Validation of the standardized index of shape tool to analyze DCE-MRI data in the assessment of neo-adjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Standardized index of shape (SIS) tool validation to examine dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (pCRT) assessment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in order to guide the surgeon versus more or less conservative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 194 patients (January 2008-November 2020), with III-IV locally advanced rectal cancer and subjected to pCRT were included. Three expert radiologists performed DCE-MRI analysis using SIS tool. Degree of absolute agreement among measurements, degree of consistency among measurements, degree of reliability and level of variability were calculated. Patients with a pathological tumour regression grade (TRG) 1 or 2 were classified as major responders (complete responders have TRG 1). RESULTS: Good significant correlation was obtained between SIS measurements (range 0.97-0.99). The degree of absolute agreement ranges from 0.93 to 0.99, the degree of consistency from 0.81 to 0.9 and the reliability from 0.98 to 1.00 (p value < < 0.001). The variability coefficient ranges from 3.5% to 26%. SIS value obtained to discriminate responders by non-responders a sensitivity of 95.9%, a specificity of 84.7% and an accuracy of 91.8% while to detect complete responders, a sensitivity of 99.2%, a specificity of 63.9% and an accuracy of 86.1%. CONCLUSION: SIS tool is suitable to assess pCRT response both to identify major responders and complete responders in order to guide the surgeon versus more or less conservative treatment.

Abbreviated MRI Protocol for the Assessment of Ablated Area in HCC Patients.

BACKGROUND: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm (TRA) was created to provide a standardized assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following loco regional therapy. The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity of standard MRI protocol versus abbreviated protocol (only T1-Weigthed fat suppressed (FS) sequences pre- and post-contrast phase) in the detection of ablated area according to LI-RADS Treatment Response (LR-TR) categories. METHODS: From January 2015 to June 2020, we selected 64 patients with HCC, who underwent Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or Microwave ablation (MWA) treatment. According to inclusion criteria, 136 pathologically proven treated HCC (median 2, range 1-3 per patient; mean size 20.0 mm; range 15-30 mm) in 58 patients (26 women, 32 men; median age, 74 years; range, 62-83 years) comprised our study population. For each ablated area, abbreviated protocol, and standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies were independently and blindly assessed in random order within and between three expert radiologists. Each radiologist assessed the ablated area by using the following categories: "LR-TR Non-viable" = 1; "LR-TR Equivocal" = 2 and "LR-TR Viable" = 0. RESULTS: According to the concordance between MRI and Contrast enhancement ultrasound (CEUS) among 136 treated HCCs, 115 lesions were assessed as non-viable or totally ablate and 21 as viable or partially ablate. The accuracy for standard MRI protocol and abbreviated MRI protocol for predicting pathologic tumor viability of a consensus reading was 98.6% (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 98.3%; positive predictive value = 91.3% and negative predictive value = 100%). No differences were found in sensitivity or specificity between standard MRI LR-TR viable and abbreviated MRI LR-TR viable categories (p value > 0.05 at McNemar test). CONCLUSION: The abbreviated dynamic protocol showed similar diagnostic accuracy to conventional MRI study in the assessment of treated HCCs, with a reduction of the acquisition study time of 30% respect to conventional MRI.

Pleomorphicskin eruptions in a COVID-19 affected patient: Case report and review of the literature.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19), during its course, may involve several organs, including the skin with a petechial skin rash, urticaria and erythematous rash, or varicella-like eruption, representing an additional effect of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, as commonly observed in other viral diseases. Considering that symptomatic patients with COVID-19 generally undergo multidrug treatments, the occurrence of a possible adverse drug reaction presenting with cutaneous manifestations should be contemplated. Pleomorphic skin eruptions occurred in a 59-year-old Caucasian woman, affected by a stable form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, treated with a combination of hydroxychloroquine sulfate, darunavir, ritonavir, sarilumb, omeprazole, ceftriaxone, high-flow oxygen therapy devices, filgrastim (Zarzio®) as a single injection, and enoxaparin. The patient stopped all treatment but oxygen and enoxaparin were continued and the patient received a high-dose Desametasone with complete remission of dermatological impairment in 10 days. It is very important to differentially diagnose COVID-19 disease-related cutaneous manifestations, where is justified to continue the multidrug antiviral treatment, from those caused by an adverse drug reaction, where it would be necessary to identify the possible culprit drug and to start appropriate antiallergic treatment.

Risk of intracranial bleeding in patients with primary brain cancer receiving therapeutic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in glioma patients. Also, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is frequently observed in subjects with primary brain tumors. Thus, the management of anticoagulant therapy for VTE is challenging and controversial in these patients. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify the risk of ICH in glioma patients treated with anticoagulant therapy for VTE compared to glioma patients without VTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases between January 1980 and January 2019 without language restrictions. Summary statistics for ICH were obtained by calculating the odds ratio (OR) using a random effects model, and heterogeneity across studies was estimated by the I2 statistic. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of studies. RESULTS: A total of 368 studies were initially identified. Of these, 346 were excluded after title review. The remaining 22 studies were reviewed in detail. According to the PICO criteria, 15 studies were excluded. Finally, 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The OR for ICH in glioma patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation for VTE versus those who did not receive anticoagulation was 3.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-7.29; I2  = 31%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that anticoagulation for VTE increases the risk of ICH in subjects with malignant brain tumors. Future studies are warranted to fully understand the best medical treatment of VTE in glioma patients.

Differences in Clinical Presentation, Rate of Pulmonary Embolism, and Risk Factors Among Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis in Unusual Sites.

Unusual site deep vein thrombosis (USDVT) is an uncommon form of venous thromboembolism with heterogeneous signs and symptoms, unknown rate of pulmonary embolism (PE), and poorly defined risk factors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 consecutive cases of USDVTs, discharged from our University Hospital over a period of 2 years. Patients were classified based on the site of thrombosis and distinguished between patients with cerebral vein thrombosis, jugular vein thrombosis, thrombosis of the deep veins of the upper extremities, and abdominal vein thrombosis. We found statistically significant differences between groups in terms of age (P < .0001) and gender distribution (P < .05). We also found that the rate of symptomatic patients was significantly different between groups (P < .0001). Another interesting finding was the significant difference between groups in terms of rate of PE (P < .01). Finally, we found statistically significant differences between groups in terms of risk factors for thrombosis, in particular cancer (P < .01). Unprovoked cases were differently distributed among groups (P < .0001). This study highlights differences between patients with USDVT, which depend on the site of thrombosis, and provides data which might be useful in clinical practice.

Antithrombotic therapy and intracranial bleeding in subjects with sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations: preliminary results from a retrospective study.

Whether antithrombotic treatment is safe and/or affects the risk of intracranial bleeding in subjects with sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is unknown. We conducted a retrospective analysis on the use of antithrombotics among patients affected by brain AVMs in follow-up at our institution. Attention was paid to the type of antithrombotic drug (either antiplatelets or anticoagulants), current or past use, dosage, and duration of treatment. Several clinical and angioarchitectural features of brain AVMs were also taken into consideration. The association between the use of antithrombotics and haemorrhagic onset was analyzed. A total of 77 patients were included in this study. Among them, ten patients were taking antithrombotic drugs at the time of AVM diagnosis. The rate of haemorrhagic onset was not significantly different between subjects who were and were not taking antithrombotic drugs (40 vs 55.2%, p = ns). Among the many clinical and angioarchitectural features analyzed, the only parameter that showed a statistically significant association with haemorrhagic onset was the size of the nidus. Patients who took antithrombotic treatments after being diagnosed with a brain AVM did not show an increased rate of intracranial haemorrhage over time considering a mean follow-up 4 years. In our study, antithrombotic treatment was not associated with increased intracranial bleeding among subjects with brain AVMs. In the presence of a strong clinical indication, antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications should not be denied a priori to patients with brain AVMs. Studies on larger populations are necessary to confirm these data.