21-gene expression assay and clinical outcomes of premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

The prognostic role of the recurrence score (RS) based on the 21-gene expression assay in premenopausal women is not well delineated, and we investigated the association of outcomes and the RS in premenopausal patients who had 21-gene expression assay at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between June 2005 and July 2018. Invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) by STEEP version 2.0 was compared according to the RS and clinical risk factors. A total of 554 patients were included in our study and 116 patients (20.9%) had age <40 years, 238 patients (43.0%) had luminal B subtype (Ki67 ≥ 20%), and 83 patients (15.0%) had RS >25. All patients received adjuvant tamoxifen ± chemotherapy. Overall, patients with RS >25 showed trend toward worse IBCFS from multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 1.89 [95% CI: 0.95-3.73], P = .069). When comparing outcomes according to age and luminal subtypes, patients with luminal B subtype and age <40 years (n = 60) showed significantly worse outcomes compared to the others (luminal A or luminal B + age ≥40 years, n = 494; adjusted HR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.49-5.82], log-rank P < .001). Among patients with luminal B subtype and age <40 years, there was no significant association observed between IBCFS and the RS (log-rank P = .51). In conclusion, while RS >25 showed association with poor outcomes in premenopausal women, it may have less prognostic significance among those with luminal B subtype and age <40 years.

Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine in node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the STAMP randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effectiveness of gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear in cholangiocarcinoma. We investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) in a homogeneous group of high-risk patients with resected, lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma of perihilar or distal bile duct with regional lymph node metastasis who underwent curative-intent surgery (R0/R1) was eligible. Patients were randomized to receive GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) every 3 weeks for 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and safety. All p values are 1 sided and were considered significant if <0.1. Between July 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients (50 in the GemCis and 51 in the capecitabine group) were included in the intention-to-treat population. Perihilar and distal bile ducts were the primary sites in 45 (44.6%) and 56 (55.4%) patients, respectively, and 32 (31.7%) had R1 resections. Median (1-sided 90% CI) follow-up duration was 33.4 (30.5-35.8) months. In the GemCis and capecitabine group, 2-year disease-free survival rates were 38.5% (29.5%-47.4%) and 25.1% (17.4%-33.5%) [HR=0.96 (CI, 0.71-1.30), p=0.430], and median overall survival was 35.7 months (29.5-not estimated) and 35.7 months (30.9-not estimated) [HR=1.08 (CI, 0.71-1.64), 1-sided p=0.404], respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 42 (84.0%) and 8 patients (16.0%) in the GemCis and capecitabine groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In resected lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, adjuvant GemCis did not improve survival outcomes compared with capecitabine.

Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX. METHODS: Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX-locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

Favorable clinical efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with progressive desmoid tumors: a retrospective real-world study.

BACKGROUND: The real-world evidence about the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in desmoid tumors is still limited. We investigated the efficacy of chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent or progressive desmoid tumors. METHODS: The patients with desmoid tumors who had received cytotoxic chemotherapy between November 2007 and June 2020 in two tertiary hospitals in Korea were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were included in the analysis. The most common primary tumor site was the intra-abdominal or pelvic cavity (56%), followed by the trunk and abdominal wall (24%), extremities (16%), and head and neck (4%). Sixty percent of the patients had familial adenomatous polyposis and 76% received doxorubicin plus dacarbazine. The objective response rate and disease control rate was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.7-82.8) and 96% (95% CI: 77.2-99.9), respectively. With the median follow-up time of 55 months (95% CI: 41.0-68.2), the 3-year PFS rate was 65% (95% CI: 41.1-80.5), and the 3-year OS rate was 89% (95% CI: 63.8-97.3). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic adverse events were reported in 14 patients, all of which were manageable. CONCLUSION: Our real-world evidence suggests that doxorubicin-based cytotoxic chemotherapy can be an effective treatment option for recurrent and progressive desmoid tumors with respect to favorable clinical outcomes.

Prediction and prevention of central nervous system relapse in patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.

Because non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy with l-asparaginase has improved survival outcomes in patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), the incidence of central nerve system (CNS) relapse can be different when compared with that in previous reports. In this research, we sought to identify the incidence of and predictors for CNS relapse and to evaluate the necessity of CNS prophylaxis with intermediate-dose methotrexate (ID-MTX). The records of 399 patients in the training cohort and 253 patients in the validation cohort with ENKTL who received non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the chemotherapy regimen included ID-MTX above 2 g/m2. A new central nervous system-prognostic index of natural killer (CNS-PINK) model was developed using 1-point powerful predictors of CNS relapse (PINK; hazard ratio [HR], 2.908; P = .030 and extranodal involvement [≥2]; HR, 4.161; P = .001) and was calculated as a sum of scores. The high-risk group of CNS-PINK was defined as 2 points. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was different between the CNS-PINK risk groups in the training (P < .001) and validation (P = .038) cohorts. Patients in the high-risk CNS-PINK group who were treated with SMILE or SMILE-like regimens with ID-MTX (S-ID-MTX) displayed a lower incidence rate of CNS relapse than did those who received other regimens without ID-MTX in the training cohort (P = .029). The CNS-PINK was demonstrated its strong predictability of CNS relapse in ENKTL patients. The effectiveness of S-ID-MTX in preventing CNS events in high-risk CNS-PINK patients should be verified in future studies.

Clinicogenomic Characteristics and Treatment of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Palliative Therapy in Real-World Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Young-onset colorectal cancer (YOCR) is increasing. This study aimed to determine the difference between advanced YOCR and non-YOCR patient outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer treated with palliative systemic therapy between 2016 and 2018. Diagnosis at < 50 years was defined as YOCR. Targeted sequencing was used to assess the mutational status. RESULTS: Among the 969 patients included, 210 (21.7%) were YOCR. The median progression-free survival with first-line chemotherapy (PFS1) was 9.7 vs 9.4 months (P = .755), and the median overall survival (OS) was 25.9 vs 22.3 months (P = .581) in the YOCR and the non-YOCR group, respectively. However, the youngest patients diagnosed at < 30 years showed poorer survival outcomes (median PFS1, 3.9 months; median OS, 8.6 months) compared with other age groups. PFS1 did not differ between YOCR and non-YOCR by choice of treatment regimen. Among the 340 patients with targeted sequencing results, YOCR had fewer APC mutations (61% vs 80%), but had similar KRAS (53% vs 48%), NRAS (7% vs 3%), and BRAF class I mutations (4% vs 6%). The median tumor mutational burden (TMB) was 10.9 vs 12.5 mut/Mb in YOCR and non-YOCR patients, respectively (P = .064). TMB increased with age in tumors with high microsatellite instability (Pearson's R = .69, P = .028), but not in microsatellite-stable tumors (R = .02, P = .658). CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcomes with palliative systemic therapy were similar between recurrent/metastatic YOCR and non-YOCR with an age cut-off of 50 years. However, patients diagnosed at < 30 years of age showed poorer outcomes compared with other age groups.

Final results of the randomized phase 2 LEO trial and bone protective effects of everolimus for premenopausal hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

The phase 2 LEO study showed that everolimus (EVE) plus letrozole (LET) with ovarian suppression increased progression-free survival (PFS) in tamoxifen-exposed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with visceral metastases. Here we report final survival outcomes from the LEO study, and the results of exploratory analyses of bone turnover marker changes and bone-specific progressive disease. Patients who were exposed to or progressed on tamoxifen as adjuvant/palliative treatments were randomly assigned (2:1) to the EVE (leuprorelin + LET + EVE, n = 92) or LET (leuprorelin + LET, n = 45) arm. In a median 51-months of follow-up, the median PFS was 17.5 and 13.8 months in the EVE and LET arms, respectively (P = .245). Patients in the EVE arm with baseline visceral (median PFS 16.4 vs 9.5 months, P = .040) and bone (median PFS 17.1 vs 10.9, P = .003) metastases had greater PFS compared to the LET arm. No differences in overall survival (OS) were observed (median OS, 48.3 vs 50.8 months, P = .948). The 1-year cumulative incidences of bone-specific disease progression were 6.0% and 23.4% in the EVE and LET arms, respectively (hazard ratio 0.26, P < .001). Bone turnover markers at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment decreased in the EVE arm but were increased or stationary in the LET arm. Skeletal-related events occurred in 6.5% and 11.1% of patients in the EVE and LET arms, respectively. EVE + LET with ovarian suppression prolonged PFS in patients with baseline visceral or bone metastases and offered bone-protective effects in the overall study population. However, these clinical benefits did not translate into an OS benefit.

