Acute myocardial infarction occurring in versus out of the hospital: patient characteristics and clinical outcome. Maximal Individual TheRapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: We describe the baseline characteristics and clinical course of patients who had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during their hospital stay. BACKGROUND: In comparison with patients who had an AMI outside of the hospital (prehospital AMI), the data on patients who had an AMI in the hospital are poorly described. METHODS: Patients with an in-hospital AMI were prospectively registered in the Southwest German Maximal Individual TheRapy in Acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) study and compared with patients with prehospital AMI. RESULTS: Of 5,888 patients with AMI, 403 patients (6.8%) had an in-hospital AMI. These patients were older, more often male and sicker as compared with the patients with a prehospital AMI. They also showed a higher prevalence of concomitant diseases, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and contraindications for thrombolysis. There was no significant difference regarding the use of reperfusion therapy, either thrombolysis (in-hospital AMI 44.2% vs. prehospital AMI 49.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 1.05) or primary angioplasty (9.9% vs. 8.2%; OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.73), or a combination of both, between the two groups. The interval from symptom onset to the start of treatment in patients receiving reperfusion therapy was 55 min for patients with an in-hospital AMI versus 180 min for patients with a prehospital AMI (p = 0.001). In-hospital death occurred in 110 (27.3%) of 403 patients with an in-hospital versus 762 (13.9%) of 5,485 patients with a prehospital AMI (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.94). This was confirmed by logistic regression analysis after adjusting for other confounding variables (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.24). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital AMI occurred in 6.8% of patients. Time to intervention was shorter; however, the use of reperfusion therapy for in-hospital AMI was not different from that for prehospital AMI. In particular, primary angioplasty seems to be underused in these patients. This, as well as the selection of patients, may result in the high hospital mortality rate of 27.3%.

Incidence, determinants, and clinical course of reinfarction in-hospital after index acute myocardial infarction (results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction [MITRA], and the myocardial infarction registry [MIR]).

There are few data about the incidence, determinants, and clinical course of in-hospital repeat acute myocardial infarction (RE-AMI) after an index AMI. From June 1994 to June 1998, 22,613 patients with AMI as an index event were registered by the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) and Myocardial Infarction Registries (MIR). Of these, 1,071 (4.7%) had a RE-AMI. For the index event, 9,143 patients (40.5%) were treated with thrombolysis, 1,707 (7.5%) with primary angioplasty, and 443 (2.0%) with a combination of both. Multivariate analysis showed that previous AMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.59; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.35 to 1.86), age >70 years (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.81), diagnostic first electrocardiogram (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.59), and female gender (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32) were independently associated with a higher incidence of RE-AMI. The incidence of RE-AMI was higher when patients received thrombolysis (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.61), and it was lower when they underwent primary angioplasty (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03) or received beta blockers (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97). Patients with RE-AMI had higher hospital mortality compared with those without RE-AMI (OR 4.35; 95% CI 3.83 to 4.95). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an independent association of RE-AMI with in-hospital death (OR 6.60; 95% CI 5.61 to 7.70), repeat revascularization (OR 2.91; 95% CI 2.42 to 3.50), low workload capacity on the bicycle ergometry test (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.71 to 2.76), and ejection fraction <40% (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.14) at discharge. Thus, RE-AMI occurs in 4.7% of patients after an AMI. Previous AMI, age >70 years, diagnostic first electrocardiogram, and female gender are independent determinants for RE-AMI. Thrombolysis is associated with a higher and beta blockers with a lower incidence of RE-AMI. Once a RE-AMI occurs, it is a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality and morbidity.

Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in patients not included in randomized studies. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction included in randomized trials comparing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (pPTCA) with thrombolysis represent a special subgroup of patients with a low event rate. Patients excluded from these trials represent a variety of different subgroups, with different patient characteristics and possibly different clinical event rates. Primary PTCA was performed in 491 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction in the prospective multicenter observational Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. They were divided into the following groups: group I, patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the randomized trials (284 of 491, 58%); group II, patients not included in these trials (207 of 491, 42%). Of group II the following subgroups were defined: group IIa, patients in cardiogenic shock (20 of 491, 4.1%); group IIb, patients with a left bundle branch block (12 of 491, 2,4%); group IIc, patients with contraindications for thrombolysis (42 of 491, 8.6%); group IId, patients with a nondiagnostic first electrocardiogram (95 of 491, 19.3%); group IIe, patients with a prehospital delay of > 12 hours (72 of 491, 14.7%); group IIf, patients with an unknown prehospital delay (30 of 491, 6.1%). A comparison of groups I and II showed similar baseline characteristics but a higher clinical event rate during hospitalization was seen in group II: combined end point of death, reinfarction, heart failure equal to or greater than NYHA class III, any stroke or postinfarction angina, 26.6% versus 18%; p = 0.022. Hospital deaths were nearly twice as high in these patients, without reaching statistical significance (10.6% vs 6%; p = 0.06). The subgroups of group II showed quite different rates of clinical events. In-hospital death rates were: IIa, 40% (8 of 20); IIb, 8% (1 of 12); IIc, 12% (5 of 42); IId, 5% (5 of 95); IIe, 6% (4 of 72); and IIf, 13% (4 of 30). The incidence of the combined end point was 60% (12 of 20) in IIa, 33% (4 of 12) in IIb, 29% (12 of 42) in IIc, 16% (15 of 95) in IId, 26% (19 of 72) in IIe, and 33% (10 of 30) in IIf. Thus, in clinical practice, about half of the patients treated with pPTCA would not have been included in randomized trials comparing pPTCA with thrombolysis. These patients represent a population at higher risk for in hospital clinical events. However, they do represent very different nonhomogenous subgroups with different clinical event rates.

Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: differences between referred patients and those treated in hospitals with on-site facilities?

BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can only be performed in a limited number of centers. Therefore, some patients will be referred for this procedure. DESIGN: We analyzed the data of the prospective observational MITRA trial, which took place at 54 hospitals in southwest Germany, to describe current practices and outcomes in referred patients compared to patients treated on-site. RESULTS: Out of 491 patients treated with primary angioplasty, 63 (12.8%) were referred. Out of 46 hospitals without facilities to perform primary angioplasty, 29 (63%) never referred patients. Referred patients were less often male (60.3% versus 75.9%; p = 0.013), suffered more often from anterior wall infarction (62.9% versus 45.8%; p = 0.014), and more often had absolute contraindications against thrombolysis (11.1% versus 2.8%; p = 0.006). In-hospital time to treatment was 80 minutes in patients treated on-site compared to 190 minutes in referred patients (p = 0.001). There was a non-significant difference of in-hospital mortality between the two groups (11.1% for referred versus 7.5% on-site; p = 0.319). Referred patients had a higher hospital morbidity as expressed by a higher proportion of post-infarction angina (28.6% versus 4.2%; p = 0.001), a more frequent need for urgent revascularization (43.8% versus 16.4%; p = 0.001) and a higher proportion of advanced heart failure (11.1% versus 4.4%; p = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: Referral of patients with AMI for primary angioplasty is used only in a minority of hospitals. The referred patients represent a selected, more ill subgroup, resulting in a higher hospital morbidity compared to patients treated on-site. Continuous efforts should be undertaken to decrease the time delay from admission at the initial hospital to the beginning of revascularization.

[Primary dilatation versus thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarct, not included in randomized studies. Results of the MITRA Study. Maximal Individual Optimized Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarct]. / Primär-Dilatation versus Thrombolyse bei Patienten mit akutem Myokardinfarkt, die nicht in randomisierte Studien eingeschlossen wurden. Ergebnisse aus der MITRA-Studie. Maximale Individuelle Therapie beim Akuten Myokardinfarkt (MITRA) -Studiengruppe.

There have been some prospective randomized studies which compared primary angioplasty with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, a substantial number of patients with AMI who would not have been included in those trials are treated with one of these two therapeutic options. To describe the proportions, characteristics, and outcome of these patients treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis we analyzed the data of the prospective "Maximal Individual Optimized Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction" (MITRA) trial. Out of 3308 patients treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis, 737 (22.3%) belonged to one of the following groups, not included in current randomized trials: Left bundle branch block, non-diagnostic first ECG, pre-hospital delay > 12 hours or unknown pre-hospital delay. Primary angioplasty was performed in 158/737 (21.4%) and thrombolysis received 579/737 (78.6%) of the patients. There were only minor differences regarding patients' characteristics and concomitant diseases between the two groups. Patients treated with primary angioplasty were 3 years younger (62 years median versus 65 years median (p < 0.036). They also more often showed overt heart failure at admission compared to patients treated with thrombolysis (primary angioplasty: 3.2% versus thrombolysis: 8.9%, OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.86). In-hospital time to intervention was 1 1/2 hours longer in patients treated with primary angioplasty (156 minutes median versus 47 minutes median, p = 0.001). beta-blockers were more often used with primary angioplasty compared to thrombolysis (70.31% versus 55.9%; OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.28-2.72), as well as ACE inhibitors (62% versus 49.9%; OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.14-2.35). Hospital mortality (8.2% versus 16.4%; OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.84), as well as a combined endpoint of death, reinfarction, postinfarction angina, advanced heart failure, and stroke (24.1% versus 42.3%, OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29-0.64) were lower in patients treated with primary angioplasty compared to those treated with thrombolysis. Logistic regression analysis showed primary angioplasty to be independently associated with a lower rate of the combined endpoint (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.91), after adjusting for confounding parameters. All subgroups showed a more favorable outcome in patients treated with primary angioplasty. In clinical practice, patients with AMI, not included in current randomized trials comparing primary angioplasty with thrombolysis, account for 22% of all patients with AMI treated with one of those two therapies. Primary angioplasty seems to be associated with a lower event rate compared to thrombolysis in these patients. This has to be confirmed by a prospective randomized trial.

Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction and the factors influencing its indications in hospitals with the facilities to perform this treatment. DESIGN: Data from the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MITRA) trial were analysed, concerning the effects of the decisions of individual hospitals, the time of admission of patients, and the effects of patient characteristics on the selection of reperfusion treatment. PATIENTS: Between June 1994 and January 1997 eight hospitals treated 1532 patients with acute myocardial infarction. 418 (27.3%) were treated conservatively, 641 (41.8%) were treated using intravenous thrombolysis, 387 (25.3%) were treated using primary angioplasty, and 86 (5.6%) received a combination of thrombolysis and angioplasty. RESULTS: The proportion of patients treated with primary angioplasty varied from 1.8% to 57.7% among the eight hospitals. The use of primary angioplasty during non-office hours also showed wide variation, ranging from 20% to 54% between centres. The use of thrombolysis was comparatively evenly distributed during the non-office hours, ranging from 50-69%. Four hospitals with a primary angioplasty use rate > 30% showed no difference in the proportion of patients with contraindications for thrombolysis, high risk patients, or a combination of both, when compared with four hospitals with a lower rate of primary angioplasty use (98/322 (30.4%) v 19/65 (29. 2%), respectively, p = 0.847). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitals with the facilities for performing primary angioplasty the most important factors influencing its use were the discretion of the individual hospital and the time of patient admission. Characteristics of patients did not influence the choice of reperfusion treatment

Differences in treatment and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with compared to without departments of cardiology; results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA 1+2) Registries and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR).

AIMS: The specialty of the admitting physician may influence treatment and outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pooled data of three German acute myocardial infarction registries: the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) 1+2 studies and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) were analysed. Patients admitted to hospitals with departments of cardiology were compared to hospitals without such departments. A total of 24 814 acute myocardial infarction patients were included, 9020 (36%) patients at 91 (29.8%) hospitals with departments of cardiology and 15 794 (64%) at 214 (70.2%) hospitals without cardiology departments. There were only minor differences in patient characteristics and prevalence of concomitant diseases between the two types of hospital. The first electrocardiogram was more often diagnostic at hospitals with cardiology departments (71.8% vs 66.5%, P<0.001). Reperfusion therapy and adjunctive medical therapy, such as aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors were used more often at cardiology departments (all P -values <0.001), even after adjustment for confounding parameters. Treatment improved at both types of hospital over time. Admission to a hospital with a department of cardiology was independently associated with a lower hospital mortality (14.2% vs 15.4%, adjusted OR=0.91; 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Additional logistic regression models showed that the higher use of reperfusion therapy and recommended concomitant medical therapy was responsible for most of the survival benefit at such hospitals. CONCLUSION: Treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients at hospitals with departments of cardiology was independently associated with a higher use of recommended therapy and a lower hospital mortality compared to hospitals without such departments.

Characterization and clinical course of patients not receiving aspirin for acute myocardial infarction: results from the MITRA and MIR studies.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of aspirin for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, not all patients receive aspirin for AMI. The aim of this study was to provide information on characteristics and clinical course of patients not treated with aspirin for AMI. METHODS: We analyzed the data of the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) and the Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) registry. MITRA and MIR were prospective multicenter registries of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Germany. RESULTS: Of 22,572 patients registered from 1994 to 1998, 1767 (7.8%) did not receive aspirin within the first 48 hours after admission. Multivariate analysis revealed two main factors associated with withholding aspirin for AMI: relative contraindications to aspirin (gastric ulcer [odds ratio (OR) 4.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-5.7], renal insufficiency [OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8]), and critical clinical state at admission (cardiogenic shock [OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.1] and prehospital resuscitation [OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2]). In addition, these patients were significantly less likely to receive reperfusion therapy and adjunctive medical therapy such as beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In-hospital mortality after adjustment for baseline characteristics was 27.2% in patients without aspirin compared with 11.1% in patients treated with aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of AMI patients (7.8%) did not receive aspirin. Relative contraindications to aspirin and a critical clinical state at admission were the main factors associated with withholding aspirin for AMI. Even after adjustment for patient characteristics, the mortality of patients without aspirin was almost three times higher.

[Long-term follow-up of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis. Results of the MITRA trial]. / Langzeitverlauf bei Patienten mit akutem Myokardinfarkt, die mittels Primär-Dilatation oder Thrombolyse behandelt wurden. Ergebnisse der MITRA-Studie.

Long-term follow-up after treatment with primary angioplasty compared to treatment with thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains still to be determined. We therefore analyzed the data of the "Maximal Individual Therapy" in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA-1) Registry. Follow-up data for a median of 17 months after discharge were available in 2090 out of 2195 (95%) AMI patients treated with thrombolysis, as well as 293 out of 312 patients (94%) treated with primary angioplasty. There were only small differences in patient characteristics between the two treatment groups. Compared to patients treated with thrombolysis, those treated with primary angioplasty had a higher prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (16.4% versus 12.2%, p = 0.04), longer prehospital delay: 10 minutes (130 minutes versus 120 minutes, p = 0.002), and a longer door-to-treatment time: 45 minutes (p < 0.001). Primary angioplasty patients were more likely to be treated with beta-blockers (primary angioplasty 79.8% versus thrombolysis 66.2%, p < 0.001) or statins (24.5% versus 16.5%, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the treatment groups for total mortality (p = 0.90) nor for the combined endpoint of death or re-infarction (p = 0.85). However, the combined endpoint of death, re-infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery was significantly lower in the primary angioplasty group (primary angioplasty 25.6% versus thrombolysis 32.3%, univariate odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02). This result was confirmed by multivariate analysis after adjusting for confounding parameters (multivariate odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42-0.91). The beneficial effect of primary angioplasty compared to thrombolysis achieved during the hospital stay after an AMI is maintained during a 17 month follow-up. AMI patients treated with thrombolysis were more likely to be treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery after discharge.

[Use of heparin in acute myocardial infarction in routine clinical practice in Germany. Results of the MITRA and MIR registries]. / Stellenwert des Heparins in der aktuellen Therapie des akuten Myokardinfarktes in Deutschland--Ergebnisse der MITRA- und MIR-Register.

OBJECTIVE: Among other adjunctive medication, heparin is widely used in the therapy of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) today. Large randomized trials, however, have shown inconclusive data on the benefit of adjunctive heparin therapy for patients with AMI. The aim of this study was to describe the use of heparin and complication rates in routine clinical practice today. METHODS: MITRA and MIR were multicenter registries of AMI patients in Germany. During the years 1994 to 1998, 22,697 patients were registered with MITRA and MIR. Of these patients 49.9% received reperfusion therapy. RESULTS: 21,004 patients (92%) received heparin during acute therapy of AMI. The following factors were associated with withholding heparin: Bleeding at admission (OR 4.7; CI 3.2-6.8), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.8; CI 1.4-2.3) and fibrinolytic therapy with streptokinase (OR 2.1; CI 1.8-2.3). Complication rates of patients with heparin were only slightly higher than among those without heparin: 1.7% strokes and 1.9% bleedings were reported among the patients with fibrinolysis and heparin compared to 1.3% strokes and 1.4% bleedings among patients without heparin (p = ns). Mortality rates were 14.1% for patients with and 27.3% for patients without heparin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients in MITRA and MIR 92% received heparin during AMI. Patients with active bleeding or in critical condition received heparin significantly less often. The selection of critically ill patients may have contributed to the high mortality of patients without heparin for AMI. Bleeding complication rates of patients with adjunctive heparin were only slightly higher than reported in randomized trials.

Daytime and nighttime differences in patterns of performance of primary angioplasty in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Concern exists regarding the results of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction when the procedure is performed during night hours. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between June 1994 and January 1997, 491 patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary angioplasty procedures were consecutive registered in the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) study. Three hundred seventy-eight patients (77%) were treated during the day and 113 (23%) at night. Baseline characteristics showed no major differences between the 2 groups. Prehospital delay time was 60 minutes shorter during the night (median value 180 minutes for day, 120 minutes for night, P =.005), and in-hospital time to treatment was 9 minutes longer (median value 85 minutes day, 94 minutes night, P =.037). Patients treated during the night more often received angiotensin-converting enzyme blockers (61.4% day, 76.1% night, P =.004) and the so-called optimal adjunctive therapy (54% day, 64.6% night, P =.045). There were no differences concerning clinical events between the 2 groups. Hospital mortality was 8.7% during the day and 5.3% during the night (univariate analysis P =.238; logistic regression P =.653). CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting, primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction can be performed safely during the night with a clinically insignificant prolongation of in-hospital time to reperfusion compared with practice during the day.

[Early treatment of acute myocardial infarct: implementation of therapy guidelines in routine clinical practice, MITRA pilot phase]. / Frühbehandlung des akuten Myokardinfarktes: Umsetzung von Therapierichtlinien in den klinischen Alltag, MITRA-Pilotphase.

The prognostic value of thrombolytics, aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors has been well documented in large clinical trials, but the application of these drugs in clinical practice is not known. MITRA is a multicenter study of 54 hospitals in a defined region in southwest Germany. The aim is to document actual clinical practice (pilot phase) and to establish an individually optimised prognostic therapy for acute myocardial infarction, considering only the absolute contraindications for each drug. In the pilot phase, 1303 consecutive patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, the prehospital time was 2.7 hours. 47% had an anterior infarction. In the subgroup of patients without absolute contraindications, only 53.4% were treated with thrombolytics, 87.6% with aspirin, 37.1% with beta-blocker, and 17.4% with ACE-inhibitor. Out of these, patients were classified as "optimally treated" if they received thrombolysis, aspirin as well as beta-blocker. Patients were also included if any of these medications was withheld in the presence of absolute contraindications. Treatment was defined suboptimal, if the patients did not receive any of these three medications despite the absence of absolute contraindications. Only 29% (n = 383) received an optimal post-infarction therapy and 71% (n = 775) a suboptimal treatment. The univariate analysis revealed 10 variables influencing optimal therapy. In this subgroup patients were younger, they more often had clear ECG-findings or left bundle branch block, an anterior infarction, acute cardiac failure, AV-block, bradycardia, recent trauma or surgery (less then 2 weeks) and a severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The prehospital time was more often available. Early mortality after 2 days was 5.0% versus 9.3% in the suboptimal treated patients (OR: 0.5, CI: 0.30-0.86) the total inhospital mortality was 10.9% in the optimal versus 17.7% in the suboptimal group (OR: 0.6, CI: 0.38-0.84). In a multivariate analysis the parameter "optimal treatment" was found to be an independent predictor of the early (OR = 0.4; CI: 0.20-0.69) and the inhospital mortality (OR = 0.4; CI: 0.25-0.64). The following in-hospital events occurred: stroke 2.8%, reinfarction 12.9%, cardiac failure 21.5%, cardiogenic shock 10.4% and in-hospital mortality 18.1% (2-days mortality 9.5%). Pharmacological therapy for acute myocardial infarction is inconsistent with the recommendations suggested in recent clinical trials and needs to be individually optimised. Optimal treatment is an independent predictor of early and inhospital mortality.

[Not Available]. / Stellenwert des Heparins in der aktuellen Therapie des akuten Myokardinfarktes in Deutschland - Ergebnisse der MITRA- und MIR-Register.

Objective Among other adjunctive medication, heparin is widely used in the therapy of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) today. Large randomized trials, however, have shown inconclusive data on the benefit of adjunctive heparin therapy for patients with AMI. The aim of this study was to describe the use of heparin and complication rates in routine clinical practice today. Methods MITRA and MIR were multicenter registries of AMI patients in Germany. During the years 1994 to 1998, 22697 patients were registered with MITRA and MIR. Of these patients 49.9% received reperfusion therapy. Results 21004 patients (92%) received heparin during acute therapy of AMI. The following factors were associated with withholding heparin: Bleeding at admission (OR 4.7; CI 3.2-6.8), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.8; CI 1.4-2.3) and fibrinolytic therapy with streptokinase (OR 2.1; CI 1.8-2.3). Complication rates of patients with heparin were only slightly higher than among those without heparin: 1.7% strokes and 1.9% bleedings were reported among the patients with fibrinolysis and heparin compared to 1.3% strokes and 1.4% bleedings among patients without heparin (p=ns). Mortality rates were 14.1% for patients with and 27.3% for patients without heparin (p<0.001). Conclusions Of the patients in MITRA and MIR 92% received heparin during AMI. Patients with active bleeding or in critical condition received heparin significantly less often. The selection of critically ill patients may have contributed to the high mortality of patients without heparin for AMI. Bleeding complication rates of patients with adjunctive heparin were only sightly higher than reported in randomized trials.

[Use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction in Germany: a comparison of daily clinical practice with international guidelines. MITRA Study]. / Indikationsstellung zur Herzkatheteruntersuchung nach akutem Myokardinfarkt in Deutschland: Klinische Praxis vs. Richtlinien. MITRA-Studie.

OBJECTIVES: Two third of patients with acute myocardial infarction are admitted to hospitals without cardiac catheterization facilities. Whether a postinfarction patient will undergo cardiac catheterization or not is more often decided by general physicians than by cardiologists. The purpose of this presentation is to investigate the determinants for decision making to use cardiac catheterization in patients after myocardial infarction. METHODS: MITRA is a prospective, multicenter registry, which enrolls all consecutive patients with acute Q wave infarction admitted to 54 hospitals in Southwestern Germany. During the pilot phase 949 consecutive survivors of acute myocardial infarction were included, and inhospital outcome as well as therapeutic strategies were registered. RESULTS: Only half of the patients underwent cardiac catheterization regardless of whether a catheterization facility was available or not. In 63% of the patients under 65 years of age coronary angiography was performed; however, every fourth patient with age above 70 years was transferred to an invasive therapeutic strategy. The percentage of male patients was twice a high in the invasive group, whereas patients with prior infarction, clinical signs of congestive heart failure, patients with moderately or severely impaired left ventricular function, and finally patients with a prehospital delay of more than 4 hours were more frequent in the conservative group. The following three parameters were calculated to be independent determinants of an invasive strategy: pathological stress ECG (OR: 2.8; CI: 1.80-4.60), patients < 70 years without stress ECG (OR: 2.18; CI: 1.5-3.18), and male gender (OR: 1.45: CI: 1.10-2.00). Independent factors of a conservative strategy were primary PTCA (OR: 0.2; CI: 0.09-0.46), prehospital delay > 4 hours (OR: 0.71; CI: 0.51-0.97), and the combination of age > 70 years and the absence of a stress ECG (OR: 0.78; CI: 0.55-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, patients with acute myocardial infarction are less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization compared to patients in other Western countries (e.g. , the United States). Despite recommended guidelines, invasive strategies are more frequent in low risk groups (younger patients, male gender) than in postinfarction patients at high risk (severely impaired left ventricular function, clinical signs of congestive heart failure, the elderly).

[30-day mortality after heart surgery: a pilot project of the Working Party of Directors of Hospital Cardiology Departments]. / 30-Tage-Sterblichkeit nach Herzoperation. Ein Modellprojekt der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 30-day mortality after operation is generally accepted as a central standard of quality, especially in regard to cardiac operations. The Working Party of Directors of Hospital Cardiology Departments (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte, ALKK) in Germany set up a pilot project to analyse whether by direct communication with patients by a database centre the expenditure incurred in collecting complete data can be decisively reduced and full documentation of outcome can in this way be obtained even for a large multi-centre patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1.6.1997 and 31.3.1998, data were consecutively collected by questionnaire on all patients registered for a cardiac operation at 85 of the 135 ALKK centres. The questionnaire included data about each patient and the indication for operation as well as the estimate of operative risk, assigned to one of five risk categories by the referring cardiologist either alone or in conjunction with the cardiac surgeon. RESULTS: Until 30.9.1998, the data were obtained on 11,349 patients who had given informed consent (response rate 99.99%), including survival figures. 824 (7.3%) patients had not undergone the planned cardiac surgery, 134 having died before the data of operation. The 30-day postoperative mortality, obtained in 99.99% of the 10,525 patients, was 3.92%. The operative mortality was lowest, at 3.73%, for aortocoronary bypass only (n = 7932), highest for aortocoronary bypass plus valvular operation (n = 785), at 8.04%. There was good agreement between the cardiologists' preoperative risk assessment and the observed mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day mortality after cardiac operation can be obtained almost completely and with reasonable expenditure even for a large patient cohort. The results confirm that hospital mortality data definitely understate the overall operative risk. The methodology used in this pilot project, namely the inclusion of information from the patients by questionnaire, can also be applied to clinical results in other areas.

Determinants of mortality after cardiac surgery: results of the registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALKK) on 10 525 patients.

BACKGROUND: Mortality from cardiac surgery is an essential indicator of quality and forms the basis of treatment strategy decisions in eligible patients. No contemporary complete data on unselected adult cardiac surgery patients are available in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: A registry was started in June 1997 of all patients referred to surgery from 85 cardiology centres in Germany. The registry was intended to include 10 000 patients and this number was reached in March 1998. Follow-up of the patients was by simple questionnaire, reporting the date of surgery, major complications, and symptomatic improvement. If the questionnaire was not returned, a reminder letter was sent and, if necessary, further telephone investigations were performed. This resulted in 99.9% complete data. Of 10 525 patients operated on, 3.91% had died by 30 days after surgery. The overall operative mortality was 4.57%, which included 69 patients who died after more than 30 days from complications related to surgery. By multivariate analysis, the following predictors of mortality were identified: previous surgery, emergency or complex operation; age >75 years, female gender, cardiac failure, angina CCS class IV, and three-vessel coronary disease. An integral part of the registry was a pre-operative prediction of surgical risk in five categories. This risk estimate revealed a surprisingly correct prediction of the mortality observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a representative unselected group of cardiac surgery patients, operative mortality was 4.57%. Several procedural and clinical parameters were significantly correlated with mortality, but the risk increment by each of these factors was small. Unstructured clinical judgement reliably predicted the operative risk.

PTCA registry of German community hospitals. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALKK) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is widely used, but no quality control has been systematically performed as yet. METHODS: A registry of all PTCA procedures has been established since October 1992 for the majority of the German community hospitals performing PTCA, representing about one third of all PTCA activity in Germany. Baseline demographic data, indication for PTCA, primary success and in-hospital clinical events were recorded. Each centre was visited at regular intervals to assure completeness and reliability of the data. RESULTS: Of 52453 procedures performed from October 1992 to December 1994 the catheter laboratory and discharge forms were 99.7% and 98.1% complete, respectively. In 85.9% a single lesion was dilated per procedure, but 48.7% of the patients had multivessel disease. The success rate was 66.5% in complete occlusions (residual stenosis < 70%) and 91.2% in non-occluded vessels (residual stenosis < 50%). Abrupt vessel closure occurred in 3.4%, of which 77.5% could be recanalized by repeat intervention. In procedures not done for acute myocardial infarction, the in-hospital mortality was 0.52%, the procedure-related mortality 0.37%. In 3.02% of all patients a severe complication occurred (procedure-related death, myocardial infarction or emergency bypass surgery). CONCLUSION: Complete recording of all PTCA procedures is feasible even on a nationwide basis. This is a pre-requisite for continuous quality control. The reporting of the procedures by itself very probably, has an impact on the quality which is, however, not measurable quantitatively.