Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Aten Primaria ; 53(1): 51-59, 2021 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of health professionals about the characteristics of health care for patients with multimorbidity. DESIGN: Qualitative study of phenomenological trajectory made between January and September 2015 through 3 group interviews and 15 individual interviews. LOCATION: Aragonese Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Medical and nursing professionals of the Aragon Health Service belonging to various services: Internal Medicine, Primary Care, Emergency and Management. A pharmacist was also included. METHODS: A non-probabilistic intentional sampling was carried out that allowed for the selection of professionals in terms of discourse representation criteria, allowing to know and interpret the phenomenon studied in depth, in its different visions. We interviewed health professionals with different profiles who knew in depth the characteristics of care provided to patients with multimorbidity. The interviews were recorded, transcribed literally and interpreted, through the social analysis of the discourse. RESULTS: Professional culture oriented to individual pathologies, lack of coordination among professionals, high prevalence of multi-prescriptions, Clinical Practice Guidelines oriented to individual pathologies and specialist training focused on individual diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Both the professional culture and the organization of the healthcare system have been oriented towards the attention to individual pathologies, which results in the difficulty to offer a more integrated care to patients with multimorbidity.


Subject(s)
Multimorbidity , Primary Health Care , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Perception , Qualitative Research
2.
Am J Addict ; 23(4): 337-42, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24961361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Research in the United States tends to indicate that immigrants from most sociogeographic regions have considerably lower substance use disorder (SUD) rates than native born individuals. We aimed to analyze the differences between immigrants and native born population regarding substance abuse and dependence. This objective was approached using data from the ARACAT cross-sectional multicenter study in primary care settings of two different Spanish regions: Aragon and Catalonia. METHODS: Three thousand six patients (1,503 immigrants randomly selected and 1,503 native born paired by age and gender) were interviewed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. RESULTS: Reported substance abuse and dependence were more prevalent in the native born population than in immigrants (alcohol abuse 5.1% vs. 2.6% p < .0001, alcohol dependence 3.3% vs. 2.6% n.s., other abuse 3.4% vs. .4% p < .0001, other dependence .5% vs. 4.0% p < .0001). Large differences were detected between different ethnic groups. Sociodemographic characteristics such as female gender, older age, higher level of education or stable housing (among others), were found to be protective against different SUDs. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Immigrants have lower levels of alcohol and substance abuse, however, those that do consume show higher levels of both comorbid mental disorders and problematic alcohol/substance use. It would appear to be the case that issues specific to immigrant cultures, such as extreme stigmatization of substance and alcohol use, may serve to promote social marginalization and inhibit treatment access.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Population Groups/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Protective Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Gac Sanit ; 31(5): 423-426, 2017.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28318758

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient safety culture in directors/managers. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study carried out from February to June 2011 among the executive/managing staff of the Aragón Health Service through semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: A total of 12 interviews were carried out. All the respondents admitted that there were many patient safety problems and agreed that patient safety was a priority from a theoretical rather than practical perspective. The excessive changes in executive positions was considered to be an important barrier which made it difficult to establish long-term strategies and achieve medium-term continuity. CONCLUSIONS: This study recorded perceptions on patient safety culture in directors, an essential factor to improve patient safety culture in this group and in the organisations they run.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Patient Safety , Safety Management/organization & administration , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL