ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is the most common cause of skin depigmentation worldwide. Patients with vitiligo may experience stigma and this needs to be addressed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate stigma in patients with vitiligo, search for associated factors and establish severity strata for the Patient Unique Stigmatization Holistic tool in Dermatology (PUSH-D) for patients with vitiligo. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in ComPaRe Vitiligo, an e-cohort of adult patients with vitiligo. Stigmatization was assessed using the PUSH-D, a recently validated dermatology-specific stigmatization assessment tool. We conducted univariate and multivariable linear regression to identify patient and disease factors associated with the stigmatization. We used an anchor-based approach to define severity strata for the PUSH-D. RESULTS: In total, 318 patients participated (mean age 49.7â years; 73.9% women). Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV-VI, severe facial involvement (high Self-Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score of the face) and depression (high Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score) were positively -associated with a higher stigmatization score, although this association was weak [r = 0.24 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.30 (P < 0.001), respectively]. PUSH-D cutoff values that best discriminated patients with high and low stigma, as defined by the anchor question, were 13 and 23 (κ = 0.622, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to use a skin-specific stigmatization tool to assess stigma in patients with vitiligo. Creating strata helps to better interpret the PUSH-D in daily practice and may facilitate its use in clinical trials.
Vitiligo is an acquired autoimmune condition characterized by well-defined depigmented patches of skin on the body. The condition affects approximately 1% of the world's population and those living with vitiligo have long experienced stigmatization. Despite the fact that previous research has investigated the correlation between stigma and vitiligo using non-specific stigma tools, to our knowledge, no study has specifically assessed stigma in people with vitiligo. This study was carried out among French patients with vitiligo to evaluate both felt and actual stigma using the Patient Unique Stigmatization Holistic tool in Dermatology (PUSH-D), a new skin-specific stigma score. We also looked for correlations between PUSH-D scores and other questionnaires measuring levels of anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9). We found that PHQ-9 scores for depression were significantly positively correlated with PUSH-D scores, although these correlations were weak. When examining which factors were associated with higher stigma, we found that darker skin phototypes and severe facial involvement predicted higher stigma. However, we found that hand involvement did not. Overall, vitiligo is associated with a lot of stigma and it has been shown to be a barrier to employment. Therefore, an objective evaluation of vitiligo is required in order to facilitate access and reimbursement of treatment (including those existing and under development). The findings from this study highlight how further research is needed with more diverse groups of people, to better objectify stigma associated with vitiligo.
Subject(s)
Dermatology , Vitiligo , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Stereotyping , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The abundance of publications of COVID-19-induced chilblains has resulted in a confusing situation. METHODS: This is a prospective single-institution study from 15 March to 13 May 2020. Thirty-two patients received PCR nasopharyngeal swabs. Of these, 28 patients had a thoracic CT-scan, 31 patients had blood and urine examinations, 24 patients had skin biopsies including immunohistochemical and direct immunofluorescence studies, and four patients had electron microscopy. RESULTS: COVID-19-induced chilblains are clinically and histopathologically identical to chilblains from other causes. Although intravascular thrombi are sometimes observed, no patient had a systemic coagulopathy or severe clinical course. The exhaustive clinical, radiological, and laboratory work-up in this study ruled-out other primary and secondary causes. Electron microscopy revealed rare, probable viral particles whose core and spikes measured from 120 to 133 nm within endothelium and eccrine glands in two cases. CONCLUSION: This study provides further clinicopathologic evidence of COVID-19-related chilblains. Negative PCR and antibody tests do not rule-out infection. Chilblains represent a good prognosis, occurring later in the disease course. No systemic coagulopathy was identified in any patient. Patients presenting with acral lesions should be isolated, and chilblains should be distinguished from thrombotic lesions (livedo racemosa, retiform purpura, or ischemic acral necrosis).
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Chilblains/etiology , Chilblains/pathology , Toes/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Biopsy/methods , COVID-19/metabolism , COVID-19/virology , Chilblains/diagnosis , Chilblains/virology , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Eccrine Glands/pathology , Eccrine Glands/ultrastructure , Eccrine Glands/virology , Endothelium/pathology , Endothelium/ultrastructure , Endothelium/virology , Female , Humans , Livedo Reticularis/pathology , Male , Microscopy, Electron/methods , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Purpura/pathology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Skin/pathology , Toes/virology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis (CGPD), considered a clinical variant of perioral dermatitis, typically affects prepubertal children of African descent. It is a condition of unknown etiology characterized by the presence of a monomorphic yellow-brown papular eruption limited to the perioral, perinasal, and periocular regions that histopathologically shows a granulomatous pattern. This disorder should be differentiated from other conditions as granulomatous rosacea, sarcoidosis, and lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei. We report a case of a 9-year-old boy who presented with flesh-colored perorificial papules on the face, evolving for two months. Upon treatment with topical tacrolimus for follicular eczema, an aggravation of the condition was observed. A skin biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of CGPD. Our patient was successfully treated with a combination of topical metronidazole and topical erythromycin.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Perioral/pathology , Granuloma/pathology , Administration, Topical , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Child , Dermatitis, Perioral/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Erythromycin/therapeutic use , Face/pathology , Granuloma/drug therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Skin/pathology , Tacrolimus/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Acne fulminans is a rare complication of classic acne. Less than 200 cases have been reported. It usually affects adolescent males with pre-existing acne vulgaris. It is characterized by an acute eruption of numerous and large inflammatory nodules, plaques, erosions, and ulcers covered by hemorrhagic crusts. The disorder may occur spontaneously or may be triggered by isotretinoin. We report a young boy who developed acne fulminans after isotretinoin therapy at a dose of 0.1mg/kg/day. A systematic literature review gathering previously reported cases on PubMed revealed that one similar case has been reported. Regarding therapeutic strategies, there are no randomized clinical trials to identify the best treatment for acne fulminans. Recommendations are based on case series and case reports. We share this case to raise awareness of the induction of acne fulminans by a very low dose of isotretinoin.
Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris/chemically induced , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Isotretinoin/adverse effects , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Acne Vulgaris/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Isotretinoin/administration & dosage , Male , Steroids/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examined several factors affecting the perception of Canadian parents about their children's mental health during COVID-19. The contribution of this research included fresh evidence from examining the demographic and sociological factors influencing children's well-being during COVID-19 using the Canadian context. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional dataset from Statistics Canada titled Impacts of COVID-19 on Canadians - Parenting during the Pandemic (2020). We relied on an ordered logit model and computed the respective odds ratios. RESULTS: Our results showed that parents with a university degree and those working from home are less concerned about their children's mental health. Nonetheless, having a disabled child, belonging to a minority, having children aged six-to fourteen-years old, and having lost a job or experienced a drop in working hours increased parents' worry. Additionally, having worries about being connected with family and friends, being concerned about work-life balance, feeling lonely at home, and waiting for the reopening of childcare services all increased the likelihood of parents' anxiety about their child's mental health. When running the analysis by province, we saw that being an immigrant and belonging to a minority increased parents' worry only in Ontario and British Columbia. CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers are encouraged to foster working-from-home practices as working from home has been linked to less worry about child mental health, mainly among mothers, as indicated in our gender heterogeneity analysis. In addition, it is advised that families with a disabled child, and families belonging to a minority received additional support. Lastly, policymakers are advised to consider the social cost of preventive measures and incorporate this into any future preventative policymaking as the social impact variables were robust across all models.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Female , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Parents/psychology , OntarioABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Natalizumab and fingolimod are well-established, sequestrating disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), widely used as a second-line treatment in patients with relapse remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, there is no standard strategy for managing treatment failure on these agents. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rituximab after natalizumab and fingolimod withdrawal. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was accomplished on RRMS patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod who were switched to rituximab. RESULTS: 100 patients (50 cases in each group) were analyzed. After six months of follow-up, a substantial decline in clinical relapse and disability progression was observed in both groups. However, no significant change was demonstrated in the pattern of MRI activity (P = 1.000) in natalizumab pretreated patients. After adjusting for the baseline characteristics, a head-to-head comparison found a non-significant trend of lower EDSS in the pretreated fingolimod group compared to those previously treated with natalizumab(P = 0.057). However, in terms of clinical relapse and MRI activity, the clinical outcomes were comparable in both groups ((P = 0.194), (P = 0.957). Moreover, rituximab was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The present study revealed the effectiveness of rituximab as an appropriate alternative option for escalation therapy after fingolimod and natalizumab discontinuation.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Natalizumab/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/chemically induced , Rituximab/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Recurrence , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the perspectives of parents who had delayed and refused human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for their children, even when it was discussed or recommended by a health care provider, and to identify the factors related to vaccine hesitancy. METHOD: Twenty predominantly African American parents of children aged 11-17 years were recruited from various community clinics and organizations to participate in focus groups about their decision-making regarding HPV vaccination. Using deductive content analysis and the Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix, we describe their perspectives and influences on vaccination decision-making. RESULTS: Multiple reasons emerged, which included concerns about the age of children, perceived discrimination and mistrust based on race and socioeconomic status, and vaccine safety. DISCUSSION: Findings support the development of targeted interventions that address vaccine safety concerns, mistrust, patient-provider communication, and parent education about the benefits of HPV vaccination.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Parents , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Vaccination Hesitancy , Child , Humans , Black or African American/psychology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Parents/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/ethnology , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Parenting/ethnology , Parenting/psychology , Patient Safety , TrustABSTRACT
Background: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other LGBTQIA cancer patients experience significant disparities in cancer-related outcomes. Their relationships may not be acknowledged in care systems designed to serve primarily heterosexual and cisgender (H/C) patients, and resources for partners and caregivers of H/C patients may not address the needs of LGBTQIA caregivers. Tailored interventions are needed to address disparities in LGBTQIA patients and caregivers. Methods: To address this gap, researchers from Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, MI and Wilmot Cancer Institute in Rochester, NY worked with a cancer action council (CAC) of LGBTQIA stakeholders with lived experience of cancer in a community-academic partnership. This group used the ADAPT-ITT model to guide their process of assessing needs in this community, identifying evidence-based interventions that could be adapted to meet those needs, and beginning the process of adapting an existing intervention to meet the needs of a new population. Results: In the Assessment phase of the model, CAC members shared their own experiences and concerns related to cancer and identified cancer caregiving as a priority area for intervention. In the Decision-Making phase of the model, researchers and CAC members performed a review of the literature on interventions that reported outcomes for cancer caregiver, identifying 13 promising interventions. Each of these interventions was evaluated over a series of meetings using a scoring rubric. Based on this rubric, the FOCUS intervention was established as an appropriate target for adaptation to the LGBTQIA population. In the first stage of the Adaptation phase, CAC members reacted to the intervention content and identified principal components for adaptation. Conclusion: While the FOCUS intervention adaptation is still in process, this manuscript can serve as a guide for others establishing community-academic partnerships to adapt interventions, as well as those developing interventions and resources for LGBTQIA persons coping with cancer.
ABSTRACT
We study the dynamic relationships between consumer expenditures and consumer sentiment in the pre- and during the COVID-19 periods. Our results indicate that sentiment is closely related to consumption as consumers seem to maintain a long memory of the impact of sentiment during the period of the pandemic relative to the pre-pandemic period. We also found asymmetric behavior of consumption growth with and without the influence of sentiment during each sub-period. We offer some specific policy implications that are beneficial to the US economy and other countries.