Flexible endosopic management of Zenker's diverticulum: characteristics and outcomes of 52 cases at a tertiary referral center.

Zenker's diverticulum causes substantial morbidity among affected elderly patients. In the United States, rigid endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy is the mainstay of management and the flexible endoscopic technique is reserved for those not deemed candidates for rigid endoscopy due to an inability to extend the neck and/or medical comorbidities. Short- and long-term outcomes following flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy in the United States are limited. We reviewed the patient characteristics and outcomes of 58 consecutive flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomies performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between March 2006 and November 2013. There were 58 procedures performed on 52 unique patients. The median age was 77 years, and 48% of patients were female. More than one third of patients had either failed previous rigid therapy or were deemed inoperable by the referring surgeon. Size of the diverticulum ranged from 1 cm to 5 cm with a mean of 2.8 cm. Most procedures (67%) were performed under general anesthesia. Initial procedural success was achieved in all patients. Of the patients, 77% reported complete symptom resolution at mean follow-up time of 26 months. Of the procedures, 71% were not associated with any adverse event, but esophageal microperforation occurred during 11 procedures (19%). Of these, nine resolved with conservative management, one required an endoscopic stent, and one developed a neck abscess that required drainage. Our data show in a group of elderly patients with preexisting comorbidities flexible endoscopy therapy for Zenker's diverticulum is feasible. Initial symptomatic improvement was universal, and long-term response appears durable. The most common adverse event was esophageal microperforation, and the majority (82%) of these resolved with conservative management. Direct comparison with outcomes of rigid endoscopic or open surgical techniques has not been performed, but these data suggest that a randomized trial is warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of a flexible endoscopic technique.

Correlation between the radiological observation of isolated tertiary waves on an esophagram and findings on high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Barium esophagrams are a frequently performed test, and radiological observations about potential abnormal esophageal motility, such as tertiary contractions, are commonly reported. We sought to assess the correlation between tertiary waves, and in particular isolated tertiary waves, on esophagrams and findings on non-synchronous high-resolution esophageal manometry. We retrospectively reviewed reports of esophagrams performed at a tertiary referral center and identified patients in whom tertiary waves were observed and a high-resolution esophageal manometry had been performed. We defined two groups; group 1 was defined as patients with isolated tertiary waves, whereas group 2 had tertiary waves and evidence of achalasia or an obstructing structural abnormality on the esophagram. We collected data on demographics, dysphagia score, associated findings on esophagram, and need for intervention. We reviewed the reports of 2100 esophagrams of which tertiary waves were noted as an isolated abnormality in 92, and in association with achalasia or a structural obstruction in 61. High-resolution manometry was performed in 17 patients in group 1, and five had evidence of a significant esophageal motility disorder and 4 required any intervention. Twenty-one patients in group 2 underwent manometry, and 18 had a significant esophageal motility disorder. An isolated finding of tertiary waves on an esophagram is rarely associated with a significant esophageal motility disorder that requires intervention. All patients with isolated tertiary waves who required intervention had a dysphagia to liquids. Tertiary contractions, in the absence of dysphagia to liquids, indicate no significant esophageal motility disorder.

Short- and long-term outcomes for patients with variceal haemorrhage in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine short- and long-term outcomes among a cohort of patients with variceal haemorrhage at a tertiary referral centre, and to determine the predictive value of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score for mortality in these patients. METHODS: Prospective database hospital audit that captured patients who presented with or were transferred with variceal haemorrhage between 2004 and 2008, and a retrospective review of long-term outcomes. Patients who presented to or were transferred to John Hunter Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital, with confirmed variceal bleeding were included. The main outcome measures were in-hospital, 6 weeks and end-of-audit mortality. We also recorded cause, location and degree of planning surrounding the deaths in this patient group. We analysed the MELD score for patients with complete survival data. RESULTS: We recorded 93 episodes of variceal haemorrhage from 78 unique patients during the initial study period. The in-hospital mortality, 6 weeks mortality and end-of-audit mortality were 2.6, 9.0 and 59, respectively, and median survival time was 3.2 years (95% confidence interval 0.0, 6.1). The most frequent cause of death was related to complications of end-stage liver disease at 74%, followed by variceal bleeding (19%) and unknown (6%). A Cox proportional hazard model showed that the risk of mortality is increased by 1.06 (1.01-1.11) for each unit increase in MELD score. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes for patients with variceal bleeding continue to improve, but long-term prognosis remains guarded and should prompt further emphasis on advanced care planning to optimise patient care.

Bleeding peptic ulcer: characteristics and outcomes in Newcastle, NSW.

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease risk factors have changed, as has the impact of treatment on morbidity and mortality. Recent data on clinical presentation and outcome are sparse in Australia. AIM: To determine the characteristics and outcome of patients presenting with a bleeding peptic ulcer to a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: We evaluated patients diagnosed with peptic ulcer bleeding between 2004 and 2008 at a tertiary referral hospital. Variables assessed included demographic data, comorbidities, medication use and Rockall score. Outcomes of interest were the time to endoscopy, peptic ulcer treatment, transfusion requirements, urgent surgery and survival. RESULTS: Peptic ulcers were confirmed in 265 patients (55% male), of which 145 were gastric and 119 duodenal. The mean age was 71 years. On admission 38% of patients had haemodynamic instability and 92% had one or more comorbidity. Consumption of ulcerogenic medications at the time of admission was frequent (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 22%, aspirin 41%, clopidogrel or warfarin 10%) and proton pump inhibitors infrequent (15%). A gastroenterologist managed all patients according to their usual practice. Only a minority of patients received over three units of packed red cells. Few patients were referred for surgery (3%) or died (3%), but both events were significantly higher for the duodenal ulcer group. CONCLUSION: The characteristics and outcomes in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding have changed. Peptic ulcer disease remains a public health problem with modifiable risk factors, such as Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAIDs, which should be targeted to reduce the burden of illness.

Outcomes of oesophageal self-dilation for patients with refractory benign oesophageal strictures.

BACKGROUND: Current management of refractory benign oesophageal strictures with endoscopic dilations and stenting leads to resolution of dysphagia in only 30% of patients. Oesophageal self-dilation may be an alternative. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oesophageal self-dilation at a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with refractory benign oesophageal strictures who participated in oesophageal self-dilation at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) between 2003 and 2017. Clinical data including stricture characteristics, Dakkak and Bennett Dysphagia Score, number and dates of endoscopies, and complications were collected. A two-tailed paired Student's t test was used to compare the measures of efficacy, with differences considered significant at a 5% probability level. RESULTS: We identified 52 patients with refractory strictures treated with self-dilation. The median number of endoscopic interventions was reduced from 9.5 (range 5-30) to 0 (range 0-3) within 12 months before and after self-dilation, respectively (P < 0.0001). A median intervention-free interval of 417 days (IQR 256-756 days) was observed. The mean dysphagia score at baseline was 2.5 (95% CI 2.2-2.8) and 0.33 (95% CI 0.11-0.53) after self-dilation. 23 of 27 (85%) patients who received enteral nutrition prior to self-dilation had their feeding tubes removed. CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal self-dilation is an effective way of maintaining oesophageal patency in refractory benign oesophageal strictures, with safety comparable to current standard of care. Prospective studies are needed to further validate the role of self-dilation in treatment of refractory benign oesophageal strictures.

Rumination syndrome: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Rumination syndrome is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by effortless and repetitive regurgitation of recently ingested food from the stomach to the oral cavity followed by either re-swallowing or spitting. Rumination is thought to occur due to a reversal of the esophagogastric pressure gradient. This is achieved by a coordinated abdominothoracic maneuver consisting of a thoracic suction, crural diaphragm relaxation and an increase in intragastric pressure. Careful history is important in the diagnosis of rumination syndrome; patients often report "vomiting" or "reflux" and the diagnosis can therefore be missed. Objective testing is available with high resolution manometry or gastroduodenal manometry. Increase in intra-gastric pressure followed by regurgitation is the most important characteristic to distinguish rumination from other disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux. The mainstay of the treatment of rumination syndrome is behavioral therapy via diaphragmatic breathing in addition to patient education and reassurance. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to critically appraise recent key developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy for rumination syndrome. A literature search using OVID (Wolters Kluwer Health, New York, NY, USA) to examine the MEDLINE database its inception until May 2016 was performed using the search terms "rumination syndrome," "biofeedback therapy," and "regurgitation." References lists and personal libraries of the authors were used to identify supplemental information. Articles published in English were reviewed in full text. English abstracts were reviewed for all other languages. Priority was given to evidence obtained from randomized controlled trials when possible.

The effect of pneumatic dilation in management of postfundoplication dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Fundoplication surgery is a commonly performed procedure for gastro-esophageal reflux disease or hiatal hernia repair. Up to 10% of patients develop persistent postoperative dysphagia after surgery. Data on the effectiveness of pneumatic dilation for treatment are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and identify clinical factors associated with successful response to pneumatic dilation among patients with persistent postfundoplication dysphagia (PPFD). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who had undergone pneumatic dilation for PPFD between 1999 and 2016. Patients with dysphagia or achalasia prior to fundoplication were excluded. Demographic information, surgical history, severity of dysphagia, and clinical outcomes were collected. Data pertaining to esophagram, manometry, endoscopy, and pneumatic dilation were also collected. RESULTS: We identified 38 patients (82% female, 95% Caucasian, and median age 59 years) with PPFD who completed pneumatic dilation. The median postfundoplication dysphagia score was 2. Eleven patients had abnormal peristalsis on manometry. Seventeen patients reported response (seven complete) with an average decrease of 1 in their dysphagia score. Fifteen patients underwent reoperation due to PPFD. Hiatal hernia repair was the only factor that predicts a higher response rate to pneumatic dilation. Only one patient in our study developed complication (pneumoperitoneum) from pneumatic dilation. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: We found that pneumatic dilation to be a safe treatment option for PPFD with moderate efficacy. Patients who developed PPFD after a hiatal hernia repair may gain the greatest benefit after pneumatic dilation. We were not able to identify additional clinical, radiological, endoscopic, or manometric parameters that were predictive of response.

Oesophageal lichen planus: the efficacy of topical steroid-based therapies.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal lichen planus is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder characterized by significant oesophageal stricturing. Oesophageal lichen planus is a rare, difficult to diagnose, and likely an under recognized disease. As a result, there is no standardized approach to therapy and treatment strategies vary. AIM: To examine the utility of topical steroid therapy (fluticasone or budesonide) in the management of oesophageal lichen planus. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with oesophageal lichen planus who underwent baseline and follow up endoscopy pre and post topical steroid therapy between 1995 and 2016 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN. Average time between upper GI endoscopy was 3.2 months (0.7-11.7). Swallowed steroid preparations included fluticasone 880 µg twice daily or budesonide 3 mg twice daily. Patients were reviewed for symptomatic response to therapy using the Dakkak-Bennett dysphagia score (0-4, no dysphagia to total aphagia). Pre- and post-endoscopic findings were assessed. Additional baseline demographic, endoscopic, and histologic data were also obtained. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients who met the inclusion criteria. A significant reduction in median dysphagia score from 1 (0-4) to 0 (0-3) after steroid therapy (P < 0.001) was noted. 62% of patients reported resolution of their dysphagia after receiving topical corticosteroids. 72.5% had an endoscopic response to steroid therapy. CONCLUSION: Topical swallowed budesonide or fluticasone appear to effective treatment for oesophageal lichen planus.

Diaphragmatic breathing for rumination syndrome: efficacy and mechanisms of action.

BACKGROUND: While high resolution esophageal manometry combined with impedancometry has demonstrated that gastric pressurizations lead to rumination, the contribution of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function to rumination is unclear. Behavioral therapy with diaphragmatic breathing (DB) can reduce rumination. We aimed to evaluate the pressures in the stomach, EGJ and UES during rumination and the effects of DB augmented with biofeedback therapy. METHODS: Sixteen patients with rumination were studied with manometry and impedancometry before and after a meal. The postprandial assessment comprised three periods: before, during, and after DB augmented with biofeedback therapy. KEY RESULTS: All patients had postprandial rumination, which was associated (p < 0.001) with increased gastric pressure and reversal of the postprandial gastroesophageal pressure gradient from -4 (-43 to 18) before to 20 (7-79) mmHg during rumination. The EGJ pressure was lower (p < 0.001) during gastric pressurizations that were associated with rumination vs those that were not. The UES also relaxed, almost completely, during rumination. Patients had a median (range) of 5 (2-10) rumination episodes before, 1 (0-2) (p < 0.001) during, and 3 (1-5) after (p < 0.001 vs during) diaphragmatic breathing. During manometry and impedancometry, DB was well-tolerated and learned within 5 min. Diaphragmatic breathing increased EGJ pressure (p < 0.001) and restored a negative gastroesophageal pressure gradient (-20 mmHg [-80 to 7]). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Diaphragmatic breathing aided with high resolution esophageal manometry is well-tolerated, effective and averts the gastroesophageal pressure disturbance that leads to rumination.

Evaluating the safety and the effects on colonic compliance of neostigmine during motility testing in patients with chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Neostigmine, an acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor, stimulates colonic motor activity and may induce vagally mediated cardiovascular effects. Our aim was to evaluate effects of i.v. neostigmine on colonic compliance and its safety in patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of a selected group of 144 outpatients with chronic constipation who were refractory to treatment. These patients had undergone intracolonic motility and compliance measurements with an infinitely compliant balloon linked to a barostat. Data abstracted included barostat balloon mean volumes with increases in pressure (4 mmHg steps from 0 to 44 mmHg) before and after i.v. neostigmine. Vital signs and oxygen saturation before and after neostigmine were recorded. KEY RESULTS: Of the 144 patients, 133 were female, mean age was 41.0 ± 15.4 years (SD), and duration of constipation was 12.9 ± 13.8 years. Among patients who had undergone colonic transit measurement by scintigraphy, the overall colonic transit at 24 h (geometric center, GC24 [n = 115]) was 1.5 ± 0.7 (normal >1.3), and at 48 h (GC48 [n = 75]) it was 2.3 ± 0.9 (normal >1.9). Neostigmine decreased colonic compliance at lower distension pressures (e.g., 12 and 20 mmHg [both p < 0.001]), but not at 40 mmHg. There were expected minor changes in vital signs in response to neostigmine in 144 patients; however, one patient developed unresponsiveness, significant bradycardia, hypotension, and muscular rigidity that responded to 400 mcg i.v. atropine. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Neostigmine significantly decreases colonic compliance in patients with refractory chronic constipation. Symptomatic bradycardia in response to neostigmine should be promptly reversed with atropine.

A case-control study of childhood trauma in the development of irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is not been fully elucidated, but childhood trauma may disturb the brain-gut axis and therefore be important. Thus, we conducted a family based case-control study of IBS cases and their relatives with the aims to (i) determine the frequency of childhood trauma among IBS cases and controls as well as their relatives, and (ii) assess childhood trauma among IBS cases with affected relatives (familial IBS). METHODS: Outpatients with IBS, matched controls, and their first-degree relatives completed a self-report version of Bremner' Early Trauma Inventory. Percent of cases and controls with a family history were compared and odds ratios were computed using chi-squared test; recurrence risks to relatives were computed using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. KEY RESULTS: Data were collected from 409 cases, 415 controls, 825 case relatives, and 921 control relatives. IBS cases had a median age of 50 and 83% were women. Of IBS cases, 74% had experienced any general trauma compared to 59% among controls, yielding an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% CI: 1.13-2.15, p < 0.008). There were no statistical differences between IBS relatives and control relatives with regards to lifetime trauma. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: IBS is associated with childhood trauma, and these traumas often occur prior to onset of IBS symptoms. This provides further insight into how traumatic childhood events are associated with development of adult IBS.