Real-world practices in reproductive health and counselling for women with epilepsy: A Canadian perspective.

Canadian women of reproductive potential living with epilepsy present unique care challenges due to the complex interplay of hormones, seizures, and medications. This study explores reproductive health practices and counselling for women with epilepsy. Through a questionnaire developed by the Canadian League Against Epilepsy women with epilepsy (WWE) workgroup, we are the first to report demographic and real-world practice characteristics of Canadian healthcare professionals providing care for WWE with specific focus on family planning, birth plans, and postpartum care counselling. Among respondents, 76.9% routinely reviewed contraception with patients and an intrauterine device (IUD) was the most popular recommended method (85.3%). With regards to preconception planning, 50% of respondents routinely had a preconception drug level prior to pregnancy. A significant proportion, 44.9%, reported not communicating a neurology-informed birth plan to obstetrical health practitioners. The majority recommended breastfeeding for WWE on anti-seizure medications (92.3%) and regularly provided safety counselling for women in the postpartum period (84.6%). Overall, our study demonstrates that Canadian practice patterns conform reasonably well to existing evidence and guidelines, although important gaps in care exist.

Real-world practices for the care of women with epilepsy during pregnancy: A Canadian perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 150,000 Canadian women live with epilepsy, a population that presents with unique challenges. Our objective was to capture demographic and real-world practice characteristics of Canadian healthcare professionals providing care for women with epilepsy (WWE) with specific focus on reproductive considerations to identify potential gaps in knowledge and care. METHODS: A questionnaire developed by the Canadian League Against Epilepsy WWE workgroup was distributed to Canadian healthcare professionals from February 2021 to October 2022 to capture participant demographic characteristics and practice patterns in key areas of the reproductive cycle in WWE. RESULTS: A total of 156 participants completed the questionnaire, most being physicians (81.4%), epilepsy specialists (69.0%), and those who cared for adult patients (86.5%), with a significant proportion based at an academic center (65.4%). The majority of participants counselled on folic acid supplementation (89.7%). Participants selected lamotrigine and levetiracetam most frequently for either focal or generalized epilepsies during pregnancy. Additionally, 85.9% performed therapeutic drug monitoring during pregnancy. Almost all practitioners always or often counseled WWE on valproic acid on the benefits of switching to a less teratogenic medication (96.2%). Some geographic variability in practice patterns was noted with valproic acid being one of the top three medications selected for patients with generalized epilepsies in Western regions, although participants in Eastern regions had brivaracetam more commonly included as one of their top three agents for this population. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first report of real-world Canadian practices in epilepsy care for women in pregnancy. Overall, our study reports that Canadian practice patterns conform well to current evidence and best-practice guidelines. Important variations in antiseizure medication selection across different regions were identified.

Strategic and principled approach to the ethical challenges of epilepsy monitoring unit triage.

Electroencephalographic monitoring provides critical diagnostic and management information about patients with epilepsy and seizure mimics. Admission to an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) is the gold standard for such monitoring in major medical facilities worldwide. In many countries, access can be challenged by limited resources compared to need. Today, triaging admission to such units is generally approached by unwritten protocols that vary by institution. In the absence of explicit guidance, decisions can be ethically taxing and are easy to challenge. In an effort to address this gap, we propose a two-component approach to EMU triage that takes into account the unique landscape of epilepsy monitoring informed by triage literature from other areas of medicine. Through the strategic component, we focus on the EMU wait list management infrastructure at the institutional level. Through the principled component, we apply a combination of the ethical principles of prioritarianism, utilitarianism and justice to triage; and we use individual case examples to illustrate how they apply. The effective implementation of this approach to specific epilepsy centres will need to be customised to the nuances of different settings, including diverse practice patterns, patient populations and constraints on resource distribution, but the conceptual consolidation of its components can alleviate some of the pressures imposed by the complex decisions involved in EMU triage.

A 1p31.3 deletion encompassing the nuclear factor 1A gene presenting as possible temporal lobe epilepsy in association with schizoaffective disorder.

Chromosome 1p32-p31 deletion syndrome, which is characterized by a variety of neurodevelopmental abnormalities, is thought to occur as a result of nuclear factor 1A (NFIA) haploinsufficiency. We present a case of a right-handed 40-year-old female with a 1p31.3 deletion, who exhibited numerous common features of this syndrome, in addition to treatment resistant schizoaffective disorder and possible temporal lobe epilepsy, making her presentation unique. While neither psychosis nor temporal lobe epilepsy has been described in this syndrome previously, these conditions likely occurred in our patient as a result of NFIA haploinsufficiency.

Affect-induced reflex seizures (AIRS): A case series based on a systematic literature review.

Seizures are commonly thought to occur in a spontaneous, unpredictable manner. However, it is well-established that a subset of patients with epilepsy can experience reflex seizures that are consistently elicited by a specific stimulus. While various forms of reflex epilepsy have been documented in the literature, acute affective states have not been commonly described as a potential reflex seizure trigger. We performed a systematic literature review to determine if acute emotional states can trigger reflex seizures. We included any case in which reflex seizures repeatedly occurred in response to a patient-specific stimulus that was reported as emotionally relevant by the authors. This yielded our case series of ten patients who have been described to have reflex seizures in response to emotional stimuli. We characterized features of these cases including the following: age, gender, developmental and psychiatric history, seizure semiology and duration, emotional triggers, other reflex triggers, relationship between reflex triggers and seizures, investigations, localization, final diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Considerable variability was found between cases. A trend toward limbic seizure semiology with psychic aura originating in networks involved in emotional processing was noted, with temporal lobe epilepsy being the most common, although without clear laterality or gender predominance. In addition, the report of a significant life stressor occurring at epilepsy onset in three of ten patients as well as the initial suspicion that reflex epileptic seizures were psychogenic in three cases both emphasize the role of electroencephalography in assessment of such presentations to avoid missing a diagnosis of epilepsy. Findings from these ten cases suggest that a patient-specific affective stimulus may trigger reflex seizures in a subset of patients, and that this could be underrecognized or mislabeled as nonepileptic. We encourage future studies with larger numbers to further characterize this phenomenon. Insights gained may enhance our understanding of seizure localization and bear potential treatment implications.

Patient perceptions and barriers to epilepsy surgery: evaluation in a large health region.

PURPOSE: Despite evidence that carefully selected patients with refractory focal epilepsy benefit from epilepsy surgery, significant delays remain. We examined patient knowledge and perceptions regarding epilepsy surgery. METHODS: A 5-minute questionnaire was administered to consecutive adults with focal epilepsy seen in the epilepsy clinic in a large Canadian health region. Survey items assessed the following: (1) knowledge of surgical options, (2) perceptions about the risks of surgery vs. ongoing seizures, (3) disease disability, (4) treatment goals, and (5) demographic and socioeconomic variables. Patient responses were compiled to calculate a "Barriers to Epilepsy Surgery Composite" (BESC) score. RESULTS: Of 129 eligible patients, 107 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 83%). The average BESC score was 60/100. Apprehension about epilepsy surgery was less likely among patients who had previously undergone epilepsy surgery and those born in Canada. DISCUSSION: People with epilepsy often have hindering perceptions that can contribute to delays in surgical care.

Effect of Training on Visual Identification of High Frequency Oscillations-A Delphi-Style Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of a simple Delphi-method feedback on visual identification of high frequency oscillations (HFOs) in the ripple (80-250 Hz) band, and assessed the impact of this training intervention on the interrater reliability and generalizability of HFO evaluations. METHODS: We employed a morphology detector to identify potential HFOs at two thresholds and presented them to visual reviewers to assess the probability of each epoch containing an HFO. We recruited 19 board-certified epileptologists with various levels of experience to complete a series of HFO evaluations during three sessions. A Delphi-style intervention was used to provide feedback on the performance of each reviewer relative to their peers. A delayed-intervention paradigm was used, in which reviewers received feedback either before or after the second session. ANOVAs were used to assess the effect of the intervention on the reviewers' evaluations. Generalizability theory was used to assess the interrater reliability before and after the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention, regardless of when it occurred, resulted in a significant reduction in the variability between reviewers in both groups (p GroupDI = 0.037, p GroupEI = 0.003). Prior to the delayed-intervention, the group receiving the early intervention showed a significant reduction in variability (p GroupEI = 0.041), but the delayed-intervention group did not (p GroupDI = 0.414). Following the intervention, the projected number of reviewers required to achieve strong generalizability decreased from 35 to 16. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows a robust effect of a Delphi-style intervention on the interrater variability, reliability, and generalizability of HFO evaluations. The observed decreases in HFO marking discrepancies across 14 of the 15 reviewers are encouraging: they are necessarily associated with an increase in interrater reliability, and therefore with a corresponding decrease in the number of reviewers required to achieve strong generalizability. Indeed, the reliability of all reviewers following the intervention was similar to that of experienced reviewers prior to intervention. Therefore, a Delphi-style intervention could be implemented either to sufficiently train any reviewer, or to further refine the interrater reliability of experienced reviewers. In either case, a Delphi-style intervention would help facilitate the standardization of HFO evaluations and its implementation in clinical care.

The ankle-to-arm blood pressure index predicts risk of cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease, as detected by a reduced ankle-to-arm blood pressure index (AAI), has been shown to predict future cardiac events. However, the utility of measuring the AAI to predict postoperative cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery is unknown. METHODS: We prospectively studied 242 consecutive patients aged 50 yr or older presenting to a university hospital preadmission clinic before elective noncardiac surgery. We performed a standardized clinical evaluation that included calculation of the revised cardiac risk index (rCRI) and measurement of the AAI using both palpation and Doppler techniques. Independent observers, blinded to preoperative assessment and AAI results, ascertained cardiac complications in the first 7 days after surgery. We assessed the ability of an abnormal AAI (

Neurologists' knowledge of and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery: a national survey.

OBJECTIVES: In the current study, we aim to assess potential neurologist-related barriers to epilepsy surgery among Canadian neurologists. METHODS: A 29-item, pilot-tested questionnaire was mailed to all neurologists registered to practice in Canada. Survey items included the following: (1) type of medical practice, (2) perceptions of surgical risks and benefits, (3) knowledge of existing practice guidelines, and (4) barriers to surgery for patients with epilepsy. Neurologists who did not complete the questionnaire after the initial mailing were contacted a second time by e-mail, fax, or telephone. After this reminder, the survey was mailed a second time to any remaining nonresponders. RESULTS: In total, 425 of 796 neurologists returned the questionnaire (response rate 53.5%). Respondents included 327 neurologists who followed patients with epilepsy in their practice. More than half (56.6%) of neurologists required patients to be drug-resistant and to have at least one seizure per year before considering surgery, and nearly half (48.6%) failed to correctly define drug-resistant epilepsy. More than 75% of neurologists identified inadequate health care resources as the greatest barrier to surgery for patients with epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of Canadian neurologists are unaware of recommended standards of practice for epilepsy surgery. Access also appears to be a significant barrier to epilepsy surgery and surgical evaluation. As a result, we are concerned that patients with epilepsy are receiving inadequate care. A greater emphasis must be placed on knowledge dissemination and ensuring that the infrastructure and personnel are in place to allow patients to have timely access to this evidence-based treatment.

Feasibility of using an online tool to assess appropriateness for an epilepsy surgery evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the applicability of applying an online tool to determine the appropriateness of referral for an epilepsy surgical evaluation and to determine whether appropriateness scores are concordant with the clinical judgment of epilepsy specialists. METHODS: We prospectively applied the tool in 107 consecutive patients with focal epilepsy seen in an epilepsy outpatient clinic. Variables collected included seizure type, epilepsy duration, seizure frequency, seizure severity, number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tried, AED-related side effects, and the results of investigations. Appropriateness ratings were then compared with retrospectively collected information concerning whether a surgical evaluation had been considered. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (36.4%) were rated as appropriate for an epilepsy surgical evaluation, all of whom had adequately tried 2 or more appropriate AEDs. The majority of patients (84.6%) rated as appropriate had previously been considered or referred for an epilepsy surgical evaluation. Tool feasibility of use was high, with the exception of assessing whether previous AED trials had been adequate and discrepancies between physician and patient reports of AED side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence-based, online clinical decision tool is easily applied and able to determine whether patients with focal epilepsy are appropriate for a surgical evaluation. Future validation of this tool will require application in clinical practice and assessment of potential improvements in patient outcomes.