A prognostic index for extranodal marginal-zone lymphoma based on the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue International Prognostic Index and serum ß2-microglobulin levels.

The mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) International Prognostic Index (IPI) was recently proposed as a prognostic index for patients with MALT lymphoma. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the serum ß2-microglobulin level in the context of MALT-IPI, and we proposed a new prognostic index. Survival outcomes were analysed with regard to ß2-microglobulin level, MALT-IPI, and the new prognostic index in MALT lymphoma patients (n = 571). The validity of the new prognostic index was assessed using an independent cohort (n = 216). Patients with high ß2-microglobulin levels had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. A high ß2-microglobulin level was independently associated with poor PFS and OS. ß2-microglobulin levels further stratified patients in the MALT-IPI intermediate-risk group in terms of PFS and OS. A new prognostic index based on the MALT-IPI and the ß2-microglobulin level, MALT-IPI-B, was proposed. The MALT-IPI-B was able to stratify patients into subgroups having distinct PFS and OS outcomes in both the training and validation cohorts. MALT-IPI-B enabled the identification of patients with poor survival outcomes who were classified into the intermediate-risk group by the MALT-IPI. In conclusion, this new ß2-microglobulin-based prognostic index may have the specific advantage of identifying high-risk patients who may require systemic treatment.

A phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to assess the safety and efficacy of CKD-516, a novel vascular disrupting agent, in combination with Irinotecan in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Introduction The combination of an anti-angiogenic agent with cytotoxic chemotherapy is a standard treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer. CKD-516 is an oral vascular disrupting agent that was preliminarily shown to be safe and efficacious as a monotherapy in refractory solid cancers. We evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and preliminary efficacy of CKD-516 in combination with irinotecan in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods This phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study included patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. CKD-516 tablets were administered for five consecutive days followed by two days off in combination with intravenous irinotecan (120 mg/m2) administered on day one of each treatment cycle every two weeks. A traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. Results In total, 16 and 23 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts, respectively. The most common adverse events included diarrhea (79%), nausea (74%), vomiting (67%), and neutropenia (62%). No dose-limiting toxicity occurred, and the recommended phase 2 dose was determined at CKD-516/irinotecan doses of 11/120 mg/m2. No cases of cardiac ischemia, cardiac dysfunction, or thromboembolism were reported. Among the 34 patients with available tumor response assessments, one patient achieved partial response (3%) and 26 patients achieved stable disease (76%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.1 and 11.6 months, respectively. Conclusion This phase 1 study showed that the combination of oral CKD-516 and irinotecan is safe and tolerable in metastatic, treatment-refractory colorectal patients and showed favorable efficacy outcomes. Further studies to confirm these preliminary findings are warranted. Trial registration number NCT03076957 (Registered at March 10, 2017).

Comparison of Clinicopathogenomic Features and Treatment Outcomes of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Single-Institution Experience.

Purpose: Exon 20 insertion mutations (E20ins) in EGFR or HER2 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has become more important with emergence of novel agents targeting E20ins. Materials and Methods: Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC patients with E20ins were included. EGFR E20ins was identified by two methods, next generation sequencing (NGS) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while HER2 E20ins was done by NGS only. Results: Between December 2013 and July 2021, E20ins were identified in 107 patients at Asan Medical Center; 67 EGFR E20ins and 40 HER2 E20ins. Out of 32 patients with EGFR E20ins who had tested both PCR and NGS, 17 were identified only through NGS and the other 15 through both tests, giving a discordance rate of 53.1%. There was no clinically signficant difference in clinicopathologic features between EGFR and HER2 E20ins; both were observed more frequently in adenocarcinoma, female and never-smokers. Brain metastases were evident at diagnosis in 31.8% of EGFR E20ins and 27.5% of HER2 E20ins, respectively. Platinum-based doublets demonstrated objective response rates (ORR) of 13.3% with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months for EGFR E20ins and 35.3% with 4.7 months for HER2 E20ins, respectively. In contrast, novel EGFR E20ins-targeted agents exhibited an ORR of 46.2% with a median PFS of 5.4 months, while HER2-targeted agents showed an ORR of 50% with that of 7.0 months. Conclusion: Identification of EGFR and HER2 E20ins is more important as their targeted therapies improved outcomes. Upfront NGS test as a comprehensive molecular approach is strongly warranted.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in South Korea.

