Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C and bleeding disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent among patients with inherited bleeding disorders and is a leading cause of mortality in those with haemophilia. AIM: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-4 infection and an inherited bleeding disorder. METHODS: Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was administered for 12 weeks to patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection and for 12 or 24 weeks to treatment-experienced cirrhotic patients with genotype 1 infection. Patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection received sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 and 24 weeks respectively. RESULTS: The majority of the 120 treated patients had a severe bleeding disorder (55%); overall, 65% of patients had haemophilia A and 26% of patients had haemophilia B; 22% were HIV coinfected. Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment was 99% (98/99) in patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection; 100% (5/5) in treatment-experienced cirrhotic patients with genotype 1 infection; 100% (10/10) in patients with genotype 2 infection; and 83% (5/6) in patients with genotype 3 infection. There were no treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). The most frequent non-bleeding AEs were fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, nausea and insomnia. Bleeding AEs occurred in 22 patients, of which all but one were considered unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection was highly effective and well tolerated among those with inherited bleeding disorders.

Simeprevir with peginterferon/ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: pooled safety analysis from Phase IIb and III studies.

This pooled analysis of five Phase IIb and III studies evaluated the safety and tolerability of simeprevir, a once daily, oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Data were summarised for patients who received simeprevir 150 mg once daily (n = 924) or placebo (n = 540) plus pegylated interferon-α/ribavirin for 12 weeks. During the first 12 weeks of treatment, few patients discontinued simeprevir or placebo due to adverse events (AEs) (both 2.2%). Pruritus (23.8% vs 17.4%), rash (any; 22.9% vs 16.7%) and photosensitivity (3.2% vs 0.6%) [Correction added on 16 January 2015, after first online publication: In the above sentence, the values in 'Photosensitivity' were previously incorrect and have now been changed to 3.2% vs 0.6%.] were more prevalent in the simeprevir vs the placebo groups. Most AEs were grade 1/2 (72.4% for simeprevir vs 71.3% for placebo). All grade 3/4 AEs occurred in <5.0% of patients, except neutropenia (9.8% vs 7.6%). Overall incidence of neutropenia was similar (17.3% vs 15.7%). Incidence of anaemia was 13.2% for simeprevir vs 10.9% for placebo, and incidence of increased bilirubin was 8.4% vs 2.8%. Bilirubin increases were mild-to-moderate and transient without concurrent transaminase increases or association with hepatic injury. Safety and tolerability did not vary with METAVIR score, although increased bilirubin and anaemia were more frequent in simeprevir-treated patients with METAVIR F4 (increased bilirubin, 13.0% vs 3.3%; anaemia, 19.0% vs 14.8%). Serious AEs were infrequent (2.1% for simeprevir vs 3.0% for placebo). No deaths were reported during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Patient-reported fatigue and other outcomes were comparable for both groups, but were of shorter duration for simeprevir due to the use of response-guided therapy. Simeprevir is well tolerated in HCV genotype 1-infected patients.

Adherence to PEG/ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C: prevalence, patterns, and predictors of missed doses and nonpersistence.

Adherence to treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) maximizes treatment efficacy. Missed doses and failing to persist on treatment are two patient-level processes that are rarely defined or analysed separately from other factors affecting treatment adherence. We evaluated the prevalence and patterns of missed doses and nonpersistence, and identified patient characteristics associated with these outcomes. Missed doses of ribavirin (RBV) and peginterferon (PEG), measured prospectively in Virahep-C using electronic monitoring technology, were analysed using generalized estimating equations. Cox proportional hazards models analysed time to nonpersistence from baseline to week 24 (N = 401) and from week 24 to 48 in Responders (N = 242). Average proportion of PEG- and RBV-missed doses increased over time from 5% to 15% and 7% to 27%, respectively. Patients who were younger, African-American, unemployed, or unmarried were at greater risk of missing PEG from week 0 to 24; higher baseline depression predicted missing PEG from weeks 24 to 48. Patients who were younger or African-American were more likely to miss daily RBV from weeks 0 to 24; and those without private insurance or employment were more likely to miss RBV from weeks 24 to 48. Fifty-two patients failed to persist on treatment for patient-driven deviations. Predictors of nonpersistence from weeks 0 to 24 included younger age, lower education, public or no insurance, or worse baseline headaches. In conclusion, electronic monitoring and the prospective Virahep-C design afforded a unique opportunity to evaluate missing doses and nonpersistence separately, and identify patients at risk of nonadherence. These processes will be important to investigate as the dosing schedules of antiviral regimens become increasingly complex.

Psychometric properties of the PROMIS short form measures in a U.S. cohort of 961 patients with chronic hepatitis C prescribed direct acting antiviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: To better understand symptoms experienced by patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), valid and reliable patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are needed. AIM: To assess the reliability and validity of 10 patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures and the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) in a large national sample of patients with HCV. METHODS: Pre-treatment data from 961 patients with HCV starting direct acting antiviral therapy at 11 U.S. liver centers were analyzed. Internal reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient; frequency distributions were examined for floor and ceiling effects; structural validity was investigated via item-response-theory models; convergent validity was evaluated using correlations with theoretically-similar items from the HCV-PRO and memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS); and known-groups validity was investigated by observing PRO differences by liver disease status and number of comorbidities. RESULTS: The HIT-6 and the majority of the PROMIS measures yielded excellent reliability (alphas ≥ 0.87). Ceiling effects were infrequent ( < 4%), while 30%-59% of patients reported no symptoms (floor effects). The data supported structural validity of the HIT-6 and most PROMIS measures. The PROMIS measures showed moderate to strong correlations with theoretically-similar items from the HCV-PRO and MSAS (0.39-0.77). Trends were observed between worse PRO scores and advanced cirrhosis and greater number of comorbidities, lending support for known-groups validity. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the HIT-6 and PROMIS measures performed satisfactorily in this large cohort of patients with HCV starting direct acting antiviral therapy. Opportunities exist for further refinement of these PROs. Evaluation of performance over time and in under-represented subgroups is needed.

All-oral direct-acting antiviral therapy in HCV-advanced liver disease is effective in real-world practice: observations through HCV-TARGET database.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus therapy in patients with advanced liver disease remains a clinical challenge. HCV-TARGET collects data in patients treated at tertiary academic and community centres. AIM: To assess efficacy of all-oral HCV therapy in advanced liver disease. METHODS: Between December 2013 and October 2014, 240 patients with a MELD score of ≥10 initiated HCV treatment with an all-oral regimen. Data from the 220 patients who completed 12-week follow-up were analysed. RESULTS: Genotype 1 (GT1) patients had higher sustained virological response (SVR) when treated with sofosbuvir plus simeprevir ± ribavirin than with sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (66-74% vs. 54%); GT1b vs GT1a (84% vs. 64%). SVR for GT2 was 72% with sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, while GT3 patients had a substantially lower response (35%). A decrease in MELD score was not clearly related to SVR over the short course of follow-up although some had improvements in MELD score, serum bilirubin and albumin. A predictor of virological response was albumin level while negative predictors were elevated bilirubin level and GT1a. Most patients with GT1 were treated with approximately 12-week duration of sofosbuvir and simeprevir ± ribavirin therapy while GT2 and GT3 patients were treated with approximately 12 and 24 weeks of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All-oral therapies are effective among patients with advanced liver disease with high levels of success in GT2 and GT1b, and may serve to reduce the severity of liver disease after SVR. Treatment for GT3 patients remains an unmet need. Clinical trial number: NCT01474811.

Plasma levels of growth-related oncogene (CXCL1-3) associated with fibrosis and platelet counts in HCV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Fibrosis progression in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients varies greatly between individuals. Chemokines recruit immune cells to the infected liver and may thus play a role in the fibrosis process. AIM: To investigate plasma levels of a diverse chemokine panel in relation to liver fibrosis. METHODS: African-American and Caucasian HCV genotype 1 infected patients were treated with peginterferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks (VIRAHEP-C cohort). Plasma levels of 13 cytokines were studied at baseline (n = 386). Subsequently, GROα levels were assessed in a sub cohort (n = 99) at baseline, and at 4 and 12 weeks after start of pegIFN/RBV treatment. RESULTS: Increased severity of fibrosis (Ishak fibrosis score 0-2 vs. 3-6) was associated with increased plasma IP-10 (CXCL10) and IL-8 (CXCL8) levels, and decreased plasma levels of the chemokine growth-related oncogene (GRO, CXCL1-3). Plasma GRO levels were also positively correlated with platelet counts, and were higher in African-American as compared to Caucasian patients. In response to pegIFN/RBV treatment, GROα levels increased in Caucasian but not African-American patients from week 4 onwards. CONCLUSIONS: The association with severity of fibrosis and platelet count positions plasma GRO as a potential biomarker for liver fibrosis in HCV-infected patients. The secretion of GRO by platelets may explain the correlation between GRO plasma level and platelet count. The ethnic difference in GRO levels both pre-treatment and in response to pegIFN/RBV might be driven by a genetic polymorphism in GROα associated with higher plasma levels and more common in the African-American population.

Virological outcomes and treatment algorithms utilisation in observational study of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with boceprevir or telaprevir.

BACKGROUND: HCV-TARGET is a longitudinal observational study of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients treated with direct-acting anti-viral agents (DAAs) in a US consortium of 90 academic and community medical centres. AIM: To assess utilisation of response-guided therapy (RGT) and sustained virological response (SVR) of a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Patients received peginterferon (PEG-IFN), ribavirin and either telaprevir or boceprevir. Demographical, clinical and virological data were collected during treatment and follow-up. RGT and treatment futility stopping rules was assessed at key time points. RESULTS: Of 2084 patients, 38% had cirrhosis and 56% had received prior treatment for HCV. SVR rates were 31% (95% CI: 24-40) and 50% (95% CI: 44-56) in boceprevir patients with and without cirrhosis, respectively. SVR rates were 46% (95% CI: 42-50) and 60% (95% CI: 57-64) in telaprevir patients with and without cirrhosis, respectively. Early clearance of virus, IL28B genotype, platelet counts and diabetes were identified as predictors of SVR among boceprevir patients, while early clearance of virus, IL28B, cirrhosis, HCV subtype, age, haemoglobin, bilirubin and albumin levels were identified as predictors of SVR for telaprevir patients. CONCLUSIONS: In academic and community centres, triple therapy including boceprevir or telaprevir led to SVR rates somewhat lower than those noted in large phase 3 clinical trials. Response rates were consistently higher among patients without cirrhosis compared to those with cirrhosis regardless of DAA used and prior treatment response. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT01474811.

Diagnostic testing for hepatitis C: practical considerations.

Although knowledge of the molecular biology of the hepatitis C virus is rapidly evolving, current therapeutic strategies remain suboptimal for most patients with chronic hepatitis C. It is hoped that with information derived from virologic variables, therapy can be tailored to individual patients, offering them the greatest likelihood of response or preventing the unnecessary use of costly and occasionally unpleasant medications when treatment failure is deemed probable. Genotyping and quantitation of hepatitis C virus have provided great insights into the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C. Retrospective studies have demonstrated that hepatitis C virus genotyping and viral burden may play some role in disease progression and response to therapy. With the widespread availability of these tests, it is important to try to develop a rational plan for their use that will provide information in a manner that is both cost-effective and relevant to clinical decision making for the individual patient. At this point, the utility of measuring hepatitis C virus RNA levels and genotyping in making decisions about treatment regimens or monitoring therapy in daily clinical practice is continually evolving.

Management of hepatitis C in the hemophilia patient.

Patients with hemophilia who received clotting factor concentrates before the availability of heat-treated factors in the mid-1980s were almost universally infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Until recently, the clinical impact of chronic hepatitis C was largely overshadowed by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in this risk group. With recent advances in treating HIV infection, there is greater emphasis on the morbidity and mortality associated with chronic hepatitis C in the hemophilic population. A recent study from the United Kingdom demonstrated that mortality from chronic liver disease in hemophilic patients was 16.7 times greater than in the general population, and death resulting from liver cancer, 5.6 times greater. Before the advent of protease inhibitors, which can alter the natural history of HIV infection, co-infection with HIV appeared to accelerate the course of chronic hepatitis C. Levels of HCV RNA were dramatically increased after HIV seroconversion, and liver failure was found in 9% of patients, exclusively among those co-infected with HIV. HCV genotypes generally reflect the predominant genotype of the donor population, but multiple genotypes may be present. Liver biopsy may be performed safely via the percutaneous or transjugular route in hemophilic patients with chronic hepatitis C, although there is an increased cost because of the expense of factor replacement. Response to interferon in this population has been similar to that expected in the general population. Large trials are underway to evaluate the role of combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin for the treatment of patients with hemophilia and hepatitis C.

Advances in therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

Major advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C have been made during the last decade. The use of PEG-IFN in combination with ribavirin undoubtedly will become the new standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. For the first time there will soon be a choice of medications for which long-term benefit will be the rule rather than the exception, as sustained virologic response rates rise above 50%. As the data mature from clinical trials with these new agents, clinicians will be able to refine and expand the indications for their use, hone the predictors of sustained response, and develop new paradigms to optimize treatment for chronic hepatitis C.

Clinical application of hepatitis C virus genotyping and quantitation.

Genotyping and quantitation of hepatitis C virus have provided great insights into the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C. The assays that are currently available for characterizing HCV remain powerful research tools that will be invaluable in future studies of the next generation of antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C in much the same way that they have provided information about the effectiveness of interferon. Retrospective studies have demonstrated that HCV genotype and viral burden may play some role in disease progression and response to therapy. However, their utility in daily clinical practice in making decisions about treatment regimens or monitoring therapy in an individual patient remains difficult to define. As newer, more effective treatment strategies evolve (longer duration of treatment, combination therapy), previously identified predictors of disease severity or response to treatment may no longer be applicable.

Serum hyaluronic acid in patients with veno-occlusive disease following bone marrow transplantation.

The development of hepatic veno-occlusive disease following bone marrow transplantation is associated with high-dose combination cytoreductive therapy. Experimental models have suggested that drug-induced injury to hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells is involved in the pathogenesis of this syndrome. Hyaluronic acid is a polysaccharide that is metabolized, almost exclusively, by hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells. The aim of the present study was to evaluate serum hyaluronic acid as a marker for endothelial cell injury in patients with veno-occlusive disease following bone marrow transplantation. Hyaluronic acid was measured in sera from patients with and without veno-occlusive disease using an enzyme-linked protein binding assay. Mean peak serum hyaluronic acid levels were significantly greater in patients who had a diagnosis of VOD compared to those transplant patients who did not, 1173.4 +/- 982.9 vs 444.9 +/- 735.6 ng/ml (P = 0.01). Serial serum samples obtained from a separate cohort of patients also demonstrated that serum hyaluronic acid levels were higher in patients with moderate or severe veno-occlusive disease compared to those with none or mild disease at days 7, 17 and 25 following transplantation (greatest difference at day 25: 366 +/- 327 vs 126 +/- 151, P = 0.01). Serum hyaluronic acid levels are increased in veno-occlusive disease and increase over time in patients with severe disease. Further studies are required to determine if elevated serum hyaluronic acid levels are due to decreased clearance by injured hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells or increased production from early hepatic fibrogenesis associated with the acute liver injury.

Hepatitis B and C and renal failure.

Hepatitis C is the most common cause of liver disease in the dialysis patient. The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C determined by anti-HCV testing in this population ranges from 6% to 38%. Using second generation EIA assays, the prevalence of anti-HCV among patients participating in the 1997 National Surveillance of Dialysis Associated Diseases in the United States was 9.3%. Polymerase chain reaction testing for HCV RNA has shown that the prevalence of HCV infection can be as high as 20% to 30% of dialysis patients. The causes and source of infection in patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis are multiple. Before the introduction of routine screening of blood donors for anti-HCV, blood transfusions were an important risk factor for acquisition of hepatitis C. Other potential sources of infection include exposure to contaminated equipment and nosocomial routes such as patient-to-patient exposure. The risk of infection appears to correlate with the duration of hemodialysis and the number of transfusions. Interestingly, dialysate and buffers have been shown to be virus free even when used in hepatitis C infected patients. The natural history of chronic hepatitis C infection in patients with renal failure is not well characterized. Although persistent elevations in ALT levels occur in 12% to 50% of dialysis patients, the frequency of persistently normal ALT levels in HCV-infected dialysis patients appears to be higher than in HCV-infected patients without renal failure. Overt liver disease and liver failure rarely occur. The degree of inflammation in liver biopsies of renal failure patients is usually mild. Thus, progressive liver disease may be less common in patients with advanced renal disease but further studies are required to assess the true impact of hepatitis C infection in this high risk population. The impact of hepatitis C infection on morbidity and mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease remains poorly defined. Initial studies have failed to show a significant increase in mortality among HCV-infected hemodialysis or renal transplant patients within the first 5 years following transplantation. In contrast, recent studies with extended follow-up of renal transplant recipients suggest that hepatitis C infection may affect patient and graft survival during the second decade. Further studies are required to identify the mechanisms of infection of patients with end-stage renal disease and to define better treatment strategies for these patients before and after kidney transplantation.

Therapy of chronic viral hepatitis.

Interferon alpha is effective therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Only 20% to 40% of patients, however, have a sustained benefit from therapy. For the majority of patients with these diseases, alternative forms of therapy are needed. Nucleoside analogues appear to be extremely promising for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and will undoubtedly play a major role in the management of this disease. For chronic hepatitis C, prolonged therapy with interferon, improved patient selection, and combined therapy with multiple agents such as ribavirin may lead to an improved therapeutic response.

Barriers to accessing care in patients with chronic hepatitis C: the impact of depression.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatitis C viral (HCV) may perceive barriers to accessing speciality care for HCV, and these barriers may be related to depressive symptoms. AIM: To evaluate the relationship between barriers to care, demographics, and depressive symptoms. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 126 patients referred for HCV at two speciality HCV clinics. Barriers to care, depressive symptoms and sociodemographics were measured using standardized instruments. A retrospective chart review was conducted to collect clinical outcome data. RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were reported in 26%. Common barriers included lack of personal financial resources; lack of HCV knowledge in the community; lack of professionals competent in HCV care; stigmatization of HCV; and long distances to clinics offering care. After we controlled for sociodemographics, depression accounted for an additional 7-18% of variability in all barriers (all p values <0.01). Lower depression, marital and employment status were associated with subsequent receipt of HCV treatment in 38% (45/120) of patients; perceived barriers were not. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is independently associated with perceived barriers to care. Higher depressive scores, but not perceived barriers, were associated with nontreatment. Healthcare providers who diagnose HCV need to be cognizant of numerous perceived barriers to accessing HCV care, and the impact that depression may have on these perceptions and receipt of treatment.

Psychiatric symptoms during interferon treatment for hepatitis C: experiences from a tertiary care hepatology centre.

BACKGROUND: Most research on the psychiatric symptoms of peginterferon/ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C comes from VA centres and clinical trials with rigid entry criteria that often excluded patients with markers of mental health and substance use disturbance (MH/SUD). The findings from these lines of research may not be generalizable to patients treated under standard of care in a tertiary care setting. AIM: To investigate the incidence and outcomes of psychiatric symptoms in patients treated under standard of care protocol, not enrolled in clinical trials. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 215 patients who underwent therapy from 2002 to 2006 at a university-based tertiary care centre. Survival curves explored the relationship between history of MH/SUD and the development of psychiatric symptoms on treatment. RESULTS: The cumulative history of MH/SUD was 67%. Of these, 39% had taken psychotropic medications previously, and 80% continued on them during therapy. On therapy, 46% developed depressive symptoms, 19% and 46% endorsed anxiety and irritability respectively. Cumulatively, 64% of patients indicated mood disturbance on therapy. Most symptoms developed between weeks 2 and 18, and rarely after week 20. Of those who developed mood symptoms, 66% required an intervention. Treatment discontinuation was infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: This large observational study provides important insights into the incidence and course of psychiatric symptoms in an unselected sample of patients treated in a tertiary care setting. Patients had higher rates of MH/SUD comorbidity, psychotropic medication use and exhibit higher rates of mood disturbance on therapy compared with previous reports, although a majority completed the prescribed treatment regimen.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: medical options.

Nonsurgical therapy provides some benefit to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, although surgical options, including transplantation, remain the only chance for cure. Careful patient selection is required; patients with small nodular tumors may be considered for PEI therapy, whereas patients with larger tumors may be considered for TACE. Regardless of the treatment modality, the likelihood of survival is usually directly associated with the degree of hepatic dysfunction. Randomized, controlled trials of these treatment modalities are limited in number and design; therefore, it is difficult to assess their true impact on patient survival and quality of life. Secondary chemoprophylaxis against recurrent disease with vitamin A analogues is a promising adjunctive measure to both surgical and nonsurgical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Therapy of hepatitis C.

In acute hepatitis C, the efficacy of alpha interferon has not been definitively demonstrated. However, several small trials have suggested that interferon may decrease the chronicity rate of acute hepatitis C. In view of the high rate of chronic infection resulting from acute hepatitis C, it is warranted to treat patients during the acute phase of illness if they continue to have HCV RNA detectable in serum for 1 month after the onset of symptoms. The regimen of alpha interferon therapy should be 3 mu three times weekly for 24 weeks. In chronic hepatitis C, therapy with 3-5 mu of alpha interferon three times weekly for 24-48 weeks will induce a temporary remission in disease with loss of HCV RNA from serum, fall of aminotransferases into the normal range, and improvement in liver histology in 50% of patients, and a sustained remission persisting after therapy is stopped in 15% to 20% of patients. Younger patients with a short duration of disease, without cirrhosis, and with lower levels of HCV RNA in serum are the most likely to respond. Unfortunately, there are no completely reliable means of predicting which patients will derive long-term benefits from the use of interferon. Interferon remains the only approved therapy for chronic hepatitis C, although the low rate of sustained remissions and the incidence of side effects mandate a search for ways to improve the efficacy of interferon, as well as to find new, more potent agents for the treatment of this disease.