Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
BMC Nephrol ; 15: 12, 2014 Jan 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24423050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The presence of glutathione transferase (GST) M1 null genotype (GSTM1-null) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is associated with lower overall survival rate in comparison to those with GSTM1-active variants. We examined association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms as well as SNPs in GSTA1/rs3957357 and GSTP1/rs1695 genes with overall and cause-specific cardiovascular mortality in ESRD patients. METHODS: Total of 199 patients undergoing hemodialysis were included in the study. Median value of time elapsed from dialysis initiation until the death, or the end of follow-up was 8 ± 5 years. The effect of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and GSTA1 gene polymorphisms on predicting overall and specific cardiovascular outcomes (myocardial infarction, MI or stroke) was analyzed using Cox regression model, and differences in survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS: GSTM1-null genotype in ESRD patients was found to be independent predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality. However, after false discovery rate and Bonferroni corrections this effect was lost. The borderline effect modification by wild-type GSTA1*A/*A genotype on associations between GSTM1-null and analyzed outcomes was found only for death from stroke. Homozygous carriers of combined GSTM1*0/GSTA1*A genotype exhibited significantly shorter time to death of stroke or MI in comparison with carriers of either GSTM1-active or at least one GSTA1*B gene variant. The best survival rate regarding cardiovascular outcome was found for ESRD patients with combined GSTM1-active and mutant GSTA1*B/*B genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Combined GSTM1*0/GSTA1*A genotypes might be considered as genetic markers for cardiovascular death risk in ESRD patients, which may permit targeting of preventive and early intervention.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Glutathione Transferase/genetics , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Female , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Markers/genetics , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Serbia/epidemiology , Survival Rate
2.
Mol Cell Biochem ; 381(1-2): 301-11, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23749198

ABSTRACT

Despite the widespread clinical use of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, dilemmas still exist about potential impact of these drugs on cardiovascular system. The present study was aimed to estimate the effects of different COX inhibitors (meloxicam, acetylsalicylic acid [ASA], and SC-560) on oxidative stress in isolated rat heart, with special focus on L-arginine/NO system. The hearts of male Wistar albino rats (total number n = 96, each group 12 rats, 8 weeks old, body mass 180-200 g) were retrogradely perfused according to the Langendorff technique at gradually increased perfusion pressure (40-120 cmH2O). After control experiments the hearts were perfused with the following drugs: 100 µmol/l ASA (Aspirin), alone or in combination with 30 µmol/l L-NAME, 0.3 µmol/l meloxicam (movalis) with or without 30 µmol/l L-NAME, 3 µmol/l meloxicam (alone or in combination with 30 µmol/l L-NAME), 30 µmol/l L-NAME, and administration of 0.25 µmol/l SC-560. In samples of coronary venous effluent the following oxidative stress markers were measured spectrophotometrically: index of lipid peroxidation (measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances [TBARS]), superoxide anion radical release (O2(-)), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). While ASA was found to have an adverse influence on redox balance in coronary circulation, and coronary perfusion, meloxicam and SC-560 do not negatively affect the intact model of the heart. Furthermore, all effects were modulated by NOS inhibition. It seems that interaction between COX and L-arginine/NO system truly exists in coronary circulation, and can be one of the possible causes for achieved effects. That means: those effects induced by different inhibitors of COX are modulated by subsequent inhibition of NOS.


Subject(s)
Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Myocardium/enzymology , Myocardium/pathology , Nitric Oxide Synthase/antagonists & inhibitors , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Animals , Aspirin/pharmacology , Hydrogen Peroxide/metabolism , In Vitro Techniques , Lipid Peroxidation/drug effects , Male , NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester/pharmacology , Nitric Oxide Synthase/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Superoxides/metabolism , Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances/metabolism
3.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 28(1): 202-12, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23034843

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increased oxidative stress is a hallmark of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics and protection of oxidative damage. We hypothesized that genetic polymorphism in antioxidant enzymes GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 is more frequent in ESRD and modulates the degree of oxidative stress in these patients. METHODS: GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genotypes were determined in 199 ESRD patients and 199 age- and gender-matched controls. Markers of protein and lipid oxidative damage [thiol groups, carbonyl groups, advanced oxidative protein products, nitrotyrosine, malondialdehyde (MDA) and MDA adducts], together with total oxidant status and pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance were determined. RESULTS: Individual GST polymorphisms influence vulnerability to both protein and lipid oxidation, with GSTM1-null gene variant having the most pronounced effect. Furthermore, a strong combined effect of null/low-activity GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTA1 and GSTP1 genotypes in terms of susceptibility towards oxidative and carbonyl stress was found in ESRD patients. When patients were stratified according to GSTM1 and GSTT1, the highest oxidant damage was noted in those with the GSTM1-null/GSTT1-null genotype. The observed effect was even stronger in patients with the third low-activity GSTP1 or GSTA1 genotype. Finally, the level of oxidative and carbonyl stress was most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with all four null or low-activity GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and GSTA1 genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: According to the GST genotype, ESRD patients may be stratified in terms of the level of oxidative and carbonyl stress that might influence cardiovascular prognosis, but could also improve efforts towards individualization of antioxidant treatment.


Subject(s)
Glutathione Transferase/genetics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Oxidative Stress/genetics , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Aged , Biomarkers , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Genetic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL