Comparative performance of psoriatic arthritis screening tools in patients with psoriasis in European/North American dermatology clinics.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners/dermatologists may be aware of musculoskeletal symptoms in patients with psoriasis but may have difficulty accurately detecting psoriatic arthritis (PsA). OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate 3 PsA screening questionnaires-the Psoriasis and Arthritis Screening Questionnaire (PASQ), Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), and Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen (ToPAS)-based on rheumatologist assessment in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: Consecutive unselected patients with psoriasis, initially evaluated by dermatologists for plaque psoriasis, were randomized to receive 1 of 3 questionnaires. Patients were subsequently evaluated by rheumatologists to establish/exclude clinical PsA diagnosis. Using clinical PsA diagnosis as the standard for comparison, questionnaire accuracy was assessed by calculating sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values. RESULTS: Of 949 patients with psoriasis evaluated by rheumatologists, 285 (30%) received a clinical diagnosis of PsA (95% confidence interval 27%-33%). Probable PsA was detected in 45.1%, 43.0%, and 42.9% of patients using PASQ, PEST, and ToPAS, respectively. Sensitivity ranged from 0.67 to 0.84; specificity, 0.64 to 0.75; positive predictive value, 0.43 to 0.60; and negative predictive value, 0.83 to 0.91. LIMITATIONS: Not all patients completed all questionnaires; lack of standardized diagnostic criteria introduced possible bias. CONCLUSION: PASQ, PEST, and ToPAS are useful screening tools that can help dermatologists identify patients without PsA and patients with possible PsA who may benefit from rheumatologist assessment.

Prevalence of rheumatologist-diagnosed psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis in European/North American dermatology clinics.

BACKGROUND: Prompt identification and treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis is critical to reducing the risk of joint damage, disability, and comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate PsA prevalence in patients with plaque psoriasis in 34 dermatology centers in 7 European and North American countries. METHODS: Consecutive patients were evaluated by dermatologists for plaque psoriasis and subsequently by rheumatologists for PsA. PsA prevalence was estimated primarily based on rheumatologists' assessment of medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Of 949 patients evaluated, 285 (30%) had PsA (95% confidence interval 27-33) based on rheumatologists' assessment. PsA diagnosis changed in 1.2% of patients when diagnostic laboratory tests were added to medical history and physical examination. Of 285 patients given the diagnosis of PsA, 117 (41%) had not been previously given the diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: Bias may have been introduced by lack of standardized diagnostic criteria and unbalanced recruitment based on country populations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, almost a third of patients with psoriasis seen in dermatology centers had PsA as determined by rheumatologists. More than a third of patients with PsA had not been previously given the diagnosis. Clinical evaluation alone is often sufficient basis for PsA diagnosis, but laboratory test results may be helpful in some patients.

Canadian Adalimumab Postmarketing Observational Epidemiological Study Assessing Effectiveness in Psoriatic Arthritis (COMPLETE-PsA): 12-month Results of Comparative Effectiveness of Adalimumab and nbDMARDs.

OBJECTIVE: COMPLETE-PsA was an observational study of biologic-naïve Canadian adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with adalimumab (ADA) or a nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (nbDMARD) regimen, after inadequate response/intolerance to a current nbDMARD treatment regimen. The aim of this analysis was to assess the 12-month effectiveness of ADA vs nbDMARDs. METHODS: Patients enrolled between March 2012 and November 2017 were included. The following clinical variables and patient-reported outcomes were collected/calculated per routine care: Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis in 28 joints (DAPSA28), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, physician global assessment (PGA), patient global assessment (PtGA), pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey, enthesitis, dactylitis, body surface area (BSA), and time to achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50, ACR70, and modified minimal disease activity (mMDA). RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-seven ADA-treated and 148 nbDMARD-treated patients were included. At baseline, ADA-treated patients were less likely to be employed, had longer morning stiffness, higher DAPSA28, DAS28, PGA, PtGA, pain, and HAQ-DI, and lower prevalence of dactylitis (all P < 0.05). ADA-treated patients showed lower baseline-adjusted DAPSA28 (16.5 vs 26.6), DAS28 (2.8 vs 3.9), PGA (25.3 vs 37.1), and ESR (10.4 vs 15.0 mm/h) after 3 months compared to nbDMARD-treated patients, with observed improvements maintained to month 12. Time to achievement of ACR50, ACR70, and mMDA was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) among ADA-treated patients, with the likelihood of having dactylitis (odds ratio [OR] 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) and BSA< 3% (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-5.0) significantly lower and higher, respectively. Switching to another biologic was less likely in ADA-treated vs nbDMARD-treated patients (hazard ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5). CONCLUSION: In a real-world Canadian population of patients with PsA, ADA was more effective than nbDMARDs at reducing disease activity and the severity of skin involvement, and demonstrated higher retention. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01559038].

Treating Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Position Paper on Applying the Treat-to-target Concept to Canadian Daily Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To develop preliminary treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for Canadian daily practice. METHODS: A task force composed of expert Canadian dermatologists and rheumatologists performed a needs assessment among Canadian clinicians treating these diseases as well as an extensive literature search on the outcome measures used in clinical trials and practice. RESULTS: Based on results from the needs assessment and literature search, the task force established 5 overarching principles and developed 8 preliminary T2T recommendations. CONCLUSION: The proposed recommendations should improve management of psoriasis and PsA in Canadian daily practice. However, these recommendations must be further validated in a real-world observational study to ensure that their use leads to better longterm outcomes.

CanVasc Recommendations for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody-associated Vasculitides.

OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims is to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) in Canada. METHODS: Diagnostic and therapeutic questions were developed based on the results of a national needs assessment survey. A systematic review of existing non-Canadian recommendations and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AAV and studies of AAV published after the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism/European Vasculitis Society recommendations (publication date: January 2009) until November 2014 was performed in the Medline database, Cochrane library, and main vasculitis conference proceedings. Quality of supporting evidence for each therapeutic recommendation was graded. The full working group as well as additional reviewers, including patients, reviewed the developed therapeutic recommendations and nontherapeutic statements using a modified 2-step Delphi technique and through discussion to reach consensus. RESULTS: Nineteen recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management were developed, as well as appendices for practical use, for rheumatologists, nephrologists, respirologists, general internists, and all other healthcare professionals more occasionally involved in the management of patients with AAV in community and academic practice settings. CONCLUSION: These recommendations were developed based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence, and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context, with the intention of promoting best practices and improving healthcare delivery for patients with AAV.

CanVasc recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides - Executive summary.

The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties, including rheumatology and nephrology and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims was to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides in Canada. This executive summary features the 19 recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management, developed by CanVasc group based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context.

Experience with subcutaneous abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis: an update for clinicians.

Abatacept is recommended by several expert consensus groups including the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as a potential choice for biologic therapy for patients with RA. Initially developed, studied, and approved as an intravenous (IV) formulation, abatacept is now also available as a subcutaneous (SC) injection. Having both options available makes abatacept a particularly versatile agent for the management of RA, greatly expanding the population of patients who could benefit from this treatment. This review provides a summary of the most important clinical trials that have investigated this molecule in both of its formulations, with a focus on the more recent trials evaluating the SC formulation, specifically the AMPLE study, the first major trial evaluating two biologic agents (abatacept and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor adalimumab) in a head-to-head manner. In that study, SC abatacept was found to have an efficacy profile similar to that of SC adalimumab, both in combination with methotrexate.

Elevated serum nitric oxide levels in patients with inflammatory arthritis associated with co-expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and protein kinase C-eta in peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify circulating nitric oxide (NO) levels and inducible NO synthase (iNOS) expression in peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages (PB-MDM) from patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) as a measure of disease activity, and to determine if there is a correlation between expression of iNOS and protein kinase C-eta (PKC-eta). METHODS: PB-MDM were isolated from whole blood of 20 patients with IA (14 rheumatoid arthritis and 6 peripheral spondyloarthropathies). Thirteen patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 9 healthy individuals were controls. Serum NO levels were measured by indirect determination of nitrite and nitrate. Expression of PKC-eta and iNOS was investigated by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. RESULTS: Serum NO (189.9 +/- 49.7 microM) was significantly higher (p < 0.0028) in IA patients than in controls (131.1 +/- 18.5 microM) or patients with OA (126.9 +/- 37.1 microM). IA patients with severe inflammation had highest levels of NO, while those with mild inflammation had normal levels of NO. RT-PCR showed that PB-MDM from IA patients with active disease co-expressed iNOS and PKC-eta. This was observed in 15 out of 16 cases. All other groups with normal plasma NO expressed neither gene. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that elevated plasma NO levels were only present in IA patients with severe disease activity. We show for the first time a positive correlation between PKC-eta and iNOS expression in arthritis, supporting our earlier in vitro findings that PKC-eta expression was essential for lipopolysaccharide-mediated iNOS induction and NO production in human monocytes. PKC-eta may be important for the development of IA-induced iNOS positive phenotype in human PB-MDM.