. The aim of this analysis was to compare different strategies and to sum up the results of 30 years at a high-volume transplant center and deliver additional information on the histopathological level. METHODS: Data of 372 liver transplantations performed for the HBV-induced liver disease in 352 patients were extracted from a prospectively organized database. HBV-reinfection was determined in the entire cohort, according to the mode of HBV-prophylaxis. Differences in survival rates were analyzed in patients with successful prophylaxis, untreated and controlled HBV-reinfection. Histopathological results were obtained from protocol biopsies in 151 patients. RESULTS: HBV-reinfection was significantly associated with the type of prophylaxis, presence of HBs-Antigen at the moment of LT, transplant year and influencing the overall survival before 2005. After the introduction of modern NUCs, HBV-reinfection stopped to impact HBV-associated transplant loss and survival. Controlled HBV-infection prevents from HBV-associated transplant hepatitis and fibrosis development. The role of HBIG declines in favor of NUCs. CONCLUSIONS: Uncontrolled HBV-reinfection does not occur any more. Even in the presence of Hbs-antigen, transplant fibrosis does not develop. The most reliable mode to prevent HBV-recurrence remains the combination of NUCs with a high genetic barrier and HBIG. However, HBIG can safely be discontinued after LT.
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Liver Transplantation , Secondary Prevention/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , End Stage Liver Disease/pathology , End Stage Liver Disease/virology , Female , Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis B, Chronic/pathology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Humans , Immunoglobulins/administration & dosage , Liver/pathology , Liver/surgery , Liver/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals allow efficient and safe treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) before and after liver transplantation (LT). However, the impact of sofosbuvir on the graft, diabetes, and on kidney function is not answered yet. Primary endpoint of this analysis was the evaluation of kidney function after antiviral treatment (AVT). Secondary endpoints were the assessment of extrahepatic manifestation of HCV-infection by diabetes mellitus and the histopathological changes in terms of inflammation, content of fat, and fibrosis stage. METHODS: From 2014 to 4/2015, 100 patients with HCV-recurrence after LT were successfully treated with AVT. Ninety-eight received a sofosbuvir-based regimen. Indication was based on genotype, transplant fibrosis stage, and urgency. Biopsies were evaluated before and after treatment. Renal function and diabetes were assessed before, during, and after AVT. RESULTS: All patients achieved sustained virological response. A significant improvement of inflammation (P = 0.001) and fibrosis stage (P = 0.031) were observed. Significantly less insulin was required in 32 patients with diabetes (P < 0.001) to keep Hb1Ac unchanged after AVT. Kidney function was stable during, 12 weeks after and 48 weeks after antiviral therapy. Stages of renal insufficiency were comparable before and after AVT. CONCLUSION: Successful sofosbuvir-based AVT leads to a variety of positive development in transplant patients including a significant improvement of inflammation, fat content and fibrosis, a significant decrease in daily insulin dose and no significant impairment of kidney function.
Subject(s)
Allografts/pathology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Kidney/drug effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver/pathology , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Allografts/drug effects , Allografts/virology , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Biopsy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/virology , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Female , Fibrosis , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis C, Chronic/pathology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Liver/drug effects , Liver/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Sofosbuvir/adverse effects , Sustained Virologic ResponseABSTRACT
De novo malignancies (DNMs) are one of the leading causes of late mortality after liver transplantation (LT). We analyzed 1616 consecutive patients who underwent LT between 1988 and 2006 at our institution. All patients were prospectively observed over a study period of 28 years by our own outpatient clinic. Complete follow-up data were available for 96% of patients, 3% were incomplete, and only 1% were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up of the patients was 14.1 years. Variables with possible prognostic impact on the development of DNMs were analyzed, as was the incidence of malignancies compared with the nontransplant population by using standardized incidence ratios. In total, 266 (16.5%) patients developed 322 DNMs of the following subgroups: hematological malignancies (n = 49), skin cancer (n = 83), and nonskin solid organ tumors (SOT; n = 190). The probability of developing any DNM within 10 and 25 years was 12.9% and 23.0%, respectively. The respective probability of developing SOT was 7.8% and 16.2%. Mean age at time of diagnosis of SOT was 57.4 years (range, 18.3-81.1 years). In the multivariate analysis, an increased recipient age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P < 0.001) and a history of smoking (HR, 1.92; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with development of SOT. Moreover, the development of SOT was significantly increased in cyclosporine A-treated compared with tacrolimus-treated patients (HR, 1.53; P = 0.03). The present analysis shows a disproportionate increase of de novo SOT with an increasing follow-up period. Increased age and a history of smoking are confirmed as major risk factors. Moreover, the importance of immunosuppression is highlighted. Liver Transplantation 23 1404-1414 2017 AASLD.
Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , End Stage Liver Disease/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Tacrolimus/adverse effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) used to be a serious problem in the era of interferon-based treatment. Since the introduction of modern directly acting antivirals, treatment has become easier and shorter. According to published data, in the natural course of hepatitis C infection the duration of antiviral treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LDV) may be shortened to 12 instead of 24 weeks, using ribavirin (RBV) in addition. Furthermore, the question of whether or not RBV is really necessary, in a 12-week SOF/LDV treatment in the post-transplant setting, is still unanswered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At our institution, 100 liver transplant patients with HCV recurrence underwent interferon-free SOF-based treatment. A total of 51 patients received SOF/LDV with or without RBV. Twenty-nine HCV genotype 1 or 4 patients with histologically proven stage 0-2 fibrosis were treated with SOF/LDV for 12 weeks; another 22 patients with advanced fibrosis (stage 3-4) either received SOF/LDV plus weight-adjusted RBV or prolonged treatment for 24 weeks. RESULTS: End of treatment response and sustained virological response (SVR) were achieved in 100% of the 51 patients, irrespective of the treatment group. Patients with prolonged treatment duration or with RBV developed significantly more adverse events (AEs) compared to the SOF/LDV group: 19 (86.4%) vs 8 (27.6%), P<.001. One of the predominant and most relevant AEs was the development of anemia in 43.1% of 10 patients receiving RBV, which was a significant result (P<.001). RBV co-medication had to be reduced in 11 (55%) patients and then stopped in 8 (40%) patients because of AEs. No significant difference was observed among the groups regarding kidney function. CONCLUSION: The SOF/LDV combination is a reliable therapy of recurrent HCV infection after LT. It is easy to administer and to achieve SVR in immunocompromised patients without interactions with immunosuppressive medications. Considering the high rate of AEs, frequent discontinuation of RBV treatment, and the 100% SVR, the use of RBV as co-medication in a 12-week SOF/LDV regimen does not seem to be justified after LT.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Fluorenes/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Aged , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Drug Interactions , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fluorenes/pharmacology , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Ribavirin/pharmacology , Sofosbuvir/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients treated with liver transplantation (LT) is associated with diminished survival. Particularly, extrahepatic localization of HCC recurrence contributes to poor prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent LT for HCC between 1989 and 2010 in a high-volume transplant center were retrospectively evaluated, and predictors of extrahepatic recurrence were identified. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-four patients underwent LT for HCC. After a median follow-up time of 78 months, 93 patients (25%) were diagnosed with a recurrence. Median time to recurrence was 19 months. Recurrence was located exclusively in the liver in 19 cases (20%), and 74 patients (80%) had extrahepatic recurrence. Factors associated with extrahepatic recurrence in multivariate analysis included HCC beyond the Milan criteria (p < 0.0001) and the presence of macrovascular tumor invasion (p = 0.035). In patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria who developed a recurrence (N = 73), macrovascular invasion was the only positive predictor of extrahepatic recurrence in multivariate analysis (p < 0.0001). In patients with HCC within the Milan criteria who recurred after LT (N = 20), DNA-index >1.5 (p = 0.013) was the only predictive factor for extrahepatic recurrence in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced HCC beyond the Milan criteria and the presence of macrovascular invasion are associated with an increased risk for extrahepatic recurrence and are currently considered as relative contraindications to LT. In patients with HCC within the Milan criteria, the DNA-index represents a valuable prognostic marker for the development of extrahepatic recurrence and may support the selection of patients for intensified postoperative tumor surveillance.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Forecasting , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Liver/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy , Incidence , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The new directly acting antivirals (DAAs) enable all-oral interferon-free treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We here investigated the effect of DAAs on the enzymatic liver function of liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with elevated liver enzymes or advanced fibrosis/compensated cirrhosis caused by recurrent HCV were treated with sofosbuvir either in combination with simeprevir, or in combination with ribavirin or daclatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks. Biochemical parameters, tacrolimus trough levels, and the maximal liver function capacity (LiMAx) were measured monthly during the treatment and 12 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: All patients achieved sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. The transaminases and cholestasis parameters normalized until week 8 of treatment. The mean LiMAx (normal ranges >315 µg/kg/h) increased from 344±142 µg/kg/h before treatment to 458±170 µg/kg/h (P<.0001) at the 12-week follow-up. In parallel, the tacrolimus trough level to dose ratio decreased from 4.68 down to 2.72 (P=.0004). CONCLUSION: Antiviral treatment with DAAs enabled sustained elimination of recurrent HCV in liver transplant recipients and was associated with a significant improvement of the enzymatic liver function.