Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Pain ; 92(1-2): 91-100, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11323130

ABSTRACT

We have examined the effects of cannabinoid agonists on hyperalgesia in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat and investigated the possible sites of action. The antihyperalgesic activity of the cannabinoids was compared with their ability to elicit behavioural effects characteristic of central cannabinoid activity. WIN55,212-2 (0.3-10 mg kg(-1)), CP-55,940 (0.03-1 mg kg(-1)) and HU-210 (0.001-0.03 mg kg(-1)) were all active in a 'tetrad' of tests consisting of tail-flick, catalepsy, rotarod and hypothermia following subcutaneous administration, with a rank order of potency in each of HU-210 > CP-55,940 > WIN55,212-2. The effects of WIN55,212-2 in each assay were blocked by the Cannabinoid1 (CB1) antagonist SR141716A. In the partial sciatic ligation model of neuropathic pain WIN55,212-2, CP-55,940 and HU-210 produced complete reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia within 3 h of subcutaneous administration with D50 values of 0.52, 0.08 and 0.005 mg kg(-1), respectively. In this model WIN55,212-2 was also effective against thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia. WIN55,212-2 produced pronounced reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia following intrathecal administration that was blocked by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A. Following intraplantar administration into the ipsilateral hindpaw, WIN55,212-2 produced up to 70% reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia, although activity was also observed at high doses following injection into the contralateral paw. The antihyperalgesic effect of WIN55,212-2 injected into the ipsilateral paw was blocked by subcutaneously administered SR141716A, but was not affected by intrathecally administered SR141716A. These data show that cannabinoids are highly potent and efficacious antihyperalgesic agents in a model of neuropathic pain. This activity is likely to be mediated via an action in both the CNS and in the periphery.


Subject(s)
Dronabinol/analogs & derivatives , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Receptors, Drug/physiology , Sciatica/physiopathology , Analgesics/pharmacology , Animals , Benzoxazines , Cannabinoids/pharmacology , Cyclohexanols/pharmacology , Disease Models, Animal , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Morpholines/pharmacology , Naphthalenes/pharmacology , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Piperidines/pharmacology , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Cannabinoid , Rimonabant , Sciatica/drug therapy
2.
Pain ; 86(1-2): 113-8, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10779668

ABSTRACT

The anti-nociceptive and locomotor effects of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists (+)-epibatidine and ABT-594 were compared in the rat. Acute thermal nociception was measured using the tail flick test. Mechanical hyperalgesia was measured as paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) in response to a mechanical stimulus in two animal models of persistent pain; (1) 24 h following subplantar injections of Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) into the left hind paw or (2) 11-15 days following a partial ligation of the left sciatic nerve. Disruption of locomotor function was assessed using an accelerating rotarod device. In all tests, (+)-epibatidine was significantly more potent than ABT-594. Both (+)-epibatidine and ABT-594 dose-dependently increased tail flick latencies but only at doses that also disrupted performance in the rotarod test. On the other hand, (+)-epibatidine and ABT-594 dose-dependently reversed inflammatory and neuropathic hyperalgesia at significantly lower doses than that needed to disrupt performance in the rotarod test. In summary, ABT-594 is less potent than (+)-epibatidine in assays of acute and persistent pain and in the rotarod assay. However, ABT-594 displayed a clearer separation between its motor and anti-hyperalgesic effects. This shows that nicotinic agonists with improved selectivity between the nicotinic receptor subtypes could provide strong analgesic effects with a much improved therapeutic window.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacology , Azetidines/pharmacology , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/pharmacology , Inflammation/complications , Nicotinic Agonists/pharmacology , Pain/drug therapy , Pyridines/pharmacology , Receptors, Nicotinic/drug effects , Sciatic Neuropathy/complications , Animals , Arthritis, Experimental/complications , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Freund's Adjuvant , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Hyperalgesia/psychology , Male , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Postural Balance/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Wistar
3.
Neuropharmacology ; 40(1): 1-9, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11077065

ABSTRACT

The excitatory neurotransmitter, glutamate, is particularly important in the transmission of pain information in the nervous system through the activation of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors. A potent, subtype-selective antagonist of the metabotropic glutamate-5 (mGlu5) receptor, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), has now been discovered that has effective anti-hyperalgesic effects in models of inflammatory pain. MPEP did not affect rotarod locomotor performance, or normal responses to noxious mechanical or thermal stimulation in naïve rats. However, in models of inflammatory pain, systemic administration of MPEP produced effective reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia without affecting inflammatory oedema. In contrast to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, indomethacin and diclofenac, the maximal anti-hyperalgesic effects of orally administered MPEP were observed without acute erosion of the gastric mucosa. In contrast to its effects in models of inflammatory pain, MPEP did not produce significant reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia in a rat model of neuropathic pain.


Subject(s)
Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/therapeutic use , Nociceptors/drug effects , Pain/drug therapy , Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Chronic Disease , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/adverse effects , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Male , Motor Activity/drug effects , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pyridines/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5 , Stomach Ulcer/chemically induced , Stomach Ulcer/pathology
4.
Br J Pharmacol ; 99(1): 145-51, 1990 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2158832

ABSTRACT

1. The involvement of the haloperidol-sensitive, sigma recognition site and the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor in the mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of (+)-N-allylnormetazocine [+)-NANM, (+)-SKF 10,047), has been investigated in the rat by use of a two-lever, operant drug discrimination paradigm. 2. Six compounds with nanamolar affinity for the sigma recognition site [+/-)-pentazocine, (+)-3-(hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine [+)-3-PPP), ditolylguanidine (DTG), haloperidol, (-)-butaclamol and BMY 14802) were investigated for their ability to generalise or antagonise the (+)-NANM discriminative stimulus. Each drug was tested at doses found in an ex vivo radioligand binding assay to displace [3H]-DTG from the central sigma recognition site by more than 40%. 3. While (+/-)-pentazocine (in the presence of naloxone) generalised and (+)-3-PPP partially antagonised the (+)-NANM cue, the other putative sigma ligands were ineffective either as agonists or antagonists at doses clearly occupying the sigma site in vivo. 4. Dose-dependent generalisation to the (+)-NANM cue was seen with the selective non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801, a compound devoid of significant affinity for the sigma recognition site. 5. (+/-)-Pentazocine was found to antagonise seizures induced in the mouse by NMDLA, a model reflecting antagonism of central NMDA receptors, and a strong correlation was found between the rank order of potency of compounds to generalise to the (+)-NANM discriminative stimulus and their potencies as anticonvulsants. 6. In conclusion, no evidence was found to substantiate the contention that the discriminative stimulus properties of (+)-NANM are mediated by the haloperidol-sensitive sigma recognition site. On the other hand, the results are consistent with the interoceptive stimulus being mechanistically based in the NMDA receptor complex.


Subject(s)
Discrimination, Psychological/drug effects , Haloperidol/pharmacology , Phenazocine/analogs & derivatives , Receptors, Opioid/physiology , Animals , Aspartic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Aspartic Acid/pharmacology , Binding, Competitive/drug effects , Dibenzocycloheptenes/pharmacology , Dizocilpine Maleate , Guanidines/metabolism , Male , Mice , N-Methylaspartate , Phenazocine/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains , Receptors, Opioid, delta , Seizures/chemically induced , Seizures/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL