Atherosclerosis as a potential pitfall in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the increase in the intima-media thickness (IMT) in arteriosclerotic disease correlates with the increase in the IMT in temporal arteries (TAs) and if that could mimic the US GCA halo sign. METHODS: Consecutive patients ⩾50 years old with high vascular risk and without signs or symptoms of GCA were included. The carotid US IMT measurements were obtained using a standardized software radiofrequency-tracking technology. Colour Doppler US and grey-scale measurements of the IMT in the branches of both TAs were performed by a second sonographer using a 22 MHz probe. RESULTS: Forty patients were studied (28 men) with a mean age of 70.6 years. The carotid IMT exhibited significant correlation with the TA IMT. A carotid IMT >0.9 mm was associated with a temporal IMT >0.3 mm. Only one patient had an IMT >0.34 mm in two branches. CONCLUSIONS: Atherosclerotic disease with a carotid IMT >0.9 mm increases the TA IMT and might mimic the halo sign. As atherosclerosis is common in this age group, we propose a cut-off of TA IMT >0.34 mm in at least two branches to minimize false positives in a GCA diagnosis.

High prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension in people with treated hypertension.

AIM: There are limited data on the quality of treated blood pressure (BP) control during normal daily life, and in particular, the prevalence of 'masked uncontrolled hypertension' (MUCH) in people with treated and seemingly well-controlled BP is unknown. This is important because masked hypertension in 'treatment naïve' patients is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular events. We therefore conducted the first study to define the prevalence and characteristics of MUCH among a large sample of hypertensive patients in routine clinical practice in whom BP was treated and controlled to recommended clinic BP goals. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data from the Spanish Society of Hypertension ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) Registry and identified patients with treated and controlled BP according to current international guidelines (clinic BP <140/90 mmHg). Masked uncontrolled hypertension was diagnosed in these patients if despite controlled clinic BP, the mean 24-h ABPM average remained elevated (24-h systolic BP ≥130 mmHg and/or 24-h diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg). From 62 788 patients with treated BP in the Spanish registry, we identified 14 840 with treated and controlled clinic BP, of whom 4608 patients (31.1%) had MUCH according to 24-h ABPM criteria (mean age 59.4 years, 59.7% men). The prevalence of MUCH was significantly higher in males, patients with borderline clinic BP (130-9/80-9 mmHg), and patients at high cardiovascular risk (smokers, diabetes, obesity). Masked uncontrolled hypertension was most often because of poor control of nocturnal BP, with the proportion of patients in whom MUCH was solely attributable to an elevated nocturnal BP almost double that solely attributable to daytime BP elevation (24.3 vs. 12.9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of masked suboptimal BP control in patients with treated and well-controlled clinic BP is high. Clinic BP monitoring alone is thus inadequate to optimize BP control because many patients have an elevated nocturnal BP. These findings suggest that ABPM should become more routine to confirm BP control, especially in higher risk groups and/or those with borderline control of clinic BP.

Numerical values and impact of hypertension in Spain.

In Spain, 33% of adults aged 30 to 79 years (10 million) were hypertensive in 2019. Among them, 68% were diagnosed, 57% received drug therapy, and effective therapeutic coverage (control) reached 33%. Both diagnosis and control show geographical and social disparities. Approximately 46 000 cardiovascular deaths per year are attributable to hypertension. In recent decades, the control of hypertension has increased, due to improvements in lifestyle measures and increased use of polytherapy, coinciding with a reduction in stroke mortality. There are several modifiable determinants of the lack of hypertension control: a) white-coat phenomenon affects 22% to 33% of treated individuals, partly due to the limited availability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) (49%) and self-measured BP (SMBP) (78%); b) inadequate patient adherence to medication and healthy lifestyles (weight loss, the most effective measure, is the least used, ≈40%); and c) insufficient use of polytherapy (≈55%). The remaining challenges include: a) technological aspects, such as measuring BP with more accurate techniques (ABPM, SMBP) and using cardiovascular-risk estimation tools (eg, SCORE); b) clinical challenges, such as reducing therapeutic inertia (≈59%), involving patients in their own management (medication adherence, ≈62%) and effectively implementing clinical guidelines); and c) public health challenges, such as reducing the burden of obesity (≈24%), monitoring progress with updated surveys, and setting national BP control targets.

Knowledge of stroke warning symptoms and intended action in response to stroke in Spain: a nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide thrombolysis rates remain suboptimal. Ambulance transfer is associated with greater use of this time-dependent treatment. Information on public awareness of stroke symptoms is important for planning effective education programs to promote calling of emergency services for suspected stroke. However, there is a paucity of data on this subject in European countries. Our objectives were to explore the recognition of stroke symptoms, awareness of the need to activate the emergency medical services for acute stroke events, and the association between knowledge of warning symptoms and intent to call for an ambulance among a sample representative of the adult population of Spain. This is the largest study on this subject to date in Europe. METHODS: The data were taken from the Study on Nutrition and Cardiovascular Risk in Spain, a cross-sectional study conducted in a sample representative of the Spanish noninstitutionalized population aged ≥18 years in 2008-2010. Study participants were selected by multistage clustered random sampling. The households within each section were selected by random telephone dialing using the landline telephone directory as the sampling frame. Subjects in the households were selected proportionally to the distribution of the population of Spain by sex and age. The study included a computer-assisted telephone interview on stroke symptom knowledge and the first action to perform in a stroke event, based on the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association recommendations, and two home visits to perform a physical examination and to obtain blood samples. RESULTS: Among 11,827 adults, 7,711 (65.2%; 95% CI = 64.1-66.3) identified 4-6 stroke warning symptoms, considered as adequate knowledge. A total of 1,348 (11.4%) were unable to classify any of the symptoms correctly. In the multivariate analysis, higher education was significantly associated with better knowledge of symptoms, and age ≥65 years, fair/poor self-rated health, history of obesity and known diabetes were significantly associated with less knowledge of stroke symptoms. One in 5 individuals indicated they would do something other than calling for an ambulance if they thought someone was having a stroke. The number of specific stroke warning symptoms known was directly associated with the intent to call an ambulance in a stroke event (OR adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables = 1.06 per symptom, 95% CI = 1.03-1.09; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, stroke symptom knowledge was suboptimal and only modestly associated with the intent to call for an ambulance. Educational interventions are needed to link stroke recognition more strongly to an immediate need to call for an ambulance in order to increase stroke patients' access to thrombolysis.

Safety and Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Self-Biting Behavior in Lesch-Nyhan Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lesch-Nyhan disease (LND) is a disease of purine metabolism linked to chromosome X due to the absence or near-absence of enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase. Patients with LND have a compulsive autoaggressive behavior that consists of self-mutilation by biting. METHODS: The objective of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin (BoNT) injected into the masticatory muscles and biceps brachii to reduce self-mutilation in patients with LND. We retrospectively analyzed six patients with LND who were treated with BoNT to prevent automutilatory behavior. RESULTS: The patient ages when started on treatment with BoNT were 4, 4.5, 6.6, 7.9, 13.9, and 32.3 years. Patients received a mean number of injections of 20, ranging from 3 to 29, over a period that ranged from 1.5 to 7.1 years. The maximum total dose of Botox was 21.3 units/kg mean and the maximum total dose of Dysport was 37.5 units/kg mean. A total of 119 injections were performed. Of these 113 (95%) were partially or completely effective. Only three of 119 injections (2.5%) produced adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin is useful and safe for the treatment of self-biting behavior in patients with LND.

[Variant phenotype of Lesch-Nyhan syndrome]. / Fenotipo variante del síndrome de Lesch-Nyhan.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (LNS) and LNS variants are due to mutations in the HPRT1 gene causing HPRT enzymatic activity deficiency. We report a patient presenting a variant phenotype and a major genetic defect. The mutation has been previously reported as always associated with complete Lesch-Nyhan phenotype. PATIENT AND METHODS: We analyzed the presence of complete HPRT mRNA in this patient, in two patients with the complete Lesch Nyhan syndrome phenotype, and in control subjects. RESULTS: We found a minor amount of normal HPRT mRNA in the present patient but also in the two patients with splice mutation and the complete Lesch Nyhan syndrome phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this patient is the first report of a major genetic defect, with no detectable enzymatic activity, and a partial HPRT deficiency phenotype. Our results question the hypothesis of a normally spliced HPRT cDNA as the sole cause of the patient partial phenotype.

[Report of the editors, 2010]. / Informe de los Editores, 2010.

The Editors of the Rev Clin Esp inform herein on their editorial activity in the last year (November 2009 to October 2010) according to three different sections: (a) Objectives and achievements during 2010, (b) editorial activity, and (c) objectives for 2011. During 2010, we have updated the editorial algorithm (manuscript time lag). We have developed the "E-case reports" section and we have linked the abstracts of the Annual Congress of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) to a journal supplement (electronically available). Since 2010, the subscribers have been able to receive all of the contents of the Rev Clin Esp on-line and to perform self-evaluations in order to obtain 1.7 credits per each journal issue (continuing education). In 2010 we handled 402 manuscripts (7.2% more than in 2009), 35% of which were accepted for publication. We asked 186 reviewers for their expert opinion, 75% of whom sent their reports in less than two weeks. The mean time needed to reach an editorial decision concerning original manuscripts ("accepted / rejected") was 44.5 days and for papers not sent to external reviewers 19.5 days. Collaboration with the work groups produced good results (2.4 published manuscripts per issue), but this could be improved if all the groups collaborated in all the journal sections. Our objectives for 2011 are to complete the renewal of the Rev Clin Esp scientific committee, in accordance with the SEMI Council, and to continue to proceed with the actions initiated to increase the journal impact factor. Rev Clim Esp is an open forum for all internal medicine specialists. Responsibility falls on all of us to collaborate in order to make our journal a little better day by day.

[Hypertension, HIV infection, and highly active antiretroviral therapy]. / Hipertensión arterial, infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana y tratamiento antirretrovírico de gran actividad.

The decline in mortality resulting from the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been accompanied by an increase in metabolic complications that produce accelerated atherosclerosis. Hypertension is one of the most important cardiovascular risk factors. Little is known about the impact of HAART on blood pressure, and it is uncertain whether chronic HIV infection or HAART have a role in the development of hypertension. In this study, the research on the relationships between hypertension and HIV infection published to date is reviewed. Antiretroviral therapy appears to have a modest impact on blood pressure and to be partially mediated by the metabolic changes occurring with this treatment.

Frequency and Prognosis of Treated Hypertensive Patients According to Prior and New Blood Pressure Goals.

United States and European guidelines have recommended new treatment goals for office blood pressure (BP). We examined 9784 hypertensives of the Spanish Ambulatory BP Monitoring (ABPM) registry with office BP treated to the prior goal (<140/90 mm Hg); and evaluated the frequency and all-cause mortality of 4 BP strata depending on whether or not they attained more conservative or new office BP goal (130-139/80-89 and <130/80 mm Hg, respectively) and whether or not BP was controlled according to ABPM criteria in the European and US guidelines (24-hour ambulatory BP <130/80 and <125/75 mm Hg, respectively). Whether achieving or not the new office BP goal, the total-mortality risk during a 5-year follow-up was only significantly higher than the reference (normal office BP and ABPM) when 24-hour ambulatory BP was above goal (hazard ratio from multivariable Cox models was in the range of 2.4-2.9; P<0.001). The frequency of patients achieving the new office BP goal was 34.4%, and the frequencies of those not achieving the ABPM goal were 31.6% and 53.7% using the 130/80 or the 125/75 ABPM goal, respectively. Mean office systolic BP was 129 mm Hg for patients not achieving the ABPM goal. In hypertensive patients controlled under prior office BP goal, the frequency of those achieving new office BP goal <130/80 was high, suggesting this goal can be attained. In addition, patients had a higher mortality risk only when ABPM was above goal despite having mean office systolic BP under control, a condition that was also common.

Home blood pressure vs. clinic blood pressure measurement-based follow up in type ii diabetics: Effect on 24-h ambulatory BP and albuminuria. Randomised trial. / Automedición en el domicilio frente a lectura de la presión arterial en la consulta en el seguimiento de diabéticos tipo ii: efecto sobre la presión arterial ambulatoria y la albuminuria. Estudio aleatorizado.

BAKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two strategies of blood pressure (BP) measurement-based follow-up in hypertension and albuminuria control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicentre, prospective, randomised, open trial with a parallel-group design. Nineteen primary care centres and a hospital clinic participated. Adult type 2 diabetics with systolic BP ≥140mmHg without relevant renal disease were randomised to one of two follow-up strategies: 1) standard follow up, with a clinic BP target <140/90mmHg and 2) self-monitoring home BP (SMHBP)-based follow up, with a BP target <135/85mmHg. Biochemical standard blood variables, albuminuria, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring were performed at entry, 12 and 24 months. The main outcome measurement was 24-h ambulatory systolic BP variation. Albuminuria change was analysed as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: 116 patients were analysed (mean age: 66.8 years). Mean systolic ambulatory 24- h BP change in two years was 3.9mmHg (95% CI 1.8-6.1). We did not find significant differences between both groups (p=0.706). Similarly, no differences were found when we compared other ambulatory BP values. Initial albuminuria was similar in both groups and did not significantly changed throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetics without relevant nephropathy a SMHBP- based follow up was equivalent to a standard clinic-based BP follow up in BP and albuminuria control.

Rationale, design, and methods for the risk evaluation and communication health outcomes and utilization trial (REACH OUT).

OBJECTIVE: To test the primary study hypothesis that a physician-delivered coronary heart disease risk evaluation and communication program can lower patients' predicted 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease by 10% within 6 months compared to usual care. DESIGN: Prospective, parallel group, open-label, controlled, cluster-randomized multinational trial; the study site is the unit of randomization. SETTING: Patients were recruited from 106 general practices located in nine European countries. PATIENTS: Men and women aged 45 to 64 (N=1500) with a documented history of hypertension (treated or untreated), systolic blood pressure > or =140 mmHg (or > or =130 mmHg in the presence of renal or kidney disease), no history of cardiovascular disease, and a predicted 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease > or =10%. INTERVENTION: Sites were randomized to deliver a physician-directed coronary heart disease risk communication and education program or usual care. The intervention program included informing patients of their 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease, educating patients about modifiable risk factors and their control, and three follow-up phone calls by a physician or study nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Predicted 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death due to coronary heart disease at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: REACH OUT will evaluate a novel, patient-focused, physician-implemented application of coronary heart disease risk equations. Results of the study will be of practical relevance to physicians, health care organizations, and those who issue clinical guidelines for the reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: efficacy of first-line combination perindopril/indapamide therapy.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is more sensitive than office BP and is highly correlated with the left ventricular mass (LVM) of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS: In this prospectively designed ancillary study of the PICXEL trial, the effects of first-line combination perindopril/indapamide on ambulatory BP were compared with those of monotherapy with enalapril in 127 patients. Hypertensive patients with LVH received once daily either perindopril 2 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg (n = 65) or enalapril 10 mg (n = 62) for 52 weeks. Dose adjustments were allowed for uncontrolled BP. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP and echocardiographic parameters were measured at baseline, week 24, and week 52. RESULTS: At study end, both treatments significantly improved ambulatory BP compared with baseline (p < or = 0.01). Perindopril/indapamide treatment reduced 24-hour and daytime systolic BP (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) significantly more than enalapril treatment (p < 0.01). No significant between-group differences were noted for diastolic BP (DBP) or for night-time measurements. Trough/peak ratios were higher with perindopril/indapamide than with enalapril (88.5 vs 65.8 for SBP and 86.7 vs 63.9 for DBP, respectively). The global smoothness index was higher with perindopril/indapamide than with enalapril (6.6 vs 5.2 for SBP and 5.6 vs 4.9 for DBP, respectively). With perindopril/indapamide treatment, LVM index was significantly reduced (-9.1 g/m2 from baseline; p vs baseline <0.001). More patients required dose increases with enalapril (87%) than with perindopril/indapamide (71%). No unusual safety elements were noted. CONCLUSIONS: First-line perindopril/indapamide combination decreased ambulatory SBP and PP, and LVM more effectively than enalapril.

Clinic Versus Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Difference in Hypertensive Patients: The Impact of Age and Clinic Blood Pressure.

Clinic blood pressure (BP) is usually higher than daytime ambulatory BP in hypertensive patients, but some recent studies have challenged this view, suggesting that this relationship is strongly influenced by age. We used the Spanish ambulatory BP monitoring cohort to examine differences between clinic and daytime BP by age among 104 639 adult hypertensive patients (office systolic/diastolic BP ≥140/90 mm Hg or treated) in usual primary-care practice, across the wide age spectrum. To assess the impact of age, cardiovascular variables, and clinic BP on the clinic-daytime BP differences, we built multivariable regression models of the average BP differences, white-coat hypertension (high clinic BP and normal daytime BP), and masked hypertension (normal clinic BP and high daytime BP). In most patients, mean clinic BP values were higher than daytime BP at all ages. Some 36.7% of patients had white-coat hypertension (amounting to 50% at clinic systolic BP of 140-159 mm Hg) and 3.9% had masked hypertension (amounting to 18% at clinic systolic BP of 130-139 mm Hg). Age explained 0.1% to 1.7% of the variance of quantitative or categorical BP differences (P<0.001). Cardiovascular variables explained an additional 1.6% to 3.4% of the variance (P<0.001). Finally, clinic BP generally explained ≥20% more of the variance (P<0.01). In this large study in usual clinical practice, clinic BP misclassified hypertension status in >40% of patients. This misclassification was not importantly influenced by age but was more evident in patients with borderline/grade 1 hypertension. These findings reinforce the importance of ambulatory BP monitoring for defining BP status in routine clinical practice.

[Home blood pressure measurement]. / Medición de la presión arterial en el domicilio.

Measurement of blood pressure (BP) by the own patient at home has become a popular procedure. Both a great offer of simple electronic devices and publication of multiple studies supporting its usefulness for the diagnosis and control of hypertension have contributed to this fact. In fact, this technique has various advantages over the conventional clinical measurement such as a higher reproducibility, better representation of the usual BP profile of the patient, greater correlation with target organs damage and greater morbimortality predictive value. Besides, there is a potential benefit on the control of patients under antihypertensives and, maybe, a reduction in health expenses at long-term follow-up. Currently, the main hypertension societies recommend the home measurement of BP in some clinical situations. However, it cannot be considered an alternative to the clinical measurement but rather a complementary technique in the evaluation of the hypertensive patient. Here we review the indications and limitations of this procedure in clinical practice.

Perindopril/indapamide combination more effective than enalapril in reducing blood pressure and left ventricular mass: the PICXEL study.

OBJECTIVE: Few data are available comparing the effects of monotherapy and combination therapy on target organ damage. The PICXEL study compared the efficacy of a strategy based on first-line combination with perindopril/indapamide versus monotherapy with enalapril in reducing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: In this 1-year multicentre randomized double-blind study, patients received an increasing dosage of perindopril/indapamide (n = 284) or enalapril (n = 272). Changes in blood pressure and echocardiographic measures of LVH were assessed from baseline to the end of treatment. Reading of the echocardiograms was central and blinded for therapy, patient and sequence. RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly more in the perindopril/indapamide than in the enalapril group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.003). The left ventricular mass index decreased by 13.6 +/- 23.9 g/m(2) (mean +/- SD) with perindopril/indapamide (P < 0.0001) and 3.9 +/- 23.9 g/m(2) with enalapril (P < 0.005); these decreases were significantly different (P < 0.0001). The left ventricular internal diameter, posterior and interventricular septal wall thickness decreased significantly with perindopril/indapamide (P < or = 0.0001); the interventricular septal wall thickness decreased significantly with enalapril (P < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A strategy based on first-line combination with perindopril/indapamide achieved better blood pressure decrease with a significantly greater degree of LVH reduction than a strategy based on monotherapy with enalapril in hypertensive patients with LVH.

Influence of immune activation and inflammatory response on cardiovascular risk associated with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have an increased cardiovascular risk. Although initially this increased risk was attributed to metabolic alterations associated with antiretroviral treatment, in recent years, the attention has been focused on the HIV disease itself. Inflammation, immune system activation, and endothelial dysfunction facilitated by HIV infection have been identified as key factors in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. In this review, we describe the epidemiology and pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in patients with HIV infection and summarize the latest knowledge on the relationship between traditional and novel inflammatory, immune activation, and endothelial dysfunction biomarkers on the cardiovascular risk associated with HIV infection.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of irbesartan and enalapril in adults with mild to moderate essential hypertension, as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: the MAPAVEL Study (Monitorización Ambulatoria Presión Arterial APROVEL).

BACKGROUND: When blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy is assessed by measurements taken in a clinic setting, angiotensin II-receptor antagonists show similar efficacy to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and better tolerability. A search of MEDLINE to date, however, reveals no randomized, double-blind studies using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to compare the BP-lowering efficacy of irbesartan and enalapril in a large number of patients ( > 200) with essential hypertension. OBJECTIVE: This study compared 24-hour BP reduction and BP control, as assessed by ABPM, in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension treated with irbesartan or enalapril. The relative tolerability of the 2 treatments was also evaluated. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (office diastolic BP [DBP] 90-109 mm Hg or systolic BP [SBP] 140-179 mm Hg). After a 3-week, single-blind placebo washout phase, patients with a mean daytime DBP > or = 85 mm Hg, as measured by ABPM between 10 AM and 8 PM, were randomized to 12 weeks of active treatment with irbesartan or enalapril. Starting doses were 150 and 10 mg/d, respectively, with titration to 300 or 20 mg/d if clinic DBP was > or = 90 mm Hg at week 4 or 8. Based on clinic measurements, BP control was defined as a BP reading < 140/90 mm Hg after 12 weeks of treatment; patients achieving a reduction in DBP of > or = 10 mm Hg at 12 weeks were considered responders. The ABPM criterion for BP control, independent of clinic values, was achievement of a daytime BP < 130/85 mm Hg after 12 weeks of treatment; patients achieving a reduction in 24-hour DBP > or = 5 mm Hg at 12 weeks were considered responders, in dependent of clinic values. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were randomized to treatment, 115 to irbesartan and 123 to enalapril. The study population was approximately 52.0% female and 48.0% male, with a mean ( +/- SD) age of 52.7 +/- 10.6 years. The study was completed by 111 patients in the irbesartan group (dose titrated to 300 mg/d in 72.0% of patients) and 115 patients in the enalapril group (dose titrated to 20 mg/d in 76.5% of patients). BP reductions were similar in the 2 groups, both as measured in the clinic (DBP, 12.7 +/- 8.8 mm Hg irbesartan vs 12.4 +/- 7.4 mm Hg enalapril; SBP, 19.0 +/- 14.1 mm Hg vs 17.5 +/- 14.0 mm Hg) and by 24-hour ABPM (DBP, 9.4 +/- 8.5 mm Hg vs 8.8 +/- 8.5 mm Hg: SBP, 14.7 +/- 14.7 mm Hg vs 12.6 +/- 13.1 mm Hg). As assessed by ABPM, rates of BP control were 40.5% (45/111) for irbesartan and 33.9% (39/115) for enalapril, and the response rates were a respective 71.2% (79/111) and 71.3% (82/115). The overall incidence of adverse events (40.0% irbesartan, 51.2% enalapril) was not statistically different between groups, although the incidence of adverse events considered probably related to antihypertensive treatment was significantly higher with enalapril than with irbesartan (24.6% vs 9.2%, respectively; P = 0.026), essentially because of the higher incidence of cough (8.1% vs 0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: As assessed by ABPM, irbesartan 150 to 300 mg/d was as effective in lowering BP and achieving BP control as enalapril 10 to 20 mg/d. Based on the number of treatment-related adverse events, irbesartan was better tolerated than enalapril.

How different urinary albumin excretion rates can predict progression to nephropathy and the effect of treatment in hypertensive diabetics.

HYPOTHESIS: The efficacy of a treatment in a clinical trial depends in part on where the cut-off point is placed for the test result used to select patients for the trial, and this applies to irbesartan in the Irbesartan Microalbuminuria II (IRMA II) trial for preventing nephropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the IRMA II trial were stratified into different pre-treatment albumin excretion rate (AER) ranges to compare the proportion of patients starting in these different ranges (i) that progressed to develop nephropathy within 24 months and (ii) whose AER was over 40 microg/minute at three months. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with pre-treatment AER values between 20 and 40 microg/minute progressing to develop nephropathy was 1.25% in the placebo group and 0.78% in the irbesartan group, while for pre-treatment AER values between 41 and 200 microg/minute, 24.4% and 11.2% develop nephropathy respectively in the placebo and irbesartan groups. In patients with a pre-treatment AER of 20 to 30 microg/minute, 32.5% and 13.6% respectively in the placebo and irbesartan groups had a value exceeding 40 microg/minute at three months. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that irbesartan is effective in reducing the onset of nephropathy within two years when the pre-treatment AER is above 40 microg/minute, but if the AER is below this level it progresses unusually to nephropathy within two years. Irbesartan also slows progression of AER to over 40 microg/minute for patients with pre-treatment AER values at or above 20 microg/minute and these patients should be treated.