Intramedullary Unicortical Button and All-Suture Anchors Provide Similar Maximum Strength for Onlay Distal Biceps Tendon Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical profile of onlay distal biceps repair with an intramedullary unicortical button versus all-suture anchors under cyclic loading and maximal load to failure. METHODS: Twenty paired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows were randomized to onlay distal biceps repair with either a single intramedullary button or with two 1.35-mm all-suture anchors. A 1.3-mm high tensile strength tape was used in a Krackow stitch to suture the tendons in both groups. Specimens and repair constructs were loaded for 3,000 cycles and then loaded to failure. Maximum load to failure, mode of failure, and construct elongation were recorded. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) maximum load to failure for the unicortical intramedullary button and all-suture anchor repairs were 503.23 ± 141.77 N and 537.33 ± 262.13 N (P = .696), respectively. Mean maximum displacement after 3,000 cycles (± standard deviation) was 4.17 ± 2.05 mm in the button group and 2.06 ± 1.05 mm in the suture anchor group (P = .014). Mode of failure in the button group was suture tape rupture in 7 specimens, failure at the tendon-suture interface in 2 specimens, and button pullout in 1 specimen. Anchor pullout was the mode of failure in all suture anchor specimens. There were no tendon ruptures or radial tuberosity fractures in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that onlay distal biceps repair with 2 all-suture anchors has similar maximum strength to repair with an intramedullary button and that both are viable options for fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All-suture anchors and unicortical intramedullary button have similar maximum strength at time zero. Both constructs provide suitable fixation for onlay distal biceps repair.

Strategies for spinal surgery reimbursement: bundling in the working-age population.

INTRODUCTION: Bundled payments for spine surgery, which is known for having high overall cost with wide variation, have been previously studied in older adults. However, there has been limited work examining bundled payments in working-age patients. We sought to identify the variation in the cost of spine surgery among working age adults in a large, national insurance claims database. METHODS: We queried the TRICARE claims database for all patients, aged 18-64, undergoing cervical and non-cervical spinal fusion surgery between 2012 and 2014. We calculated the case mix adjusted, price standardized payments for all aspects of care during the 60-, 90-, and 180-day periods post operation. Variation was assessed by stratifying Hospital Referral Regions into quintiles. RESULTS: After adjusting for case mix, there was significant variation in the cost of both cervical ($10,538.23, 60% of first quintile) and non-cervical ($20,155.59, 74%). Relative variation in total cost decreased from 60- to 180-days (63 to 55% and 76 to 69%). Index hospitalization was the primary driver of costs and variation for both cervical (1st-to-5th quintile range: $11,033-$19,960) and non-cervical ($18,565-$36,844) followed by readmissions for cervical ($0-$11,521) and non-cervical ($0-$13,932). Even at the highest quintile, post-acute care remained the lowest contribution to overall cost ($2070 & $2984). CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the cost of spine surgery across the United States for working age adults, driven largely by index procedure and readmissions costs. Our findings suggest that implementing episodes longer than the current 90-day standard would do little to better control cost variation.

A Biomechanical Comparison of High-Tensile Strength Tape Versus High-Tensile Strength Suture for Tendon Fixation Under Cyclic Loading.

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of high-tensile strength tape and high-tensile strength suture across 2 selected stitch techniques, the Krackow and whip stitch, in securing tendinous tissue during 5,000 cycles of nondestructive loading followed by a load to failure. METHODS: Fourteen matched pairs each of cadaveric Achilles, quadriceps, and patellar tendons (n = 84) were randomly assigned to either Krackow or whip stitch and sutured with either 2-mm high-tensile strength tape or No. 2 high-tensile strength suture. Specimens were preloaded to 20 N, cyclically loaded from 20 to 200 N for 5,000 cycles at 2 Hz, and then loaded to failure at 200 mm/min. Linear mixed models evaluated the effects of suture material and stitch technique on cyclic normalized tendon-suture elongation, total normalized tendon-suture elongation at 5,000 cycles, and maximum load at failure. RESULTS: Across all suture constructs, normalized elongation was greater during the initial 10 cycles, compared with all subsequent cycling intervals (all P < .001). There was less total normalized elongation (ß = -0.239; P = .007) and greater maximum load at failure in tape (ß = 163.71; P = .014) when used in the Krackow stitch compared with the whip stitch. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that tape used in the Krackow stitch maintains the most favorable fixation strength after enduring cyclic loading, with greater maximum load at failure. In addition, overall normalized elongation during long-term cyclic loading was predominately affected by the stitch technique used, regardless of the suture material; however, tape allowed less normalized elongation during the initial loading cycles, especially when placed in the whip stitch. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the potential short- and long-term outcomes of suture material and stitch technique on securing tendinous tissue under repetitive stresses can help inform clinicians on optimal tendon fixation techniques for early postoperative activities.

Lumbar disc height and vertebral Hounsfield units: association with interbody cage subsidence.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative subsidence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages can result in loss of lordosis and foraminal height, and potential recurrence of nerve root impingement. The objectives of this study were to determine factors associated with TLIF cage subsidence. Specifically, the authors sought to determine if preoperative disc height compared to cage height could be used to predict TLIF interbody cage subsidence, and if decreased postoperative vertebral Hounsfield units (HUs) predisposed to cage subsidence. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing instrumented TLIF from two institutions between July 2004 and June 2014. The preoperative disc height was measured for the operative and adjacent-level disc on MRI. The difference between cage and disc heights was measured and compared between the subsidence and nonsubsidence groups. The average HUs of the L1 vertebral body were measured on CT scans. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were identified with complete imaging and follow-up information. Forty-five patients (50.6%) had evidence of interbody cage subsidence on follow-up CT. The average cage subsidence was 5.5 mm (range 2.2-10.8 mm). The average implant height was significantly higher in the subsidence group compared to the nonsubsidence group (12.6 vs 11.2 mm). Additionally, the difference between cage height and preoperative adjacent-level disc height was also significantly larger in the subsidence group (3.8 vs 1.2 mm). First lumbar vertebral body (L1) HUs were significantly higher in the nonsubsidence versus the subsidence group (167.8 vs 137.71 HUs, p = 0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified suprajacent disc height and L1 HUs to be independent predictors of interbody cage subsidence. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a suprajacent to cage height difference > 1.3 mm to have a 93.3% sensitivity for cage subsidence. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first of its kind to demonstrate the association between vertebral body HUs and suprajacent disc height with the development of interbody cage subsidence after TLIF. The authors found that patients with lower HUs in the L1 vertebral body were more likely to experience subsidence, regardless of surgical level. Additionally, the study demonstrated that interbody cage height > 1.3 mm above the height of the suprajacent level is an independent risk factor for cage subsidence, with 93.3% sensitivity. These findings suggest that these factors may be utilized to create a template preoperatively for intraoperative cage selection.

The Effects of Bone Microstructure on Subsidence Risk for ALIF, LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF Spine Cages.

Several approaches (anterior, posterior, lateral, and transforaminal) are used in lumbar fusion surgery. However, it is unclear whether one of these approaches has the greatest subsidence risk as published clinical rates of cage subsidence vary widely (7-70%). Specifically, there is limited data on how a patient's endplate morphometry and trabecular bone quality influences cage subsidence risk. Therefore, this study compared subsidence (stiffness, maximum force, and work) between anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), and transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion cage designs to understand the impact of endplate and trabecular bone quality on subsidence. Forty-eight lumbar vertebrae were imaged with micro-ct to assess trabecular microarchitecture. micro-ct images of each vertebra were then imported into image processing software to measure endplate thickness (ET) and maximum endplate concavity depth (ECD). Generic ALIF, LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF cages made of polyether ether ketone were implanted on the superior endplates of all vertebrae and subsidence testing was performed. The results indicated that TLIF cages had significantly lower (p < 0.01) subsidence stiffness and maximum subsidence force compared to ALIF and LLIF cages. For all cage groups, trabecular bone volume fraction was better correlated with maximum subsidence force compared to ET and concavity depth. These findings highlight the importance of cage design (e.g., surface area), placement on the endplate, and trabecular bone quality on subsidence. These results may help surgeons during cage selection for lumbar fusion procedures to mitigate adverse events such as cage subsidence.

Assessing practice pattern differences in the treatment of acute low back pain in the United States Military Health System.

BACKGROUND: Acute low back pain is one of the most common reasons for individuals to seek medical care in the United States. The US Military Health System provides medical care to approximately 9.4 million beneficiaries annually. These patients also routinely suffer from acute low back pain. Within this health system, patients can receive care and treatment from physicians, or physician extenders including physician assistants and nurse practitioners. Given the diversity of provider types and their respective training programs, it would be informative to evaluate variation in care delivery, adherence to clinical guidelines, and differences within the MHS among a complex mix of provider types. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional quantitative analysis that examined variations in treatment between provider types within the Military Health System in 2015 for treatment of acute low back pain using administrative data. In addition to descriptive and summary statistics, binomial logistic regression models were used to assess variation in practice patterns among physicians and mid-level practitioners for prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, opioids, plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: With regard to prescribing practices, results indicated that the odds of receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory prescriptions increased significantly for both physician assistants and nurse practitioners when compared to physicians. For basic radiological referrals, odds increased significantly for ordering plain radiography for physician assistants and nurse practitioners when compared to physicians. For more advanced imaging, odds significantly decreased for ordering computed tomography (CT) and slightly decreased for magnetic resonance for physician assistants, nurse practitioners and physician residents compared to the physician group. Additionally this study discovered differences in the prescribing patterns between provider categories. Both contractors and civilians had higher odds of prescribing opioids compared to active duty providers. CONCLUSIONS: As physician assistants and nurse practitioners continue to gain popularity as physician extenders in the US and in addressing provider shortages for the Military Health System, further research should be conducted to determine what impact, if any, the differences found in this study have on patient outcomes. In addition, provider type warrants further investigation to determine if labor mix and outsourcing decisions within a single payer system impacts health delivery and value based care.

Pathophysiologic Spine Adaptations and Countermeasures for Prolonged Spaceflight.

Low back pain due to spaceflight is a common complaint of returning astronauts. Alterations in musculoskeletal anatomy during spaceflight and the effects of microgravity (µg) have been well-studied; however, the mechanisms behind these changes remain unclear. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has released the Human Research Roadmap to guide investigators in developing effective countermeasure strategies for the Artemis Program, as well as commercial low-orbit spaceflight. Based on the Human Research Roadmap, the existing literature was examined to determine the current understanding of the effects of microgravity on the musculoskeletal components of the spinal column. In addition, countermeasure strategies will be required to mitigate these effects for long-duration spaceflight. Current pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic countermeasure strategies are suboptimal, as evidenced by continued muscle and bone loss, alterations in muscle phenotype, and bone metabolism. However, studies incorporating the use of ultrasound, beta-blockers, and other pharmacologic agents have shown some promise. Understanding these mechanisms will not only benefit space technology but likely lead to a return on investment for the management of Earth-bound diseases.

Spinal Pathology and Muscle Morphologies with Chronic Low Back Pain and Lower Limb Amputation.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA) and contributes to substantial reductions in quality of life and function. Towards understanding pathophysiological mechanisms underlying LBP after LLA, this article compares lumbar spine pathologies and muscle morphologies between individuals with LBP, with and without LLA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried electronic medical records of Service members with and without LLA who sought care for LBP at military treatment facilities between January 2002 and May 2020. Two groups with cLBP, one with (n = 15) and one without unilateral transtibial LLA (n = 15), were identified and randomly chosen from a larger sample. Groups were matched by age, mass, and sex. Lumbar muscle morphology, Pfirrmann grades, Modic changes, facet arthrosis, Meyerding grades, and lordosis angle were determined from radiographs and magnetic resonance images available in the medical record. Independent t-tests compared variables between cohorts while multiple regression models determined if intramuscular fat influenced Pfirrmann grades. Chi-square determined differences in presence of spondylolysis and facet arthrosis. RESULTS: Lordosis angle was larger with LLA (P = 0.01). Spondylolysis was more prevalent with LLA (P = 0.008; 40%) whereas facet arthrosis was similar between cohorts (P = 0.3). Muscle area was not different between cohorts, yet intramuscular fat was greater with LLA (P ≤ 0.05). Intramuscular fat did not influence Pfirrmann grades (P > 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar lumbar muscle size, those with unilateral LLA may be predisposed to progress to symptomatic spondylolisthesis and intramuscular fat. Surgical and/or rehabilitation interventions may mitigate long-term effects of diminished spinal health, decrease LBP-related disability, and improve function for individuals with LLA.

Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Plate Fixation Versus Integrated Fixation Cage for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric, biomechanic study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the range of motion profiles of the cervical spine following one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) constructs instrumented with either an interbody cage and anterior plate or integrated fixation cage in a cadaveric model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While anterior plates with interbody cages are the most common construct of fixation in ACDF, newer integrated cage-plate devices seek to provide similar stability with a decreased implant profile. However, differences in postoperative cervical range of motion between the 2 constructs remain unclear. METHODS: Six cadaveric spines were segmented into 2 functional spine units (FSUs): C2-C5 and C6-T2. Each FSU was nondestructively bent in flexion-extension (FE), right-left lateral bending (LB), and right-left axial rotation (AR) at a rate of 0.5°/s under a constant axial load until a limit of 2-Nm was reached to evaluate baseline range of motion (ROM). Matched pairs were then randomly assigned to undergo instrumentation with either the standard anterior cage and plate (CP) or the integrated fixation cage (IF). Following instrumentation, ROM was then remeasured as previously described. RESULTS: For CP fixation, ROM increased by 61.2±31.7% for FE, 36.3±20.4% for LB, and 31.7±19.1% for AR. For IF fixation, ROM increased by 64.2±15.5% for FE, 56.7±39.8% for LB, and 94.5±65.1% for AR. There was no significant difference in motion between each group across FE, LB, and AR. CONCLUSION: This biomechanical study demonstrated increased motion in both the CP and IF groups relative to the intact, un-instrumented state. However, our model showed no differences in ROM between CP and IF constructs in any direction of motion. These results suggest that either method of instrumentation is a suitable option for ACDF with respect to constructing stiffness at time zero.

Rates and Predictors of Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Between the Military and Civilian Health Care Systems.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review (level of evidence III). OBJECTIVE: Surgical care patterns for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), a common musculoskeletal condition of high relevance to the Military Health System (MHS), have not been described or compared across the direct care and purchased care MHS components. This study aimed to describe surgery rates in MHS beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care versus purchased care and to evaluate characteristics associated with the location of surgery. Differences in care patterns for LDH may suggest unexpected variation within the centrally managed MHS. METHODS: We described 1-year rates of surgery among beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care versus purchased care. Among beneficiaries who were diagnosed in direct care and had surgery, multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with surgery location. RESULTS: We identified 726,638 MHS beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care or purchased care during the 9-year study period. One-year surgery rates were 10.1% in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in direct care versus 11.3% in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in purchased care. Among the 7467 patients who were diagnosed in direct care and had surgery within 1 year, characteristics associated with lower probability of surgery in purchased care versus direct care included diagnosing facility type (hospital with a neurosurgery or spine specialty versus clinic (odds ratio [OR], 0.12 (95% CI, 0.10-0.15)), Navy versus Army (OR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.21-0.28)), and diagnosing facility specialty (Medical Expense and Performance Reporting System) (surgical care (OR, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.27-0.40)) and orthopedic care (OR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33-0.46)) versus primary care. The presence of comorbidities was associated with higher probability of surgery in purchased care versus direct care (OR, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.06-1.36)). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year rate of surgery for LDH was modestly higher in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in purchased care versus direct care. Among patients who were diagnosed in direct care, several patient-level and facility-level characteristics were associated with receiving surgery in purchased care, suggesting potentially unexpected variation in care utilization across components of the MHS.

Lumbar Degenerative Disease and Muscle Morphology Before and After Lower Limb Loss in Four Military Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA). Reports describing longitudinal changes in spine health before and after amputation are rare. This study describes lumbar spine pathology, muscle morphology, and the continuum of care for LBP before and after LLA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried electronic medical records of patients who sought care for LBP before and after unilateral LLA between January 2002 and April 2020 and who had documented lumbar imaging pre- and post-LLA. Patient demographics, muscle morphology, spinal pathology, premorbid and comorbid conditions, self-reported pain, and treatment interventions were assessed. RESULTS: Four patients with LBP and imaging before and after LLA were identified. Intervertebral disc degeneration progressed after amputation in three patients, whereas facet arthrosis progressed in both female patients. The fat content of lumbar musculature generally increased after amputation. Conservative management of LBP before and after amputation was standard, with progression to steroidal injections. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar spine health may degrade after amputation. Here, lumbar muscle size did not change after LLA, yet the fat content increased in combination with increases in facet and intervertebral disc degeneration.

Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare motions at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and supra-adjacent level (UIV+1) between two fixation techniques in thoracic posterior spinal fusion constructs. We hypothesized there would be greater motion at UIV+1 after cyclic loading across all constructs and bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) with posterior ligamentous compromise would demonstrate the greatest UIV+1 range of motion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Proximal junctional kyphosis is a well-recognized complication following long thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion, however, its mechanism is poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven thoracic functional spine units were randomly divided into three UIV fixation groups (n=9): (1) BPS, (2) bilateral transverse process hooks (TPHs), and (3) BPS with compromise of the posterior elements between UIV and UIV+1 (BPS-C). Specimens were tested on a servohydraulic materials testing system in native state, following instrumentation, and after cyclic loading. functional spine units were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending, and axial rotation. RESULTS: After cyclic testing, the TPH group had a mean 29.4% increase in FE range of motion at UIV+1 versus 76.6% in the BPS group ( P <0.05). The BPS-C group showed an increased FE of 49.9% and 62.19% with sectioning of the facet joints and interspinous ligament respectively prior to cyclic testing. CONCLUSION: BPSs at the UIV led to greater motion at UIV+1 compared to bilateral TPH after cyclic loading. This is likely due to the increased rigidity of BPS compared to TPH leading to a "softer" transition between the TPH construct and native anatomy at the supra-adjacent level. Facet capsule compromise led to a 49.9% increase in UIV+1 motion, underscoring the importance of preserving the posterior ligamentous complex. Clinical studies that account for fusion rates are warranted to determine if constructs with a "soft transition" result in less proximal junctional kyphosis in vivo .

Biomechanical Analysis of Multilevel Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Constructs.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled Laboratory Study. OBJECTIVE: To compare multilevel posterior cervical fusion (PCF) constructs stopping at C7, T1, and T2 under cyclic load to determine the range of motion (ROM) between the lowest instrumented level and lowest instrumented-adjacent level (LIV-1). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PCF is a mainstay of treatment for various cervical spine conditions. The transition between the flexible cervical spine and rigid thoracic spine can lead to construct failure at the cervicothoracic junction. There is little evidence to determine the most appropriate level at which to stop a multilevel PCF. METHODS: Fifteen human cadaveric cervicothoracic spines were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: PCF stopping at C7, T1, or T2. Specimens were tested in their native state, following a simulated PCF, and after cyclic loading. Specimens were loaded in flexion-extension), lateral bending, and axial rotation. Three-dimensional kinematics were recorded to evaluate ROM. RESULTS: The C7 group had greater flexion-extension motion than the T1 and T2 groups following instrumentation (10.17±0.83 degree vs. 2.77±1.66 degree and 1.06±0.55 degree, P <0.001), and after cyclic loading (10.42±2.30 degree vs. 2.47±0.64 degree and 1.99±1.23 degree, P <0.001). There was no significant difference between the T1 and T2 groups. The C7 group had greater lateral bending ROM than both thoracic groups after instrumentation (8.81±3.44 degree vs. 3.51±2.52 degree, P =0.013 and 1.99±1.99 degree, P =0.003) and after cyclic loading. The C7 group had greater axial rotation motion than the thoracic groups (4.46±2.27 degree vs. 1.26±0.69 degree, P =0.010; and 0.73±0.74 degree, P =0.003) following cyclic loading. CONCLUSION: Motion at the cervicothoracic junction is significantly greater when a multilevel PCF stops at C7 rather than T1 or T2. This is likely attributable to the transition from a flexible cervical spine to a rigid thoracic spine. Although this does not account for in vivo fusion, surgeons should consider extending multilevel PCF constructs to T1 when feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

The Effect of Preoperative Mental Health Status on Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: The effect of preoperative mental health on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is of increasing interest. The purpose of this study was to utilize patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to compare outcomes after ACDF in patients with and without poor mental health. We hypothesized that patients with worse baseline mental health would report worse outcomes after surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical spondylosis with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Outcomes collected before and after surgery included the RAND-36, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included and assigned to the depression or nondepression group based on baseline mental health. The depression group had worse baseline preoperative scores across all PROMs: NDI (44.2 vs 36.8, P = 0.05), RAND (1511.4 vs 2198.18, P < 0.001), EQ-5D (12.55 vs 10.14, P < 0.001), and SANE (56.3 vs 72.9, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the depression group had worse scores at the final follow-up for RAND (2242.8 vs 2662.2, P = 0.03) and SANE (71.5 vs 80.8, P = 0.02). Both groups experienced improvements with ACDF across all PROMs. The changes in each PROM were not statistically significant between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference across PROMs. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to utilize the RAND-36, EQ-5D, NDI, and SANE scores to assess preoperative mental health and its effect on postoperative outcomes after ACDF. While poor preoperative mental health status yielded significantly worse baseline and postoperative outcomes scores, patients experienced significant improvement in symptoms after ACDF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be aware of the effects of poor mental health status on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion, but can still expect significant clinical improvements after surgery.

Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Current techniques for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction do not reproduce the anatomic ulnar footprint of the UCL. The purpose of this study was to describe a novel UCL reconstruction technique that utilizes proximal-to-distal ulnar bone tunnels to better re-create the anatomy of the UCL and to compare the biomechanical profile at time zero among this technique, the native UCL, and the traditional docking technique. HYPOTHESIS: The biomechanical profile of the anatomic technique is similar to the native UCL and traditional docking technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten matched cadaveric elbows were potted with the forearm in neutral rotation. The palmaris longus tendon graft was harvested, and bones were sectioned 14 cm proximal and distal to the elbow joint. Specimen testing included (1) native UCL testing performed at 90° of flexion with 0.5 N·m of valgus moment preload, (2) cyclic loading from 0.5 to 5 N·m of valgus moment for 1000 cycles at 1 Hz, and (3) load to failure at 0.2 mm/s. Elbows then underwent UCL reconstruction with 1 elbow of each pair receiving the classic docking technique using either anatomic (proximal to distal) or traditional (anterior to posterior) tunnel locations. Specimen testing was then repeated as described. RESULTS: There were no differences in maximum load at failure between the anatomic and traditional tunnel location techniques (mean ± SD, 34.90 ± 10.65 vs 37.28 ± 14.26 N·m; P = .644) or when including the native UCL (45.83 ± 17.03 N·m; P = .099). Additionally, there were no differences in valgus angle after 1000 cycles across the anatomic technique (4.58°± 1.47°), traditional technique (4.08°± 1.28°), and native UCL (4.07°± 1.99°). The anatomic group and the native UCL had similar valgus angles at failure (24.13°± 5.86° vs 20.13°± 5.70°; P = .083), while the traditional group had a higher valgus angle at failure when compared with the native UCL (24.88°± 6.18° vs 19.44°± 5.86°; P = .015). CONCLUSION: In this cadaveric model, UCL reconstruction with the docking technique utilizing proximal-to-distal ulnar tunnels better restored the ulnar footprint while providing valgus stability comparable with reconstruction with the docking technique using traditional anterior-to-posterior ulnar tunnel locations. These results suggest that utilization of the anatomic tunnel location in UCL reconstruction has similar biomechanical properties to the traditional method at the time of initial fixation (ie, not accounting for healing after reconstruction in vivo) while keeping the ulnar tunnels farther from the ulnar nerve. Further studies are warranted to determine if an anatomically based UCL reconstruction results in differing outcomes than traditional reconstruction techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Current UCL reconstruction techniques do not accurately re-create the ulnar UCL footprint. The UCL is a dynamic constraint to valgus loads at the elbow, and a more anatomic reconstruction may afford more natural joint kinematics. This more anatomic technique performs similarly to the traditional docking technique at time zero, and the results of this study may offer a starting point for future in vivo studies.

Accuracy of the freehand technique for 3 fixation methods in the C-2 vertebrae.

OBJECT: Intraoperative imaging often does not provide adequate visualization to ensure safe placement of screws. Therefore, the authors investigated the accuracy of a freehand technique for placement of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar screws in C-2. METHODS: Sixteen cadaveric specimens were instrumented freehand by 2 experienced cervical spine surgeons with either a pars or pedicle screw, and bilateral intralaminar screws. The technique was based on anatomical starting points and published screw trajectories. A pedicle finder was used to establish the trajectory, followed by tapping, palpation, and screw placement. After placement of all screws (16 pars screws, 16 pedicle screws, and 32 intralaminar screws), the C-2 segments were disarticulated, radiographed in anteroposterior, lateral, and axial planes, and meticulously inspected by another spine surgeon to determine the nature and presence of any defects. RESULTS: A total of 64 screws were evaluated in this study. Pars screws exhibited 2 critical defects (1 in the foramen transversarium and 1 in the C2-3 facet) and an insignificant dorsal cortex breech, for an overall accuracy rate of 81.3%. Pedicle screws demonstrated only 1 insignificant violation (inferior facet/medial cortex intrusion of 1 mm) with an accuracy rate of 93.8%, and intralaminar screws demonstrated 3 insignificant violations (2 in the ventral canal, 1 in the caudad lamina breech) for an accuracy rate of 90.6%. Pars screws had significantly more critical violations than intralaminar screws (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Instrumentation of the C-2 vertebrae using the freehand technique for insertion of pedicle and intralaminar screws showed a high success rate with no critical violations. Pars screw insertion was not as reliable, with 2 critical violations from a total of 16 placements. The freehand technique appears to be a safe and reliable method for insertion of C-2 pedicle and intralaminar screws.

Telemedicine for the Spine Surgeon in the Age of COVID-19: Multicenter Experiences of Feasibility and Implementation Strategies.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has obligated physicians to recur to additional resources and make drastic changes regarding the standard physician-patient encounter. In the last century, there has been a substantial improvement in technology, which over the years has opened the door to a new form of medical practicing known as telemedicine. METHODS: Healthcare workers from three hospitals involved in the care for COVID-19 patients in the united states were invited to share their experience using telemedicine to deliver clinical care to their patients. RESULTS: Since the appearance of this worldwide outbreak, social distancing has been a key factor in preventing the spread of the virus, for which measures have been taken to limit physical contact. Because of the ongoing situation, telemedicine has been progressively incorporated into the physician-patient encounters and quickly has become an essential component in the day-today medical practice. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to deliver viable spine practice with the use of telemedicine. A proper patient selection of patients requiring virtual treatment versus those requiring in-person visits should be considered.

Development of an in vitro test method to simulate intra-operative impaction loading on lumbar intervertebral body fusion devices.

Intervertebral body fusion devices (IBFDs) are commonly used in the treatment of various spinal pathologies. Intra-operative fractures of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) implants have been reported in the literature and to the FDA as device-related adverse events. The device and/or implant inserter failures typically occur during device impaction into the disc space and require implant removal and replacement. These additional steps may cause further complications along with increased surgical time and cost. Currently, there are no standardized test methods that evaluate clinically relevant impaction loading conditions on IBFDs. This study aims to develop an in vitro test method that would evaluate implant resistance to failure during intra-operative impaction. To achieve this, (1) surgical implantations of IBFDs were simulated in nine lumbar cadaver specimens by three different orthopedic spine surgeons (n = 3/surgeon). Impact force and mallet speed data were acquired for each surgeon. (2) Based on the acquired surgeon data, a benchtop mechanical test setup was developed to differentiate between two TLIF IBFD designs and two inserter designs (for a total of four IBFD-inserter combinations) under impaction loading. During implant insertion, impact force measurements indicated that lumbar IBFDs are subjected to high energy forces that may exceed their mechanical strength. Our test method successfully replicated clinically-relevant loading conditions and was effective at differentiating failure parameters between different implant and inserter instrument designs. The mechanical test method developed shows promise in its ability to assess impaction resistance of IBFD/inserter designs and evaluate potential risks of device failure during intraoperative loading.

Factors Associated With Progression to Surgical Intervention for Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Military Health System.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine surgery-free survival of patients receiving conservative management of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in the military healthcare system (MHS) and risk factors for surgical intervention. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Radiculopathy from LDH is a major cause of morbidity and cost. METHODS: The Military Data Repository was queried for all patients diagnosed with LDH from FY2011-2018; the earliest such diagnosis in a military treatment facility (MTF) was kept for each patient as the initial diagnosis. Follow-up time to surgical intervention was defined as the time from diagnosis to first encounter for lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression in either a MTF or in the civilian sector. The Military Data Repository was also queried for history of tobacco use at any time during MHS care, age at the time of diagnosis, sex, MHS beneficiary category, and diagnosing facility characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations of patient and diagnosing facility characteristics with time to surgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 84,985 MHS beneficiaries including 62,771 active duty service members were diagnosed with LDH in a MTF during the 8-year study period. A total of 10,532 (12.4%) MHS beneficiaries, including 7650 (10.9%) active duty, failed conservative management onto surgical intervention with lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression. Median follow-up time of the cohort was 5.2 (interquartile range 2.6, 7.5) years. Among all healthcare beneficiaries, several patient-level (younger age, male sex, and history of tobacco use) and facility-level characteristics (hospital vs. clinic and surgical care vs. primary care clinic) were independently associated with higher risk of surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: LDH compromises military readiness and negatively impacts healthcare costs. MHS beneficiaries with LDH have a good prognosis with approximately 88% of patients successfully completing conservative management. However, strategies to improve outcomes of conservative management in LDH should address risks associated with both patient and facility characteristics.Level of Evidence: 4.

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Feasibility, Patient/Provider Satisfaction, and Value of Virtual Spine Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, patient/provider satisfaction, and perceived value of telehealth spine consultation after rapid conversion from traditional in-office visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were obtained for patients undergoing telehealth visits with spine surgeons in the first 3 weeks after government restriction of elective surgical care at 4 sites (March 23, 2020, to April 17, 2020). Demographic factors, technique-specific elements of the telehealth experience, provider confidence in diagnostic and therapeutic assessment, patient/surgeon satisfaction, and perceived value were collected. RESULTS: A total of 128 unique visits were analyzed. New (74 [58%]), preoperative (26 [20%]), and postoperative (28 [22%]) patients were assessed. A total of 116 (91%) visits had successful connection on the first attempt. Surgeons felt very confident 101 times (79%) when assessing diagnosis and 107 times (84%) when assessing treatment plan. The mean and median patient satisfaction was 89% and 94%, respectively. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher for video over audio-only visits (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was not significantly different with patient age, location of chief complaint (cervical or thoracolumbar), or visit type (new, preoperative, or postoperative). Providers reported that 76% of the time they would choose to perform the visit again in telehealth format. Sixty percent of patients valued the visit cost as the same or slightly less than an in-office consultation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and high patient/provider satisfaction of virtual spine surgical consultation, and appropriate reimbursement and balanced regulation for spine telehealth care is essential to continue this existing work.