ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Comparative studies evaluating quality of care in different healthcare systems can guide reform initiatives. This study seeks to characterize best practices by comparing utilization and outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) in the USA and Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Patients (age ≥ 66 years) with PC were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry and SEER-Medicare databases from 2006 to 2015. Demographics and treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or multimodality (surgery and chemotherapy)) were described. In resected patients, neoadjuvant therapy, readmission, and 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were calculated. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: This study includes 38,858 and 11,512 patients with PC from the USA and Ontario, respectively. More female patients were identified in the USA (54.0%) versus Ontario (46.9%). In the entire cohort, US patients received more radiation in addition to other therapies (18.8% vs. 13.5% Ontario) and chemotherapy alone (34.3% vs. 19.0% Ontario). While rates of resection were similar (13.4% USA vs.12.5% Ontario), multimodality therapy was more common in the UAS (9.0% vs. 6.4%). Among resected patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was uncommon in both groups, although more frequent in the USA (12.0% vs. 3.2% Ontario). The 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were lower in Ontario vs. the USA (30-day: 3.26% vs. 4.91%; 90-day: 7.08% vs. 10.96%), however, overall survival was similar between the USA and Ontario. CONCLUSIONS: We observed substantive differences in treatment and outcomes between PC patients in the USA and Ontario, which may reflect known differences in healthcare systems. Close evaluation of healthcare policies can inform initiatives to improve care quality.
Subject(s)
National Health Programs , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Registries , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Joint-sparing resection of periarticular bone tumors can be challenging because of complex geometry. Successful reconstruction of periarticular bone defects after tumor resection is often performed with structural allografts to allow for joint preservation. However, achieving a size-matched allograft to fill the defect can be challenging because allograft sizes vary, they do not always match a patient's anatomy, and cutting the allograft to perfectly fit the defect is demanding. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there a difference in mental workload among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation approaches? (2) Is there a difference in conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft), elapsed time during reconstruction, and qualitative assessment of goodness-of-fit of the allograft reconstruction among the approaches? METHODS: Seven surgeons used three modalities in the same order (freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation) to fashion synthetic bone to reconstruct a standardized bone defect. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) mental task load index questionnaires and procedure time were captured. Cone-beam CT images of the shaped allografts were used to measure conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft) to a computer-generated ideal bone graft model. Six additional (senior) surgeons blinded to modality scored the quality of fit of the allografts into the standardized tumor defect using a 10-point Likert scale. We measured conformance using the root-mean-square metric in mm and used ANOVA for multipaired comparisons (p < 0.05 was significant). RESULTS: There was no difference in mental NASA total task load scores among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation techniques. We found no difference in conformance root-mean-square values (mean ± SD) between surgical navigation (2 ± 0 mm; mean values have been rounded to whole numbers) and patient-specific instrumentation (2 ± 1 mm), but both showed a small improvement compared with the freehand approach (3 ± 1 mm). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to 1.1; p = 0.01). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% CI -0.1 to 0.9; p = 0.02). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 0 mm (95% CI -0.5 to 0.2; p = 0.82). In evaluating the goodness of fit of the shaped grafts, we found no clinically important difference between surgical navigation (median [IQR] 7 [6 to 8]) and patient-specific instrumentation (median 6 [5 to 7.8]), although both techniques had higher scores than the freehand technique did (median 3 [2 to 4]). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 4 (p < 0.001). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the difference of medians was 3 (p < 0.001). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 1 (p = 0.03). The mean ± procedural times for freehand was 16 ± 10 minutes, patient-specific instrumentation was 14 ± 9 minutes, and surgical navigation techniques was 24 ± 8 minutes. We found no differences in procedures times across three shaping modalities (freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation: mean difference 2 minutes [95% CI 0 to 7]; p = 0.92; freehand versus surgical navigation: mean difference 8 minutes [95% CI 0 to 20]; p = 0.23; patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation: mean difference 10 minutes [95% CI 1 to 19]; p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Based on surgical simulation to reconstruct a standardized periarticular bone defect after tumor resection, we found a possible small advantage to surgical navigation over patient-specific instrumentation based on qualitative fit, but both techniques provided slightly better conformance of the shaped graft for fit into the standardized post-tumor resection bone defect than the freehand technique did. To determine whether these differences are clinically meaningful requires further study. The surgical navigation system presented here is a product of laboratory research development, and although not ready to be widely deployed for clinical practice, it is currently being used in a research operating room setting for patient care. This new technology is associated with a learning curve, capital costs, and potential risk. The reported preliminary results are based on a preclinical synthetic bone tumor study, which is not as realistic as actual surgical scenarios. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgical navigation systems are an emerging technology in orthopaedic and reconstruction surgery, and understanding their capabilities and limitations is paramount for clinical practice. Given our preliminary findings in a small cohort study with one scenario of standardized synthetic periarticular bone tumor defects, future investigations should include different surgical scenarios using allograft and cadaveric specimens in a more realistic surgical setting.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dentists serve a crucial role in managing treatment complications for patients with head and neck cancer, including post-radiation caries and oral infection. To date, dental services for head and neck cancer patients in Ontario, Canada have not been well characterized and considerable disparities in allocation, availability, and funding are thought to exist. The current study aims to describe and assess the provision of dental services for head and neck cancer patients in Ontario. METHODS: A mixed methods scoping assessment was conducted. A purposive sample of dentist-in-chiefs at each of Ontario's 9 designated head and neck cancer centres (tertiary centres which meet provincially-set quality and safety standards) was invited to participate. Participants completed a 36-item online survey and 60-minute semi-structured interview which explored perceptions of dental services for head and neck cancer patients at their respective centres, including strengths, gaps, and inequities. If a centre did not have a dentist-in-chief, an alternative stakeholder who was knowledgeable on that centre's dental services participated instead. Thematic analysis of the interview data was completed using a mixed deductive-inductive approach. RESULTS: Survey questionnaires were completed at 7 of 9 designated centres. A publicly funded dental clinic was present at 5 centres, but only 2 centres provided automatic dental assessment for all patients. Survey data from 2 centres were not captured due to these centres' lack of active dental services. Qualitative interviews were conducted at 9 of 9 designated centres and elicited 3 themes: (1) lack of financial resources; (2) heterogeneity in dentistry care provision; and (3) gaps in the continuity of care. Participants noted concerning under-resourcing and limitations/restrictions in funding for dental services across Ontario, resulting in worse health outcomes for vulnerable patients. Extensive advocacy efforts by champions of dental services who have sought to mitigate current disparities in dentistry care were also described. CONCLUSIONS: Inequities exist in the provision of dental services for head and neck cancer patients in Ontario. Data from the current study will broaden the foundation for evidence-based decision-making on the allocation and funding of dental services by government health care agencies.
Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Diseases , Humans , Ontario , Delivery of Health Care , Dental Caries/therapy , Dental CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess whether surgical case volume for lateral neck dissection has an impact on the survival of patients who have well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) with lateral cervical node metastases. The authors used a population-based cohort study design. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of WDTC patients in Ontario Canada who underwent thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection. These patients were identified using both hospital- and surgeon-level administrative data between 1993 and 2017 (n = 1832). Surgeon and hospital volumes were calculated based on the number of cases managed in the year before the procedure by the physician and at the institution managing each case, respectively, and divided into tertiles. Multilevel Cox regression models were used to estimate the effect of volume on disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A crude model without patient or treatment characteristics demonstrated that DFS was associated with both higher surgeon volume tertiles (p < 0.01) and higher hospital volume tertiles (p < 0.01). After control for clustering, patient/treatment covariates, and hospital volume, the lowest surgeon volume tertile (range, 0-20/year; mean, 6.5/year) remained an independent statistically significant negative predictor of DFS (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95 % confidence interval, 1.22-2.4; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Surgeon lateral neck dissection case volume is a predictor of better DFS for thyroid cancer patients, with the lowest surgeon volume tertile (<20 neck dissections per year) demonstrating poorer DFS.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary , Thyroid Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Cohort Studies , Humans , Neck Dissection , Ontario , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , ThyroidectomyABSTRACT
No population-based study exists to demonstrate the full-spectrum impact of COVID-19 on hindering incident cancer detection in a large cancer system. Building upon our previous publication in JNCCN, we conducted an updated analysis using 12 months of new data accrued in the pandemic era (extending the study period from September 26, 2020, to October 2, 2021) to demonstrate how multiple COVID-19 waves affected the weekly cancer incidence volume in Ontario, Canada, and if we have fully cleared the backlog at the end of each wave.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ontario/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Resource restrictions were established in many jurisdictions to maintain health system capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disrupted healthcare access likely impacted early cancer detection. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on weekly reported cancer incidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a population-based study involving individuals diagnosed with cancer from September 25, 2016, to September 26, 2020, in Ontario, Canada. Weekly cancer incidence counts were examined using segmented negative binomial regression models. The weekly estimated backlog during the pandemic was calculated by subtracting the observed volume from the projected/expected volume in that week. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 358,487 adult patients with cancer. At the start of the pandemic, there was an immediate 34.3% decline in the estimated mean cancer incidence volume (relative rate, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.75), followed by a 1% increase in cancer incidence volume in each subsequent week (relative rate, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.001-1.017). Similar trends were found for both screening and nonscreening cancers. The largest immediate declines were seen for melanoma and cervical, endocrinologic, and prostate cancers. For hepatobiliary and lung cancers, there continued to be a weekly decline in incidence during the COVID-19 period. Between March 15 and September 26, 2020, 12,601 fewer individuals were diagnosed with cancer, with an estimated weekly backlog of 450. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that there is a large volume of undetected cancer cases related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Incidence rates have not yet returned to prepandemic levels.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms , Adult , Male , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Ontario/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With the declaration of the global pandemic, surgical slowdowns were instituted to conserve health care resources for anticipated surges in patients with COVID-19. The long-term implications on survival of these slowdowns for patients with cancer in Canada is unknown. METHODS: We constructed a microsimulation model based on real-world population data on cancer care from Ontario, Canada, from 2019 and 2020. Our model estimated wait times for cancer surgery over a 6-month period during the pandemic by simulating a slowdown in operating room capacity (60% operating room resources in month 1, 70% in month 2, 85% in months 3-6), as compared with simulated prepandemic conditions with 100% resources. We used incremental differences in simulated wait times to model survival using per-day hazard ratios for risk of death. Primary outcomes included life-years lost per patient and per cancer population. We conducted scenario analyses to evaluate alternative, hypothetical scenarios of different levels of surgical slowdowns on risk of death. RESULTS: The simulated model population comprised 22 799 patients waiting for cancer surgery before the pandemic and 20 177 patients during the pandemic. Mean wait time to surgery prepandemic was 25 days and during the pandemic was 32 days. Excess wait time led to 0.01-0.07 life-years lost per patient across cancer sites, translating to 843 (95% credible interval 646-950) life-years lost among patients with cancer in Ontario. INTERPRETATION: Pandemic-related slowdowns of cancer surgeries were projected to result in decreased long-term survival for many patients with cancer. Measures to preserve surgical resources and health care capacity for affected patients are critical to mitigate unintended consequences.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/surgery , Pandemics , Time-to-Treatment , Delayed Diagnosis , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ontario/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Uncertainty , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
A great promise for tissue engineering is represented by scaffolds that host stem cells during proliferation and differentiation and simultaneously replace damaged tissue while maintaining the main vital functions. In this paper, a novel process was adopted to develop composite scaffolds with a core-shell structure for bone tissue regeneration, in which the core has the main function of temporary mechanical support, and the shell enhances biocompatibility and provides bioactive properties. An interconnected porous core was safely obtained, avoiding solvents or other chemical issues, by blending poly(lactic acid), poly(ε-caprolactone) and leachable superabsorbent polymer particles. After particle leaching in water, the core was grafted with a gelatin/chitosan hydrogel shell to create a cell-friendly bioactive environment within its pores. The physicochemical, morphological, and mechanical characterization of the hybrid structure and of its component materials was carried out by means of infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and mechanical testing under different loading conditions. These hybrid polymer devices were found to closely mimic both the morphology and the stiffness of bones. In addition, in vitro studies showed that the core-shell scaffolds are efficiently seeded by human mesenchymal stromal cells, which remain viable, proliferate, and are capable of differentiating towards the osteogenic phenotype if adequately stimulated.
Subject(s)
Polymers , Tissue Scaffolds , Bone Regeneration , Bone and Bones , Polyesters/chemistry , Tissue Engineering/methods , Tissue Scaffolds/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Monitoring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), known as liquid biopsies, continue to be developed as diagnostic and prognostic markers for a wide variety of cancer indications, mainly due to their minimally invasive nature and ability to offer a wide range of phenotypic and genetic information. While liquid biopsies maintain significant promising benefits, there is still limited information regarding the kinetics of ctDNA and CTCs following radiation therapy which remains a vital treatment modality in head and neck cancers. This study aims to describe the kinetics of ctDNA and CTCs following radiation exposure in a preclinical rabbit model with VX2 induced buccal carcinoma. METHODS: Seven rabbits were inoculated with VX2 cells in the buccal mucosa and subjected to radiation. At selected time points, blood sampling was performed to monitor differing levels of ctDNA and CTC. Plasma ctDNA was measured with quantitative PCR for papillomavirus E6 while CTCs were quantified using an immunomagnetic nanoparticles within a microfluidic device. Comparisons of CTC detection with EpCAM compared to multiple surface markers (EGFR, HER2 and PSMA) was evaluated and correlated with the tumor size. RESULTS: Plasma ctDNA reflects the overall tumor burden within the animal model. Analysis of correlations between ctDNA with tumor and lymph node volumes showed a positive correlation (R = 0.452 and R = 0.433 [p < 0.05]), respectively. Over the course of treatment, ctDNA levels declined and quickly becomes undetectable following tumor eradication. While during the course of treatment, ctDNA levels were noted to rise particularly upon initiation of radiation following scheduled treatment breaks. Levels of CTCs were observed to increase 1 week following inoculation of tumor to the primary site. For CTC detection, the use of multiple surface markers showed a greater sensitivity when compared to detection using only EpCAM. Plasma CTC levels remained elevated following radiation therapy which may account for an increased shedding of CTCs following radiation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the utility of ctDNA and CTCs detection in response to radiation treatment in a preclinical head and neck model, allowing for better understanding of liquid biopsy applications in both clinical practice and research development.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/blood , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Mouth Neoplasms/blood , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Animals , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/chemically induced , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Cottontail rabbit papillomavirus , Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule/blood , Head and Neck Neoplasms/blood , Head and Neck Neoplasms/chemically induced , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Immunomagnetic Separation/methods , Liquid Biopsy/methods , Male , Mouth Neoplasms/chemically induced , Mouth Neoplasms/virology , Nanoparticles , Neoplasm Transplantation , Open Reading Frames , Rabbits , Radiotherapy Dosage , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
This study evaluates a long-acting liposomal fluorescence / CT dual-modality contrast agent (CF800) in head and neck cancer to enhance intraoperative tumor demarcation with fluorescence imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CF800 was administered to 12 buccal cancer-bearing rabbits. Imaging was acquired at regular time points to quantify time-dependent contrast enhancement. Surgery was performed 5-7 days after, with intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy and CBCT, followed by histological and ex-vivo fluorescence assessment. Tumor enhancement on CT was significant at 24, 96 and 120 hours. Volumetric analysis of tumor segmentation showed high correlation between CBCT and micro-CT. Fluorescence signal was apparent in both ex-vivo and in-vivo imaging. Histological correlation showed [100%] specificity for primary tumor. Sensitivity and specificity of CF800 in detecting nodal involvement require further investigation.CF800 is long acting and has dual function for CT and fluorescence contrast, making it an excellent candidate for image-guided surgery.
Subject(s)
Contrast Media/chemistry , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Optical Imaging , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Animals , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Fluorescence , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Injections , Liposomes/administration & dosage , Liposomes/pharmacokinetics , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Rabbits , X-Ray MicrotomographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify a subgroup of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who might be suitable for hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT-hypo) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: HNSCC cases (oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx) treated with definitive RT-hypo (60 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks), moderately accelerated radiotherapy (RT-acc) alone (70 Gy in 35 fractions over 6 weeks), or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) during 2005-2017 were included. Locoregional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) after RT-hypo, RT-acc, and CCRT were compared for various subgroups. RESULTS: The study identified 994 human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma cases (with 61, 254, and 679 receiving RT-hypo, RT-acc, and CCRT, respectively) and 1045 HPV- HNSCC cases (with 263, 451, and 331 receiving RT-hypo, RT-acc, and CCRT, respectively). The CCRT cohort had higher T/N categories, whereas the radiotherapy-alone patients were older. The median follow-up was 4.6 years. RT-hypo, RT-acc, and CCRT produced comparable 3-year LRC and DC for HPV+ T1-2N0-N2a disease (seventh edition of the TNM system [TNM-7]; LRC, 94%, 100%, and 94%; P = .769; DC, 94%, 100%, and 94%; P = .272), T1-T2N2b disease (LRC, 90%, 94%, and 97%; P = .445; DC, 100%, 96%, and 95%; P = .697), and T1-2N2c/T3N0-N2c disease (LRC, 89%, 93%, and 95%; P = .494; DC, 89%, 90%, and 87%; P = .838). Although LRC was also similar for T4/N3 disease (78%, 84%, and 88%; P = .677), DC was significantly lower with RT-hypo or RT-acc versus CCRT (67%, 65%, and 87%; P = .005). For HPV- HNSCC, 3-year LRC and DC were similar with RT-hypo, RT-acc, and CCRT in stages I and II (LRC, 85%, 89%, and 100%; P = .320; DC, 99%, 98%, and 100%; P = .446); however, RT-hypo and RT-acc had significantly lower LRC in stage III (76%, 69%, and 91%; P = .006), whereas DC rates were similar (92%, 85%, and 90%; P = .410). Lower LRC in stage III predominated in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma receiving RT-acc (62%) but not RT-hypo (80%) or CCRT (92%; RT-hypo vs CCRT: P = .270; RT-acc vs CCRT: P = .004). CCRT had numerically higher LRC in comparison with RT-hypo or RT-acc in stage IV (73%, 65%, and 66%; P = .336). CONCLUSIONS: It is proposed that RT-hypo be considered in place of CCRT for HPV+ T1-T3N0-N2c (TNM-7) HNSCCs, HPV- T1-T2N0 HNSCCs, and select stage III HNSCCs during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Pandemics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Risk Factors , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/virology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, access to surgical care for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is limited and unpredictable. Determining which patients should be prioritized is inherently subjective and difficult to assess. The authors have proposed an algorithm to fairly and consistently triage patients and mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes. METHODS: Two separate expert panels, a consensus panel (11 participants) and a validation panel (15 participants), were constructed among international HNC surgeons. Using a modified Delphi process and RAND Corporation/University of California at Los Angeles methodology with 4 consensus rounds and 2 meetings, groupings of high-priority, intermediate-priority, and low-priority indications for surgery were established and subdivided. A point-based scoring algorithm was developed, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN-HN). Agreement was measured during consensus and for algorithm scoring using the Krippendorff alpha. Rankings from the algorithm were compared with expert rankings of 12 case vignettes using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 62 indications for surgical priority were rated. Weights for each indication ranged from -4 to +4 (scale range; -17 to 20). The response rate for the validation exercise was 100%. The SPARTAN-HN demonstrated excellent agreement and correlation with expert rankings (Krippendorff alpha, .91 [95% CI, 0.88-0.93]; and rho, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.45-0.95]). CONCLUSIONS: The SPARTAN-HN surgical prioritization algorithm consistently stratifies patients requiring HNC surgical care in the COVID-19 era. Formal evaluation and implementation are required. LAY SUMMARY: Many countries have enacted strict rules regarding the use of hospital resources during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Facing delays in surgery, patients may experience worse functional outcomes, stage migration, and eventual inoperability. Treatment prioritization tools have shown benefit in helping to triage patients equitably with minimal provider cognitive burden. The current study sought to develop what to the authors' knowledge is the first cancer-specific surgical prioritization tool for use in the COVID-19 era, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN-HN). This algorithm consistently stratifies patients requiring head and neck cancer surgery in the COVID-19 era and provides evidence for the initial uptake of the SPARTAN-HN.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Health Resources , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Triage/methods , Algorithms , COVID-19 , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , International Cooperation , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design , SARS-CoV-2 , SurgeonsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) techniques, including use of radioisotopes, have disadvantages including the use of a radioactive tracer. Indocyanine green (ICG) based near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging and cone beam CT (CBCT) have advantages for intraoperative use. However, limited literature exists regarding their use in head and neck cancer SLNB. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized study using a rabbit oral cavity VX2 squamous cell carcinoma model (n = 10) which develops lymph node metastasis. Pre-operatively, images were acquired by MicroCT. During surgery, CBCT and NIR fluorescence imaging of ICG was used to map and guide the SLNB resection. RESULTS: Intraoperative use of ICG to guide fluorescence resection resulted in identification of all lymph nodes identified by pre-operative CT. CBCT was useful for near real time intraoperative imaging and 3D reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This pre-clinical study further demonstrates the technical feasibility, limitations and advantages of intraoperative NIR-guided ICG imaging for SLN identification as a complementary method during head and neck surgery.
Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Indocyanine Green/administration & dosage , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Optical Imaging/methods , Sentinel Lymph Node/diagnostic imaging , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Transplantation , Prospective Studies , Rabbits , Radiography, Interventional , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/diagnostic imaging , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , X-Ray MicrotomographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the incidence of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like features (NIFTP) in Ontario, Canada and the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) by comparing patients with follicular variant papillary thyroid cancer (FVPTC) and patients with NIFTP. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study included all patients who had definitive surgery for well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) in Ontario, Canada between 1990 and 2001 and were followed until 2014. A conservative decision rule was applied to subtype-select FVPTCs into NIFTPs after pathology report review. The primary outcome was DFS, for which Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of FVPTC versus NIFTP. RESULTS: At pathology re-review of the 725 FVPTC cases, 318 were reclassified as potential NIFTP. The median follow-up time was 15.3 years for the entire cohort and 15.9 years for those alive at the last follow-up visit. Disease failure occurred for 109 patients, 79 (19.4%) in the FVPTC group and 30 (9.4%) in the NIFTP group (p < 0.01). This effect was sustained in the multivariable analysis, with FVPTC showing significantly worse DFS than NIFTP (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.89). After recategorization of certain FVPTCs into NIFTPs, the findings showed that NIFTP accounted for 16.8% (1.461/8.699 per 100,000) of all WDTCs. CONCLUSION: The disease failure rate for NIFTP was 9.4%. The NIFTP diagnosis is challenging for the pathologist and may make tumor behavior difficult to predict for this entity. Caution should be used in the management of patients with an NIFTP.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/mortality , Carcinoma, Papillary/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Papillary/mortality , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thyroid Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/pathology , Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical precision in the reconstruction of the orbital floor is crucial to functional visual and aesthetic outcomes. Increasingly, computer-aided design is being utilized to aid in precise preoperative planning by using the mirror images of the unaffected side. The authors aim to use 3-dimensional (3D) quantitative analysis to establish whether the native orbital floor topography is sufficiently symmetric to support this practice. METHODS: Ten high resolution head and neck computed tomography scans of patients without periorbital pathology were obtained. These were imported into a 3D medical image processing software and segmented to isolate bilateral orbital floors. Each native orbital floor was compared to the mirror image of the contralateral side by conformance map computation. Data collection included measures of 25% and 75% quartile, median, mean, standard deviation, and root-mean-square (RMS). RESULTS: The topographic analysis demonstrated a high degree of topographic conformance with a mean RMS of 0.58â±â0.37âmm. Further volumetric analysis comparing the total orbital volume between each side also demonstrates a high degree of volumetric symmetry with a mean difference of 0.55âmL (Pâ=â0.30). CONCLUSION: Comparison of the native orbital floor and the mirror image of the contralateral side by conformance map computation and volumetric analysis demonstrated a high degree of morphologic similarity. The native orbital floor topography provides optimal symmetry to support mirror imaging techniques used in orbital floor reconstruction.
Subject(s)
Orbit/diagnostic imaging , Orbit/surgery , Computer-Aided Design , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Software , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Current nonvascular osseous reconstructive options for reconstruction of the orbital floor after maxillectomy include options such as scapular tip and iliac crest bone grafts. The aim of this study was to determine whether these donor sites were morphologically comparable with the orbital floor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study design was selected. By use of a pre-existing melanoma database (January 1, 2005, through September 20, 2015), computed tomography scans of the head, neck, thorax, and pelvis were obtained from patients without evidence of bony metastases. With the use of 3-dimensional software (Mimics; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), grafts from the scapulae and iliac crests, the predictor variables, were digitally harvested, co-registered with the orbital floors bilaterally, and analyzed. The primary outcome was conformance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and tests of statistical significance. The significance level was set at P<.05. RESULTS: The study sample included 10 patients (6 men and 4 women; mean age, 55 ± 18 years). Close conformance was observed when we analyzed the morphology of the orbital floor to the scapular (2.23 ± 0.31 mm) and iliac crest (2.13 ± 0.30 mm) bone grafts, with no significant difference between sites. Conformance mapping showed maximum conformance centrally (scapula, 0.001 ± 0.001 mm; iliac crest, 0.001 ± 0.001 mm), with decreased morphologic similarity peripherally (scapula, 6.09 ± 0.94 mm; iliac crest, 5.74 ± 0.88 mm). There was no significant difference in conformance between sides of graft harvest. CONCLUSIONS: When considering nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of the orbital floor, both the scapula and iliac crest offer nearly complete conformance to the orbital floor structure and represent reasonable reconstructive options.
Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation/methods , Ilium/transplantation , Maxillary Neoplasms/surgery , Melanoma/surgery , Orbit/diagnostic imaging , Orbit/surgery , Scapula/transplantation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Maxillary Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a smartphone based Virtual Reality Epley Maneuver System (VREMS) for home use. METHODS: A smartphone application was designed to produce stereoscopic views of a Virtual Reality (VR) environment, which when viewed after placing a smartphone in a virtual reality headset, allowed the user to be guided step-by-step through the Epley maneuver in a VR environment. Twenty healthy participants were recruited and randomized to undergo either assisted Epleys or self-administered Epleys following reading instructions from an Instructional Handout (IH). All participants were filmed and two expert Otologists reviewed the videos, assigning each participant a score (out of 10) for performance on each step. Participants rated their perceived workload by completing a validated task-load questionnaire (NASA Task Load Index) and averages for both groups were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty participants were evaluated with average age 26.4±7.12years old in the VREMS group and 26.1±7.72 in the IH group. The VR assisted group achieved an average score of 7.78±0.99 compared to 6.65±1.72 in the IH group. This result was statistically significant with p=0.0001 and side dominance did not appear to play a factor. Analyzing each step of the Epley maneuver demonstrated that assisted Epleys were done more accurately with statically significant results in steps 2-4. Results of the NASA-TLX scores were variable with no significant findings. CONCLUSION: We have developed and demonstrated face validity for VREMS through our randomized controlled trial. The VREMS platform is promising technology, which may improve the accuracy and effectiveness of home Epley treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Subject(s)
Facial Recognition/physiology , Patient Positioning/methods , Physical Therapy Modalities/instrumentation , Posture/physiology , Smartphone , Virtual Reality , Adult , Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/physiopathology , Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/therapy , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In 2009, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care engaged Cancer Care Ontario to expand the Wait Time Information System to capture surgical consultation data (Wait 1). Over the years, an increasing number of patient and provider reports have shown that Wait 1 wait times account for a significant portion of the total wait time for surgery. With data published online by the ministry in late summer 2017, patients were given access to consultation wait time information for over 200 types of procedures at 92 surgical facilities in Ontario. This article explains how a highly focused data strategy, strong stakeholder and clinical expert support and a comprehensive communications strategy were critical to driving change for a large-scale provincial initiative, which is helping to drive better access for patients and improve transparency and accountability.