Failure to remove de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies is influenced by antibody properties and identifies kidney recipients with late antibody-mediated rejection destined to graft loss - a retrospective study.

Current research is focusing on identifying bioclinical parameters for risk stratification of renal allograft loss, largely due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We retrospectively investigated graft outcome predictors in 24 unsensitized pediatric kidney recipients developing HLA de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), and treated for late AMR with plasmapheresis + low-dose IVIG + Rituximab or high-dose IVIG + Rituximab. Renal function and DSA properties were assessed before and longitudinally post treatment. The estimated GFR (eGFR) decline after treatment was dependent on a negative % eGFR variation in the year preceding treatment (P = 0.021) but not on eGFR at treatment (P = 0.74). At a median follow-up of 36 months from AMR diagnosis, 10 patients lost their graft. Altered eGFR (P < 0.001) and presence of C3d-binding DSAs (P = 0.005) at treatment, and failure to remove DSAs (P = 0.01) were negatively associated with graft survival in the univariable analysis. Given the relevance of DSA removal for therapeutic success, we analyzed antibody properties dictating resistance to anti-humoral treatment. In the multivariable analysis, C3d-binding ability (P < 0.05), but not C1q-binding, and high mean fluorescence intensity (P < 0.05) were independent factors characterizing DSAs scarcely susceptible to removal. The poor prognosis of late AMR is related to deterioration of graft function prior to treatment and failure to remove C3d binding and/or high-MFI DSAs.

In kidney transplant patients, alemtuzumab but not basiliximab/low-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induces B cell depletion and regeneration, which associates with a high incidence of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody development.

In this single-center matched-cohort study, we evaluated the phenotype of repopulating B cells and its correlation with donor-specific anti-HLA Ab development and long-term graft function in 16 renal transplant recipients and 32 age- and gender-matched controls induced with alemtuzumab or basiliximab (Bas)/low-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG), respectively. Alemtuzumab, but not Bas/rATG, profoundly depleted peripheral B cells in the first 2 mo posttransplantation. Early posttransplant, naive B cells were significantly depleted, whereas Ag-experienced and memory B cells were partially spared. Transitional B cells transiently increased 2 mo posttransplant. At month 6 posttransplant, pregerminal center B cells emerged, a process promoted by increased BAFF serum levels. Thereafter, B cell counts increased progressively, mainly due to expansion of naive B cells. Conversely, Bas/rATG did not modify the B cell phenotype throughout the follow-up period. Alemtuzumab was associated with a higher incidence of de novo DSA compared with Bas/rATG. DSA development was predicted by changes in the B cell compartment and correlated with worse long-term graft function. Thus, alemtuzumab-induced B cell depletion/reconstitution may promote chronic humoral responses against the graft.

Three-yr safety and efficacy of everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine in de novo pediatric kidney transplant patients.

The three yr results of a multicenter trial in de novo pediatric KT treated with a proliferative signal inhibitor and low dose CNI are presented. Thirty-seven children (9.1 ± 5 yr old) received basiliximab, cyclosporine A (CyA C2:1400 ng/mL), (MMF C0:1.5-3 µg/mL), and prednisone. Three wk later everolimus was started (C0:5-10 ng/mL), CyA was reduced (C2:600 ng/mL after 90 days 300 ng/mL), and MMF discontinued. During the three-yr period patient and graft survivals were 96%. One patient died for causes unrelated to the immunosuppression. Cumulative acute rejection rate including protocol and indication biopsies was 21.9%. None of the patients had signs of chronic humoral rejection. Incidence of dnDSA was 5%, 11%, and 22% at one, two, and three yr post-transplant, respectively. Mean glomerular filtration rate measured at one yr and three yr post-transplant was 105.5 ± 31 and 110.7 ± 27 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. A growth velocity of 7.7 ± 6.7 cm/yr was achieved with positive catch-up growth. No malignancy or post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases were diagnosed. In conclusion, the treatment based on basiliximab induction, everolimus, low-dose cyclosporine, and low-dose prednisone leads to good long-term efficacy in de novo pediatric KT recipients.

Anti-glutathione S-transferase theta 1 antibodies correlate with graft loss in non-sensitized pediatric kidney recipients.

Introduction: Immunity to Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) cannot explain all cases of ABMR, nor the differences observed in the outcome of kidney recipients with circulating DSAs endowed with similar biologic characteristics. Thus, increasing attention has recently been focused on the role of immunity to non-HLA antigenic targets. Methods: We analyzed humoral auto- and alloimmune responses to the non-HLA antigen glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1), along with development of de novo (dn)HLA-DSAs, in a cohort of 146 pediatric non-sensitized recipients of first kidney allograft, to analyze its role in ABMR and graft loss. A multiplex bead assay was employed to assess GSTT1 antibodies (Abs). Results: We observed development of GSTT1 Abs in 71 recipients after transplantation, 16 with MFI > 8031 (4th quartile: Q4 group). In univariate analyses, we found an association between Q4-GSTT1Abs and ABMR and graft loss, suggesting a potential role in inducing graft damage, as GSTT1 Abs were identified within ABMR biopsies of patients with graft function deterioration in the absence of concomitant intragraft HLA-DSAs. HLA-DSAs and GSTT1 Abs were independent predictors of graft loss in our cohort. As GSTT1 Ab development preceded or coincided with the appearance of dnHLA-DSAs, we tested and found that a model with the two combined parameters proved more fit to classify patients at risk of graft loss. Discussion: Our observations on the harmful effects of GSTT1Abs, alone or in combination with HLA-DSAs, add to the evidence pointing to a negative role of allo- and auto-non-HLA Abs on kidney graft outcome.

Post-transplant de novo non donor-specific HLA antibodies are not associated with poor graft outcome in non-sensitized pediatric recipients of kidney transplantation.

While de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSAs) have a detrimental impact on kidney graft outcome, the clinical significance of de novo non donor-specific antibodies (dnNDSAs) is more controversial. We retrospectively evaluated for Ab development and characteristics of dnNDSAs serially collected post-transplant sera and, when available, graft biopsy eluates, from 144 non-sensitized, primary pediatric kidney recipients, consecutively transplanted at a single center between 2003 and 2017, using HLA class I and class II single-antigen flow-bead assays (SAB). The results were compared with clinical-pathologic data from HLA antibody negative and HLA dnDSA-positive patients. Forty-five out of 144 patients developed dnNDSAs (31%). Among the dnNDSA-positive patients, 86% displayed one or more class I/II antibodies recognizing antigens included in the CREG/shared epitope groups that also comprise the mismatched donor HLA antigens. Despite potential pathogenicity, as suggested by their occasional presence within the graft, dnNDSAs displayed significantly lower MFI, and limited complement binding and graft homing properties, when compared with dnDSAs. In parallel, the graft survival probability was significantly lower in patients with dnDSA than in those with dnNDSA or without HLA antibodies (p < 0.005). Indeed, the dnNDSA-positive patients remaining dnDSA-negative throughout the posttransplant period did not develop clinical antibody mediated rejection and graft loss, and maintained good graft function at a median follow-up of 9 years. The biological characteristics of dnNDSAs may account for the low graft damaging capability when compared to dnDSAs.

Luminex technology for anti-HLA antibody screening: evaluation of performance and of impact on laboratory routine.

The recent introduction of new technologies such as Luminex has provided alternative methods to the Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) test for HLA specific antibody detection. In this study we compared the results obtained with CDC to those obtained using a Luminex method with the aim of evaluating the impact of this new technology on antibody screening policies in our transplant setting.A total of 1,421 sera, acquired from patients on the waiting list for a kidney transplant or following transplantation, were tested by both methodologies. CDC was performed using a whole lymphocyte population comprising a panel of 52 cells. The percentage panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and antibody specificity were evaluated using Lambda Scan Analysis software. For the Luminex method sera screening and identification of antibody specificity were carried out using the LABScreen Mixed and LABScreen PRA respectively. The overall concordance between the results obtained using the CDC and the Luminex methods was 85%. HLA antibody specificity was confirmed in 96% of the sera which tested positive using the Luminex system and serum positivity corresponded with a previous sensitisation event in these individuals. Using the Luminex method 18% of patients on the waiting list were considered and managed as sensitised as compared to 7% when testing with CDC alone. The Luminex method was able to detect a number of antibody specificities significantly more frequently than the CDC method and in addition the CDC method failed to detect some of the antibody specificities detected by the Luminex system. Based on this comparison study we have incorporated the Luminex methodology into our screening strategy.

De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Developing Early or Late after Transplant Are Associated with the Same Risk of Graft Damage and Loss in Nonsensitized Kidney Recipients.

De novo posttransplant donor-specific HLA-antibody (dnDSA) detection is now recognized as a tool to identify patients at risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss. It is still unclear whether the time interval from transplant to DSA occurrence influences graft damage. Utilizing sera collected longitudinally, we evaluated 114 consecutive primary pediatric kidney recipients grafted between 2002 and 2013 for dnDSA occurrence by Luminex platform. dnDSAs occurred in 39 patients at a median time of 24.6 months. In 15 patients, dnDSAs developed within 1 year (early-onset group), while the other 24 seroconverted after the first posttransplant year (late-onset group). The two groups were comparable when considering patient- and transplant-related factors, as well as DSA biological properties, including C1q and C3d complement-binding ability. Only recipient age at transplant significantly differed in the two cohorts, with younger patients showing earlier dnDSA development. Late AMR was diagnosed in 47% of the early group and in 58% of the late group. Graft loss occurred in 3/15 (20%) and 4/24 (17%) patients in early- and late-onset groups, respectively (p = ns). In our pediatric kidney recipients, dnDSAs predict AMR and graft loss irrespective of the time elapsed between transplantation and antibody occurrence.

Heart transplantation with donor-specific antibodies directed toward denatured HLA-A*02:01: a case report.

The development of solid-phase assays for antibody detection has aided in the frequent detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in nonalloimmunized males. Some scientists have reported that these HLA antibodies are produced to pathogens or allergens and the reactivity with HLA coated beads is the result of cross-reactive epitopes. These antibodies may also be directed toward cryptic epitopes exposed on the denatured beads. In this report, we describe the case of a heart transplanted patient who exhibited anti-HLA-A*02:01 donor-specific antibodies detected with a bead-based assay (Luminex) and undetected with the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test. Posttransplant monitoring, carried out with CDC and with Luminex on sera from this patient collected at the 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th posttransplant weeks and at 1 year confirmed the presence of anti-HLA-A*02:01 in all serum samples. Additional tests carried out with denatured and intact HLA molecules using single antigen beads demonstrated that the antibody was directed toward a cryptic epitope. One year after transplantation the patient is doing well. No sign of antibody-mediated rejection was observed throughout the follow-up. A comprehensive evaluation of the anamnesis and of antibodies is critical to avoid needless exclusion of organ donors.

Isoniazid in patient plasma may cause a false-positive result on the complement-dependent cytotoxicity test.

Correct definition of clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies is important for transplant organ allocation and outcome. We describe a candidate for kidney transplantation who was treated with isoniazid because of active tuberculosis. The patient's serum gave a positive antibody result on screening with the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test but a negative result on screening with a bead-based assay (Luminex). The clinical history indicated no immunologic stimuli. Subsequent testing on fresh serum samples confirmed the discrepancy between CDC and Luminex results. An autologous cross-match test gave negative results, and the antibodies were sensitive to dithiothreitol treatment. We postulated that nonspecific binding of drug-antibody complexes to panel lymphocytes in the CDC test may have caused the observed lympholysis. This case, although isolated, emphasizes the importance of the combined use of CDC and solid phase assays. The CDC results alone would have led to the erroneous conclusion that the patient was highly sensitized.

Six-year monitoring of the donor-specific immune response to cryopreserved aortic allograft valves: implications with valve dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The immune rejection has been anticipated as one of the major causes of allograft aortic valve (AAV) degeneration. The purpose of this study was to prospectively serially measure the magnitude and evolution of the recipient anti-HLA class I antibody response up to 6 years from AAV implant and to correlate serologic data with valve performance by means of a concurrent echocardiographic survey. METHODS: Cryopreserved AAVs were obtained from multiorgan HLA-typed donors. Nineteen patients younger than 50 years (mean age, 43.3 +/- 8 years) were prospectively studied. After successful surgery, all AAV recipient underwent at 3 and 6 months and each year postoperatively (mean follow-up, 71.9 months) concomitant serum sample collection and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies was tested against a panel of lymphocytes obtained from 30 blood donors. RESULTS: Progressive structural valve deterioration was seen in 6 patients (31.5%) of whom 4 (21%) were reoperated. All pretransplant recipients sera were panel-reactive antibody negative. Seventeen patients (89.4%) demonstrated significant panel-reactive antibody levels, which peaked at 6 months postoperatively, declined from 6 to 24 months, and slowly decreased afterward. In 14 of 19 cases (73.6%) donor-specific HLA antibodies were identified. A strong immunization (6-year persistence of panel-reactive antibody > 70% and peak panel-reactive antibody > 80%) was detected in 31.5% and 36.8% of recipients, respectively. Strong immunization was found to be significantly associated with progressive structural deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: The immune reaction after cryopreserved AAV implantation is a peculiar long-lasting response occurring in the majority of recipients younger than 50 years of age. An association between a sustained and pronounced immunization and an aggressive AAV degeneration was observed.