Heparin-binding protein as a biomarker of post-injury sepsis in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-binding protein (HBP) is a neutrophil-derived protein advocated as a biomarker in sepsis. We evaluated plasma HBP as a predictor of post-injury sepsis in trauma patients. METHODS: Ninety-seven trauma patients were studied during the first week of intensive care. Injury-related data were collected and clinical parameters registered daily. Plasma HBP was sampled on day 1, 3 and 5 after trauma and evaluated for associations with injury-related parameters and sepsis. The predictive properties of HBP were compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC). RESULTS: Median Injury Severity Score was 33, one-third of the trauma patients received massive transfusion and a quarter was in shock on arrival. Overall 30-day mortality was 8%. Plasma HBP was significantly higher in severely injured patients and associated with shock on arrival, massive transfusions and organ failure. Septic patients had higher levels of HBP only on day 5. When evaluated for prediction of onset of sepsis during the two following days after plasma sampling by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, areas under the curves were non-significant for all time points. Similar patterns were seen for CRP and WBC. CONCLUSION: In trauma patients, HBP levels are related to severity of injury and organ dysfunction. Heparin-binding protein was weakly associated with sepsis and only at the later stage of the observation period of 1 week. Moreover, HBP showed poor discriminatory properties as an early biomarker of post-injury sepsis. Trauma-induced inflammation during the post-injury phase may blunt the sepsis-predictive performance of HBP.

A prospective study on the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis among people with persistent increase of rheumatoid factor.

OBJECTIVES: To study the stability of rheumatoid factor (RF) increases and to compare the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in people with transient or persistent increase of one or more RF isotypes. METHODS: From an original cohort of nearly 14 000 participants in a population study, 135 previously RF positive persons were recruited in 1996 and evaluated according to the 1987 ACR criteria. The observation time ranged from 9-22 years (mean 16. 5). Blood samples were obtained from all participants at entry and again in 1996. RESULTS: About 40% of the participants who had only one raised RF isotype in the original sample had become RF negative in 1996 compared with only 15% of those with increase of two or three RF isotypes (p=0.002). The seven participants who developed RA during the study period all had persistently raised RF. Six of the 54 participants with more than one RF isotype raised in 1996 developed RA, corresponding to an annual incidence of 0.67%, which was 7.5 times higher than observed in the other participants (p=0. 045). CONCLUSION: Symptom free persons with persistently raised RF have greatly increased risk of developing RA. This suggests that dysregulation of RF production is a predisposing factor in RA.