Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Malar J ; 19(1): 316, 2020 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32867788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients with malaria often present with comorbidities or associated complications for which a variety of drugs are prescribed. Multiple drug therapy often leads to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Therefore, the current study investigated the prevalence, levels, risk factors, clinical relevance, and monitoring parameters/management guidelines of potential DDIs (pDDIs) among inpatients with malaria. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at two tertiary care hospitals. A total of 398 patients' profiles were evaluated for pDDIs using the Micromedex Drug-Reax®. Odds ratios were calculated to identify the strength of association between presence of DDIs and potential risk factors via logistic regression analysis. Further, the clinical relevance of frequent pDDIs was investigated. RESULTS: Of 398 patients, pDDIs were observed in 37.2% patients, while major-pDDIs in 19.3% patients. A total of 325 interactions were found, of which 45.5% were of major- and 34.5% moderate-severity. Patients with the most common pDDIs were found with signs/symptoms and abnormalities in laboratory findings representing nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, QT interval prolongation, and reduced therapeutic efficacy. The following drug pairs reported the highest frequency of adverse events associated with the interactions; calcium containing products-ceftriaxone, isoniazid-rifampin, pyrazinamide-rifampin, isoniazid-acetaminophen, and ciprofloxacin-metronidazole. The adverse events were more common in patients prescribed with the higher doses of interacting drugs. Multivariate regression analysis showed statistically significant association of pDDIs with 5-6 prescribed medicines (p = 0.01), > 6 prescribed medicines (p < 0.001), > 5 days of hospital stay (p = 0.03), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: PDDIs are commonly observed in patients with malaria. Healthcare professional's knowledge about the most common pDDIs could help in preventing pDDIs and their associated negative effects. Pertinent clinical parameters, such as laboratory findings and signs/symptoms need to be checked, particularly in patients with polypharmacy, longer hospital stay, and diabetes mellitus.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/adverse effects , Drug Interactions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Malaria , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Female , Humans , Malaria/parasitology , Male , Middle Aged , Pakistan/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
2.
Ann Hepatol ; 17(6): 1001-1011, 2018 10 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30600298

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Hepatitis patients usually present with comorbidities and polypharmacy which increases risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). We explored frequency, levels, predictors, and clinical relevance of pDDIs in hospitalized hepatitis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was used. Clinical profiles of 413 hepatitis patients were reviewed for pDDIs using Micromedex-DrugReax. Frequency, levels and clinical relevance of pDDIs were reported. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds-ratios for predictors. RESULTS: Of total 413 patients, pDDIs were reported in 55.2%. Major-pDDIs were found in 35% patients. Total 660 pDDIs were identified, of which, 304 (46%) were of major-severity and 299 (45%) of moderateseverity. Patient's profiles of top-10 major-pDDIs were presented with signs/symptoms such as fever, hepatomegaly, anorexia, jaundice, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, & pedal edema; and abnormalities in labs such as electrolytes-level, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin-level, & serum creatinine. Significant association was observed for the presence of pDDIs with > 9 prescribed medicines (p < 0.001), hospitalization of > 5 days (p = 0.03), and stroke as comorbidity (p = 0.05). Moreover, odds of exposure to major-pDDIs were significantly higher in patients taking > 9 prescribed medicines (p < 0.001), hospitalization of > 5 days (p = 0.002), and stroke as comorbidity (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: We observed hepatitis patients presented with a considerable number of clinically relevant pDDIs. Attention should be given to widespread major-pDDIs and their potential adverse outcomes. Clinically relevant parameters, such as labs and signs/symptoms should be monitored particularly in high risk patients having polypharmacy, prolong hospitalization, and stroke as comorbidity.


Subject(s)
Drug Interactions , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/drug therapy , Polypharmacy , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Developing Countries , Female , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/diagnosis , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pakistan , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 762, 2018 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30314487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) are one of the preventable drug related problems having the risk of serious adverse events or therapeutic failure. In developing countries like Pakistan, this issue remains poorly addressed. The objective of this study was to explore prevalence of pDDIs in the Outpatient Department (OPD) of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. The secondary aim was to describe the levels of reported pDDIs and develop a list of widespread clinically relevant interactions. METHODS: Prescriptions of 2400 OPD patients were analyzed for pDDIs through Micromedex Drug-Reax®. Prevalence, severity- and documentation-levels and widespread clinically relevant interactions were reported. RESULTS: Of total 2400 prescriptions, pDDIs were present in 22.3%. Whereas, moderate- and major-pDDIs were found in 377 (15.7%) and 225 (9.4%), respectively. PDDIs were more prevalent in Medicine (9.2%) and Cardiology (2.6%) as compared with other OPD specialties. Total 942 pDDIs were identified, of which, the majority were either moderate- (61.9%) or major-pDDIs (32.1%). Some of the most common interactions were ibuprofen + levofloxacin (n = 50), ciprofloxacin + diclofenac (32), aspirin + atenolol (24), and diclofenac + levofloxacin (19). The potential adverse outcomes of widespread interactions were seizures, bleeding, QT-interval prolongation, arrhythmias, tendon rupture, hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia, serotonin syndrome, drug toxicity, and decreased therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: OPD patients were at risk to pDDIs, particularly to major- and moderate-pDDIs. Screening of prescriptions for pDDIs and monitoring of pharmacotherapy in terms of response and associated adverse drug events will contribute to patient safety.


Subject(s)
Drug Interactions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Pakistan , Patient Safety , Prevalence , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
4.
J Crit Care ; 40: 243-250, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28458171

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate frequencies, levels, clinical relevance and predictors of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). METHODS: Case notes of 411 patients were reviewed for pDDIs through Micromedex. Frequencies, levels and clinical relevance of pDDIs were reported. Logistic regression was applied to calculate the odds-ratios for predictors of pDDIs. RESULTS: We recorded pDDIs in 59.4% patients. Major-pDDIs were found in 34.5% patients. Total 990 pDDIs were identified, of which, 37.8% were of moderate-severity and 30.6% of major-severity. Patient's case notes of top-ten pDDIs showed presence of signs/symptoms such as fever, jaundice, vomiting, anorexia, tachycardia, drowsiness, & lethargy; and abnormalities in labs such as total leukocytes count, blood urea nitrogen, alanine aminotransferase, & potassium-level. Odds of exposure to major-pDDIs were significantly higher in patients aged 6-12years (p=0.008); hospital stay of ≥7days (p=0.05); and ≥11 prescribed medicines (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Substantial numbers of patients in PICU are exposed to pDDIs. Major-pDDIs are of particular concern. Timely identification of pDDIs, preferably with computerized source, is crucial point for their management. Monitoring of clinically relevant parameters and identification of various predictors are needed to minimize or prevent the associated negative consequences of pDDIs.


Subject(s)
Child, Hospitalized , Drug Interactions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Drug Monitoring , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Pakistan/epidemiology , Prescription Drugs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL