Initial validation of a modified suction task training system.

BACKGROUND: Trainees rarely have the opportunity to practice suctioning copious or bloody secretions from the airways of patients in respiratory distress. The act of suctioning is frequently overlooked during the training of personnel in airway management and, thus, there is a dearth of simulated suction devices that can reproduce the fidelity of this process. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe their experience developing and obtaining initial validation of a modified suction task training system. METHODS: Senior-level students and faculty participated in the validation of this simulator. All participants used the modified Yankauer suction device in a simulated 'mini' scenario that required the use of suction. The panel of experts consisted of faculty from respiratory therapy, nursing and emergency medical services. After completion of the scenario, participants were asked to anonymously complete a survey. RESULTS: More than 94% (n=36) of students agreed or strongly agreed that the simulated oropharyngeal suction was an important component in their learning experience. The expert panel (n=11) strongly agreed that the modified Yankauer suctioning of oral secretions was an important component of student training and also strongly agreed that this apparatus would improve their students' suctioning skills (82% for both questions). Similar to the students, 90% of the faculty believed strongly that the simulator worked well. DISCUSSION: The authors describe their experience developing and obtaining initial validation of a modified suction task training system that has both structural and functional fidelity, offering learners an opportunity to practice appropriate and effective suctioning in patients.

HISTORIQUE: Les stagiaires ont rarement l'occasion de s'exercer à l'aspiration de sécrétions copieuses ou sanguinolentes dans les voies aériennes de patients en détresse respiratoire. On néglige souvent l'aspiration dans le cadre de la formation du personnel sur la prise en charge des voies aériennes. Il existe donc peu d'appareils de simulation de l'aspiration pour reproduire ce processus fidèlement. OBJECTIF: Les auteurs décrivent leur expérience dans la mise au point d'un système modifié de formation sur l'aspiration et dans sa validation initiale. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des étudiants avancés et des professeurs ont participé à la validation de ce simulateur. Tous les participants ont utilisé l'appareil d'aspiration modifié Yankauer dans un mini-scénario d'aspiration. Le groupe d'experts était composé de professeurs en inhalothérapie, en soins infirmiers et en services médicaux d'urgence. Une fois le scénario terminé, les participants ont été invités à remplir un sondage anonyme. RÉSULTATS: Plus de 94 % des étudiants (n=36) étaient d'accord ou fortement d'accord avec le fait que la simulation de l'aspiration oropharyngée était un élément important de leur expérience d'apprentissage. Le groupe d'experts (n=11) était fortement d'accord avec le fait que l'appareil d'aspiration modifié Yankauer des sécrétions orales constituait un élément important de la formation des étudiants et que cet appareil pouvait améliorer les habiletés d'aspiration des étudiants (82 % aux deux questions). À l'instar des étudiants, 90 % des professeurs étaient fortement convaincus que le simulateur fonctionnait bien. EXPOSÉ: Les auteurs décrivent leur expérience à mettre au point et à obtenir la validation initiale d'un système de formation modifié sur l'aspiration, fidèle à la fois sur le plan structurel et fonctionnel, qui permet aux apprenants de s'exercer à une aspiration pertinente et efficace chez les patients.

Drive-thru continuing education to meet learners' needs.

BACKGROUND: Continuing education is a requirement for emergency medical services practitioners in Ohio, and simulation-based learning has been effective for this purpose. Limitations to providing simulation for emergency medical services practitioners include a lack of simulation resources or equipment and a lack of trained simulationists to adequately use existing equipment, such as high-fidelity manikins. Here, we sought to provide simulation-based learning in the ambulance bays of our local hospitals to meet these needs. METHODS: The OhioHealth simulation team, in conjunction with OhioHealth Emergency Medical Services, conducted simulation-based education sessions in ambulance bays scheduled in 2-h blocks for 3 consecutive days at 3 different hospitals in Columbus, Ohio. The outcomes of the education sessions were evaluated based on the ability to meet the educational objectives and the suitability of the environment for learning. In total, 171 learners completed educational sessions and evaluations. RESULTS: Modified Likert scale surveys were completed by learners to assess their confidence in the learning objectives. For each session, the learners were able to meet the determined learning objectives after the education. Regarding the feasibility of using ambulance bays for education, 90% of learners (155/171) responded that they "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" that the environment was conducive to learning. CONCLUSION: Using care site ambulance bays with simulation staff and content experts, we were able to effectively deliver simulation-based education. Based on learner perception and ability for education to meet its determined objectives, the ambulance bay provides a feasible way to address existing barriers (cost, access to equipment, and trained staff) to simulation-based education for emergency medical services practitioners.

Predictors of epinephrine autoinjector needle length inadequacy.

BACKGROUND: Self-administered epinephrine is the primary out-of-hospital treatment of anaphylaxis. Intramuscular injection of epinephrine results in higher peak plasma concentration than subcutaneous injection. With the prevalence of obesity, autoinjectors may not have an adequate needle length for intramuscular injection. OBJECTIVES: To measure muscle depth and evaluate predictors of autoinjector needle length inadequacy. METHODS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of low acuity emergency department patients aged 18 to 55 years. We recorded demographic data, measured thigh circumference, and calculated body mass index (BMI). Using ultrasound, we took depth-to-muscle measurements of the vastus lateralus in a standing position, with and without gentle pressure to simulate muscle compression that occurs with correct autoinjector use. We conducted univariate analyses using χ(2) and t tests with P ≤ .05 and 95% confidence intervals. We considered the patient a potential "failure" risk if his/her muscle depth exceeded 15.9 mm (longest available epinephrine autoinjectors needle). RESULTS: We enrolled 120 subjects with a mean BMI of 29.2 kg/m(2). Thirty-one percent (31%) of our sample were found to be failure risks (36/116; confidence interval, 22.6%-39.5%). Women were 6.4 times more likely than men to be a failure risk (54.4% vs 5% for men failure rate; P < .001). Failures were more likely to be shorter, have a higher BMI, and have larger thigh circumference (P < .001). We did not find any statistical difference in muscle depth for race, age, or weight. CONCLUSION: The current epinephrine autoinjector needle length is inadequate for intramuscular injection, especially among women.

Interdisciplinary Simulation Training Reduces Restraint Use in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.

Introduction Safe and effective management of agitated patients poses multiple challenges for healthcare professionals. Patients placed in restraints because of agitated behavior are at a higher risk of complications, including death. This intervention was designed to provide emergency department staff a framework for de-escalation, improve teamwork, and reduce the use of violent physical restraints. Methods Emergency medicine nurses, patient support associates, and protective services officers underwent a 90-minute educational intervention in 2017. A 30-minute lecture focusing on communication and early use of medication for agitation was followed by a simulation using standardized participants, then a structured debriefing. A standardized return-on-learning tool determined participants' reactions to and application of the educational intervention. Additionally, data was collected and reported as a ratio of number of restraints applied each month compared to total emergency department visits that month. Data were analyzed comparing the six months before the education and the subsequent six months after the education. Results A pilot group of 30 emergency department staff members completed the educational intervention. The intervention contributed to the overall decrease in restraint use in the department. Most participants (86%) felt more confident in their ability to manage agitated patients. Conclusion An interdisciplinary simulation-enhanced educational intervention successfully reduced use of restraints in the emergency department and improved staff attitudes toward de-escalation techniques for agitated patients.

Multidisciplinary Simulation Improves Resident Confidence for Pregnant Patients Requiring Surgical Intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular adenomas are a rare but serious cause of bleeding, which is further complicated by pregnancy. Interprofessional cooperation is a key component of residency education, thus simulations designed to integrate multiple programs are mutually beneficial. This simulation details surgical and obstetric management of a pregnant patient in hemorrhagic shock from a bleeding hepatocellular adenoma. Objectives for the study were to evaluate learners' confidence to 1) prioritize the care of a pregnant patient with hemoperitoneum and hemorrhagic shock, 2) demonstrate interdisciplinary collaboration with other specialties, 3) apply massive transfusion protocol (MTP) in the appropriate clinical setting, and 4) analyze critical decisions for evaluating pregnant females with severe abdominal pain. METHODS: Obstetric, general surgery, and anesthesia residents, along with labor and delivery nurses participated in a simulated clinical scenario that focused on the management of a pregnant patient in hemorrhagic shock. The learners evaluated the educational session using a standard Return on Investment in Learning survey immediately following the session. RESULTS: A total of 23 residents and medical students gave feedback on the experience. The main learning objectives were met with increased confidence in the four learning objectives by 77.3-95.4% of responders. Overall, greater than 90% of participants felt the simulation was relevant to their training and realistic, with 100% responding that the course provided new, or clarified existing information for them. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary simulation-based educational intervention was successful in improving learner confidence in managing a complicated surgical emergency in a pregnant patient with inter-residency cooperation.