Importance: Valuable evidence regarding clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited to individual hospital databases or national-level registries. The common data and federated analysis framework developed through the Extensible Platform for Observational Research in Lung Cancer (EXPLORE-LC) initiative allows for research across multiple high-quality data sources, which may provide a deeper understanding of the NSCLC landscape and identification of unmet needs of subpopulations. Objective: To describe clinical characteristics, initial treatment patterns, subsequent treatment, and overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC in South Korea. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with NSCLC between 2014 and 2019 and followed up until March 2020 at 3 tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Clinical data were collected using a common data model and clinical data warehouse. Patients who had an initial diagnosis of nonsquamous (NSQ) or squamous (SQ) NSCLC and who had received at least 1 treatment for NSCLC were included in the study. Data were analyzed from June through November 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinical OS for patients with NSCLC. Secondary outcomes were clinical characteristics and treatment patterns subsequent to the diagnosis of NSCLC. Results: Among 22 101 patients with NSCLC who received anticancer treatment analyzed in this study, 17 350 patients (78.5%) had NSQ and 4751 patients (21.5%) had SQ NSCLC. Clinical characteristics and outcomes and treatment patterns were assessed for 13 084 patients with NSQ cancer who had known EGFR and ALK status (75.4%; mean [SD] 62.2 [10.5] years; 6552 males [50.1%]) and all 4751 patients with SQ cancer (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [8.6] years; 4427 males [93.2%]). More than half of patients with NSQ cancer were never smokers (7399 patients [56.6%]). Patients with SQ cancer were mostly males and former or current smokers (4235 patients [89.1%]) and were diagnosed at a later clinical stage than patients with NSQ cancer (eg, stage I: 1165 patients [24.5%] vs 5388 patients [41.2%]). Patients with EGFR-positive and ALK-positive NSQ cancer diagnosed between 2017 and 2019 had better median OS than similar patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2016 (EGFR-positive: not reached [95% CI, 35.9 months to not reached] vs 28.4 months [95% CI, 25.8 to 30.0 months]; P < .001; ALK-positive: not reached [95% CI, not reached] vs 49.5 months [95% CI, 35.1 months to not reached]; P < .001). No significant difference was observed in OS from first-line treatment for patients with SQ cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: This study, which pooled medical data from multiple clinical data warehouses to produce a large study cohort, may provide meaningful insights into the clinical practice of NSCLC and underscores the value of a common data model approach. The analyzable dataset may hold great promise for future comprehensive identification of subpopulations and unmet needs.

Liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NASOX): A multicenter phase I/IIa study.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter phase I/IIa study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin, and S-1 (NASOX) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease, aged ≥ 19 years, with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. The primary endpoints were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I cohort and overall response rate (ORR) in the phase IIa cohort. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included patients who received the RP2D. RESULTS: In phase I, seven patients were screened, and six were assessed for DLT. None experienced DLT during the first cycle. The RP2D was determined as nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-7 every 14 days. For the ITT (N = 41; 7, and 34 from phases I and IIa, respectively), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (31.7 %), enterocolitis (9.8 %), anorexia (7.3 %), and diarrhea (2.4 %). The ORR was 58.5 % (1 complete, and 23 partial responses). Two underwent conversion surgery; both achieved R0 resection. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.0-8.1) and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95 % CI, 9.8-15.5). CONCLUSION: NASOX exhibited a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy outcomes consistent with NALIRIFOX, showing potential to replace infusional 5-fluorouracil with oral S-1 in the triplet regimen.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer: evolution, indication, and tailored treatment strategy.

In recent years, endocrine therapy (ET), an effective systemic treatment for the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, has regained interest as a neoadjuvant therapy based on evidence that ET can fulfill the aim of neoadjuvant systemic treatment for tumor shrinkage as well as elucidate important clinical information on endocrine sensitivity that enables the prognostication of patients. Moreover, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) potentially provides an opportunity for early assessment of the clinical efficacy of novel agents. Furthermore, recently reported trials have generated evidence for a more tailored approach for perioperative management of ER-positive breast cancer using clinical and molecular biomarkers, and this has provided a rationale that enables the broadening of clinical indications for NET. This review discusses the current evidence for NET, the evolution of NET trials, clinical indications, and NET-based treatment strategies.

Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The transition of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-low breast cancer has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we evaluated the HER2 transition among HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer cases post-NAC and its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We included 1288 patients with HER2-low or zero breast cancer who underwent NAC and surgery between 2014 and 2018 and had paired pre- and post-therapeutic HER2 status results. RESULTS: Among patients who were HER2-zero pre-NAC (n = 650), 68% and 29% were HER2-zero and HER2-low, respectively, post-NAC. Among patients who were HER2-low pre-NAC (n = 638), 32% of patients showed HER2 changes (low to zero), and 59% of patients had a constant HER2-low status post-NAC. Patients with constant HER2-low or transitions from HER2-low to zero had a higher proportion of hormone receptor positivity (84% and 79%) than those with changes from HER2-zero to low (77%) or with constant HER2-zero (56%), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with oestrogen receptor positivity had a higher probability of gaining HER2-low expression than those with oestrogen receptor negativity (odds ratio 2.48). No significant differences were observed in terms of overall survival or disease-free survival between patients with and without HER2-changes according to their hormone receptor status, except in the post-therapeutic HER2-low, hormone receptor-negativity subset. CONCLUSION: Temporal heterogeneity of HER2-low expression is observed in substantial numbers of post-NAC breast cancer patients. Clinical outcomes show no significant associations, except in the post-therapeutic HER2-low, hormone receptor negativity subset. The prognostic implications of HER2 transition in HER2-low breast cancer require further investigation.

Central nervous systemic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and concordance between intra/extracranial response in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) markedly improve the clinical outcomes of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the intracranial efficacy of ICI is not well elucidated, and previous studies showed discordant outcomes of ICI between intracranial and extracranial diseases. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the intracranial and extracranial response of patients with NSCLC and brain metastasis who were treated with ICI in the real-world setting. METHODS: A total of 55 patients (median age, 63 years [range 42-80]; male, 78%) who had NSCLC with brain metastasis and treated with ICI monotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. We separately assessed the response rates of brain lesions and systemic lesions, and estimated the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The median OS and overall PFS were 17.0 months (95% CI 10.3-25.6) and 3.19 months (95% CI 2.24-5.03), respectively. The intracranial objective response rate and disease control rate of ICI were 36 and 54%, respectively. Among the 44 patients who showed disease progression, only 32% (n = 14) showed concordant outcomes and 9 patients (20%) showed opposing discordant outcomes. Eight patients continued ICI with local brain therapy after intracranial progression, and their median extracranial PFS and OS were 15 months (95% CI 5.0-not assessed [NA]) and 23.8 months (95% CI 14.7-NA), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICI monotherapy had a clinically meaningful intracranial efficacy in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis. Watchful waiting and close monitoring without local radiotherapy might be feasible in NSCLC patients with asymptomatic active brain metastasis.

The Prognosis and the Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Bladder Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the prognosis of pathologically node-positive bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients, and the value of preoperative clinical evaluation for lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by partial/radical cystectomy and had pathologically confirmed lymph node metastases between January 2007 and December 2019 were identified and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included in the study. The median age was 61 years (range, 34 to 81 years) with males comprising 86.8%. Among the 52 patients with post-neoadjuvant/pre-operative computed tomography results, only 33 patients (63.5%) were considered positive for lymph node metastasis. Sixteen patients (30.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC group), and 37 patients did not (no AC group). With the median follow-up duration of 67.7 months, the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.5 months and 16.2 months, respectively. The 2-year RFS and OS rates were 23.3% and 34.6%, respectively. RFS and OS did not differ between the AC group and no AC group (median RFS, 8.8 months vs. 6.8 months, p=0.772; median OS, 16.1 months vs. 16.3 months, p=0.479). Thirty-eight patients (71.7%) experienced recurrence. Distant metastases were the dominant pattern of failure in both the AC group (91.7%) and no AC group (76.9%). CONCLUSION: Patients with lymph node-positive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery showed high recurrence rates with limited survival outcomes. Little benefit was observed with the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Clinical Outcome of Everolimus Followed by CDK4/6 Inhibitors with the Opposite Treatment Sequence in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: In hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+ HER2-MBC), the mainstay treatment options include cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and everolimus (EVE) in combination with endocrine treatment. This study aims to compare the outcomes of the following treatment sequences: CDK4/6i followed by EVE and EVE followed by CDK4/6i. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from HR+ HER2- MBC patients treated between January 2014 and November 2020 with both CDK4/6i and EVE were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 88 patients included in the study, 51 received CDK4/6i before EVE (C→E group), and 37 received EVE before CDK4/6i (E→C group) with endocrine treatment. More patients in the E→C group had endocrine resistance (13.7% vs. 40.5%), experienced palliative chemotherapy (7.8% vs. 40.5%), and were heavily treated (treated as ≥ 3rd line, 5.9% vs. 40.5%). Median overall survival was 46.8 months in the C→E group and 38.9 months in the E→C group (p=0.151). Median composite progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the start of the preceding regimen to disease progression on the following regimen or death, was 24.8 months in the C→E group vs. 21.8 months in the E→C group (p=0.681). Median PFS2/PFS1 ratio did not differ significantly between groups (0.5 in the C→E group, 0.6 in the E→C group; p=0.775). Ten patients (11.4%) discontinued EVE, and two patients (2.3%) discontinued CDK4/6i during treatment. CONCLUSION: Although the CDK4/6i-based regimen should be considered as an earlier line of treatment, CDK4/6i- and EVE-based treatments can be valid options in circumstances where the other treatment had been already given.

Modified Stage Grouping of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Involving the Same Side of the Diaphragm in the Rituximab Era.

Among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) involving the same side of the diaphragm, the prognostic implications of extranodal disease or its contiguity with the nodal lesion remain unclear. In this study, patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP whose disease was limited to the same side of the diaphragm were included. Survival was assessed by the presence, contiguity, and number of extranodal lesions. Among the 508 patients included, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ according to the presence of single extranodal involvement or its anatomical contiguity with the nodal lesion. However, patients with ≥2 extranodal involvement showed significantly inferior OS and PFS. We re-classified these patients into two groups: modified stage IIEe (≥2 extranodal involvement, n=92) and modified stage II (nodal or single extranodal involvement irrespective of anatomical contiguity, n=416). This modified staging showed improved prognostic performance based on the time-dependent ROC curve compared with Ann Arbor staging. In conclusion, the survival outcomes of patients with DLBCL on the same side of the diaphragm were associated with the number of extranodal lesions, but not with the contiguity of the lesions or presence of a single extranodal involvement. Based on these results, we propose a modified staging system (modified stage IIEe and II) for these patients.

Pathological complete response, long-term outcomes, and recurrence patterns in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The interest in HER2-low breast cancer (BC) has increased in recent years with the development of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. Here, we investigated the clinical outcomes and relapse patterns of patients with HER2-low or -zero BCs in an Asian population. METHODS: We retrospectively identified HER2-low or -zero BC patients with stage I-III tumours who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent curative surgery, between 2014 and 2018 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. RESULTS: A total of 818 and 754 HER2-zero and HER2-low BC patients, respectively, were consecutively included in this analysis. The HER2-low group had more hormone receptor [HR]-positive patients (81% versus 56%, P < 0.001). The HER2-zero group had a higher proportion of patients who achieved pathological complete response (pCR) (14.7% versus 9.8%, P = 0.003); however, no significant differences of pCR rate by HER2 status were identified in the HR-positive (P = 0.4) and HR-negative groups (P = 0.3) when analysed separately. The HER2-low BC cases had higher 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (P < 0.001 for OS; P = 0.002 for DFS); however, no differences were observed in terms of OS and DFS by HER2 status in the HR-positive group (P = 0.21 for OS and P = 0.66 for DFS). CONCLUSIONS: Our current findings do not support that HER2-low BC had different biology and clinical features compared to HER2-zero BC in patients who treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the prognostic impact of HER2-low status in BC remains controversial; thus warranting further research.