Anti-HNA testing of allo-exposed COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors including genetic human neutrophil antigen screening to prevent anti-HNA antibody-mediated transfusion-related acute lung injury.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-related acute lung injury caused by antibodies against human neutrophil antigens (HNA) is a serious but rare complication associated with blood transfusion. The presence of such antibodies is most probable in donors with a transfusion/pregnancy history. During the COVID-19 pandemic period convalescent plasma (CP) containing neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was widely used for COVID-19 patients as a therapy in the absence of any treatment. The aim of the study was to work out a simple diagnostic algorithm of anti-HNA testing of allo-exposed CP donors including genetic HNA screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 457 anti-HLA-negative allo-exposed CP donors were genotyped for HNA-1a/1b, HNA-3a/3b, and HNA-2, and only donors with homozygous HNA-1a/1a; HNA-3b/3b; or HNA-2null genotypes were tested for anti-HNA antibody using LabScreenMulti (One Lambda) and homozygous HNA-1b/1b using the granulocyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT) but verified using LabScreenMulti. RESULTS: Testing of 83 homozygous HNA-3b/3b; HNA-2null; or HNA-1a/1a donors revealed anti-HNA-3a antibody in one case. Testing of 181 HNA-1b/1b donors using GIFT gave 10 ambiguous results verified using LabScreenMulti which confirmed anti-HNA-1a antibody in one case. The frequency of FCGR3B*01 and *04 encoding HNA-1a was 0.34; FCGR3B*02, *03, and *05 encoding HNA-1b-0.66; SLC44A2*01 encoding HNA-3a-0.80; and SLC44A2*02 encoding HNA-3b-0.20. In 3.7% cases the HNA-2null genotype was revealed. DISCUSSION: Due to applying HNA genotyping as a primary test before anti-HNA antibody testing the serological work was limited only to HNA-homozygous donors revealing two anti-HNA immunized donors. The distribution of HNA genotypes in the cohort was similar to other Caucasian populations.

Noninvasive diagnostics of fetal KEL*01.01 allele from maternal plasma of immunized women using digital PCR protocols.

Allo-antibodies produced by K-negative pregnant women against a fetal K antigen from the Kell blood group system may cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Predicting the fetal K antigen using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is important for decisions concerning management of pregnancies. Digital and droplet digital PCR techniques permit the detection of fetal single nucleotide variant with a higher specificity and sensitivity than real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). AIM: The aim was to evaluate and compare protocols for fetal KEL*01.01 genotyping using different assays and digital PCR platforms. METHODS: DNA isolated from 59 pregnant women (9-39 weeks of gestation, 49 with anti-K) was tested using home-made and custom-ordered KEL*01.01/KEL*02 assays with Droplet Digital™ and QuantStudio™3D. The results were compared with fetal/neonatal genotypes/phenotypes. RESULTS: Fetal KEL*01.01 results using all tested protocols were concordant with fetal/neonatal KEL*01.01 genotypes/phenotypes. None of the tested combinations of assays or digital PCR platforms gave false KEL*01.01-negative results, but inconclusive KEL*01.01 reads were observed in all tested protocols. For 36 cases compared using two digital PCR platforms and assays, there were not statistically significant differences in a level of fetal KEL*01.01 fraction (p < .72). CONCLUSION: Independent of the applied dPCR and ddPCR platforms and KEL*01.01 assays, prediction of the fetal KEL*01.01 is highly reliable. Before implementation in routine practice further validation of the KEL*01.01 protocol with a larger group of pregnant women should be performed.

RHD variants in Polish blood donors routinely typed as D-.

BACKGROUND: Blood donors exhibiting a weak D or DEL phenotypical expression may be mistyped D- by standard serology hence permitting incompatible transfusion to D- recipients. Molecular methods may overcome these technical limits. Our aim was to estimate the frequency of RHD alleles among the apparently D- Polish donor population and to characterize its molecular background. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma pools collected from 31,200 consecutive Polish donors typed as D- were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of RHD-specific markers located in Intron 4 and Exons 7 and 10. RHD+ individuals were characterized by PCR or cDNA sequencing and serology. RESULTS: Plasma cross-pool strategy revealed 63 RHD+ donors harboring RHD*01N.03 (n = 17), RHD*15 (n = 12), RHD*11 (n = 7), RHD*DEL8 (n = 3), RHD*01W.2 (n = 3), RHD-CE(10) (n = 3), RHD*01W.3, RHD*01W.9, RHD*01N.05, RHD*01N.07, RHD*01N.23, and RHD(IVS1-29G>C) and two novel alleles, RHD*(767C>G) (n = 3) and RHD*(1029C>A). Among 47 cases available for serology, 27 were shown to express the D antigen CONCLUSION: 1) Plasma cross-pool strategy is a reliable and cost-effective tool for RHD screening. 2) Only 0.2% of D- Polish donors carry some fragments of the RHD gene; all of them were C or E+. 3) Almost 60% of the detected RHD alleles may be potentially immunogenic when transfused to a D- recipient.