Multidisciplinary Simulation of Trauma in Pregnancy with Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Utilization.

Background Studies have demonstrated the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion catheters of the aorta (REBOA) in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage and traumatic hemorrhagic shock. However, REBOA is infrequently utilized leading to a lack of clinician comfort. This study's aim was to demonstrate the utility of REBOA in a hemorrhaging pregnant trauma patient and improve clinician comfort with the placement of REBOA while emphasizing collaboration between medical specialties. Methods A multidisciplinary in-situ simulation was developed for the management of a pregnant patient with an abdominal gunshot wound evaluated by obstetrics and surgery teams. A trauma survey, emergency c-section, massive transfusion protocol (MTP), and evaluation for and placement of REBOA were indicated during the simulation. A standardized Return on Learning questionnaire was utilized to determine participants' reactions and confidence gained during the simulation. Results A total of 32 of 41 participants completed the survey (78%). A statistically significant increase in confidence was reported in the ability to prioritize the care of a pregnant patient with hemorrhagic shock (p = 0.016), apply MTP to the appropriate clinical setting (p = 0.03), and analyze critical decisions made for abdominal trauma in pregnant patients (p = 0.006). Specifically for physicians, a significant increase in confidence in the ability to identify indications/contraindications for REBOA placement in hemorrhaging patients was observed (p = 0.021). Conclusions A multidisciplinary simulation for the management of a pregnant patient in hemorrhagic shock secondary to penetrating abdominal trauma improved learner confidence in MTP, care of pregnant patients in hemorrhagic shock, and abdominal trauma in pregnancy. Physician learners gained confidence in indications for REBOA placement in abdominal trauma. This simulation was highly relevant to all participants.

A tranquil virtual reality experience to reduce subjective stress among COVID-19 frontline healthcare workers.

OBJECTIVE: The novel coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) has taken an immense physical, social, and emotional toll on frontline healthcare workers. Research has documented higher levels of anxiety, depression, and burnout among healthcare workers during the pandemic. Thus, creative interventions are needed now more than ever to provide brief, accessible support to frontline workers. Virtual reality is a rapidly growing technology with potential psychological applications. In this study, we piloted a three-minute Tranquil Cinematic-VR simulation of a nature scene to lower subjective stress among frontline healthcare workers in COVID-19 treatment units. We chose to film a nature scene because of the extensive empirical literature documenting the benefits of nature exposure and health. METHODS: A convenience sample of frontline healthcare workers, including direct care providers, indirect care providers, and support or administrative services, were recruited from three COVID-19 units located in the United States. Inclusion criteria for participation included adults aged 18 years and older who could read and speak in English and were currently employed by the healthcare system. Participants viewed a 360-degree video capture of a lush, green nature preserve in an Oculus Go or Pico G2 4K head-mounted display. Prior to viewing the simulation, participants completed a brief demographic questionnaire and the visual analogue scale to rate their subjective stress on a 10-point scale, with 1 = 'Not at all stressed' to 10 = 'Extremely stressed.' We conducted paired t-tests to examine pre- and post-simulation changes in subjective stress as well as Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U tests to examine differences by demographic variables. All analyses were conducted in SPSS statistical software version 28.0. We defined statistical significance as a p-value less than .05. RESULTS: A total of 102 individuals consented to participate in the study. Eighty-four (82.4%) participants reported providing direct patient care, 73 (71.6%) identified as women, 49 (48.0%) were between the ages of 25-34 years old, and 35 (34.3%) had prior experience with VR. The pre-simulation mean stress score was 5.5±2.2, with a range of 1 to 10. Thirty-three (32.4%) participants met the 6.8 cutoff for high stress pre-simulation. Pre-simulation stress scores did not differ by any demographic variables. Post-simulation, we observed a significant reduction in subjective stress scores from pre- to post-simulation (mean change = -2.2±1.7, t = 12.749, p < .001), with a Cohen's d of 1.08, indicating a very large effect. Further, only four (3.9%) participants met the cutoff for high stress after the simulation. Post-simulations scores did not differ by provider type, age range, gender, or prior experience with virtual reality. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this pilot study suggest that the application of this Tranquil Cinematic-VR simulation was effective in reducing subjective stress among frontline healthcare workers in the short-term. More research is needed to compare the Tranquil Cinematic-VR simulation to a control condition and assess subjective and objective measures of stress over time.

