Search details
1.
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.
Annu Rev Psychol
; 73: 719-748, 2022 01 04.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665669
2.
How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?
BMC Med
; 20(1): 438, 2022 11 09.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352426
3.
Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology.
BMC Biol
; 19(1): 68, 2021 04 09.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33836762
4.
Five lessons to guide more effective biodiversity conservation message framing.
Conserv Biol
; 34(5): 1131-1141, 2020 10.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043648
5.
Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution.
Bioscience
; 67(3): 282-289, 2017 Mar 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28596617
6.
What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data? A cross-sectional survey.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol
; 2024 May 06.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708950
7.
Cancer researchers' experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey.
Account Res
; : 1-28, 2024 Feb 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299475
8.
Computationally reproducing results from meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology using shared code and data.
PLoS One
; 19(3): e0300333, 2024.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478503
9.
Revisiting the promise of conservation psychology.
Conserv Biol
; 32(6): 1464-1468, 2018 12.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29604116
10.
The perception of positive and negative facial expressions in unilateral brain-damaged patients: A meta-analysis.
Laterality
; 18(4): 437-59, 2013.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22849611
11.
Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data.
BMJ
; 382: e075767, 2023 07 11.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433624
12.
Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups.
R Soc Open Sci
; 10(6): 221553, 2023 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37293358
13.
Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process.
PLoS One
; 18(1): e0274429, 2023.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36701303
14.
Error bars in experimental biology.
J Cell Biol
; 177(1): 7-11, 2007 Apr 09.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17420288
15.
Decision making in a human population living sustainably.
Conserv Biol
; 26(5): 760-8, 2012 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22891858
16.
Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science.
Conserv Biol
; 26(1): 29-38, 2012 Feb.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22280323
17.
Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process.
BMC Res Notes
; 15(1): 127, 2022 Apr 05.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35382867
18.
Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
F1000Res
; 10: 491, 2021.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34631024
19.
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence.
Syst Rev
; 10(1): 112, 2021 04 16.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33863381
20.
Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts.
Risk Anal
; 30(3): 512-23, 2010 Mar.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20030766