Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Soft Matter ; 12(8): 2465-72, 2016 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26822233

ABSTRACT

The binding affinity of a curvature-sensing protein domain (N-BAR) is measured as a function of applied osmotic stress while the membrane curvature is nearly constant. Varying the osmotic stress allows us to control membrane tension, which provides a probe of the mechanism of binding. We study the N-BAR domain of the Drosophila amphiphysin and monitor its binding on 50 nm-radius vesicles composed of 90 mol% DOPC and 10 mol% PIP. We find that the bound fraction of N-BAR is enhanced by a factor of approximately 6.5 when the tension increases from zero to 2.6 mN m(-1). This tension-induced response can be explained by the hydrophobic insertion mechanism. From the data we extract a hydrophobic domain area that is consistent with known structure. These results indicate that membrane stress and strain could play a major role in the previously reported curvature-affinity of N-BAR.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/chemistry , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/metabolism , Nerve Tissue Proteins/chemistry , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Synaptic Vesicles/metabolism , Animals , Biophysical Phenomena , Drosophila/chemistry , Drosophila/genetics , Kinetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Osmosis , Protein Binding , Protein Domains , Synaptic Vesicles/chemistry
2.
Langmuir ; 30(15): 4522-30, 2014 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24684606

ABSTRACT

Biofilms are sessile communities of microbes that are spatially structured by an embedding matrix. Biofilm infections are notoriously intractable. This arises, in part, from changes in the bacterial phenotype that result from spatial structure. Understanding these interactions requires methods to control the spatial structure of biofilms. We present a method for growing biofilms from initiating cells whose positions are controlled with single-cell precision using laser trapping. The native growth, motility, and surface adhesion of positioned microbes are preserved, as we show for model organisms Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. We demonstrate that laser-trapping and placing bacteria on surfaces can reveal the effects of spatial structure on bacterial growth in early biofilm development.


Subject(s)
Biofilms/growth & development , Bacterial Adhesion/physiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/growth & development , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development
3.
Langmuir ; 28(11): 5176-81, 2012 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22335608

ABSTRACT

We measured the effect of a model membrane-binding protein on line tension and morphology of phase-separated lipid-bilayer vesicles. We studied giant unilamellar vesicles composed of a cholesterol/dioleoylphosphatidylcholine/palmitoylsphingomyelin mixture and a controlled mole fraction of a Ni-chelating lipid. These vesicles exhibited two coexisting fluid-phase domains at room temperature. Owing to the line tension, σ, between the two phases, the boundary between them was pulled like a purse string so that the smaller domain formed a bud. While observing the vesicles in a microscope, histidine-tagged green fluorescent protein was added, which bound to the Ni-chelating lipid. As protein bound, the vesicle shape changed and the length of the phase boundary increased. The change in morphology was attributed to a reduction of σ between the two phases because of preferential accumulation of histidine-tagged green fluorescent protein-Ni-chelating lipid clusters at the domain boundary. Greater reductions of σ were found in samples with higher concentrations of Ni-chelating lipid; this trend provided an estimate of the binding energy at the boundary, approximately k(B)T. The results show how domain boundaries can lead to an accumulation of membrane-binding proteins at their boundaries and, in turn, how proteins can alter line tension and vesicle morphology.


Subject(s)
Proteins/metabolism , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Lipid Bilayers , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Protein Binding , Temperature
4.
mBio ; 7(2): e00237, 2016 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27006463

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: In traditional models ofin vitrobiofilm development, individual bacterial cells seed a surface, multiply, and mature into multicellular, three-dimensional structures. Much research has been devoted to elucidating the mechanisms governing the initial attachment of single cells to surfaces. However, in natural environments and during infection, bacterial cells tend to clump as multicellular aggregates, and biofilms can also slough off aggregates as a part of the dispersal process. This makes it likely that biofilms are often seeded by aggregates and single cells, yet how these aggregates impact biofilm initiation and development is not known. Here we use a combination of experimental and computational approaches to determine the relative fitness of single cells and preformed aggregates during early development ofPseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms. We find that the relative fitness of aggregates depends markedly on the density of surrounding single cells, i.e., the level of competition for growth resources. When competition between aggregates and single cells is low, an aggregate has a growth disadvantage because the aggregate interior has poor access to growth resources. However, if competition is high, aggregates exhibit higher fitness, because extending vertically above the surface gives cells at the top of aggregates better access to growth resources. Other advantages of seeding by aggregates, such as earlier switching to a biofilm-like phenotype and enhanced resilience toward antibiotics and immune response, may add to this ecological benefit. Our findings suggest that current models of biofilm formation should be reconsidered to incorporate the role of aggregates in biofilm initiation. IMPORTANCE: During the past decades, there has been a consensus around the model of development of a biofilm, involving attachment of single planktonic bacterial cells to a surface and the subsequent development of a mature biofilm. This study presents results that call for a modification of this rigorous model. We show how free floating biofilm aggregates can have a profound local effect on biofilm development when attaching to a surface. Our findings show that an aggregate landing on a surface will eventually outcompete the biofilm population arising from single cells attached around the aggregate and dominate the local biofilm development. These results point to a regime where preformed biofilm aggregates may have a fitness advantage over planktonic cells when it comes to accessing nutrients. Our findings add to the increasingly prominent comprehension that biofilm lifestyle is the default for bacteria and that planktonic single cells may be only a transition state at the most.


Subject(s)
Biofilms/growth & development , Cell Adhesion , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/physiology , Computer Simulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL