ABSTRACT
Marginal difference, huge impact: The topological analyses of the electron-density distributions obtained from experiment (see figure) and quantum-chemical calculations in the two title compounds can consistently explain marginal changes in bonding and rationalize different catalytic abilities. The electronic structures of the compounds bis(pentafluorophenyl)(N-pyrrolyl)borane (1) and bis(pentafluorophenyl)(N-pyrrolidinyl)borane (2) were investigated by low-temperature high-resolution X-ray diffraction experiments and subsequent multipole refinements. Additionally, DFT calculations were performed. The topological analyses of the electron-density distributions obtained from experiments and from quantum-chemical calculations are described and discussed. In this paper reasons for the different reactivities of the compounds are provided.
ABSTRACT
The negative charge originating from deprotonation of the methyl group is distributed over the 2-picolyl ring. Bonding properties derived from the electron density distribution support the enamide character of picolyllithium (PicLi; the picture shows the deformation density of [2-PicLi x PicH](2)), but electrophilic attack occurs at the deprotonated C atom. This reactivity is rationalized by the electrostatic potential, which guides electrophiles towards the nucleophilic C atom.