Data processing techniques impact quantification of cortico-cortical evoked potentials.

BACKGROUND: Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are a common tool for probing effective connectivity in intracranial human electrophysiology. As with all human electrophysiology data, CCEP data are highly susceptible to noise. To address noise, filters and re-referencing are often applied to CCEP data, but different processing strategies are used from study to study. NEW METHOD: We systematically compare how common average re-referencing and filtering CCEP data impacts quantification. RESULTS: We show that common average re-referencing and filters, particularly filters that cut out more frequencies, can significantly impact the quantification of CCEP magnitude and morphology. We identify that high cutoff high pass filters (> 0.5 Hz), low cutoff low pass filters (< 200 Hz), and common average re-referencing impact quantification across subjects. However, we also demonstrate that the presence of noise may impact CCEP quantification, and preprocessing is necessary to mitigate this. We show that filtering is more effective than re-referencing or averaging across trials for reducing most common types of noise. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: These results suggest that existing CCEP processing methods must be applied with care to maximize noise reduction and minimize changes to the data. We do not test every available processing strategy; rather we demonstrate that processing can influence the results of CCEP studies. We emphasize the importance of reporting all processing methods, particularly re-referencing methods. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a general framework for choosing an appropriate processing pipeline for CCEP data, taking into consideration the noise levels of a specific dataset. We suggest that minimal gentle filtering is preferable.

Beta Burst-Driven Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Improves Gait Impairment and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is often refractory to medication. Pathological prolonged beta bursts within the subthalamic nucleus (STN) are associated with both worse impairment and freezing behavior in PD, which are improved with deep brain stimulation (DBS). The goal of the current study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of beta burst-driven adaptive DBS (aDBS) for FOG in PD. Methods: Seven individuals with PD were implanted with the investigational Summit™ RC+S DBS system (Medtronic, PLC) with leads placed bilaterally in the STN. A PC-in-the-loop architecture was used to adjust stimulation amplitude in real-time based on the observed beta burst durations in the STN. Participants performed either a harnessed stepping-in-place task or a free walking turning and barrier course, as well as clinical motor assessments and instrumented measures of bradykinesia, OFF stimulation, on aDBS, continuous DBS (cDBS), or random intermittent DBS (iDBS). Results: Beta burst driven aDBS was successfully implemented and deemed safe and tolerable in all seven participants. Gait metrics such as overall percent time freezing and mean peak shank angular velocity improved from OFF to aDBS and showed similar efficacy as cDBS. Similar improvements were also seen for overall clinical motor impairment, including tremor, as well as quantitative metrics of bradykinesia. Conclusion: Beta burst driven adaptive DBS was feasible, safe, and tolerable in individuals with PD with gait impairment and FOG.

Fully implanted adaptive deep brain stimulation in freely moving essential tremor patients.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a safe and established treatment for essential tremor (ET) and several other movement disorders. One approach to improving DBS therapy is adaptive DBS (aDBS), in which stimulation parameters are modulated in real time based on biofeedback from either external or implanted sensors. Previously tested systems have fallen short of translational applicability due to the requirement for patients to continuously wear the necessary sensors or processing devices, as well as privacy and security concerns. APPROACH: We designed and implemented a translation-ready training data collection system for fully implanted aDBS. Two patients chronically implanted with electrocorticography strips over the hand portion of M1 and DBS probes in the ipsilateral ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for treatment of ET were recruited for this study. Training was conducted using a translation-ready distributed training procedure, allowing a substantially higher degree of control over data collection than previous works. A linear classifier was trained using this system, biased towards activating stimulation in accordance with clinical considerations. MAIN RESULTS: The clinically relevant average false negative rate, defined as fraction of time during which stimulation dropped below [Formula: see text] clinical levels during movement epochs, was 0.036. Tremor suppression, calculated through analysis of gyroscope data, was 33.2% more effective on average with aDBS than with continuous DBS. During a period of free movement with aDBS, one patient reported a slight paresthesia; patients noticed no difference in treatment efficacy between systems. SIGNIFICANCE: Here is presented the first translation-ready training procedure for a fully embedded aDBS control system for MDs and one of the first examples of such a system in ET, adding to the consensus that fully implanted aDBS systems are sufficiently mature for broader deployment in treatment of movement disorders.