New Operative Reporting Standards: Where We Stand Now and Opportunities for Innovation.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer's (CoC) new operative standards for breast cancer, melanoma, and colon cancer surgeries will require that surgeons provide synoptic documentation of essential oncologic elements within operative reports. Prior to designing and implementing an electronic tool to support synoptic reporting, we evaluated current documentation practices at our institution to understand baseline concordance with these standards. METHODS: Applicable procedures performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Two independent reviewers evaluated sequential operative notes, up to a total of 100 notes, for documentation of required elements. Complete concordance (CC) was defined as explicit documentation of all required CoC elements. Mean percentage CC and surgeon-specific CC were calculated for each procedure. Interrater reliability was assessed via Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS: For sentinel lymph node biopsy, mean CC was 66% (n = 100), with surgeon-specific CC ranging from 6 to 100%, and for axillary dissection, mean CC was 12% (n = 89) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 0 to 47%. The single surgeon performing melanoma wide local excision had a mean CC of 98% (n = 100). For colon resections, mean CC was 69% (n = 96) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 39 to 94%. Kappa scores were 0.77, 0.78, -0.15, and 0.78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified heterogeneity in current documentation practices. In our cohort, rates of baseline concordance varied across surgeons and procedures. Currently, documentation elements are interspersed within the operative report, posing challenges to chart abstraction with resulting imperfect interrater reliability. This presents an exciting opportunity to innovate and improve compliance by introducing an electronic synoptic documentation tool.

Racial Disparities in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in surgery are increasingly recognized. We evaluated the impact of race on presentation, preoperative evaluation, and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for PHPT at a single center (1997-2015). Patients were classified by self-identified race, as African-American or White. The primary outcome was disease severity at referral. The secondary outcome was completeness of preoperative evaluation. Operative success and surgical cure were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2392 patients were included. The majority of patients (87.6%) were White. African-American patients had higher rates of comorbid disease as well as higher preoperative calcium (10.9 vs.10.8 mg/dl, p < 0.001) and PTH levels (122 vs. 97 pg/ml, p < 0.001). White patients were more likely to have history of bone loss documented by DXA and nephrolithiasis. African-American patients had lower rates of complete preoperative evaluation including DXA scan. Operatively, African-American patients had larger glands by size (1.7 vs. 1.5 cm, p < 0.001) and mass (573 vs. 364 mg, p < 0.001). We observed similar operative success (98.9 vs. 98.0%, p = 0.355) and cure rates (98.3 vs. 97.0%, p = 0.756). CONCLUSIONS: At the time of surgical referral, African-American patients with PHPT have more biochemically severe disease and higher rates of incomplete evaluation. Operative success and cure rates are comparable.

Pilot study of humanized glypican-3-targeted zirconium-89 immuno-positron emission tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Purpose: Glypican-3 (GPC3)-targeted radioisotope immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) may lead to earlier and more accurate diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), thus facilitating curative treatment, decreasing early recurrence, and enhancing patient survival. We previously demonstrated reliable HCC detection using a zirconium-89-labeled murine anti-GPC3 antibody (89Zr-αGPC3M) for immunoPET. This study evaluated the efficacy of the humanized antibody successor (αGPC3H) to further clinical translation of a GPC3-based theranostic for HCC. Methods: In vitro αGPC3 binding to HepG2 cells was assessed by flow cytometry. In vivo 89Zr-αGPC3H and 89Zr-αGPC3M tumor uptake was evaluated by PET/CT and biodistribution studies in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model of HCC. Results: αGPC3H maintained binding to GPC3 in vitro and 89Zr-αGPC3H immunoPET identified liver tumors in vivo. PET/CT and biodistribution analyses demonstrated high 89Zr-αGPC3H tumor uptake and tumor-to-liver ratios, with no difference between groups. Conclusion: Humanized αGPC3 successfully targeted GPC3 in vitro and in vivo. 89Zr-αGPC3H immunoPET had comparable tumor detection to 89Zr-αGPC3M, with highly specific tumor uptake, making it a promising strategy to improve HCC detection.

Robotic hepatectomy: current evidence and future directions.

Minimally invasive hepatectomy continues to gain popularity and acceptance for treatment of benign and malignant liver disease. Robotic hepatectomy offers potential advantages over open and conventional laparoscopic approaches. Review of the literature on robotic hepatectomy was performed. Search terms included "robotic hepatectomy" and "minimally invasive hepatectomy." Search was further customized to include articles related to robotic surgical technology. Across many parameters in liver surgery, robotic liver resection appears to have comparable outcomes with respect to laparoscopic resection. The benefits over open resection are largely related to less morbidity and faster recovery times. There is evidence that the robotic approach may have a shorter learning curve and enable more difficult resections to be performed minimally invasively. The robotic platform may have the potential to achieve superior margin status or parenchymal sparing resection in oncologic resections, but numerous obstacles remain. The robotic platform has not been applied to liver surgery to the same extent as either laparoscopic or open surgery. Robotic surgical technology will need to continue developing to deliver on its potential advantages.

External beam radiotherapy for thyroid cancer: Patients, complications, and survival.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of utilization of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in thyroid cancer are incompletely described. We characterize therapeutic intent, complications, and survival in thyroid cancer treated with EBRT. METHODS: In this retrospective study of 105 thyroid cancer patients treated with EBRT at one institution (2008-2018), the primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included incomplete treatment, emergency department (ED) visits, weight change, and gastrostomy placement. RESULTS: Dominant histopathology was differentiated (44%), anaplastic (45%) and poorly-differentiated (11%) disease. EBRT was mainly utilized for locoregional control (differentiated 87%, poorly-differentiated 75%, anaplastic 92%). Palliative EBRT was more common in poorly-differentiated disease (42%). Weight loss was greater in aggressive/advanced disease (differentiated 10 lb, poorly-differentiated 27 lb, anaplastic 18 lb). Anaplastic cancer had higher rates of gastrostomy (34%) and lowest rates of treatment completion (83%). ED encounters were common (differentiated 44%, poorly-differentiated 50%, anaplastic 45%). Gastrostomy was associated with mortality on multivariable analysis in non-anaplastic malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT was most frequently administered for locoregional control in thyroid cancer. Despite complications, the majority of patients completed EBRT therapy.

Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: An uncommon malignancy requiring unique reconstructive approaches.

Surgery is considered for patients without metastatic disease and with resectable primary tumor. Pre-operatively, high quality imaging is reviewed to determine the likely extent of resection, specifically including the need for potential en-bloc resection of adjacent organs. In cases where up-front surgical approach would expose the patient to excessive morbidity (such as bilateral nephrectomy, multi-visceral resection, or prohibitively high risk of positive margins), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy is considered. Though data are sparse in LMS, a neoadjuvant regimen of doxorubicin and dacarbazine is typically considered for borderline resectable tumors at our institution; patients may be treated for up to 4 months with interval imaging every 2 months to evaluate for tumor response. Postoperatively, adjuvant systemic therapy or radiation may be considered for patients with positive surgical margins or high-grade tumors.

Teaching what matters: Integrating health equity education into the core surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparities in surgical outcomes exist. It is imperative to prepare future doctors to eliminate disparities. Our team of senior medical students developed a surgical clerkship module examining equity in prostate cancer. Student attitudes before and after a facilitated teaching session were assessed. METHODS: A surgical equity pilot module was integrated into the core surgical clerkship starting in July 2020. This module was composed of (1) asynchronous preparatory material and (2) a synchronous interactive case discussion regarding disparities in prostate cancer. Discussion sessions were facilitated by upper-level medical students. Participants answered optional anonymous Likert-style and open-ended survey questions before and after the session. Pre- and post-responses were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen students completed the module between July 2020 and January 2021. Pre- and post-survey response rates were 66% and 29%, respectively. At baseline, almost all students (95%) agreed knowledge of disparities would make them a better physician. However, the majority (95%) described their general knowledge of surgical disparities as "nonexistent," "poor," or "average." Most students did not have a framework for assessing causes of surgical disparities (86%) and were not aware of interventions for reducing disparities (90%). After intervention, the majority rated their knowledge of surgical disparities as "good" or "excellent" (71%; P < .001). Most students indicated they had a framework 79%; P < .001) and were aware of effective interventions (62%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a successful pilot of an equity-focused clerkship module. Student attitudes after a single session reflected significant improvement in knowledge of causes and interventions related to surgical disparities. Equity-focused teaching can be incorporated into the surgical clerkship.

Double adenoma as a cause of primary hyperparathyroidism: Asymmetric hyperplasia or a distinct pathologic entity?

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) caused by double adenoma may carry a higher risk of failure to cure. We compared outcomes in single adenoma (SA), double adenoma (DA) and four-gland hyperplasia (HP). METHODS: Patients undergoing initial parathyroidectomy for PHPT were categorized by diagnosis. The primary outcome was persistent/recurrent disease postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 3408 patients, 81.3% had SA, 9.5% had DA, and 9.3% had HP. Rates of persistence/recurrence were 2.9%, 5.3%, and 4.5% in SA, DA, and HP, respectively (p = 0.281). Patients with persistence/recurrence had higher preoperative calcium (11.0 vs 10.7 mg/dl, p = 0.028) and PTH (96 vs 77 pg/ml, p = 0.015), and lower rates of IOPTH normalization (77% vs 96%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, DA was associated with increased risk of persistent/recurrent disease (OR 3.0, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with DA are cured with removal of two glands, but approximately 5% experience disease persistence/recurrence. Low-normal final IOPTH was associated with lower risk of persistent/recurrent disease.

Osteoradionecrosis of the Occipitocervical Junction After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer: A Report of 8 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) refers to the degenerative changes seen in bone after local radiation, particularly in head and neck cancer. ORN can present as neck or facial pain and may be confused with tumor recurrence. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans are often inconclusive, requiring percutaneous biopsy to differentiate ORN from infection and recurrent disease. We reviewed the utility of preprocedural imaging in guiding the decision to biopsy in cases of ORN. CASE DESCRIPTION: Eight patients with a history of prior head and neck cancer, radiation therapy, and suspected ORN at the skull base, occipitocervical junction, and atlantoaxial spine were identified retrospectively from a single academic medical center. In 4 cases, MRI findings and PET imaging were negative for recurrence. One patient in this group underwent an aborted biopsy. Four patients had MRI concerning for infection or recurrent tumor with PET-positive lesions. Three patients in this group underwent biopsy that was negative for recurrent tumor. One patient developed an arteriovenous fistula after biopsy. The fourth patient was observed and did not demonstrate progression at 5 months. At last follow-up for all patients, there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or metastasis at the index site to indicate a misdiagnosis for recurrent tumor. CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlights that PET scanning may not be useful in predicting which patients will benefit from biopsy for ORN because no patients with PET-positive lesions had histopathologic evidence of tumor recurrence or metastasis on biopsy.