In-Situ Simulation in Interdisciplinary Family Practice Improves Response to In-Office Emergencies.

Background Medical emergencies can present to family medicine offices. For optimal patient outcomes, multiple team members must come together to provide emergency care and mobilize the appropriate resources. In-situ simulation has been used to improve provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as identify latent safety threats. The aim of this training was to provide family medicine physicians, nurses, and office staff education about how to manage in-office emergencies. Specifically, we sought to clarify team members' roles, improve communication, and identify latent safety threats. Methodology Two different in-situ simulations were performed with debriefing sessions. The first was a pediatric patient in respiratory distress. The second was a patient who presented for shortness of breath and became unresponsive in the lobby. Physicians, nurses, and office staff responded to the emergencies and used existing equipment and protocols to medically manage each patient. A standardized return on investment in learning survey evaluating the learners' confidence in managing in-office emergencies was completed by all learners immediately prior to and after the training. Results The training improved the participants' self-reported confidence in their ability to manage in-office emergencies. Additionally, participants believed they were better able to identify other team members' roles when responding to an in-office emergency. Learners were able to identify where knowledge gaps existed in current protocols, as well as aspects of the protocols that required updating. Lastly, the teams identified latent safety threats that were able to be mitigated by the practice. Conclusions In-situ simulation for high-risk, low-frequency in-office emergencies is a valuable tool to improve team members' confidence, identify knowledge gaps, and mitigate latent safety threats.

Airway Obstacle Course for Teaching Prehospital Providers Airway Techniques.

BACKGROUND:  Early airway intervention is a vital step in the management of critically ill patients. Emergency medical service (EMS) providers are often first in the chain of survival with equipment to manage airway problems that arise. Therefore, it is paramount that they receive thorough training in aspects of airway management. Often, the training providers currently undergo does not reflect the environmental challenges inherent in EMS. Our obstacle course not only offers trainees a situational environment that simulates common challenges associated with the prehospital environment, but also provides a break from traditional tabletop and lecture-based training methods. METHODS:  An airway obstacle course was created that comprised four different "obstacles". Each obstacle was a patient in a precarious position requiring airway management, and the trainees could manage the obstacles in the order of their choosing. Trainees could choose from four different airway devices based on the local protocol. Once the device was used successfully, it could no longer be implemented in the course, and thus each device was used once. A validated return on the learning model was used for evaluating learning. RESULTS:  Immediately following training, 95.1% (78) trainees felt they were more confident with airway management. Nearly all, 96.4% (79), agreed that the scenarios in the obstacle course were realistic. Participants retained confidence gains in resource management for intubation at the six-month follow-up (p=0.010). In the six months following training, there was a doubling in the number of intubation attempts (24 to 48) and an overall drop in the success rate (75% to 63%). At the six-month follow-up, participants were able to describe specific events where the training helped them with patient management. CONCLUSIONS:  The model of an intubation obstacle course as a means of training EMS providers is both realistic to the participants and provides lasting effects to their confidence in resource management skills. Further studies are needed to determine its effects on intubation success rates and patient outcomes.

A Novel Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Verbal De-escalation Training.

Background Agitated or aggressive patients pose a high risk of emotional and physical harm to hospital staff. Healthcare associates have the highest rate of workplace violence among studied fields. Learning to effectively de-escalate a patient who is a danger to self or others is key to reducing these incidents. This course was designed to improve education and communication among staff on a hospital surgical floor when verbal de-escalation is needed. Methods A ninety-minute simulation-based multidisciplinary curriculum was developed. This included a 30-minute didactic discussion, 10-minute simulation, and 50-minute debrief. Learners included nurses, patient service associates, and protective services officers from a medical/surgical unit. Data were collected using a validated return on investment in learning protocol and the Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale (MAVAS) tool. Results Our return on investment in learning showed that more than 97% of learners felt safer in managing agitated patients after participating in the training. The MAVAS tool was used in pre- and post-format and showed a significant trend toward the importance of clear communication and role clarity when de-escalating a patient. Conclusions A combination of didactic teaching and simulated experience allowed for greater confidence, communication, and teamwork in de-escalating an agitated patient in a community hospital surgical unit.

So Much Moulage, So Little Time: A Guide to Performing Moulage for Mass Casualty Scenarios.

Simulation has become a central component of healthcare education. Allowing learners to experience low-frequency high-risk situations, such as a mass casualty event, in a safe learning environment is a basic tenet of simulation-based education in healthcare. Creating realistic simulations often involves advanced moulage to accurately represent illness and injury. However, providing advanced moulage for mass casualty exercises can be time-consuming, resource-intensive, and costly. Here we discuss a novel means to execute moulage for multiple victims while maintaining a high level of realism. We executed two simultaneous mass casualty exercises as part of medical student education and employed our novel 3-step moulage process. Step 1-Preparation included case development, generation of a victim list, and victim designation into "zones" within the simulation. Step 2-Creation entailed making wounds, in-house 3D printing materials, and assembling each victim's moulage bag. Step 3-Application was an assembly line method of executing all victims' moulage on the day of the simulation. This method of moulage supported the highly realistic simulation activity that learners have come to expect while decreasing time, resources, and cost.

In Situ Simulation to Promote Residents as Resuscitation Leaders.

Objectives  Our study sought to assess whether perceptions of residents as resuscitation team leaders could be improved by using emergency department (ED) in situ simulations involving ED staff. Secondarily, we monitored changes indicated in overall resuscitation team dynamics. Methods We conducted a prospective experimental study over the 2018-2019 academic year. Data were collected at a community-based ED with an emergency medicine residency program. Prior to starting the education, all ED staff including residents, attending physicians nurses and techs completed a survey of their perceptions of team performance and leadership during medical resuscitations. Throughout the year, residents and ED staff members were exposed to various in situ simulation scenarios. A follow-up survey was administered to reassess resident and ED staff perceptions of team dynamics and, specifically, residents as patient care team leaders. A relational coordination survey analysis was performed, dichotomized by professional domain. Results A total of 20 participants completed surveys before and after the in situ simulations, covering the professional domains with matched pre-simulation and post-simulation data showing significant improvement in communication and team dynamics for residents (p = 0.029) and other ED staff in medical resuscitations. Using residents as the team leaders for the simulation improved perceived leadership during resuscitation (p = 0.006). Conclusions Our study suggests that in situ simulation within the ED leads to improved team dynamics and defined roles while emphasizing the resident as a resuscitation leader.

Simulation Improves Internal Medicine Resident Confidence With Defibrillation, Cardioversion, and Transcutaneous Pacemaker Use.

Introduction While many graduate medical education programs require residents to be certified in advanced cardiac life support, this does not cover all aspects of cardiac stabilization in patients with a pulse. Residents are often on the front lines of providing care to patients with life-threatening dysrhythmias. Our residents expressed a lack of confidence in their ability to provide this care. Methods A convenience sample of internal medicine, preliminary medicine, and transitional year residents from our large community-based tertiary care hospital participated in our survey and training. We utilized a pre-post survey method of our residents' confidence in domains that are critical to caring for patients requiring cardiac resuscitation and stabilization. Our pre-post survey was a modified Likert scale. Our training consisted of a 1-hour faculty-led hands-on training session focused on these critical domains in our hospital's simulation suites. Follow-up survey data were collected immediately after the training and at six and 11 months after the training using mean confidence across all five domains as the study variable. Results Resident mean confidence in the five domains (placing leads and pads, manipulating defibrillator controls, performing defibrillation, performing synchronized cardioversion, and performing transcutaneous pacemaker use) increased immediately after our training compared to before the training (p<0.001). This increase in confidence from before the training was sustained at six and 11 months after the training (p=0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Confidence was lower at six and 11 months than immediately after training (p=0.01 and p=0.004, respectively). Conclusion Our project showed that simulation-based training was effective in improving our trainee's confidence in providing care to patients with life-threatening dysrhythmias. As with previous studies in simulation, confidence degradation was seen over time and likely mirrors skill degradation in these low-frequency encounters. As such, future aims include identification of ideal time intervals between training.

Disaster Day: A Simulation-Based Disaster Medicine Curriculum for Novice Learners.

BACKGROUND: Mass casualty and multi-victim incidents have increased in recent years due to a number of factors including natural disasters and terrorism. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) recommends that medical students be trained in disaster preparedness and response. However, a majority of United States medical students are not provided such education. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a 1 day, immersive, simulation-based Disaster Day curriculum. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Learners were first and second year medical students from a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our education provided learners with information on disaster management, allowed for application of this knowledge with hands-on skill stations, and culminated in near full-scale simulation where learners could evaluate the knowledge and skills they had acquired. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: To study the effectiveness of our Disaster Day curriculum, we conducted a single-group pretest-posttest and paired analysis of self-reported confidence data. RESULTS: A total of 40 first and second year medical students participated in Disaster Day as learners. Learners strongly agreed that this course provided new information or provided clarity on previous training, and they intended to use what they learned, 97.6% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students' self-reported confidence of key disaster management concepts including victim triage, tourniquet application, and incident command improved after a simulation-based disaster curriculum. This Disaster Day curriculum provides students the ability to apply concepts learned in the classroom and better understand the real-life difficulties experienced in a resource limited environment.

Coaching From the Sidelines: Examining the Impact of Teledebriefing in Simulation-Based Training.

INTRODUCTION: Although simulation facilities are available at most teaching institutions, the number of qualified instructors and/or content experts that facilitate postsimulation debriefing is inadequate at many institutions. There remains a paucity of evidence-based data regarding several aspects of debriefing, including debriefing with a facilitator present versus teledebriefing, in which participants undergo debriefing with a facilitator providing instruction and direction from an off-site location while they observe the simulation in real-time. We conducted this study to identify the effectiveness and feasibility of teledebriefing as an alternative form of instruction. METHODS: This study was conducted with emergency medicine residents randomized into either a teledebriefing or on-site debriefing group during 11 simulation training sessions implemented for a 9-month period. The primary outcome of interest was resident perception of debriefing effectiveness, as measured by the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare-Student Version (See Appendix, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SIH/A282) completed at the end of every simulation session. RESULTS: A total of 44 debriefings occurred during the study period with a total number of 246 Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare-Student Version completed. The data revealed a statistically significant difference between the effectiveness of on-site debriefing [6.64 (0.45)] and teledebriefing [6.08 (0.57), P < 0.001]. Residents regularly evaluated both traditional debriefing and teledebriefing as "consistently effective/very good." CONCLUSIONS: Teledebriefing was found to be rated lower than in-person debriefing but was still consistently effective. Further research is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of teledebriefing in comparison with other alternatives. Teledebriefing potentially provides an alternative form of instruction within simulation environments for programs lacking access to expert faculty.

A Pilot Curriculum to Integrate Standardized Patient Simulation into Clinical Pastoral Education.

INTRODUCTION: We describe a novel means of experiential learning for clinical pastoral care residents using standardized patient (SP) simulations. METHODS: A prospective cohort study involving 7 clinical pastoral care residents was performed. All residents underwent 2 verbatim SP sessions and 2 simulation sessions. After all sessions, residents completed a self-evaluation. Faculty completed an evaluation and then provided a debriefing session to all residents. RESULTS: Performance ratings were globally higher on simulated scenarios when compared to the verbatim sessions. CONCLUSIONS: More research in the field of pastoral care is needed to validate the learned professional skills that enhance a comprehensive training program through the use of medical simulation, verbatim reports, and clinical pastoral education (CPE) competencies. Medical simulation provides a promising teaching methodology for the training of CPE residents.